1999 Ford E-250 Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs

The Good

The 1999 Ford E-250 offers robust advantages, primarily its "get-it-done" workhorse reliability and powerful V8/V10 engine options, delivering exceptional towing and hauling performance. Its spacious, utilitarian design appeals to practical buyers needing vast cargo room. While not comfort-oriented, its simple, durable construction ensures longevity and readily available, affordable parts, representing strong long-term value and peace of mind for business owners and DIY enthusiasts alike.

The Bad

Known weaknesses of the 1999 Ford E-250 include notoriously poor fuel economy, cumbersome handling typical of a large truck-based van, and a very basic, unrefined interior. Rust can be a significant concern, especially on the body and frame in salt-prone regions. Watch out for potential braking system wear due to heavy loads and common steering component issues like worn tie rods or ball joints.

1999 Ford E-250: Quick Overview

The 1999 Ford E-250 offered a range of robust powertrains to suit various commercial and heavy-duty needs. Key specifications include:

• Engine Options: The lineup featured a 4.2-liter OHV V6, a 4.6-liter SOHC Triton V8, a more powerful 5.4-liter SOHC Triton V8, and for maximum capability, a 6.8-liter SOHC Triton V10. A highly sought-after option was the legendary 7.3-liter OHV Power Stroke Turbodiesel V8.
• Horsepower: Horsepower figures varied by engine: the 4.2L V6 produced approximately 205 hp, the 4.6L V8 around 220 hp, the 5.4L V8 about 255 hp, the 6.8L V10 roughly 265 hp, and the 7.3L Power Stroke diesel was rated at approximately 215 hp and significantly higher torque.
• Fuel Economy: Given its size and purpose, fuel economy was not a strong suit. Owners typically reported combined figures ranging from 10-15 MPG for gasoline engines, with the V10 and diesel variants often seeing similar or slightly better figures depending on load and driving conditions, though official EPA ratings were rarely provided for these commercial vehicles.
• 0-60 MPH Times: Performance in acceleration was utilitarian, with 0-60 mph times generally ranging from 10 to 15 seconds, heavily dependent on the engine choice and the vehicle's loaded weight. These vans were built for hauling, not drag racing.
• Towing Capacity: A major highlight, the E-250 boasted substantial towing capabilities, typically ranging from 7,000 pounds up to 10,000 pounds or more when properly equipped with the larger V8 or V10 engines, making it ideal for trailers and heavy equipment.
• Trim-Level Features: The E-250 primarily focused on function. Standard features on the base cargo van (often designated XL) included vinyl seating, an AM/FM stereo, manual windows, and basic instrumentation. Stepping up to more equipped cargo or passenger configurations (like the XLT) could add amenities such as cloth upholstery, air conditioning, power windows and door locks, cruise control, a tilt steering column, and a slightly upgraded audio system. However, luxury was never the E-250's aim; practicality and durability were paramount across all trims.

1999 Ford E-250 Specifications

Vehicle History Report

What Problems Does the 1999 Ford E-250 Have?

The 1999 Ford E-250, while a durable workhorse, has several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns that owners should be aware of. Many issues stem from its heavy-duty usage and age.

• Engine Issues: The Triton V8 and V10 gasoline engines, particularly the 5.4L, are known for issues like spark plug ejection or stripped threads in the aluminum cylinder heads, though this became more widespread in later model years. Exhaust manifold studs breaking are also common, leading to exhaust leaks. The 7.3L Power Stroke Turbodiesel, while generally revered for its longevity, isn't immune to problems, with common complaints including cam position sensor (CPS) failures (often leading to sudden stalling), oil leaks from the EBPV (exhaust back pressure valve) pedestal, and injector O-ring leaks.
• Transmission Problems: Both the 4R70W and the heavier-duty 4R100 automatic transmissions can suffer from wear, especially under consistent heavy loads or with neglected fluid changes. Overheating due to strenuous use is a major contributor to premature transmission failure.
• Braking System: Due to the vehicle's weight and potential for heavy loads, brake components such as pads, rotors, and calipers experience accelerated wear. Master cylinder failures and issues with the anti-lock braking (ABS) system are also occasionally reported.
• Steering and Suspension: Worn-out front suspension components are prevalent, including ball joints, tie rod ends, and control arm bushings, leading to loose steering and poor alignment. Steering gear box play can also contribute to a wandering feel.
• Rust: As with many Ford vehicles of this era, rust is a significant long-term concern. It commonly affects body panels, especially rocker panels, wheel wells, and door bottoms, as well as the frame, fuel tank straps, and brake lines, particularly in regions exposed to road salt.
• Electrical Gremlins: Minor electrical issues, such as faulty power window switches, blend door actuators for the HVAC system, and dashboard light failures, can crop up with age.

Recalls: For the 1999 E-Series, several recalls were issued. Notably, recalls concerning the cruise control deactivation switch (which could pose a fire risk), various seat belt components, and sometimes issues related to brake master cylinders or brake lines have been documented. Prospective buyers should always check a specific vehicle's VIN for open recalls. Overall, the E-250 offers good long-term reliability provided it receives diligent and preventative maintenance, as neglect can quickly exacerbate these common issues.

