The 2013 Freightliner M2 106 is a highly versatile medium-duty commercial truck, part of Freightliner's M2 series launched in the early 2000s. Known for its 'set-back axle' configuration, it's available as a chassis cab for various applications like box trucks, utility vehicles, refuse haulers, and tow trucks. Its popularity stems from its robust build, adaptability, and the wide range of available powertrains, making it a workhorse for many industries. New pricing typically ranged from $60,000 to over $120,000, depending on configuration.
The Good
The 2013 M2 106 offers robust reliability through proven Cummins engines and a durable chassis, appealing to practical buyers seeking uptime and low total cost of ownership. Its customizable design and comfortable, driver-focused cabin foster loyalty. Excellent maneuverability and strong resale value make it a smart, dependable investment for businesses.
The Bad
Common weaknesses include potential issues with the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems due to their complexity. The ride quality can be firm when unloaded, and some interior plastics may feel basic. Electrical gremlins and sensor failures have also been reported, especially with age.
2013 Freightliner M2 106: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2013 Freightliner M2 106 offered a range of reputable diesel engines, primarily from Cummins and Detroit Diesel. Common options included:
- Cummins ISB6.7: A popular choice for lighter-duty applications, known for its balance of power and efficiency.
- Cummins ISC8.3: Offering more power for heavier vocational tasks.
- Detroit DD Series (e.g., DD5, DD8 for later models, though 2013 largely featured Cummins): Designed for reliability and fuel economy.
- Horsepower: Horsepower ratings varied significantly based on the chosen engine and its tuning, generally ranging from around 200 hp for the ISB6.7 to over 300 hp for the ISC8.3, providing ample power for most medium-duty applications.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy is highly dependent on the engine, load, driving conditions, and body configuration. Owners can typically expect anywhere from 6 to 10 MPG. Specific metrics often focus on gallons per hour (GPH) during heavy-duty operations or idling.
- 0-60 Times: As a medium-duty commercial truck, 0-60 mph acceleration times are not a relevant performance metric and are generally not published. These vehicles are engineered for torque and hauling capability, not rapid acceleration.
- Towing/Hauling Capacity: The M2 106 is a chassis-cab design, meaning its 'towing' or 'hauling' capacity is primarily defined by its Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) and Gross Combined Weight Rating (GCWR). GVWR typically ranged from 26,000 lbs to 33,000 lbs, with GCWR often extending beyond 50,000 lbs when properly equipped as a tractor or heavy hauler.
- Trim-Level Features: The M2 106 is a work truck, so features focus on utility and durability. Trim levels are often less about 'luxury' and more about cab configuration and chassis options:
- Standard Cab: Basic vinyl or cloth seating, manual windows/locks (power optional), AM/FM radio, basic instrumentation. Designed for robust daily use.
- Extended/Crew Cab: Offered for applications requiring extra seating. These often come with slightly upgraded interior finishes, more storage, and potentially better sound insulation.
- Vocational Packages: Specific packages for applications like refuse, utility, or delivery may include reinforced frames, specialized PTOs, enhanced electrical systems, and application-specific controls.
- Comfort & Convenience Options: Air conditioning was standard, with options like air-ride driver's seat, cruise control, power mirrors, and upgraded audio systems for driver comfort during long shifts.
2013 Freightliner M2 106 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2013 |
| Make | Freightliner |
| Model | M2 106 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | MT. HOLLY |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 8.3-L L-6 Diesel |
| Engine Size | 8.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | 6x4 |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2013 Freightliner M2 106 Have?
The 2013 Freightliner M2 106, while a dependable workhorse, is not immune to common issues prevalent in commercial vehicles of its era, particularly those related to emissions systems. Frequently reported problems often center around the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems. Owners commonly experience DPF regen issues, leading to reduced power (limp mode) and costly forced regenerations or component replacements. Similarly, DEF (Diesel Exhaust Fluid) system components, such as the DEF pump, injectors, or sensors, can fail, triggering warning lights and derating the engine.
