The 2013 Ford E-250 is a full-size, heavy-duty van that was part of Ford's long-standing E-Series line, produced for many years with minimal changes, showcasing its enduring utility. Available as a cargo or passenger van, it offered robust capability. Key trims typically included the base XL and the more feature-rich XLT. New pricing ranged from approximately $25,000 to $35,000. Its popularity stems from its exceptional hauling capacity, rugged build, and proven workhorse reputation, making it a favorite for tradespeople and fleet operators.
The Good
The 2013 Ford E-250 excels in raw performance and steadfast reliability, offering a dependable workhorse for demanding tasks. Its practical design prioritizes utility, while its substantial towing and cargo capabilities provide immense value, reassuring both the pragmatic business owner and the driver who needs unwavering support.
The Bad
Potential buyers of the 2013 Ford E-250 should be aware of its dated interior technology and comfort features compared to modern vehicles. Fuel economy is a significant drawback, and some owners report issues with aging electrical components and suspension wear over time.
2013 Ford E-250: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 4.6L V8 Triton (Flex-Fuel capable)
- 5.4L V8 Triton (Flex-Fuel capable)
- 6.8L V10 Triton (Flex-Fuel capable)
- Horsepower:
- 4.6L V8: Approximately 225 hp
- 5.4L V8: Approximately 255 hp
- 6.8L V10: Approximately 305 hp
- Torque:
- 4.6L V8: Approximately 286 lb-ft
- 5.4L V8: Approximately 350 lb-ft
- 6.8L V10: Approximately 420 lb-ft
- Fuel Economy (EPA estimates, highly variable based on load, driving conditions, and specific configuration):
- 4.6L V8: Around 10-12 MPG city / 13-15 MPG highway
- 5.4L V8: Around 9-11 MPG city / 12-14 MPG highway
- 6.8L V10: Around 9-11 MPG city / 12-14 MPG highway
- 0-60 Times: (Generally not a primary metric for this vehicle, but estimated) Around 9-11 seconds depending on engine and configuration.
- Towing Capacity: Varies significantly based on wheelbase, axle ratio, engine, and configuration, but can reach up to 10,000 lbs or more for properly equipped models.
- Trim-Level Features (XL):
- Basic interior with vinyl or cloth seats
- Manual windows and locks
- AM/FM stereo
- Heavy-duty suspension
- Black vinyl floor covering
- Optional: Air conditioning, cruise control, power mirrors
- Trim-Level Features (XLT):
- Upgraded interior trim
- Cloth upholstery
- Power windows and door locks
- Remote keyless entry
- Premium audio system
- Front and rear vinyl floor mats
- Optional: Power adjustable pedals, upgraded seating options
- Body Styles: Cargo Van, Passenger Van (Wagon).
- Wheelbases: Available in various wheelbases to suit different cargo needs.
2013 Ford E-250 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2013 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | E-250 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Cargo |
| Type | Cargo |
| Category | Cargo Van |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | AVON LAKE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 3-Door |
| Curb Weight | 5376 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 8900 pounds |
| Overall Height | 85.00 inches |
| Overall Length | 236.40 inches |
| Overall Width | 79.40 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 138.00 inches |
| Standard Seating | 2 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.6-L V-8 |
| Engine Size | 4.6L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $30,145 |
| Invoice Price | $27,808 |
| Delivery Charges | $995 |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2013 Ford E-250 Have?
The 2013 Ford E-250, like many vehicles in its generation, has reported issues that owners should be aware of. One common concern revolves around the transmission, particularly the 4-speed automatic, which can sometimes exhibit rough shifting or premature wear, especially under heavy use or with neglected fluid changes. Another area of note is the fuel system; while generally robust, some owners have reported issues with fuel pumps or fuel injectors failing over time.
Suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and leaf springs, can wear out due to the heavy loads these vans often carry, leading to steering vagueness or clunking noises. Electrical gremlins are also not uncommon in older vans; this can manifest as malfunctioning power windows, door locks, or interior lights. The alternator is another component that can require replacement as the vehicle ages.
