by VIN, Year, Make, Model by License Plate

1986 Ford Mustang Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs

Rating: 0.00
Based on 0 Owner Reviews
Eugene S | October 4, 2025

The 1986 Ford Mustang represents a significant evolution in the iconic pony car's lineage, marking the second year of the third-generation 'Fox Body' refresh. Available primarily as a coupe and convertible, this model year offered trims like the base, GT, and the performance-oriented SVO. New, it ranged from approximately $9,000 to $16,000 depending on trim and options. Its popularity stems from its blend of sporty styling, attainable performance, and the enduring appeal of the Mustang nameplate, offering a more refined experience than its predecessors.

The Good

The 1986 Mustang delivers a compelling mix of exhilarating performance with its available V8s, a surprisingly comfortable ride for its class, and a timeless, aggressive design. Its value proposition is strong for enthusiasts seeking accessible performance and a piece of automotive history, while its reliability is generally considered good for the era, making it a practical choice for daily driving or weekend cruising.

The Bad

Potential buyers should watch out for rust, particularly in the wheel wells, rocker panels, and rear quarter panels. Electrical gremlins, aging interior components, and potential issues with the fuel injection system are also common concerns. Engine performance degradation over time and worn suspension parts are also areas to inspect closely.

1986 Ford Mustang: Quick Overview

  • Engine Options:
    • 2.3L Naturally Aspirated Inline-4 (EFI)
    • 2.3L Turbocharged Inline-4 (SVO)
    • 5.0L Naturally Aspirated V8 (EFI)

  • Horsepower:
    • 2.3L EFI I4: ~88 hp
    • 2.3L Turbo I4 (SVO): ~205 hp
    • 5.0L V8: ~225 hp

  • Fuel Economy (EPA Estimated):
    • 2.3L I4: ~23 MPG city / 28 MPG highway
    • 5.0L V8: ~17 MPG city / 23 MPG highway
    Note: Actual mileage will vary based on driving conditions, maintenance, and specific configuration.

  • 0-60 Times:
    • 5.0L V8: ~6.5 - 7.5 seconds
    • SVO: ~6.5 seconds
    These are approximate figures and can vary.

  • Towing Capacity:
    The 1986 Ford Mustang was not typically equipped or designed for significant towing. Towing capacity was generally minimal, if offered at all, and not a primary feature.

  • Trim-Level Features:
    • Base: Standard coupe or convertible, 4-cylinder engine, basic interior, manual windows and locks.
    • GT: 5.0L V8 engine, sport suspension, dual exhaust, fog lights, body-colored bumpers, upgraded interior trim, power steering, power brakes.
    • SVO: Tuned 2.3L turbocharged engine, unique suspension tuning, larger brakes, performance tires, distinctive aerodynamic elements, premium interior features, limited-slip differential.
    Optional features across trims could include air conditioning, power windows, power locks, cruise control, premium sound systems, and automatic transmissions.

1986 Ford Mustang Specifications

Vehicle Information
Year 1986
Make Ford
Model Mustang
Trim -
Style -
Type Hatchback
Category Compact Car
Manufacturing Details
Made In United States
Manufacturing City ST. PAUL
Dimensions
Doors 3-Door
Curb Weight -
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating -
Overall Height -
Overall Length -
Overall Width -
Wheelbase Length -
Standard Seating -
Engine & Performance
Engine 2.5 CFI
Engine Size 1.6L
Engine Cylinders 4
Transmission n / a
Transmission Type -
Transmission Speeds -
Drivetrain Rear-Wheel Drive
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System -
Steering Type -
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) -
Invoice Price -
Delivery Charges -

Vehicle History Report

Vehicle
Specifications
Ownership
History
All History
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Accident
Check
Theft
Check
Open Lien
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Market Price
Analysis

What Problems Does the 1986 Ford Mustang Have?

The 1986 Ford Mustang, like many vehicles of its era, has some common issues that owners report. One of the most prevalent concerns is rust. Due to its construction and age, corrosion can develop in common areas like the rocker panels, wheel wells, door bottoms, and frame rails, especially in regions with harsh winters or high humidity. Addressing rust early is crucial to prevent significant structural damage.

Electrical issues are also frequently mentioned. This can range from minor annoyances like faulty gauge clusters, door lock actuators, and power window motors to more significant problems with the wiring harness or the engine control unit (ECU). Owners often find themselves troubleshooting intermittent electrical gremlins.

The 5.0L V8 engine, while generally robust, can develop specific problems over time. These include issues with the original fuel injection system (EFI), such as failing fuel pumps, clogged injectors, or malfunctioning idle air control (IAC) valves. Overheating can also be a concern if the cooling system isn't properly maintained, leading to potential head gasket issues.