How long will the 1999 Ford E-250 last?

What Technology & Safety Features are Included?

The 1999 Ford E-250, being a utilitarian vehicle from its era, offered a very spartan approach to built-in technology, entertainment, and driver-assistance features compared to modern standards. Its primary focus was on functionality rather than creature comforts or advanced electronics.

• Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard entertainment was typically an AM/FM radio. Higher trims or optional packages might have included a cassette player or, less commonly for commercial vehicles of this vintage, a single-CD player. There was no integrated navigation, touchscreens, Bluetooth connectivity, or advanced infotainment system. Instrumentation was entirely analog, providing essential vehicle information.
• Driver-Assistance Features: Modern driver-assistance technologies like blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, or adaptive cruise control were non-existent. The most advanced driver aid available was conventional cruise control, often an optional feature, particularly on base cargo variants.
• Safety Features: Safety features were fundamental. The 1999 E-250 came standard with driver and front passenger airbags. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were typically included for the rear wheels, with a four-wheel ABS system often available as an option or standard on higher trim passenger models. The vehicle featured side-impact beams within the doors for enhanced occupant protection and three-point seat belts with pretensioners for front occupants.
• Optional Features: Beyond standard amenities, optional features generally focused on enhancing usability and basic comfort. These could include air conditioning (often an extra on base cargo models), power windows and door locks, a tilt steering column, and various interior configurations for passenger or specialized cargo use. A heavy-duty trailer tow package was a popular and essential option for many buyers.
• Crash-Test Ratings: Crash-test ratings for full-size vans of this vintage are less comprehensive than for modern vehicles. According to NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) tests for the 1999 Ford Econoline (which includes the E-250), the vehicle generally received ratings of 3 or 4 stars out of 5 for frontal impact protection for both the driver and passenger. Side-impact testing was not commonly performed or rated for full-size vans during this period. Rollover risk was also not a prominent rating category for such vehicles at the time.

What Colors Options are Available?

1999 Ford E-250 Prices and Market Value

1999 Ford E-250 Cost of Ownership

1999 Ford E-250 Fuel Efficiency

1999 Ford E-250 Safety Rating

1999 Ford E-250 Warranty

1999 Ford E-250 Insurance

How Does the 1999 Ford E-250 Compare to Other Cargo?

The 1999 Ford E-250 competed fiercely in the full-size commercial van segment against key rivals like the Chevrolet Express / GMC Savana (which shared a platform) and the Dodge Ram Van (B-Series).

• Performance: The E-250 offered a formidable range of engines, from the reliable 5.4L Triton V8 to the immensely powerful 6.8L V10 and the legendary 7.3L Power Stroke turbodiesel. This allowed the E-250 to often outmuscle its rivals in towing and hauling capacities, especially with the V10 and 7.3L diesel. The Chevy Express/GMC Savana provided strong competition with their 5.7L Vortec V8 and optional 6.5L turbodiesel, while the Dodge Ram Van relied on its powerful Magnum V8s but lacked a factory diesel option, putting it at a disadvantage for maximum heavy-duty work.
• Features: All three vans were largely utilitarian. Standard features were basic across the board, focusing on functionality. Optional amenities like air conditioning, power windows/locks, and cruise control were available on all. None boasted advanced infotainment or driver-assistance tech beyond the era's standards. The E-250's interior ergonomics were competitive, offering a traditional truck-like driving position.
• Reliability: All three American full-size vans of this period were known for their rugged durability. The E-250's 7.3L Power Stroke diesel is often considered the gold standard for longevity among this group, frequently outlasting GM's 6.5L diesel. Gasoline engines from Ford, Chevy, and Dodge all had their known quirks but were generally dependable workhorses when maintained. Ford's robust body-on-frame chassis and heavy-duty components ensured it could withstand years of abuse.
• Price: New prices were comparable across the segment, with variations based on engine, configuration, and options. In the used market today, the E-250 with the 7.3L diesel often commands a premium due to its strong reputation. Gas-powered Ford, Chevy, and Dodge vans are similarly priced, with condition and mileage being the primary drivers of value.

Recommended Alternatives:
For those seeking similar capabilities and ruggedness, the 1996-2002 Chevrolet Express / GMC Savana 2500 models are excellent, direct alternatives, offering strong V8 gasoline engines and a 6.5L diesel option. They often provide a slightly smoother ride due to their independent front suspension, though the E-Series' solid axle is preferred by some for extreme durability. If fuel economy and modern features are a priority and budget allows, newer options like the Ford Transit, Ram ProMaster, or Mercedes-Benz Sprinter offer significant improvements but at a substantially higher cost and with different operational characteristics (e.g., unibody construction, FWD/RWD, more complex systems).

Final Verdict: Is the 1999 Ford E-250 a Good Cargo?

1999 Ford E-250 Owner Reviews

Jovan

Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.