The 1986 Ford Taurus, part of the second generation introduced in 1986 and produced until 1991, was a groundbreaking front-wheel-drive mid-size car. Available in sedan and wagon body styles, key trims included the GL, LX, and the sporty SHO. It was a revolutionary car for its time, praised for its aerodynamic design and innovative engineering, significantly boosting Ford's market share.
The Good
The 1986 Taurus offered a comfortable ride and impressive fuel efficiency for its class. Its modern, aerodynamic design appealed to emotional buyers, while practical aspects like its spacious interior and good handling provided solid value.
The Bad
Potential buyers should be aware of common issues such as transmission problems, particularly with the AXOD automatic transmission, and potential for rust. Electrical gremlins and suspension wear are also points to scrutinize.
1986 Ford Taurus: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L I4 (4-cylinder)
- 3.0L V6 (ESR)
- 3.8L V6
- Horsepower:
- 2.5L I4: Approximately 105-115 hp
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 140-150 hp
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 140-160 hp
- Fuel Economy (EPA estimates, may vary):
- 2.5L I4: Around 22-25 mpg city / 30-34 mpg highway
- 3.0L V6: Around 18-20 mpg city / 26-28 mpg highway
- 3.8L V6: Around 17-19 mpg city / 24-26 mpg highway
- 0-60 Times: Varies significantly by engine and transmission. Generally in the 9-12 second range for V6 models.
- Towing Capacity: Not a primary feature for the Taurus; towing capacity was generally not specified or advertised for this model.
- Trim-Level Features:
- GL: Standard features typically included power steering, power brakes, AM/FM radio, intermittent wipers, and cloth upholstery.
- LX: Added more comfort and convenience features such as power windows, power door locks, cruise control, upgraded interior trim, and often a cassette player.
- SHO (Super High Output): This performance variant came with a more powerful 3.0L V6 engine, sport-tuned suspension, alloy wheels, performance tires, and sportier interior accents.
- Optional Features: Air conditioning, rear defroster, premium sound systems, sunroof, anti-lock brakes (ABS), and alloy wheels were often available as options or standard on higher trims.
1986 Ford Taurus Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1986 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Taurus |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | CHICAGO |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 3L V6 |
| Engine Size | 3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1986 Ford Taurus Have?
The 1986 Ford Taurus, while a sales success, did encounter several recurring issues that owners should be aware of. One of the most frequently cited problems involves the AXOD automatic transmission. These transmissions could be prone to overheating and premature failure, often manifesting as slipping or erratic shifting. Regular fluid changes and avoiding hard acceleration were recommended preventative measures.
Engine mounts were another common wear item, leading to vibrations and clunking noises, especially at idle or during acceleration. Cooling system issues, such as radiator leaks and failing water pumps, could also arise, potentially leading to overheating if not addressed promptly.
Electrical gremlins were not uncommon. This could range from malfunctioning power windows and door locks to issues with the instrument cluster or various sensors. Sometimes, these were related to corrosion in connectors or aging wiring harnesses.
Suspension components, including ball joints, tie rod ends, and struts, are subject to wear over time and mileage, leading to poor handling, steering vagueness, and knocking sounds.
Rust, particularly in areas with harsh winters and road salt, was a significant concern for many Taurus models of this era. Areas prone to rust included wheel wells, rocker panels, and the underside of the vehicle. Regular washing and undercoating could help mitigate this.
While there weren't widespread major recalls specifically for the 1986 model that stand out prominently, it's always advisable to check for any outstanding recalls with Ford. Long-term reliability concerns are generally tied to the aforementioned mechanical and electrical components. With diligent maintenance, especially regarding the transmission and cooling system, these vehicles can still offer dependable service, but they require proactive attention to potential issues.
Engine mounts were another common wear item, leading to vibrations and clunking noises, especially at idle or during acceleration. Cooling system issues, such as radiator leaks and failing water pumps, could also arise, potentially leading to overheating if not addressed promptly.
Electrical gremlins were not uncommon. This could range from malfunctioning power windows and door locks to issues with the instrument cluster or various sensors. Sometimes, these were related to corrosion in connectors or aging wiring harnesses.
Suspension components, including ball joints, tie rod ends, and struts, are subject to wear over time and mileage, leading to poor handling, steering vagueness, and knocking sounds.
