The 1983 Ford Mustang marked a significant refresh for the second generation, ushering in a new era of sporty styling and improved performance. This iconic American pony car, produced from 1979-1993, featured a sleek hatchback and convertible body style. Key trims included the base model, the sportier GT, and the performance-oriented Cobra. Initial pricing for a 1983 Mustang started around $7,800. Its popularity stemmed from its attainable performance, youthful appeal, and the enduring legacy of the Mustang nameplate, offering a taste of sportiness to a broad audience.
The Good
The 1983 Mustang offers an appealing blend of sporty design and accessible performance for its era. Its compact size and responsive handling provide a fun driving experience, while the availability of V6 and V8 engines caters to different performance desires. It represents good value, delivering iconic styling and a sense of freedom.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1983 Ford Mustang include dated interior ergonomics and a lack of modern safety features. Some models may suffer from rust, particularly around wheel wells and rocker panels. Older examples might also exhibit electrical gremlins or minor mechanical wear common with age.
1983 Ford Mustang: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L I4 (Naturally Aspirated and Turbocharged)
- 3.8L V6
- 4.2L V8 (carbureted)
- 5.0L V8 (carbureted)
- Horsepower:
- 2.3L I4: Approximately 88 hp (naturally aspirated), 105 hp (turbocharged)
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 112 hp
- 4.2L V8: Approximately 131 hp
- 5.0L V8: Approximately 175 hp (GT and Cobra trims often had slightly more)
- Fuel Economy:
- Varies significantly by engine and transmission. Expect in the range of 18-25 MPG combined for the 4-cylinder and V6, with the V8s being less economical.
- 0-60 Times:
- Highly dependent on engine and transmission. 2.3L turbo models could achieve around 10-11 seconds. V8 models, especially the 5.0L, could dip into the 7-8 second range.
- Towing Capacity:
- Not a primary focus for the Mustang; towing capacity is generally not specified or recommended.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Model: Standard features included manual windows, manual locks, AM radio, basic cloth interior.
- GT: Often included sportier suspension tuning, fog lights, unique badging, and optional power amenities.
- Cobra: Represented the top-tier performance model, featuring the 5.0L V8 engine, performance-tuned suspension, aggressive styling cues, and often upgraded interior appointments. Optional features across trims could include air conditioning, power windows/locks, upgraded sound systems, and different wheel options.
1983 Ford Mustang Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1983 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Mustang |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 2-Door Sedan |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | DEARBORN |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.3-L L-4 SOHC 8V |
| Engine Size | 2.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1983 Ford Mustang Have?
The 1983 Ford Mustang, being part of the Fox body generation, generally enjoys a reputation for being relatively robust, especially with the V8 models. However, like any vehicle of this age, specific issues can arise. One of the most common concerns for vehicles of this vintage, regardless of specific model year within the 1983 range, is rust. Areas prone to corrosion include the lower body panels, wheel wells, rocker arms, and the frame rails. Early models of the Fox body platform sometimes experienced issues with carburetor performance and drivability, though these were often addressed through maintenance and tuning. For the 2.3L turbocharged engines, carbon buildup and turbocharger reliability could be points of concern if not properly maintained. Electrical issues are also not uncommon; aging wiring harnesses, failing relays, and corroded connections can lead to intermittent problems with lights, gauges, and other systems. The automatic transmissions, while generally durable, can develop wear over time, leading to delayed shifting or slipping. Manual transmissions are typically more robust. While specific recalls for the 1983 model year were not exceptionally numerous or widespread compared to some other vehicles, it is always advisable to check for any outstanding safety recalls that may have been issued. Long-term reliability heavily depends on how well the car was maintained throughout its life. A well-cared-for 1983 Mustang can still be a reliable driver, but neglected examples are more likely to present a host of mechanical and electrical challenges. There aren't significant known issues that drastically differentiate 1983 from 1982 or 1984 within the same generation; common problems are largely age-related and inherent to the design and materials of the era.
How long will the 1983 Ford Mustang last?
