The 2009 Freightliner M2 106 is a highly versatile medium-duty conventional truck, a core model in Freightliner's M2 line, which began production in the early 2000s. Known for its adaptability, it features a "set-back axle" body style, optimizing maneuverability. Popular for vocational applications like delivery, refuse, utility, and construction, it stands out for its robust chassis and customizable configurations, catering to a wide range of industry needs. New pricing varied greatly based on configuration, but typically started in the $50,000-$80,000 range for a basic chassis cab.
The Good
The 2009 M2 106 offers robust performance and proven reliability, making it a practical workhorse. Its customizable design and comfortable cab appeal to drivers, enhancing long-haul well-being. Good fuel efficiency for its class, combined with strong residual value, provides excellent long-term economy. It's a dependable partner that instills confidence in any demanding job.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 2009 Freightliner M2 106 include common issues with DPF systems from this era due to stricter emissions, which can lead to costly repairs. Rust can be a concern on chassis components, especially in harsh climates. Interior plastics might show wear over time, affecting long-term comfort and aesthetics.
2009 Freightliner M2 106: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2009 M2 106 typically offered a range of robust diesel engines from Detroit Diesel, Cummins, and Mercedes-Benz (before Daimler fully phased out the MBE engines in North America). Common options included:
- Detroit Diesel MBE 900 Series: Available in various displacements (e.g., 6.4L, 7.2L) and power outputs.
- Cummins ISB/ISC Series: The Cummins ISB 6.7L was a popular choice, known for its balance of power and efficiency, while the ISC offered higher performance.
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings varied significantly based on the chosen engine and tuning. They generally ranged from approximately 185 hp for lighter duty configurations up to around 350 hp for heavier vocational applications, with torque figures often exceeding 1000 lb-ft for larger engines.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy is highly dependent on the engine, load, body type, and driving conditions. As a medium-duty truck, figures could range from 6 to 10 miles per gallon (MPG), with efficient driving and lighter loads leaning towards the higher end. Vocational trucks with PTOs or constant idling would see lower figures.
- 0-60 Times: The 0-60 mph acceleration time is not a primary performance metric for medium-duty vocational trucks like the M2 106. These vehicles are designed for hauling and durability, not speed. A laden M2 106 would typically achieve 0-60 mph in the range of 25-40 seconds, varying wildly based on GVWR, engine, and transmission.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity is immense and highly customizable. The M2 106 is built for heavy-duty work. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) could range from 26,000 lbs to over 33,000 lbs, with a Gross Combined Weight Rating (GCWR) often exceeding 50,000 lbs when properly equipped as a tractor.
- Trim-Level Features: The M2 106 isn't marketed with "trim levels" in the passenger car sense but rather customizable configurations. Core features included a durable steel or aluminum cab, air conditioning, power steering, and air brakes. Optional features were extensive and included:
- Various axle configurations (e.g., single or tandem rear axles)
- Multiple wheelbase options
- Different suspension types (air ride, spring)
- Pneumatic seats for driver and passenger comfort
- Advanced gauge packages
- PTO (Power Take-Off) options for specialized equipment
- Upgraded interior materials, sound systems, and storage compartments
- Chrome exterior accents and aerodynamic packages.
2009 Freightliner M2 106 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2009 |
| Make | Freightliner |
| Model | M2 106 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | MT. HOLLY |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 7.2-L L-6 Diesel |
| Engine Size | 7.2L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2009 Freightliner M2 106 Have?
For the 2009 Freightliner M2 106, many frequently reported problems stem from the early implementation of EPA 2007 emissions standards, particularly concerning the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) and regeneration systems. Owners often experienced issues with clogged DPFs, frequent "regen" cycles, and sensor failures within the emissions system, leading to reduced power, diagnostic trouble codes, and costly repairs or replacements. These systems required meticulous maintenance and often experienced failures if not properly cared for or if the truck was used for short-haul, low-speed applications not conducive to proper DPF regeneration.