Rust, particularly in areas with harsh winters and road salt, was a significant concern for many Taurus models of this era. Areas prone to rust included wheel wells, rocker panels, and the underside of the vehicle. Regular washing and undercoating could help mitigate this.
While there weren't widespread major recalls specifically for the 1986 model that stand out prominently, it's always advisable to check for any outstanding recalls with Ford. Long-term reliability concerns are generally tied to the aforementioned mechanical and electrical components. With diligent maintenance, especially regarding the transmission and cooling system, these vehicles can still offer dependable service, but they require proactive attention to potential issues.
How long will the 1986 Ford Taurus last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits, a well-maintained 1986 Ford Taurus can reasonably achieve between 150,000 and 200,000 miles, with some examples exceeding this. Long-term durability heavily depends on how the vehicle was cared for. Proactive maintenance, particularly on the transmission and cooling system, is crucial. Weaknesses that tend to emerge over time include aging suspension components, potential electrical issues, and susceptibility to rust if exposed to harsh climates. However, the fundamental engine and body structures were generally robust for their time, meaning that addressing wear-and-tear items can allow these cars to remain on the road for many years.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1986 Ford Taurus represented a significant step forward in automotive technology for its time, especially concerning safety and driver convenience. Standard safety features included driver and passenger airbags (a relatively new feature for mainstream vehicles then), power-assisted front disc brakes, and rear drum brakes. Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was an available, though not standard, option on higher trims or as part of specific packages, offering enhanced braking control. The vehicle's unibody construction was designed for improved structural integrity in a crash.
In terms of entertainment, the base models typically came with an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player as an upgrade or standard on higher trims like the LX. Higher-end optional sound systems offered improved audio quality and more features. Convenience features included power steering, intermittent windshield wipers, and remote mirrors.
Optional technology and comfort features were plentiful and aimed at enhancing the driving experience. These included air conditioning, power windows, power door locks, cruise control, and a rear window defroster. A tilt steering wheel was also a common option for improved driver ergonomics.
Regarding crash-test ratings, the Ford Taurus and its Mercury Sable sibling were lauded for their safety in their debut years. While specific official NHTSA ratings for the 1986 model year might not be readily available in the same detailed format as today, contemporary tests and reviews generally indicated strong performance for its class, particularly in frontal impact scenarios due to its advanced safety structures and the inclusion of airbags. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) also recognized the Taurus for its safety advancements during this period.
In terms of entertainment, the base models typically came with an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player as an upgrade or standard on higher trims like the LX. Higher-end optional sound systems offered improved audio quality and more features. Convenience features included power steering, intermittent windshield wipers, and remote mirrors.
Optional technology and comfort features were plentiful and aimed at enhancing the driving experience. These included air conditioning, power windows, power door locks, cruise control, and a rear window defroster. A tilt steering wheel was also a common option for improved driver ergonomics.
Regarding crash-test ratings, the Ford Taurus and its Mercury Sable sibling were lauded for their safety in their debut years. While specific official NHTSA ratings for the 1986 model year might not be readily available in the same detailed format as today, contemporary tests and reviews generally indicated strong performance for its class, particularly in frontal impact scenarios due to its advanced safety structures and the inclusion of airbags. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) also recognized the Taurus for its safety advancements during this period.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1986 Ford Taurus Prices and Market Value
When new in 1986, the Ford Taurus had a starting MSRP generally ranging from around $9,000 for base models to over $17,000 for the well-equipped LX and the sporty SHO variant. As a relatively modern classic, current used market prices for a 1986 Ford Taurus vary widely. Well-maintained examples, especially the SHO trim, can fetch anywhere from $3,000 to $8,000 or more, depending on condition, mileage, and originality. Common models in average condition might be found for $1,000 to $2,500. The Taurus experienced typical automotive depreciation after its initial years, but its status as a pioneering design and a popular car of its era helps stabilize and, in some cases, appreciate its value as a collector's item, particularly for well-preserved examples.