For the SVO model, the turbocharged 2.3L engine requires meticulous maintenance. Turbocharger issues, blown head gaskets due to higher boost pressures, and worn clutch components are more common on these performance-oriented variants.

Suspension and braking components will naturally wear out over time. Worn-out bushings, ball joints, and shocks can lead to poor handling and a less comfortable ride. Brake components may also require frequent attention, especially if the car has been driven hard.

While specific recalls for the 1986 model year are not overwhelmingly numerous, it's always advisable to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any safety recalls that might have been issued and may still be addressable, though parts availability can be a challenge for older vehicles.

Long-term reliability hinges heavily on the extent of maintenance and repairs performed by previous owners. A well-maintained 1986 Mustang can still be a dependable car, but potential buyers should expect to address wear-and-tear items and be prepared for the possibility of encountering some of these common problems.

How long will the 1986 Ford Mustang last?

Based on owner data and maintenance habits, a well-cared-for 1986 Ford Mustang can reasonably be expected to serve for 200,000 to 250,000 miles, or even more, with diligent attention. The 5.0L V8 engine is known for its durability if properly maintained, often outlasting the chassis components. However, weaknesses over time are primarily associated with aging components and environmental factors. Rust remains a significant long-term enemy, potentially compromising the vehicle's structural integrity. Electrical systems can also become more prone to failure with age. While the core mechanicals can be very robust, the longevity of a 1986 Mustang is heavily dependent on consistent maintenance, prompt repairs, and protection against the elements.

What Technology & Safety Features are Included?

The 1986 Ford Mustang reflects the technology of its era, meaning its offerings are relatively basic by modern standards. Built-in technology primarily revolved around convenience and rudimentary entertainment.

Entertainment: Standard equipment usually included an AM/FM radio. Optional upgrades often featured a cassette player, offering a significant step up in audio flexibility for the time. Higher-end sound systems might have included more speakers or basic graphic equalizers. Powering these systems were typically modest speaker setups, with premium options offering more.

Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance technology was virtually non-existent in 1986. Features that we now consider standard, like anti-lock braking systems (ABS), were typically optional or only available on higher-performance variants like the SVO. Power steering was common, and power brakes were widely available, enhancing driver ease. Cruise control was a popular optional convenience feature for highway driving.

Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included seat belts (often lap and shoulder belts in the front) and the basic structural integrity of the coupe or convertible body. Side-impact door beams were a feature of this generation. The SVO and GT trims might have offered slightly more robust braking systems. Airbags were not a standard feature in 1986; they were still a developing technology and not common in mainstream vehicles. Conversely, the Mustang did not have advanced crumple zones or extensive electronic stability control systems.

Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings for the 1986 Ford Mustang from entities like the NHTSA or IIHS are not readily available in the detailed format we see today. However, the third-generation Mustang (Fox Body) was generally considered to have adequate safety for its time. Later model years within this generation saw improvements in crashworthiness, but the 1986 model predates many of the stringent safety standards enforced today. It would likely perform modestly in modern crash simulations, particularly in frontal and side-impact tests.

What Colors Options are Available?

We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.

1986 Ford Mustang Prices and Market Value

When new in 1986, the Ford Mustang ranged from approximately $9,000 for a base model to upwards of $16,000 for a loaded GT or SVO. Like most vehicles, the Mustang experienced significant depreciation in its early years. However, over time, certain models and trims have seen their values stabilize and even appreciate, particularly the 5.0L GT and the limited-production SVO. Current used market prices vary widely, from $3,000-$5,000 for project cars or high-mileage examples to $15,000-$30,000+ for well-preserved, low-mileage GT and SVO models. Factors affecting resale value include condition (rust, interior wear, mechanical soundness), mileage, originality, and the desirability of the specific trim and options. Enthusiast interest continues to drive demand for well-maintained examples.

1986 Ford Mustang Cost of Ownership

Owning a 1986 Ford Mustang can be relatively economical for fuel, especially with the 4-cylinder engine, but the V8s are thirstier. Insurance costs can be moderate, depending on your driving record and location, but enthusiast-focused models like the GT may incur slightly higher premiums. Routine maintenance is generally straightforward and affordable, with many parts readily available. However, repair costs can increase significantly if major issues arise, particularly with older electrical components or rust-related bodywork. Overall, the 1986 Mustang is considered moderately economical to own, especially if you can perform some maintenance yourself. It's not as cheap as a modern economy car, but it offers good value for a classic performance vehicle.