Estimating average mileage for a 1983 Ford Mustang is challenging due to its age and varying usage patterns. However, well-maintained examples can easily exceed 200,000 miles. Many are cherished as weekend or hobby cars, accumulating fewer miles annually. Long-term durability is generally good, especially for V8 models, provided regular maintenance. Weaknesses that manifest over time include rust, as mentioned, which can compromise structural integrity if left unchecked. Engine and transmission components, while robust, will eventually require attention with high mileage. The suspension can also wear out, affecting ride quality and handling. Conversely, a meticulously maintained 1983 Mustang, with consistent oil changes, timely repairs, and protection against the elements, can offer decades of enjoyment.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1983 Ford Mustang is a product of its time, meaning advanced technology and safety features are quite rudimentary by today's standards. Built-in tech was primarily focused on basic functionality. Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM or AM/FM radio, often with a single speaker. Optional upgrades could include a more sophisticated stereo system with cassette tape player, and sometimes a graphic equalizer. There were no built-in navigation systems or digital displays. Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent; cruise control was a common option, and that was about it. No lane departure warnings, adaptive cruise control, or blind-spot monitoring were available. Safety features were also basic. Standard equipment generally included lap and shoulder seat belts, and perhaps an interior rearview mirror with day/night functionality. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not yet standard or widely available on performance-oriented vehicles like the Mustang in 1983. Airbags were not a standard feature; some high-end vehicles were beginning to offer them as an option, but not the Mustang at this point. Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this era are often not directly comparable to modern NHTSA or IIHS tests. However, the Fox body platform was generally considered reasonably safe for its time, offering a degree of structural integrity. The car would have featured crumple zones and a robust passenger cage, but without the advanced materials and engineering found in contemporary vehicles. Power steering and power brakes were common options that improved the driving experience and, indirectly, safety by making the car easier to control. In summary, the 1983 Mustang offered a straightforward driving experience with minimal electronic intervention or advanced safety nets, prioritizing mechanical engagement over technological assistance.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1983 Ford Mustang Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1983 Ford Mustang had a starting MSRP around $7,800 for a base model, with higher trims like the GT and Cobra costing significantly more, potentially reaching into the low $10,000s. Today, used market prices for the 1983 Mustang vary widely based on condition, mileage, trim level, and originality. You might find project cars for a few thousand dollars, while well-maintained, low-mileage, or performance-oriented examples (especially 5.0L V8 models) can fetch anywhere from $5,000 to $15,000 or more. Depreciation for the 1983 Mustang has long since bottomed out; these cars are now considered classics. Resale value is positively impacted by originality, low mileage, the presence of desirable options (like the 5.0L V8), good condition, and a documented maintenance history. Rust is a significant detractor from value.
1983 Ford Mustang Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1983 Ford Mustang can be surprisingly economical, especially compared to modern sports cars. Insurance rates are generally reasonable for classic vehicles, though premiums will vary with coverage levels and driver history. Fuel costs depend heavily on the engine; V8 models will be thirstier than the 4-cylinder or V6 options. Maintenance is typically straightforward and parts are widely available and relatively inexpensive. Repairs can be manageable for DIY enthusiasts. Overall, the 1983 Mustang is considered economical to own for a sporty classic, with routine maintenance being the primary ongoing expense. Enthusiast forums and clubs can also provide cost-saving tips.
1983 Ford Mustang Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1983 Ford Mustang Recalls & Defects
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump
Recall date
2007-08-27
Recall no.
07e064000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Federal-Mogul Aftermarket Fuel Pumps Sold Under THE Brand Names OF Carter, Accuflow, Napa, Truflow, Parts Depo, and Parts Master, Shipped Between August 2006 and July 2007 FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above. THE Fuel Pump Diaphragm IN Certain Production Runs MAY Have Been Improperly Installed or Inadequately Tested Which MAY Cause THE Fuel Pump TO Leak.
Consequence
A Leaking Fuel Pump Could Create A Vehicle Fire Hazard.
Remedy
Federal-Mogul Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Defective Fuel Pumps Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 15, 2007. Owners CAN Contact Federal-Mogul AT 248-354-7700.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Carter, Napa, Accuflow, TRU Flow, Parts Master, and Parts Depot Brand Fuel Pumps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Motor Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1983 Ford Mustang Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1983 Ford Mustang Insurance
Insurance for a 1983 Ford Mustang is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sedan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1983 Ford Mustang Compare to Other Sedan?
In the 1983 automotive landscape, the Ford Mustang competed against a few key rivals in the sporty coupe and performance car segment. Its primary competitors included the Chevrolet Camaro, Pontiac Firebird, and arguably the lower-end models of the Nissan 300ZX or Toyota Supra.
