The 1984 Ford Mustang, part of the Fox-body generation, offered a blend of sporty appeal and affordability. Available as a coupe and convertible, its model years spanned from 1979 to 1993. Key trims included the GT and the performance-oriented SVO. Its popularity stemmed from its accessible performance and customizable nature, making it a staple for enthusiasts seeking a stylish American pony car.
The Good
The 1984 Mustang offers an engaging driving experience with decent performance for its era, a relatively straightforward design that's easy to appreciate and maintain, and a solid value proposition for those seeking an affordable classic with sporty flair. Its iconic styling appeals emotionally, while its accessible parts market appeals practically.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1984 Mustang include rust, especially in the lower body panels and around wheel wells. Older models may also experience electrical gremlins, worn interior components, and aging suspension parts. Engine performance can be modest in non-performance trims.
1984 Ford Mustang: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L Inline-4 (Naturally Aspirated)
- 2.3L Turbocharged Inline-4 (SVO)
- 3.8L V6
- 5.0L V8 (Cobra, GT) - Horsepower:
- 2.3L I4: Approximately 88 hp
- 2.3L Turbo I4: Approximately 175 hp (SVO)
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 110 hp
- 5.0L V8: Approximately 175 hp (GT/Cobra) - Fuel Economy:
Varies significantly by engine and transmission. Expect roughly 18-22 MPG combined for V8 models and potentially slightly better for the 4-cylinder variants. - 0-60 Times:
Highly dependent on engine and transmission. V8 models could achieve 0-60 mph in the low 8-second range, while 4-cylinder variants were considerably slower, often exceeding 10 seconds. - Towing Capacity:
Not generally equipped or designed for towing. - Trim-Level Features:
Base Model: Typically featured manual windows, basic interior, and often the 2.3L I4 or 3.8L V6.
GT: Offered a more aggressive appearance package, performance suspension, upgraded brakes, and the 5.0L V8 engine.
SVO: This top-tier performance model boasted a specially tuned 2.3L turbocharged four-cylinder engine, unique suspension tuning, aerodynamic enhancements, and a more upscale interior. It was positioned as a more focused sports car.
Cobra: Often featured the 5.0L V8 with performance enhancements and distinct badging.
1984 Ford Mustang Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1984 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Mustang |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Hatchback |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | DEARBORN |
Dimensions
| Doors | 3-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.5 CFI |
| Engine Size | 2.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1984 Ford Mustang Have?
The 1984 Ford Mustang, while generally appreciated for its spirit, is not immune to common issues found in vehicles of its era. Rust is a significant concern; areas prone to corrosion include the floor pans, rocker panels, wheel wells, and the frame rails. This can compromise structural integrity if left unchecked. Engine-related problems can include carburetor issues, exhaust leaks, and worn-out seals and gaskets, particularly in the 5.0L V8. The 2.3L turbocharged engines, while offering good power, can be prone to issues with the turbocharger itself, boost leaks, and associated plumbing. The automatic transmissions, especially the C5, can develop issues with shifting and longevity if not maintained. Manual transmissions are generally more robust. Electrical gremlins are also frequently reported, ranging from faulty gauges and lighting issues to problems with the ignition system and power windows. Interior components, such as dashboard cracks, worn seat upholstery, and brittle plastic trim, often show their age. Suspension and brake components will likely need replacement on surviving examples due to wear and tear. Specific to the 1984 model year, there weren't widespread catastrophic recalls that defined its reliability, but rather a collection of typical maintenance and wear-and-tear items. The SVO model, with its more complex turbocharged engine and performance tuning, might require more specialized attention than the standard V8 models. Long-term reliability heavily depends on the vehicle's maintenance history and climate it has lived in. A well-maintained 1984 Mustang can still be a dependable driver, but expect ongoing attention to be necessary.
How long will the 1984 Ford Mustang last?