1986 Ford Taurus Cost of Ownership
The 1986 Ford Taurus is generally economical to own. Insurance costs are typically low, reflecting its age and market value. Fuel costs depend on the engine choice; the 4-cylinder and base V6 offer good mileage, making them efficient. Maintenance is generally straightforward and affordable, with parts readily available. However, repairs for common issues like transmission problems or electrical gremlins can add to costs. Overall, with regular maintenance and addressing issues promptly, the long-term ownership costs are considered modest, making it an economical choice for budget-conscious buyers, especially compared to more complex or luxury vehicles of its era.
1986 Ford Taurus Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1986 Ford Taurus Recalls & Defects
Steering:column Locking:anti-Theft Device
Recall date
1985-12-26
Recall no.
85v172000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Consequence
IF THE Car IS Left Unattended With THE KEY Removed and THE Ignition Switch NOT IN Lock Position, THE Car CAN BE Easily Stolen. Studies Have Shown That Stolen Cars ARE Frequently Involved IN Accidents.
Remedy
Ignition Lock Switch Cylinder Will BE Replaced.
Notes
System: Lock, Ignition System, Fmvss 114. Vehicle Description:passenger Car.description Defect:the Ignition KEY CAN BE Removed From THE Ignition Switch IN Positions Other Than THE Lock Positions.fmvss 114 Requires That When THE KEY IS Removed From THE Ignition Switch That Either THE Steering or Transmission BE Locked.removal OF THE KEY When NOT IN THE Lock Position Leaves THE Steering and Transmission IN THE Normal Operating Mode.
Visibility
Recall date
1986-03-10
Recall no.
86v039000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Right Quarter Windows MAY Contain Glass Which WAS Improperly Tempered. This Glass MAY Yield Pieces Larger Than THE Maximum Allowed BY Fmvss 205, Glazing Material. Consequence OF Defect: IN Case OF AN Accident These Large Pieces OF Glass MAY Seriously Injure THE Occupants OF THE Car.
Consequence
Remedy
Replace THE Quarter Windows Containing Date Code 5 AF.
Notes
System: Window Glazing/Fmvss 205. Vehicle Description: Station Wagons Equipped With 5 AF Date Code Right Side Tinted Quarter Window Glass.
Visibility:windshield Wiper/Washer:motor
Recall date
1987-02-19
Recall no.
87v017000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Road Salt Induced Erosion OF THE Wiper Motor Conductor Strips Could Cause Localized Thermal Stress Within THE Glass.
Consequence
Glass Could Fracture While Station Wagon IS Being Drivenor Parked, Creating A Risk OF Injury TO Occupants or Sudden Distraction TO Thedriver.
Remedy
Apply Sealant TO Conductor Strips and Protective Tape TO Lower Backlites.
Notes
System: Rear Window Wiper Motor.vehicle Description: Station Wagons Equipped With Optional Rear Window Wipermotors.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
1987-09-04
Recall no.
87v139000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Spring Lock Fuel Line Coupling MAY NOT BE Properly Engaged.
Consequence
Coupling Could Disengage DUE TO Fuel Pressure,vibration, and Engine Movements; This Would Cause Loss OF Fuel Which, Inpresence OF AN Ignition Source, Creates A Fire Risk.
Remedy
Install Retainer Clips Over THE Couplings TO Prevent Coupling Separation and Fuel Leakage.
Notes
System: Fuel Line Couplingvehicle Description: Passenger Cars and Light Trucks Equipped With Fuelinjection.
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:foundation Components:disc:rotor
Recall date
1991-08-06
Recall no.
91v134000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Front Disc Brake Rotors OF THE Subject Vehicles MAY Experience Severe Corrosion IF Operated IN Areas Where Calcium Chloride and Sodium Chloride ARE Used Extensively.
Consequence
Severely Corroded Rotors MAY Fracture or Separate Nearthe Inner Edges OF THE Brake Discs Resulting IN Reduced Braking Effectiveness,higher Than Normal Pedal Efforts, Loud Grinding Noises, and Moderate Pulls Whenthe Brakes ARE Applied. Reduced Braking Effectiveness MAY Increase Minimumstopping Distances, Possibly Resulting IN AN Accident.
Remedy
Replace Front Brake Rotors With Full Cast Front Brake Rotors.
Notes
System: Brakes.vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles Sold or Registered IN THE Following States: CT, IL, IN, ME, MA, MI, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, VT, and WI.
Wheels
Recall date
1992-05-11
Recall no.