While specific recalls for the 2013 model year are limited, it's always advisable to check with Ford or the NHTSA for any outstanding safety recalls. The E-Series has a reputation for longevity, but its older design means that some components are subject to wear and tear. Routine and diligent maintenance, especially fluid changes for the engine, transmission, and differentials, is crucial for mitigating long-term reliability concerns. For instance, failing to service the transmission can accelerate wear significantly. Issues with the intake manifold or cooling system, particularly leaks, have also been reported by some owners as the mileage increases.
Suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and leaf springs, can wear out due to the heavy loads these vans often carry, leading to steering vagueness or clunking noises. Electrical gremlins are also not uncommon in older vans; this can manifest as malfunctioning power windows, door locks, or interior lights. The alternator is another component that can require replacement as the vehicle ages.
While specific recalls for the 2013 model year are limited, it's always advisable to check with Ford or the NHTSA for any outstanding safety recalls. The E-Series has a reputation for longevity, but its older design means that some components are subject to wear and tear. Routine and diligent maintenance, especially fluid changes for the engine, transmission, and differentials, is crucial for mitigating long-term reliability concerns. For instance, failing to service the transmission can accelerate wear significantly. Issues with the intake manifold or cooling system, particularly leaks, have also been reported by some owners as the mileage increases.
How long will the 2013 Ford E-250 last?
The 2013 Ford E-250 is renowned for its exceptional long-term durability, with many examples exceeding 200,000 miles and even reaching 300,000 miles or more with proper care. Owners frequently report achieving 15-20 years of service life. Its robust chassis and powertrain were designed for heavy-duty use, contributing to this longevity. However, weaknesses that emerge over time often relate to components subjected to wear and tear from constant use and heavy loads, such as suspension parts (ball joints, bushings), brake components, and occasionally, the transmission if not meticulously maintained. Despite these wear items, the core mechanicals tend to be very resilient, showcasing Ford's commitment to building a workhorse.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2013 Ford E-250's technology, entertainment, and safety features reflect its utilitarian design, leaning more towards functionality than cutting-edge innovation. Standard features in the base XL trim are minimal, typically including an AM/FM stereo and perhaps a basic auxiliary input. The XLT trim offers some enhancements like power windows and locks, a more premium audio system, and remote keyless entry, providing a touch more convenience for daily use. Bluetooth connectivity and advanced infotainment systems were not standard and often not even available options, reflecting the era and purpose of the vehicle.
Driver-assistance features were largely absent. There were no blind-spot monitoring, lane departure warnings, or adaptive cruise control systems. Parking sensors might have been an optional add-on for some models, but sophisticated electronic aids were not a focus. The primary safety features centered on the essentials: front airbags, anti-lock brakes (ABS) for the four-wheel disc brakes, and a sturdy body-on-frame construction designed to withstand considerable stress. Stability control was also becoming more common around this model year and was likely available as an option or standard on certain configurations.
Crash-test ratings for commercial vans like the E-250 are not always as comprehensive or publicly emphasized as those for passenger cars. However, the E-Series generally received decent ratings for its time, particularly in frontal and side impact tests, testament to its heavy-duty construction. Owners seeking modern tech and advanced safety features would find the 2013 E-250 lacking compared to contemporary SUVs or even newer commercial vans. It prioritizes practicality and essential safety over digital amenities and advanced driver aids.
Driver-assistance features were largely absent. There were no blind-spot monitoring, lane departure warnings, or adaptive cruise control systems. Parking sensors might have been an optional add-on for some models, but sophisticated electronic aids were not a focus. The primary safety features centered on the essentials: front airbags, anti-lock brakes (ABS) for the four-wheel disc brakes, and a sturdy body-on-frame construction designed to withstand considerable stress. Stability control was also becoming more common around this model year and was likely available as an option or standard on certain configurations.