Estimating average mileage for a 1984 Ford Mustang is challenging as many have been driven extensively, while others are preserved as collector items. However, a well-maintained example could realistically achieve 200,000 miles or more. The long-term durability is a mixed bag. The chassis and drivetrain components, particularly the 5.0L V8 and manual transmissions, are known for their robustness if properly cared for. However, the car's susceptibility to rust is a major limiting factor in its longevity, especially in regions with harsh winters. Electrical systems and interior plastics tend to degrade over time, often requiring refurbishment. Regular maintenance, including fluid changes, rustproofing, and addressing minor issues promptly, is crucial for maximizing its lifespan and enjoying its classic appeal for many years.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1984 Ford Mustang represents the technology of its era, meaning it’s quite basic by modern standards. Built-in tech was primarily focused on functionality rather than advanced features. Entertainment options were typically limited to an AM/FM radio, with an optional cassette player often available, sometimes as part of a premium sound system. Power windows and door locks were also optional luxuries on lower trims, becoming more common on higher-end models like the GT or SVO. Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent, with the primary focus being on the driving mechanics themselves. Safety features included standard seatbelts (lap and shoulder belts in the front), and a padded dashboard. Some models might have offered optional fog lights for improved visibility. Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this period are not as comprehensively documented or standardized as they are today. However, the Fox-body Mustang generally performed acceptably for its time, though it would not meet current safety benchmarks. The structure was designed to absorb impact, and the use of crumple zones was a developing aspect of automotive safety then. It's important to note that any safety technology, such as anti-lock brakes (ABS), was not a common feature on the 1984 Mustang, and would likely only have been available on very specific, late-model performance variants as a cutting-edge option, if at all. Overall, the tech and safety suite was functional and utilitarian, reflecting the priorities of automotive design in the mid-1980s.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Black
Oxford White
Medium Red
Shadow Blue
Smokestone Metallic
Goldenrod Yellow
Light Argent
Dark Saddle
Medium Charcoal
Regal Blue
Ember Red
Wimbledon White
Harvest Brown
Interior Colors
Gray Cloth
Black Cloth
Red Cloth
Blue Cloth
Charcoal Vinyl
Gray Vinyl
Black Vinyl
Red Vinyl
Blue Vinyl
Saddle Vinyl
1984 Ford Mustang Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1984 Ford Mustang carried a price tag that varied significantly by trim level. Base models likely started in the $7,000-$9,000 range, while the more specialized SVO or performance GT models could climb into the $12,000-$15,000 mark. Today, the used market prices for a 1984 Mustang are quite varied. Well-maintained, low-mileage examples, especially the sought-after GT and SVO trims, can fetch anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000 or more. More common models with higher mileage or in need of restoration might be found for $3,000-$7,000. The vehicle has completed its steepest depreciation curve and is now appreciating as a classic. Factors affecting resale value include the specific trim level, overall condition (rust, interior wear, mechanical soundness), originality, mileage, and any desirable modifications. Performance variants like the SVO and 5.0L GT hold their value best.
1984 Ford Mustang Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1984 Ford Mustang can be reasonably economical, especially compared to modern performance cars, but costs vary. Insurance is generally affordable for classic status vehicles, particularly for older drivers or those with a good record. Fuel costs depend heavily on the engine; the 5.0L V8 will consume more premium fuel than the 4-cylinder variants. Maintenance is a key factor; parts are widely available and generally affordable, making routine upkeep manageable. However, the potential for rust and aging electrical systems can lead to unexpected repair bills. Overall, while not the cheapest to run due to fuel consumption and potential repairs, the 1984 Mustang offers good value for enthusiasts who are willing to perform or budget for its upkeep.
1984 Ford Mustang Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1984 Ford Mustang Recalls & Defects
Seat Belts:front:anchorage
Recall date
1992-04-29
Recall no.
92v063000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Plastic Sleeve IN THE Front Safety Belt Tongue Assembly Which Retains THE Lock BAR CAN Deteriorate From Prolonged Exposure TO Sunlight and Become Displaced, Causing THE Tongue TO Detach From THE Safety Belt Webbing.
Consequence
IF THE Tongue Detaches From THE Safety Belt Webbing, Thesafety Belt Would NOT Attach TO Itself, Resulting IN Increased Risk OF Injuryto THE Seat Occupant IN THE Event OF A Sudden Stop or Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Ford Will Repair THE Safety Belts Experiencing This Condition Regardless OF Vehicle AGE or Condition.
Notes
System: Safety Belts.vehicle Description: Passenger Cars.
Fuel System, Gasoline:carburetor System
Recall date
1984-10-02
Recall no.
84v119000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Secondary Throttle Shaft May, With Accumulated Mileage, Become Contaminated and MAY Stick IN A Partially Open Position While Driving.
Consequence
Consequence OF Defect: This Sticking Could Result IN A Faster Speed Than Intended, Possibly Resutling IN AN Accident.
Remedy
THE Primary TO Secondary Throttle Closure Link ON THE Carburetor Will BE Replaced Free OF Charge.
