The 1985 Ford Mustang, part of the Fox-body generation (1979-1993), revitalized the pony car segment with its sporty design and accessible performance. Available as a coupe, convertible, and hatchback, key trims included the popular GT and the performance-oriented SVO. New pricing ranged from around $8,000 to $15,000. Its enduring popularity stems from its iconic styling, rear-wheel-drive dynamics, and a strong aftermarket support, making it a beloved choice for enthusiasts.
The Good
The 1985 Mustang offers engaging performance with its V8 options and RWD handling, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Its classic Fox-body design evokes nostalgia and pride. For practical buyers, it represents accessible performance and a relatively simple mechanical platform, contributing to its good value.
The Bad
Potential buyers should watch out for rust, especially on the lower body panels, wheel wells, and frame rails. Electrical gremlins can also be a concern in older vehicles. Engine and transmission wear are common, and some interior components may be brittle due to age.
1985 Ford Mustang: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L I4 (Turbocharged): Available on base models and SVO.
- Horsepower: Approximately 175 hp (Turbo GT) to 205 hp (SVO).
- Torque: Around 240 lb-ft (Turbo GT) to 248 lb-ft (SVO).
- 3.8L V6: Offered in some base models.
- Horsepower: Approximately 110-115 hp.
- Torque: Around 190-195 lb-ft.
- 5.0L V8 (302 cu in): The iconic engine for performance trims.
- Horsepower: Approximately 175 hp (GT) to 210 hp (GT, with EFI).
- Torque: Around 245 lb-ft (GT) to 285 lb-ft (GT, with EFI).
- 2.3L I4 (Turbocharged): Available on base models and SVO.
- Fuel Economy:
Estimated MPG varies significantly by engine and transmission. The 5.0L V8 typically ranged from 14-18 MPG city and 18-22 MPG highway.
The 2.3L Turbo I4 could achieve slightly better, around 16-20 MPG city and 22-26 MPG highway.
The 3.8L V6 offered the best fuel economy in the lineup, though with significantly less power. - 0-60 Times:
Highly dependent on the engine and transmission.
5.0L V8 (EFI): Could achieve 0-60 MPH in the mid-7 to low-8 second range.
2.3L Turbo GT: Around 8-10 seconds.
SVO: Could approach low 7-second times.
3.8L V6: Significantly slower, often 10+ seconds. - Towing Capacity:
Not a primary design feature. Light towing might be possible with V8 models, but official towing capacities are not readily available or recommended for significant loads. - Trim-Level Features:
Base Models: Often came with the 2.3L I4 or 3.8L V6, standard manual transmission, basic interior appointments, and steel wheels.
GT: Featured the 5.0L V8 engine (with Electronic Fuel Injection on some models), upgraded suspension, sportier exterior styling, fog lights, and a more performance-oriented interior.
SVO: A special performance variant with a unique turbocharged 2.3L I4 engine, performance suspension, disc brakes on all four wheels, unique aerodynamic enhancements, and a driver-focused cockpit.
1985 Ford Mustang Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1985 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Mustang |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Passenger Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | DEARBORN |
Dimensions
| Doors | 3-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.5 CFI |
| Engine Size | 1.6L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | - |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1985 Ford Mustang Have?
The 1985 Ford Mustang, being a vehicle of its era, is susceptible to several common issues, primarily related to age and wear rather than specific model year defects. One of the most prevalent concerns is rust. Because the Fox body was produced for many years and used steel in its construction, areas like the rocker panels, rear quarter panels, wheel arches, door bottoms, and subframes are prone to corrosion, especially in climates with road salt. Thorough inspection of these areas is crucial for any potential buyer.
Electrical issues are another frequently reported problem. Older vehicles often develop intermittent electrical faults due to degraded wiring harnesses, failing grounds, or aging switches and relays. This can manifest as non-functioning lights, faulty gauges, or erratic engine performance. Owners might experience issues with the alternator, starter, or power window motors.
The 5.0L V8 engine, while powerful and desirable, can suffer from typical V8 issues like oil leaks from gaskets (e.g., valve cover gaskets, oil pan gaskets) and coolant leaks from hoses or the radiator. The fuel injection system, while an improvement over carburetors, can also develop its own set of problems, including faulty fuel injectors or a failing fuel pump.