Electrical problems are another area of concern, ranging from faulty sensors (e.g., NOx sensors, engine position sensors) to wiring harness corrosion or loose connections causing intermittent dashboard warnings, power issues, or accessory malfunctions. These can be particularly frustrating to diagnose. Some owners have also reported issues with turbochargers, particularly with the variable geometry turbo (VGT) components becoming sticky or failing.
Regarding recalls for the 2013 model year M2 106, typical issues addressed by the manufacturer might include brake system components, steering linkage, seat belt defects, or specific engine-related sensor issues that could lead to engine stalls or emissions non-compliance. It's crucial for owners to check the NHTSA database using their specific VIN for any outstanding recalls. Over the long term, common wear items like air suspension components, brakes, and kingpins require regular maintenance. While the chassis and major driveline components are robust, the complexity of modern emissions control systems and electrical systems remain the primary long-term reliability concerns, often leading to significant repair costs as the vehicle ages and accumulates mileage.
Electrical problems are another area of concern, ranging from faulty sensors (e.g., NOx sensors, engine position sensors) to wiring harness corrosion or loose connections causing intermittent dashboard warnings, power issues, or accessory malfunctions. These can be particularly frustrating to diagnose. Some owners have also reported issues with turbochargers, particularly with the variable geometry turbo (VGT) components becoming sticky or failing.
Regarding recalls for the 2013 model year M2 106, typical issues addressed by the manufacturer might include brake system components, steering linkage, seat belt defects, or specific engine-related sensor issues that could lead to engine stalls or emissions non-compliance. It's crucial for owners to check the NHTSA database using their specific VIN for any outstanding recalls. Over the long term, common wear items like air suspension components, brakes, and kingpins require regular maintenance. While the chassis and major driveline components are robust, the complexity of modern emissions control systems and electrical systems remain the primary long-term reliability concerns, often leading to significant repair costs as the vehicle ages and accumulates mileage.
How long will the 2013 Freightliner M2 106 last?
With diligent maintenance, a 2013 Freightliner M2 106 can easily achieve 300,000 to 500,000 miles, with some well-maintained units exceeding 750,000 miles or more in certain applications. In terms of years, a service life of 10 to 15 years is common. Its long-term durability primarily rests on the robust Cummins engines and heavy-duty chassis. However, as it ages, the emissions control systems (DPF, DEF) become primary weaknesses, requiring costly replacements or frequent maintenance. Electrical components and minor cabin fixtures may also degrade, but the core mechanicals generally hold up very well with proper preventative care.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2013 Freightliner M2 106, being a commercial work vehicle of its time, featured technology focused on functionality and basic driver needs rather than advanced creature comforts or cutting-edge driver assistance.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically included a basic AM/FM radio, often with CD player functionality. Bluetooth connectivity was an optional upgrade, allowing for hands-free calling. The instrument cluster was analog, providing essential readouts for speed, RPM, fuel, and air pressure, often complemented by a small digital display for odometer, trip information, and diagnostic codes. Auxiliary power outlets (12V) were standard for charging devices.
Driver-Assistance Features: In 2013, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) were largely absent in medium-duty commercial trucks. Features like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, or collision mitigation were not standard or typically available. Drivers relied on excellent visibility from the large windshield and mirrors, and the truck's inherent maneuverability for navigation.
Safety Features: Core safety features were robust, primarily focusing on passive safety and braking performance.
Optional Safety Features: Depending on the specific build, options might include additional mirrors for improved blind-spot visibility, backup cameras (often aftermarket or fleet-installed), and possibly some rudimentary stability control systems.
Crash-Test Ratings: It is important to note that medium-duty commercial trucks like the Freightliner M2 106 are not subjected to the same standardized crash-test ratings (e.g., NHTSA or IIHS) as passenger vehicles. Their robust construction and intended use in various vocational applications mean safety is assessed through adherence to commercial vehicle safety standards and design principles for heavy-duty applications.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically included a basic AM/FM radio, often with CD player functionality. Bluetooth connectivity was an optional upgrade, allowing for hands-free calling. The instrument cluster was analog, providing essential readouts for speed, RPM, fuel, and air pressure, often complemented by a small digital display for odometer, trip information, and diagnostic codes. Auxiliary power outlets (12V) were standard for charging devices.