92v065000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Children CAN Accidentally Lock Themselves IN THE Footwell Area OF THE Rear-Facing Third Seat, or IN THE Storage Compartment IN Station Wagons NOT Equipped With AN Optional Third Seat. Once THE Compartment IS Closed IT Cannot BE Opened From THE Inside.
Consequence
There IS A Danger OF AIR Deprivation, Hyperthermia,and/Or Panic Response TO A Child WHO HAS Locked Himself or Herself Into Thecompartment, With THE Possibility OF Asphyxiation.
Remedy
Replace THE Self-Latching Assembly Currently Used IN THE Rear Storage Compartment With A Latch Assembly That CAN Only BE Closed With A Key.
Notes
System: Structure: Storage Compartments.vehicle Description: Passenger Cars (Station Wagons).note: Ford Will Have Sufficient Quantities OF THE NEW Latch Assemblies Availableto Begin THE Replacement Recall IN July, 1992. Until THE Latch Assembly Isreplaced, Ford Recommends Owners Lock THE Storage Compartment When NOT IN Use.also, Ford Advises That THE Latch Striker CAN BE Removed TO Disable THE Currentlatch Until Revised Latch Assemblies ARE Available.
Structure:frame and Members
Recall date
1993-06-23
Recall no.
93v106000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Taurus and Sables Built From 10-14-85 Through 8-19-88, and Lincoln Continentals Built From 11-4-87 Through 9-30-88 (Except 1989 - 1991 2.5l Taurus and 1989 - 1992 Sho). THE Affected Cars Were Originally Sold or Currently Registered IN THE Following States: Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, NEW Hampshire, NEW Jersey, NEW York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin. THE Body Mounts AT THE Rear Corners OF THE Subframe, Which Supports THE Engine and Transmission, MAY Become Detached DUE TO Corrosion OF THE Subframe Mount Retaining Plate. This Would Allow THE Rear Corners OF THE Subframe TO Drop.
Consequence
IF ONE OF THE Rear Corners Drops, Only Minor Indications OF A Malfunction Such AS A Clunking Noise or Slight Change IN Steering Wheel Alignment ARE Noticeable. However, IF Both Rear Corners OF THE Subframe Drop, Steering Becomes Very Difficult, Which Could Adversely Affect Vehicle Control and Possibly Result IN AN Accident.
Remedy
Install A Corrosion-Resistant Reinforcing Plate and A NEW Bolt ON Both Rear Subframe Mounts. This Recall Campaign HAS Been Superseded BY Recall 98v-323.
Notes
This Recall Campaign HAS Been Superseded BY Recall 98v-323.
Suspension:front:shock Absorber
Recall date
1994-11-25
Recall no.
94e036000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE ARC Welds ON THE Sway BAR Bracket, Where IT Attaches TO THE Strut Reserve Tube, DID NOT Fuse Properly.
Consequence
Over Time, A Portion OF THE Bracket CAN Tear Away From THE Strut, Falling Into and Puncturing THE Tire or Causing Damage TO THE Wheel, Which Could Result IN AN Accident.
Remedy
Monroe Dealers Will Replace THE Strut Free OF Charge.
Notes
Equipment Description: Aftermarket Shock Absorbers FOR 1986 - 1994 Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable Passenger Cars; Part 71780, 81780.if THE Vehicle IS Presented TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and THE Remedy IS NOT Provided Free OF Charge Within A Reasonable Time or THE Remedy Does NOT Correct THE Defect, Please Contact Monroe AT 1-800-521-6754. Also, Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Structure:frame and Members
Recall date
1998-12-16
Recall no.
98v323000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles Originally Sold or Currently Registered IN Connecticut, Delaware, District OF Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, NEW Hampshire, NEW Jersey, NEW York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virgnia, and Wisconsin. THE Rear Lower Subframe Mount Plate NUT CAN Experience Stress Corrosion Cracking IF Subjected TO Long Term Exposure TO Road Salts. This CAN Result IN Fracture and Loss OF THE Structural Integrity OF THE Subframe Mount Attachment. Detachment OF THE Body Mounts AT THE Rear Corners OF THE Subframe, Which Supports THE Engine and Transmission, Allows THE Rear Corners OF THE Subframe TO Drop.