Transmission issues can occur, particularly with higher mileage vehicles. Automatic transmissions may exhibit slipping or hard shifting, while manual transmissions can develop clutch wear or synchronizer problems. The rear axle, especially if subjected to hard driving, can also be a point of concern.
Specific to 1985, the Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI) system on the 5.0L V8 was an improvement, but early EFI systems could still have their quirks, such as issues with the Mass Airflow (MAF) sensor or idle air control (IAC) valve. The turbocharged 2.3L engine, particularly in the SVO model, is known for its performance but also for potential turbocharger wear and intercooler leaks if not properly maintained.
Ford issued several recalls for the Fox body Mustang across its production run, though specific recalls for the 1985 model year are less prominent than some earlier or later years. However, potential owners should always check for any outstanding safety recalls that might apply to specific VINs. Overall, the long-term reliability of a 1985 Mustang is heavily dependent on its maintenance history and how it has been driven and stored. A well-maintained example can be quite reliable, while a neglected one will likely require significant attention.
Electrical issues are another frequently reported problem. Older vehicles often develop intermittent electrical faults due to degraded wiring harnesses, failing grounds, or aging switches and relays. This can manifest as non-functioning lights, faulty gauges, or erratic engine performance. Owners might experience issues with the alternator, starter, or power window motors.
The 5.0L V8 engine, while powerful and desirable, can suffer from typical V8 issues like oil leaks from gaskets (e.g., valve cover gaskets, oil pan gaskets) and coolant leaks from hoses or the radiator. The fuel injection system, while an improvement over carburetors, can also develop its own set of problems, including faulty fuel injectors or a failing fuel pump.
Transmission issues can occur, particularly with higher mileage vehicles. Automatic transmissions may exhibit slipping or hard shifting, while manual transmissions can develop clutch wear or synchronizer problems. The rear axle, especially if subjected to hard driving, can also be a point of concern.
Specific to 1985, the Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI) system on the 5.0L V8 was an improvement, but early EFI systems could still have their quirks, such as issues with the Mass Airflow (MAF) sensor or idle air control (IAC) valve. The turbocharged 2.3L engine, particularly in the SVO model, is known for its performance but also for potential turbocharger wear and intercooler leaks if not properly maintained.
Ford issued several recalls for the Fox body Mustang across its production run, though specific recalls for the 1985 model year are less prominent than some earlier or later years. However, potential owners should always check for any outstanding safety recalls that might apply to specific VINs. Overall, the long-term reliability of a 1985 Mustang is heavily dependent on its maintenance history and how it has been driven and stored. A well-maintained example can be quite reliable, while a neglected one will likely require significant attention.
How long will the 1985 Ford Mustang last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits for vehicles of this age, a well-maintained 1985 Ford Mustang can realistically achieve or surpass 200,000 miles of service. Many enthusiasts report much higher figures, often exceeding 250,000 miles, especially with meticulous upkeep and occasional component replacements. The long-term durability of the Fox body platform is commendable, particularly the robust V8 engines and the underlying chassis. However, weaknesses that emerge over time are primarily related to the aging of rubber and plastic components, such as suspension bushings, fuel lines, and interior trim. Rust remains a significant factor affecting longevity, especially in harsher climates. Regular fluid changes, timely repairs, and addressing minor issues before they escalate are key to maximizing the service life of a 1985 Mustang, allowing it to provide enjoyment for many years to come.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1985 Ford Mustang represents a period where automotive technology was beginning to incorporate more electronic features, though it was far from the sophisticated systems found in modern vehicles.