Beyond emissions, other long-term reliability concerns include electrical system gremlins, such as issues with wiring harnesses, body control modules, and various sensor failures (e.g., ABS sensors, oil pressure sensors). Air conditioning system components, like compressors and lines, can also be prone to failure over time, especially in high-usage scenarios. Suspension components, particularly bushings and air springs, require regular inspection and replacement, especially for trucks operating under heavy loads or on rough terrain. Brake system components, while robust, will naturally require periodic maintenance and replacement.
Corrosion on chassis components, frame rails, and cab mounts is another common issue, particularly in regions with road salt or high humidity, which can compromise structural integrity if left unchecked. While specific recalls for the 2009 model year would require checking NHTSA's database, common themes for Freightliner trucks of this era included potential issues with steering components, brake lines, and electrical connections that could lead to intermittent power loss or component malfunction. Owners should always verify if any open recalls exist for a specific VIN before purchase. Overall, while the M2 106 is a durable platform, its 2009 iteration reflects a challenging period for diesel emissions technology, which often translates into higher maintenance demands for the emissions-related components.
Beyond emissions, other long-term reliability concerns include electrical system gremlins, such as issues with wiring harnesses, body control modules, and various sensor failures (e.g., ABS sensors, oil pressure sensors). Air conditioning system components, like compressors and lines, can also be prone to failure over time, especially in high-usage scenarios. Suspension components, particularly bushings and air springs, require regular inspection and replacement, especially for trucks operating under heavy loads or on rough terrain. Brake system components, while robust, will naturally require periodic maintenance and replacement.
Corrosion on chassis components, frame rails, and cab mounts is another common issue, particularly in regions with road salt or high humidity, which can compromise structural integrity if left unchecked. While specific recalls for the 2009 model year would require checking NHTSA's database, common themes for Freightliner trucks of this era included potential issues with steering components, brake lines, and electrical connections that could lead to intermittent power loss or component malfunction. Owners should always verify if any open recalls exist for a specific VIN before purchase. Overall, while the M2 106 is a durable platform, its 2009 iteration reflects a challenging period for diesel emissions technology, which often translates into higher maintenance demands for the emissions-related components.
How long will the 2009 Freightliner M2 106 last?
The 2009 Freightliner M2 106, with diligent maintenance, can easily achieve 500,000 to 700,000 miles, and often more, serving 15-20 years in many fleets. Some well-maintained units have even surpassed a million miles. Its core components – the chassis, cab structure, and drivetrain (engines and transmissions, especially Cummins and Allison) – are built for long-term durability. However, long-term weaknesses frequently emerge in the emissions control system (DPF, EGR), which can require significant investment post-300,000 miles. Electrical issues, corrosion in severe climates, and wear on suspension components are also common over time. Proactive fluid changes, emissions system care, and addressing rust early are crucial for maximizing its operational lifespan and minimizing expensive downtime.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
As a 2009 medium-duty vocational truck, the Freightliner M2 106 was built primarily for utility and ruggedness rather than advanced consumer-grade technology. Built-in tech was rudimentary by today's standards but functional for its purpose. Standard features typically included an AM/FM radio, basic instrumentation displays for critical vehicle functions (speedometer, tachometer, fuel, temperature, air pressure), and standard air conditioning/heating controls. Some models might have included a simple CD player.
Optional entertainment features were limited to upgrades like more robust sound systems or provisions for CB radios. Connectivity was not a significant factor beyond basic auxiliary inputs if specified. Driver-assistance features, in the modern sense, were largely absent. Advanced systems like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, or automatic emergency braking were not common in this class of vehicle at that time. Instead, "driver-assistance" was inherent in the design: excellent visibility from the large windshield and door windows, robust power steering for ease of maneuvering, and responsive air brakes.
Safety features were primarily passive and fundamental. These included:
Optional entertainment features were limited to upgrades like more robust sound systems or provisions for CB radios. Connectivity was not a significant factor beyond basic auxiliary inputs if specified. Driver-assistance features, in the modern sense, were largely absent. Advanced systems like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, or automatic emergency braking were not common in this class of vehicle at that time. Instead, "driver-assistance" was inherent in the design: excellent visibility from the large windshield and door windows, robust power steering for ease of maneuvering, and responsive air brakes.