Consequence
IF Both Rear Corners Drop, Steering Would Become Suddenly Very Difficult, Affecting Vehicle Control and Increasing THE Risk OF A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install Subframe Rear Mount Bolts, Reinforcement Plates, and Plate Nuts.
Notes
Note:this Recall Campaign Supercedes Recall Campaign 93v-106.owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin January 18, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
1986 Ford Taurus Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1986 Ford Taurus Insurance
Insurance for a 1986 Ford Taurus is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sedan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1986 Ford Taurus Compare to Other Sedan?
The 1986 Ford Taurus entered a competitive mid-size sedan market. Its primary rivals included the Chevrolet Celebrity, Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera, Pontiac 6000, Chrysler LeBaron, and Japanese offerings like the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord.
In terms of performance, the Taurus, especially with its V6 engines, offered competitive power and handling for its class. The SHO variant was a standout, outperforming many rivals in sportiness. The Camry and Accord often offered smoother, quieter rides and more refined powertrains, while American competitors might have offered more aggressive styling or comfort-oriented suspensions.
Features were a strong point for the Taurus. It was considered a technological leader with its aerodynamic design, available airbags, and ABS. While Japanese rivals were known for build quality and reliability, the Taurus often offered more interior space and a more modern, European-inspired design. American competitors were often priced aggressively, but sometimes at the expense of perceived quality or advanced features.
Reliability was a mixed bag. While the Taurus was a sales success, it did face known issues, particularly with transmissions. The Toyota Camry and Honda Accord, in this era, were building their reputations for exceptional long-term reliability and fewer mechanical gremlins. Some American rivals also struggled with reliability compared to their Japanese counterparts.
In terms of price, the Taurus was competitively positioned. It offered a lot of car for the money, especially considering its safety features and modern design. Its pricing was generally in line with or slightly above American competitors and often undercut similarly equipped Japanese models.
Alternatives:
In terms of performance, the Taurus, especially with its V6 engines, offered competitive power and handling for its class. The SHO variant was a standout, outperforming many rivals in sportiness. The Camry and Accord often offered smoother, quieter rides and more refined powertrains, while American competitors might have offered more aggressive styling or comfort-oriented suspensions.
Features were a strong point for the Taurus. It was considered a technological leader with its aerodynamic design, available airbags, and ABS. While Japanese rivals were known for build quality and reliability, the Taurus often offered more interior space and a more modern, European-inspired design. American competitors were often priced aggressively, but sometimes at the expense of perceived quality or advanced features.
Reliability was a mixed bag. While the Taurus was a sales success, it did face known issues, particularly with transmissions. The Toyota Camry and Honda Accord, in this era, were building their reputations for exceptional long-term reliability and fewer mechanical gremlins. Some American rivals also struggled with reliability compared to their Japanese counterparts.
In terms of price, the Taurus was competitively positioned. It offered a lot of car for the money, especially considering its safety features and modern design. Its pricing was generally in line with or slightly above American competitors and often undercut similarly equipped Japanese models.
Alternatives:
- For superior reliability: The 1986 Toyota Camry or Honda Accord would be excellent choices, offering robust engineering and fewer common issues, though potentially with less interior space or a more utilitarian design.
- For a more traditional American comfort ride: The Buick Century or Chevrolet Celebrity offered a softer experience, though likely with less sophisticated handling and fewer advanced features.
- For a sportier feel without the SHO premium: Some buyers might consider older, rear-wheel-drive models like a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro if pure driving engagement was the priority, though these are different vehicle types.
Final Verdict: Is the 1986 Ford Taurus a Good Sedan?
The 1986 Ford Taurus is ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a capable and stylish sedan from the mid-80s, particularly those who appreciate its historical significance as a revolutionary design for Ford. It's worth buying for enthusiasts who value its aerodynamic aesthetics, or for those needing a dependable, economical daily driver if a well-maintained example is found. Given its age, buying new is impossible. When purchasing used, focus on examples with documented maintenance, especially concerning the transmission and cooling system. The LX trim offers a good balance of comfort and features, while the SHO is a collector's item for performance enthusiasts. It's a solid choice if procured at a fair price and with a thorough pre-purchase inspection, acknowledging its potential for age-related maintenance.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.