Built-in Tech and Entertainment: The standard entertainment system was typically an AM/FM radio, often with an optional cassette player for those seeking more personalized audio. Higher trim levels or optional packages might have included a premium sound system with more speakers, aiming for better audio fidelity. Digital dashboards were not yet common, with analog gauges being the norm for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Climate control was usually a manual system with adjustable vents and fan speeds.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance systems as we know them today did not exist in the 1985 Mustang. Features like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) were still a nascent technology and not widely available on this model. Cruise control was often an optional feature on higher trims, providing a basic form of assistance for highway driving. Power steering was standard on most models, enhancing ease of maneuverability.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment in the 1985 Mustang included lap and shoulder seatbelts for all occupants, which were significant advancements for the time. Crumple zones were designed into the body structure to absorb impact energy in a collision. Side-impact protection was limited by the standards of the era. Airbags were not yet a standard or even widely optional feature in 1985 for mass-produced passenger cars like the Mustang. Braking systems typically consisted of front disc brakes and rear drum brakes, with the GT and SVO trims often receiving upgraded brake components for better performance.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 1985 model year are not readily available in the same standardized format as modern tests. However, vehicles from this era generally performed less favorably in frontal and side-impact crash tests compared to contemporary vehicles due to differences in structural engineering and safety technology. The focus was more on occupant restraint and basic structural integrity rather than energy management systems that have become standard. Any available data would likely reflect performance considerably below current safety benchmarks.
Built-in Tech and Entertainment: The standard entertainment system was typically an AM/FM radio, often with an optional cassette player for those seeking more personalized audio. Higher trim levels or optional packages might have included a premium sound system with more speakers, aiming for better audio fidelity. Digital dashboards were not yet common, with analog gauges being the norm for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Climate control was usually a manual system with adjustable vents and fan speeds.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance systems as we know them today did not exist in the 1985 Mustang. Features like ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) were still a nascent technology and not widely available on this model. Cruise control was often an optional feature on higher trims, providing a basic form of assistance for highway driving. Power steering was standard on most models, enhancing ease of maneuverability.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment in the 1985 Mustang included lap and shoulder seatbelts for all occupants, which were significant advancements for the time. Crumple zones were designed into the body structure to absorb impact energy in a collision. Side-impact protection was limited by the standards of the era. Airbags were not yet a standard or even widely optional feature in 1985 for mass-produced passenger cars like the Mustang. Braking systems typically consisted of front disc brakes and rear drum brakes, with the GT and SVO trims often receiving upgraded brake components for better performance.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 1985 model year are not readily available in the same standardized format as modern tests. However, vehicles from this era generally performed less favorably in frontal and side-impact crash tests compared to contemporary vehicles due to differences in structural engineering and safety technology. The focus was more on occupant restraint and basic structural integrity rather than energy management systems that have become standard. Any available data would likely reflect performance considerably below current safety benchmarks.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1985 Ford Mustang Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1985 Ford Mustang had a starting MSRP that typically ranged from approximately $8,000 to $15,000, depending on the body style and trim level, with the SVO model commanding a higher price. As with most vehicles, the Mustang experienced significant depreciation in its early years. However, the 1985 Mustang has since transitioned from a depreciating asset to a classic appreciating vehicle, particularly for well-preserved examples.
Current used market prices can vary dramatically, ranging from around $3,000-$5,000 for project cars or those in fair condition, up to $10,000-$20,000+ for pristine, low-mileage, or highly sought-after trims like the GT or SVO. Factors affecting resale value include the specific trim level (GT and SVO are most desirable), overall condition (rust, interior wear, mechanical soundness), originality, mileage, and maintenance history. Enthusiast demand and the iconic status of the Fox body Mustang continue to drive its market value.
Current used market prices can vary dramatically, ranging from around $3,000-$5,000 for project cars or those in fair condition, up to $10,000-$20,000+ for pristine, low-mileage, or highly sought-after trims like the GT or SVO. Factors affecting resale value include the specific trim level (GT and SVO are most desirable), overall condition (rust, interior wear, mechanical soundness), originality, mileage, and maintenance history. Enthusiast demand and the iconic status of the Fox body Mustang continue to drive its market value.
1985 Ford Mustang Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1985 Ford Mustang can be quite economical if you have basic mechanical skills, but costs can rise with professional repairs. Insurance is generally affordable, especially for classic or enthusiast policies. Fuel costs, particularly for the V8 models, can be substantial due to their lower MPG. Maintenance is relatively straightforward with readily available parts, making routine upkeep manageable. However, unforeseen repairs, especially for rust remediation or complex electrical issues, can become costly. Overall, while not the most economical car to fuel, the 1985 Mustang can be cost-effective to own if maintained diligently and if you can handle some DIY work, but neglect will lead to escalating expenses.