1986 Ford Mustang Fuel Efficiency

Fuel Type Gasoline
Fuel Capacity -
City Mileage -
Highway Mileage -

1986 Ford Mustang Recalls & Defects

Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date 1987-09-04
Recall no. 87v139000
Source NHTSA
Summary Spring Lock Fuel Line Coupling MAY NOT BE Properly Engaged.
Consequence Coupling Could Disengage DUE TO Fuel Pressure,vibration, and Engine Movements; This Would Cause Loss OF Fuel Which, Inpresence OF AN Ignition Source, Creates A Fire Risk.
Remedy Install Retainer Clips Over THE Couplings TO Prevent Coupling Separation and Fuel Leakage.
Notes System: Fuel Line Couplingvehicle Description: Passenger Cars and Light Trucks Equipped With Fuelinjection.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump
Recall date 2007-08-27
Recall no. 07e064000
Source NHTSA
Summary Certain Federal-Mogul Aftermarket Fuel Pumps Sold Under THE Brand Names OF Carter, Accuflow, Napa, Truflow, Parts Depo, and Parts Master, Shipped Between August 2006 and July 2007 FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above. THE Fuel Pump Diaphragm IN Certain Production Runs MAY Have Been Improperly Installed or Inadequately Tested Which MAY Cause THE Fuel Pump TO Leak.
Consequence A Leaking Fuel Pump Could Create A Vehicle Fire Hazard.
Remedy Federal-Mogul Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Defective Fuel Pumps Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 15, 2007. Owners CAN Contact Federal-Mogul AT 248-354-7700.
Notes This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Carter, Napa, Accuflow, TRU Flow, Parts Master, and Parts Depot Brand Fuel Pumps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Motor Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.

1986 Ford Mustang Insurance

Insurance for a 1986 Ford Mustang is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Hatchback with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.

How Does the 1986 Ford Mustang Compare to Other Hatchback?

The 1986 Ford Mustang competed in a vibrant segment of affordable performance cars. Its primary rivals included:

Chevrolet Camaro/Pontiac Firebird: These GM siblings offered similar coupe and hatchback body styles and often matched or exceeded Mustang's performance, especially with their V8 engines. The Camaro and Firebird sometimes boasted slightly more aggressive styling and, depending on the trim, could offer comparable or superior handling. Features and reliability were generally on par, though specific issues varied between models. Prices when new and used were often competitive with the Mustang.

Dodge Daytona/Mitsubishi Starion/Chrysler Conquest: These were front-wheel-drive (Daytona) or rear-wheel-drive (Starion/Conquest) sporty coupes that emphasized turbocharging. The Starion/Conquest, in particular, offered sharp styling and strong performance, often rivaling the Mustang SVO. However, their reliability could be more hit-or-miss than the Mustang's V8 variants, and their interiors might have felt less robust. Their price point could be similar, depending on options.

Nissan 300ZX (Z31): This Japanese sports coupe offered a more refined, technologically advanced experience with its V6 engines, often turbocharged. It generally provided superior build quality, comfort, and a more sophisticated interior than the Mustang. However, its performance, while strong, was often more grand touring-oriented rather than outright muscle. The 300ZX was typically more expensive both new and on the used market. Reliability is generally good, but repairs can be more costly due to complexity.

Alternatives:

For similar performance and classic muscle car feel, the 5.0L GT Mustang remains a benchmark. If you prioritize handling and a slightly more European feel, a well-maintained Camaro IROC-Z from the same era is a strong contender. For those seeking a more modern and potentially more reliable, albeit less 'classic' experience, a later model Fox Body Mustang (late 80s/early 90s) or even a first-generation Mazda RX-7 could be considered, though the latter has its own unique maintenance considerations.

Final Verdict: Is the 1986 Ford Mustang a Good Hatchback?

The 1986 Ford Mustang is ideal for automotive enthusiasts who appreciate classic American performance and styling without the exorbitant cost of earlier or later collectible models. It's a solid buy for those seeking a weekend cruiser or a project car to personalize. The 5.0L GT is best for drivers wanting V8 power and iconic Mustang looks, while the SVO appeals to those interested in a more sophisticated, turbocharged performance variant. Buying used is the only option, and condition is paramount; prioritize models with minimal rust and a well-documented maintenance history. It's worth buying if you're prepared for some upkeep typical of a 35+ year-old vehicle and are looking for a rewarding ownership experience in a piece of automotive history.

1986 Ford Mustang Owner Reviews

0.00
Consumer Rating, Based on 0 Consumer Reviews
Overall rating
Cancel
Thank You for Your Review!

We truly appreciate the time and effort you took to share your experience with us.

Uh oh!

Something went wrong, please try again later.

Author Image
Eugene S

Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.