Notes
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles Equipped With 5.0 Liter Engines, and Trucks and Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles Equipped With 5.8 or 7.5 Liter Engines; Vehicles ARE Equipped With 4 Barrel Carburetors.system: Fuel; Carburetor Secondary Throttle Control.
Seat Belts:front:anchorage
Recall date
1983-12-20
Recall no.
83v134000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Bolts That Attach THE D-Shaped Ring FOR THE Shoulder Belt ARE Inadequately Supported BY THE Material IN Which They ARE Mounted. THE Attachment Does NOT Comply With THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 210, "seat Belt Assembly Anchorages".
Consequence
Remedy
Dealers Will Install NEW Attaching Hardware TO Improve THE Strength OF THE Mounting.
Notes
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles and Light Trucks.system: Interior Systems; Seat Belts and Upper Torso Restraint Attachments.consequences OF Defect: IN Severe Collisions, THE Shoulder Belt Attachmentcould Separate, Increasing THE Possibility OF Occupant Injury.note: Manufacturer Advises That Seat Belts Should Continue TO BE Used AT Alltimes, AS Substantial Benefits MAY Still BE Obtained.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump
Recall date
2007-08-27
Recall no.
07e064000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Federal-Mogul Aftermarket Fuel Pumps Sold Under THE Brand Names OF Carter, Accuflow, Napa, Truflow, Parts Depo, and Parts Master, Shipped Between August 2006 and July 2007 FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above. THE Fuel Pump Diaphragm IN Certain Production Runs MAY Have Been Improperly Installed or Inadequately Tested Which MAY Cause THE Fuel Pump TO Leak.
Consequence
A Leaking Fuel Pump Could Create A Vehicle Fire Hazard.
Remedy
Federal-Mogul Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Defective Fuel Pumps Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 15, 2007. Owners CAN Contact Federal-Mogul AT 248-354-7700.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Carter, Napa, Accuflow, TRU Flow, Parts Master, and Parts Depot Brand Fuel Pumps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Motor Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1984 Ford Mustang Insurance
Insurance for a 1984 Ford Mustang is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Hatchback with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1984 Ford Mustang Compare to Other Hatchback?
In 1984, the Ford Mustang competed in the pony car segment against rivals like the Chevrolet Camaro, Pontiac Firebird, and the smaller, more nimble Mazda RX-7. In terms of performance, the Mustang GT and SVO models offered competitive V8 power and a balanced chassis for their time. The Camaro Z28 and Firebird Trans Am were often seen as direct rivals, offering similar muscle car V8 options and sportier handling. The Mazda RX-7, with its rotary engine, provided a distinct performance character focused on lighter weight and agile handling, appealing to a different set of enthusiasts. When it came to features, the Mustang offered a range of options, from basic amenities to more performance-oriented equipment, comparable to its domestic rivals. However, compared to imports like the RX-7, the Mustang might have lagged in interior refinement and advanced technology of the era. Reliability is a mixed bag. The Mustang's V8 engines were generally robust, but rust and electrical gremlins were common issues, a concern shared to varying degrees by its American counterparts. The RX-7, while mechanically unique, could have its own set of specialized maintenance requirements. Price-wise, the Mustang was often positioned as an accessible performance option, generally undercutting some of the higher-end Camaros and Firebirds, and significantly more affordable than many European sports cars. Alternatives worth considering from the era include the aforementioned Chevrolet Camaro and Pontiac Firebird, which offered similar muscle car appeal. For those prioritizing handling and a unique driving experience, the Mazda RX-7 remains a strong contender. If outright V8 power is the primary goal, a well-maintained Mustang GT or a comparable Camaro would be excellent choices. For a more unique and potentially less common classic, the Mustang SVO offered a different take on performance with its turbocharged four-cylinder.
Final Verdict: Is the 1984 Ford Mustang a Good Hatchback?
The 1984 Ford Mustang is ideal for classic car enthusiasts who appreciate American muscle car heritage, enjoy weekend cruising, and are comfortable with basic maintenance. It's a worthwhile purchase for those seeking an iconic sports coupe or convertible that offers engaging driving dynamics without the exorbitant costs of some other classics. Buying a used 1984 Mustang is definitely recommended, as new ones are obviously not available. Specific trims like the GT and SVO offer the most rewarding performance and are generally the best investment. Thorough inspection for rust and a solid mechanical report are crucial. For the price and historical significance, a well-chosen 1984 Mustang represents good value for its segment.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.