1985 Ford Mustang Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1985 Ford Mustang Recalls & Defects
Seat Belts:front:anchorage
Recall date
1992-04-29
Recall no.
92v063000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Plastic Sleeve IN THE Front Safety Belt Tongue Assembly Which Retains THE Lock BAR CAN Deteriorate From Prolonged Exposure TO Sunlight and Become Displaced, Causing THE Tongue TO Detach From THE Safety Belt Webbing.
Consequence
IF THE Tongue Detaches From THE Safety Belt Webbing, Thesafety Belt Would NOT Attach TO Itself, Resulting IN Increased Risk OF Injuryto THE Seat Occupant IN THE Event OF A Sudden Stop or Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Ford Will Repair THE Safety Belts Experiencing This Condition Regardless OF Vehicle AGE or Condition.
Notes
System: Safety Belts.vehicle Description: Passenger Cars.
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist:vacuum
Recall date
1985-05-21
Recall no.
85v068000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Brake Booster Rear Shells MAY Have Reduced Wall Thicknesses Which Could Cause THE Shell TO Break. Consequence OF Defect: Repeated Brake USE Could Cause THE Shell TO Crack and THE Booster Assembly TO Come Apart. Service Brakes Capability Would BE Totally Lost Without Warning and Could Result IN AN Accident.
Consequence
Remedy
Inspect and IF Necessary Replace THE Power Brake Booster Assembly.
Notes
Vehicle Description: Passenger Cars Equipped With 3.8 or 5.0 Liter Engines Andtandem Power Brake Boosters.vehicles Equipped With Police or Taxi Package Option ARE NOT Affected.system: Power Brake Boosters.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:fuel Pump
Recall date
2007-08-27
Recall no.
07e064000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Federal-Mogul Aftermarket Fuel Pumps Sold Under THE Brand Names OF Carter, Accuflow, Napa, Truflow, Parts Depo, and Parts Master, Shipped Between August 2006 and July 2007 FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above. THE Fuel Pump Diaphragm IN Certain Production Runs MAY Have Been Improperly Installed or Inadequately Tested Which MAY Cause THE Fuel Pump TO Leak.
Consequence
A Leaking Fuel Pump Could Create A Vehicle Fire Hazard.
Remedy
Federal-Mogul Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Defective Fuel Pumps Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 15, 2007. Owners CAN Contact Federal-Mogul AT 248-354-7700.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Carter, Napa, Accuflow, TRU Flow, Parts Master, and Parts Depot Brand Fuel Pumps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Motor Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1985 Ford Mustang Insurance
Insurance for a 1985 Ford Mustang is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Passenger Sedan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1985 Ford Mustang Compare to Other Passenger Sedan?
In the mid-1980s, the 1985 Ford Mustang competed primarily against other sporty coupes and personal luxury cars, with its main rivals including the Chevrolet Camaro, Pontiac Firebird, and arguably, the Toyota Supra and Nissan 300ZX.
Performance: The Mustang GT, with its 5.0L V8, offered strong straight-line acceleration that often bested its V6-powered competitors and was competitive with the base V8 Camaro/Firebird models. The SVO variant, with its turbocharged four-cylinder, provided excellent handling and respectable, albeit different, performance characteristics. The Camaro and Firebird, especially with their V8 engines, offered comparable or sometimes superior power and handling. The Japanese rivals, like the Supra and 300ZX, leaned more towards sophisticated engineering and handling prowess, often lacking the raw V8 grunt of the Mustang and its American counterparts.
Features: Features in 1985 were generally more basic across the board compared to today. The Mustang offered an array of options, including cassette players and basic power accessories. The Camaro and Firebird provided similar levels of interior amenities. The Japanese sports cars often boasted more advanced technology for the time, such as independent rear suspension (standard on Supra/300ZX, not Mustang) and more refined interiors.
Reliability: American V8s of this era, including Ford's 5.0L, were generally considered reliable with proper maintenance, though they could be prone to leaks and accessory failures. Japanese rivals like Toyota and Nissan had a reputation for superior build quality and long-term mechanical reliability, often surpassing their American counterparts in this regard. The Mustang's simpler RWD platform, however, was often easier and cheaper to maintain than some of the more complex import drivetrains.