Safety features were primarily passive and fundamental. These included:
- Anti-lock Braking System (ABS): Standard on most medium-duty trucks, providing better control during emergency braking.
- Traction Control: Often available, especially on models equipped with higher horsepower or for specific applications, to help prevent wheel spin.
- Driver and Passenger Airbags: Generally not standard in this class and year; safety largely relied on the robust cab structure and seatbelts.
- Seatbelts: Three-point seatbelts were standard for occupants.
- Steel Cab Construction: Providing a strong protective shell for occupants.
- Daytime Running Lights: Common for improved visibility.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2009 Freightliner M2 106 Prices and Market Value
When new, a 2009 Freightliner M2 106 chassis cab could range from approximately $50,000 to $80,000, but with vocational bodies (e.g., dump, reefer, utility), prices often soared well over $100,000, sometimes reaching $150,000+. Today, the used market prices vary wildly based on mileage, condition, engine, transmission, and most critically, the type and condition of the mounted body. You might find a well-used chassis cab for $15,000-$30,000, while specialized units in good shape could still command $40,000-$70,000+. Depreciation is significant initially, but then plateaus due to their workhorse nature. Factors affecting resale value include the operational condition of the engine and emissions system, absence of significant rust, an Allison automatic transmission often adding value, and the functionality and remaining life of the specific vocational body.
2009 Freightliner M2 106 Cost of Ownership
Long-term ownership of a 2009 Freightliner M2 106 can be costly. Insurance varies significantly by use case (commercial vs. private) and cargo, generally being higher than for light-duty vehicles. Fuel costs are substantial, given its diesel engine and lower MPG (6-10 MPG), especially with fluctuating diesel prices. Maintenance is critical and includes expensive items like oil changes (large capacities), tire replacements, and brake services. Repairs, particularly for the DPF/emissions system or major drivetrain components, can easily run into thousands of dollars. While its upfront purchase might seem economical used, the ongoing operational expenses and potential for high repair bills mean it's a costly vehicle to own, requiring a strong operational budget.
2009 Freightliner M2 106 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2009 Freightliner M2 106 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2009 Freightliner M2 106 Insurance
Insurance for a 2009 Freightliner M2 106 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2009 Freightliner M2 106 Compare to Other Truck?
The 2009 Freightliner M2 106 competes in the highly competitive medium-duty truck segment, often stacked against rivals like the Hino 268/338, Isuzu F-Series (e.g., FVR), International Durastar (later MV Series), and Kenworth T270/T370. Each offers a unique blend of attributes.
Performance: The M2 106, with its Cummins ISB/ISC or Detroit Diesel MBE 900 engine options, offers comparable performance to its rivals. Hino and Isuzu often emphasize fuel efficiency and maneuverability, particularly in urban environments, with their own proprietary engines. International Durastars, particularly with Cummins engines, matched the M2's power output. Kenworth's T270/T370, being a more premium offering, often shared similar engine choices but might have offered slightly better ride quality.
Features: Feature-wise, these trucks are all highly customizable. The M2 106 excels in its sheer breadth of available configurations and body upfitting ease. Isuzu and Hino typically feature cab-over designs, offering superior visibility and tighter turning radii for congested areas, but less engine access. The International Durastar offered similar conventional cab flexibility. Kenworth often provided a more refined interior and perceived higher build quality.
Reliability: Reliability in this era is a mixed bag for all brands, largely due to the challenging EPA 2007 emissions systems. All manufacturers struggled with DPF and EGR issues. Cummins engines, available in many of these trucks including the M2, often had a good reputation, though their emissions systems could still be problematic. Hino and Isuzu sometimes had a slight edge in powertrain longevity for their specific applications, but overall, diligent maintenance was the key differentiator for any brand. Corrosion protection could be better on some Japanese imports.
Price: New, the M2 106 was competitively priced, often offering strong value due to its configurability. Used, its prices remain competitive, largely dictated by mileage, condition, and body type. Hino and Isuzu tend to hold strong resale values due to their reputation for urban efficiency and durability. Kenworth models typically commanded a premium new and used. International Durastars were often priced similarly to the M2 106.