Driver-Assistance Features: In 2013, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) were largely absent in medium-duty commercial trucks. Features like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, or collision mitigation were not standard or typically available. Drivers relied on excellent visibility from the large windshield and mirrors, and the truck's inherent maneuverability for navigation.
Safety Features: Core safety features were robust, primarily focusing on passive safety and braking performance.
- Air Brakes: Standard on most configurations, providing reliable stopping power.
- Anti-lock Braking System (ABS): A crucial safety feature for maintaining steering control during hard braking.
- Traction Control: Often available to help prevent wheel spin on slippery surfaces.
- Daytime Running Lights (DRL): To improve visibility to other drivers.
- Heavy-Duty Frame and Cab Construction: Designed to withstand the rigors of commercial use and offer protection in the event of an impact.
Optional Safety Features: Depending on the specific build, options might include additional mirrors for improved blind-spot visibility, backup cameras (often aftermarket or fleet-installed), and possibly some rudimentary stability control systems.
Crash-Test Ratings: It is important to note that medium-duty commercial trucks like the Freightliner M2 106 are not subjected to the same standardized crash-test ratings (e.g., NHTSA or IIHS) as passenger vehicles. Their robust construction and intended use in various vocational applications mean safety is assessed through adherence to commercial vehicle safety standards and design principles for heavy-duty applications.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Fleet White
Jet Black
Freightliner Red
Commercial Blue
Metallic Silver
Interior Colors
Standard Grey
Interior Black
2013 Freightliner M2 106 Prices and Market Value
When new in 2013, a Freightliner M2 106 chassis cab typically ranged from $60,000 for a basic configuration to well over $120,000 for specialized vocational setups with advanced bodies. Today, used market prices for a 2013 model vary significantly, generally falling between $15,000 and $50,000, depending heavily on mileage, condition, engine, and the specific upfit/body. Depreciation is substantial in the initial years, but these trucks hold value well over the long term due to their utility. Factors affecting resale include engine type (Cummins generally favored), maintenance history, emissions system health, remaining tire life, and the condition/type of the installed body (e.g., reefer vs. flatbed). High mileage with poor maintenance severely impacts value, while a clean, well-maintained vocational unit can command premium pricing.
2013 Freightliner M2 106 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2013 Freightliner M2 106 involves significant operating costs. Insurance premiums are substantial due to its commercial nature and high replacement value. Fuel costs are a major expense, with diesel prices and consumption (6-10 MPG) adding up quickly for daily operations. Maintenance, including oil changes, tire rotations, and brake inspections, is frequent and critical. Repairs, especially for complex emissions systems (DPF/DEF) or engine issues, can be very costly, often thousands of dollars. While economical for its purpose compared to heavier trucks, it is a costly vehicle to own compared to passenger cars, demanding a robust operational budget for parts, labor, and downtime.
2013 Freightliner M2 106 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Diesel
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2013 Freightliner M2 106 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2013 Freightliner M2 106 Insurance
Insurance for a 2013 Freightliner M2 106 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2013 Freightliner M2 106 Compare to Other Truck?
The 2013 Freightliner M2 106 competes in the fiercely contested medium-duty segment against rivals like the International Durastar, Hino 268, Isuzu F-Series, and Kenworth T270/T370.
Performance: The M2 106 with its Cummins ISB or ISC engines offers comparable performance to its rivals, providing ample torque for vocational tasks. International's Durastar, often with Navistar engines (though Cummins options were available), had mixed reliability perceptions around its engines at the time. Hino and Isuzu models typically featured their own well-regarded, often smaller displacement, engines known for efficiency. Kenworth T270/T370, as premium alternatives, also relied on Cummins power, often offering a slightly more refined driving experience.