Price: The 1985 Mustang offered a compelling value proposition, providing V8 performance at a price point often lower than comparable V8 Camaro or Firebird models. The Japanese sports cars were typically priced higher than the Mustang.
Alternatives: If performance and affordability are paramount, the 1985 Mustang GT is a strong contender. For those prioritizing handling and a more refined driving experience, a **Toyota Supra** or **Nissan 300ZX** from the same era would be excellent alternatives, albeit at a potentially higher purchase and maintenance cost. The **Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z** or **Pontiac Firebird Trans Am** (if equipped with the V8) are very similar in spirit and performance, offering a direct American muscle car alternative. For a slightly different, but still engaging, RWD experience, a well-maintained **Mazda RX-7** could also be considered, though its rotary engine requires specialized care.
Performance: The Mustang GT, with its 5.0L V8, offered strong straight-line acceleration that often bested its V6-powered competitors and was competitive with the base V8 Camaro/Firebird models. The SVO variant, with its turbocharged four-cylinder, provided excellent handling and respectable, albeit different, performance characteristics. The Camaro and Firebird, especially with their V8 engines, offered comparable or sometimes superior power and handling. The Japanese rivals, like the Supra and 300ZX, leaned more towards sophisticated engineering and handling prowess, often lacking the raw V8 grunt of the Mustang and its American counterparts.
Features: Features in 1985 were generally more basic across the board compared to today. The Mustang offered an array of options, including cassette players and basic power accessories. The Camaro and Firebird provided similar levels of interior amenities. The Japanese sports cars often boasted more advanced technology for the time, such as independent rear suspension (standard on Supra/300ZX, not Mustang) and more refined interiors.
Reliability: American V8s of this era, including Ford's 5.0L, were generally considered reliable with proper maintenance, though they could be prone to leaks and accessory failures. Japanese rivals like Toyota and Nissan had a reputation for superior build quality and long-term mechanical reliability, often surpassing their American counterparts in this regard. The Mustang's simpler RWD platform, however, was often easier and cheaper to maintain than some of the more complex import drivetrains.
Price: The 1985 Mustang offered a compelling value proposition, providing V8 performance at a price point often lower than comparable V8 Camaro or Firebird models. The Japanese sports cars were typically priced higher than the Mustang.
Alternatives: If performance and affordability are paramount, the 1985 Mustang GT is a strong contender. For those prioritizing handling and a more refined driving experience, a **Toyota Supra** or **Nissan 300ZX** from the same era would be excellent alternatives, albeit at a potentially higher purchase and maintenance cost. The **Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z** or **Pontiac Firebird Trans Am** (if equipped with the V8) are very similar in spirit and performance, offering a direct American muscle car alternative. For a slightly different, but still engaging, RWD experience, a well-maintained **Mazda RX-7** could also be considered, though its rotary engine requires specialized care.
Final Verdict: Is the 1985 Ford Mustang a Good Passenger Sedan?
The 1985 Ford Mustang is an ideal vehicle for nostalgia enthusiasts, budding gearheads, and those seeking accessible American muscle car performance. It's worth buying for anyone who appreciates its iconic Fox body styling and the engaging driving experience it offers, especially with the V8 engine.
When considering a purchase, buying used is the only option, and condition is paramount. Prioritize examples with minimal rust, a well-documented maintenance history, and a sound drivetrain. The GT trim is generally the sweet spot for balancing performance and availability, while the SVO is for the true collector seeking a unique performance variant. Thorough pre-purchase inspections are essential. For those willing to invest a bit of time and effort into maintenance or minor repairs, the 1985 Mustang offers a rewarding ownership experience and a piece of automotive history.
When considering a purchase, buying used is the only option, and condition is paramount. Prioritize examples with minimal rust, a well-documented maintenance history, and a sound drivetrain. The GT trim is generally the sweet spot for balancing performance and availability, while the SVO is for the true collector seeking a unique performance variant. Thorough pre-purchase inspections are essential. For those willing to invest a bit of time and effort into maintenance or minor repairs, the 1985 Mustang offers a rewarding ownership experience and a piece of automotive history.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.