Performance: The Mustang, particularly with the 5.0L V8, offered competitive acceleration and handling for its price point. The Camaro and Firebird often boasted similar or slightly better performance in their V8 variants, with the Z28 and Trans Am models being direct competitors to the Mustang GT and Cobra.
Features: Compared to its rivals, the 1983 Mustang offered a decent, though basic, array of features for its era. The Japanese imports, like the 300ZX and Supra, often presented more advanced technology and creature comforts, such as independent rear suspension, fuel injection (more widely adopted), and more refined interiors, though at a higher price point.
Reliability: American V8s from this period, including the Mustang's 5.0L, were generally known for their mechanical simplicity and robustness, making them easier to repair. Japanese imports often had a reputation for superior build quality and fewer electrical gremlins, but repairs could sometimes be more complex and costly.
Price: The Mustang typically offered a more accessible entry price into performance motoring compared to the Japanese rivals. The Camaro and Firebird were similarly priced, making them very close competitors.
Alternatives:
* Chevrolet Camaro/Pontiac Firebird: Very similar in spirit and price, offering comparable performance and styling. A good alternative if you prefer GM styling.
* Dodge Daytona: Offered front-wheel drive and a turbocharged engine, providing a different take on sporty performance, often at a competitive price.
* Nissan 300ZX / Toyota Supra (early models): If budget allows and a more refined, technologically advanced experience is desired, these Japanese sports cars are excellent, albeit more expensive, alternatives offering superior handling and build quality.
The 1983 Mustang stood out by offering a blend of attainable performance, iconic American muscle car heritage, and a more budget-friendly price than some of its import competitors, making it a strong contender for its intended audience.
Performance: The Mustang, particularly with the 5.0L V8, offered competitive acceleration and handling for its price point. The Camaro and Firebird often boasted similar or slightly better performance in their V8 variants, with the Z28 and Trans Am models being direct competitors to the Mustang GT and Cobra.
Features: Compared to its rivals, the 1983 Mustang offered a decent, though basic, array of features for its era. The Japanese imports, like the 300ZX and Supra, often presented more advanced technology and creature comforts, such as independent rear suspension, fuel injection (more widely adopted), and more refined interiors, though at a higher price point.
Reliability: American V8s from this period, including the Mustang's 5.0L, were generally known for their mechanical simplicity and robustness, making them easier to repair. Japanese imports often had a reputation for superior build quality and fewer electrical gremlins, but repairs could sometimes be more complex and costly.
Price: The Mustang typically offered a more accessible entry price into performance motoring compared to the Japanese rivals. The Camaro and Firebird were similarly priced, making them very close competitors.
Alternatives:
* Chevrolet Camaro/Pontiac Firebird: Very similar in spirit and price, offering comparable performance and styling. A good alternative if you prefer GM styling.
* Dodge Daytona: Offered front-wheel drive and a turbocharged engine, providing a different take on sporty performance, often at a competitive price.
* Nissan 300ZX / Toyota Supra (early models): If budget allows and a more refined, technologically advanced experience is desired, these Japanese sports cars are excellent, albeit more expensive, alternatives offering superior handling and build quality.
The 1983 Mustang stood out by offering a blend of attainable performance, iconic American muscle car heritage, and a more budget-friendly price than some of its import competitors, making it a strong contender for its intended audience.
Final Verdict: Is the 1983 Ford Mustang a Good Sedan?
The 1983 Ford Mustang is ideal for automotive enthusiasts who appreciate classic American performance, iconic styling, and a hands-on driving experience. It's a great choice for those looking for a project car to restore or a fun weekend cruiser. It is certainly worth buying, especially in today's used market, provided one approaches the purchase with realistic expectations.
For buyers, focusing on the 5.0L V8 models (GT or Cobra trims) will yield the most rewarding performance. Buying used is the only option. Thoroughly inspect any potential purchase for rust, mechanical soundness, and originality. A well-maintained, rust-free example, even with moderate mileage, is a far better investment than a cheap, neglected project. It's a car that offers significant character and a rewarding ownership experience for those willing to put in the effort or appreciate its classic charm.
For buyers, focusing on the 5.0L V8 models (GT or Cobra trims) will yield the most rewarding performance. Buying used is the only option. Thoroughly inspect any potential purchase for rust, mechanical soundness, and originality. A well-maintained, rust-free example, even with moderate mileage, is a far better investment than a cheap, neglected project. It's a car that offers significant character and a rewarding ownership experience for those willing to put in the effort or appreciate its classic charm.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.