Alternatives: For someone prioritizing urban maneuverability and potentially better fuel economy for lighter loads, a Hino 268 or Isuzu FVR might be a better alternative. For those needing a comparable all-around workhorse with extensive customization options, the International Durastar is a very similar alternative. If a more premium experience and slightly better build quality are desired, a Kenworth T270/T370 would be a strong, albeit potentially pricier, choice.
Performance: The M2 106, with its Cummins ISB/ISC or Detroit Diesel MBE 900 engine options, offers comparable performance to its rivals. Hino and Isuzu often emphasize fuel efficiency and maneuverability, particularly in urban environments, with their own proprietary engines. International Durastars, particularly with Cummins engines, matched the M2's power output. Kenworth's T270/T370, being a more premium offering, often shared similar engine choices but might have offered slightly better ride quality.
Features: Feature-wise, these trucks are all highly customizable. The M2 106 excels in its sheer breadth of available configurations and body upfitting ease. Isuzu and Hino typically feature cab-over designs, offering superior visibility and tighter turning radii for congested areas, but less engine access. The International Durastar offered similar conventional cab flexibility. Kenworth often provided a more refined interior and perceived higher build quality.
Reliability: Reliability in this era is a mixed bag for all brands, largely due to the challenging EPA 2007 emissions systems. All manufacturers struggled with DPF and EGR issues. Cummins engines, available in many of these trucks including the M2, often had a good reputation, though their emissions systems could still be problematic. Hino and Isuzu sometimes had a slight edge in powertrain longevity for their specific applications, but overall, diligent maintenance was the key differentiator for any brand. Corrosion protection could be better on some Japanese imports.
Price: New, the M2 106 was competitively priced, often offering strong value due to its configurability. Used, its prices remain competitive, largely dictated by mileage, condition, and body type. Hino and Isuzu tend to hold strong resale values due to their reputation for urban efficiency and durability. Kenworth models typically commanded a premium new and used. International Durastars were often priced similarly to the M2 106.
Alternatives: For someone prioritizing urban maneuverability and potentially better fuel economy for lighter loads, a Hino 268 or Isuzu FVR might be a better alternative. For those needing a comparable all-around workhorse with extensive customization options, the International Durastar is a very similar alternative. If a more premium experience and slightly better build quality are desired, a Kenworth T270/T370 would be a strong, albeit potentially pricier, choice.
Final Verdict: Is the 2009 Freightliner M2 106 a Good Truck?
The 2009 Freightliner M2 106 is ideal for businesses or individuals needing a versatile, robust medium-duty truck for vocational tasks such as local delivery, utility work, refuse collection, or as a tractor for moderate loads. It's a workhorse built for functionality and customization.
Is it worth buying? Yes, but with significant caveats, especially as a used vehicle. It's crucial to buy a used M2 106 that has a documented maintenance history, particularly regarding its DPF and emissions system. A pre-purchase inspection by a diesel mechanic familiar with Freightliner is non-negotiable. Look for models with a Cummins engine and an Allison automatic transmission for maximum reliability and ease of use. Avoid units with severe rust or neglected emissions systems unless you factor in substantial repair costs.
It's a sensible choice for those who understand the higher operational costs of a medium-duty diesel, especially from this emissions era, and who can commit to diligent preventative maintenance. It offers excellent value as a used work truck if found in good condition, proving its worth over many years of service.
Is it worth buying? Yes, but with significant caveats, especially as a used vehicle. It's crucial to buy a used M2 106 that has a documented maintenance history, particularly regarding its DPF and emissions system. A pre-purchase inspection by a diesel mechanic familiar with Freightliner is non-negotiable. Look for models with a Cummins engine and an Allison automatic transmission for maximum reliability and ease of use. Avoid units with severe rust or neglected emissions systems unless you factor in substantial repair costs.
It's a sensible choice for those who understand the higher operational costs of a medium-duty diesel, especially from this emissions era, and who can commit to diligent preventative maintenance. It offers excellent value as a used work truck if found in good condition, proving its worth over many years of service.
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.