Features: All these trucks offered similar basic commercial features: air brakes, heavy-duty chassis, and a range of cab configurations. The M2 106 stood out for its 'Driver's First' design philosophy, offering decent visibility and ergonomics. Hino and Isuzu were often praised for their excellent maneuverability and visibility in urban settings due to cab-over designs. Kenworth often provided a more 'trucker-friendly' cabin with better materials and amenities, though at a higher price point.
Reliability: The M2 106's reliability is strong for its core mechanicals, particularly with Cummins engines, but emissions systems posed challenges across the board for all manufacturers in this era. Hino and Isuzu often garnered strong reputations for their engine reliability. International's reliability perceptions were more varied in the early 2010s. Kenworth, backed by PACCAR, generally had a good reliability record.
Price: New, the M2 106 was competitively priced, offering great value for its versatility. Hino and Isuzu often presented slightly lower entry-level prices, while Kenworth consistently commanded a premium due to its brand image and perceived quality. In the used market, pricing parity is largely dictated by condition, mileage, and specific upfit.
Recommendations: The 2013 Freightliner M2 106 remains a strong contender. For similar versatility and parts availability, consider a 2013 International Durastar, preferably with a Cummins engine option. For urban maneuverability and proven engine reliability, a Hino 268 or Isuzu F-Series are excellent alternatives. If budget allows for a slightly more premium experience, a Kenworth T270/T370 from the same year offers similar Cummins dependability with enhanced interior comfort.
Performance: The M2 106 with its Cummins ISB or ISC engines offers comparable performance to its rivals, providing ample torque for vocational tasks. International's Durastar, often with Navistar engines (though Cummins options were available), had mixed reliability perceptions around its engines at the time. Hino and Isuzu models typically featured their own well-regarded, often smaller displacement, engines known for efficiency. Kenworth T270/T370, as premium alternatives, also relied on Cummins power, often offering a slightly more refined driving experience.
Features: All these trucks offered similar basic commercial features: air brakes, heavy-duty chassis, and a range of cab configurations. The M2 106 stood out for its 'Driver's First' design philosophy, offering decent visibility and ergonomics. Hino and Isuzu were often praised for their excellent maneuverability and visibility in urban settings due to cab-over designs. Kenworth often provided a more 'trucker-friendly' cabin with better materials and amenities, though at a higher price point.
Reliability: The M2 106's reliability is strong for its core mechanicals, particularly with Cummins engines, but emissions systems posed challenges across the board for all manufacturers in this era. Hino and Isuzu often garnered strong reputations for their engine reliability. International's reliability perceptions were more varied in the early 2010s. Kenworth, backed by PACCAR, generally had a good reliability record.
Price: New, the M2 106 was competitively priced, offering great value for its versatility. Hino and Isuzu often presented slightly lower entry-level prices, while Kenworth consistently commanded a premium due to its brand image and perceived quality. In the used market, pricing parity is largely dictated by condition, mileage, and specific upfit.
Recommendations: The 2013 Freightliner M2 106 remains a strong contender. For similar versatility and parts availability, consider a 2013 International Durastar, preferably with a Cummins engine option. For urban maneuverability and proven engine reliability, a Hino 268 or Isuzu F-Series are excellent alternatives. If budget allows for a slightly more premium experience, a Kenworth T270/T370 from the same year offers similar Cummins dependability with enhanced interior comfort.
Final Verdict: Is the 2013 Freightliner M2 106 a Good Truck?
The 2013 Freightliner M2 106 is ideal for businesses requiring a versatile, dependable medium-duty work truck for diverse applications like local delivery, construction, refuse, or utility services. It's particularly suited for fleets that value a robust chassis and a wide range of engine options. Buying a used 2013 M2 106 can be an excellent value proposition, especially if it has a documented maintenance history and the emissions systems have been well cared for or recently serviced. It's definitely worth buying if you find a well-maintained unit, ideally with a proven Cummins engine, and are prepared for potential higher long-term repair costs related to emissions components. Thorough pre-purchase inspections are crucial, focusing on DPF/DEF systems and overall drivetrain health, making it a smart, cost-effective choice for a commercial fleet or owner-operator on a budget.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.