Crash-test ratings for commercial vans like the E-250 are not always as comprehensive or publicly emphasized as those for passenger cars. However, the E-Series generally received decent ratings for its time, particularly in frontal and side impact tests, testament to its heavy-duty construction. Owners seeking modern tech and advanced safety features would find the 2013 E-250 lacking compared to contemporary SUVs or even newer commercial vans. It prioritizes practicality and essential safety over digital amenities and advanced driver aids.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2013 Ford E-250 Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2013 Ford E-250 typically ranged from approximately $25,000 for a base cargo van to over $35,000 for a well-equipped passenger XLT model. As a used vehicle, prices in 2024 can vary widely, generally falling between $8,000 and $18,000, heavily dependent on mileage, condition, configuration (cargo vs. passenger), and any upfitting. The E-250 experiences a moderate depreciation curve for a commercial vehicle; while it loses value, its inherent utility and durability help it retain a decent portion of its worth, especially well-maintained examples. Factors significantly affecting resale value include maintenance records, absence of rust, previous commercial or heavy use (which can decrease value), and the presence of desirable options or upfits. Lower mileage and excellent condition are key for commanding higher prices.
2013 Ford E-250 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2013 Ford E-250 can be moderately costly, primarily due to its fuel consumption and potential repair needs as it ages. Insurance costs can be higher than for a standard car, especially for commercial use. Fuel expenses will be significant, with MPG typically in the low double digits. Maintenance is straightforward but essential; regular fluid changes and checks are paramount. Repair costs can be average to high, as parts for heavy-duty vehicles can be pricier, though the simplicity of its design can sometimes offset this. Overall, while not an economical vehicle in terms of fuel, its durability and capability can offer strong long-term value if maintenance is prioritized.
2013 Ford E-250 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Flex-Fuel
Fuel Capacity
15 gallons
City Mileage
13 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
17 miles/gallon
2013 Ford E-250 Safety Rating
IIHS
2013 Ford E-250 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
36 months / 36,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
60 months / 60,000 miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
60 months / unlimited miles
Estimated remaining
Expired
2013 Ford E-250 Insurance
Insurance for a 2013 Ford E-250 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Cargo with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2013 Ford E-250 Compare to Other Cargo?
The 2013 Ford E-250 primarily competed against rivals like the Chevrolet Express 2500 and the Ram ProMaster (though the ProMaster was new to the US market around this time and less established in the traditional van segment).
Performance: The E-250 offered strong V8 and V10 engine options, providing ample power for towing and hauling, comparable to or exceeding the Chevrolet Express 2500 in terms of raw grunt, especially with the larger engines. However, fuel economy was a common weakness across all these heavy-duty vans, with the E-250 generally not outperforming its peers significantly in this area.
Features: In terms of features, the 2013 E-250 was decidedly utilitarian and somewhat dated compared to newer competitors or even its own car lines. The Chevrolet Express 2500 offered a similar basic interior and feature set. The Ram ProMaster, with its front-wheel-drive configuration and different design, offered potentially better cargo space efficiency but a less traditional truck-like feel. Modern vans introduced around or after 2013, like the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter or Ford's own Transit (which replaced the E-Series), offered significantly more advanced technology, better ergonomics, and more refined driving dynamics.
Reliability: The Ford E-Series has a long-standing reputation for robust mechanical reliability, particularly its powertrains. The Chevrolet Express also boasts a proven track record for durability. Both are workhorses built to last. The E-250's reliability is generally considered strong, though like any vehicle of its age, it will require regular maintenance.
Price: At launch, the E-250 was competitively priced against the Express 2500. Used, both tend to hold their value due to demand for durable commercial vehicles. The Ram ProMaster might have offered a different value proposition due to its unique FWD design and cargo optimization.
Alternatives: For those prioritizing modern technology, better fuel efficiency, or more refined driving comfort, a used Ford Transit (introduced for the 2015 model year) or a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter would be superior, albeit typically more expensive, alternatives. However, for pure, unadulterated workhorse capability and a lower used price point, the 2013 Ford E-250 remains a strong contender against its direct peers of the era like the Chevrolet Express 2500.
Performance: The E-250 offered strong V8 and V10 engine options, providing ample power for towing and hauling, comparable to or exceeding the Chevrolet Express 2500 in terms of raw grunt, especially with the larger engines. However, fuel economy was a common weakness across all these heavy-duty vans, with the E-250 generally not outperforming its peers significantly in this area.
Features: In terms of features, the 2013 E-250 was decidedly utilitarian and somewhat dated compared to newer competitors or even its own car lines. The Chevrolet Express 2500 offered a similar basic interior and feature set. The Ram ProMaster, with its front-wheel-drive configuration and different design, offered potentially better cargo space efficiency but a less traditional truck-like feel. Modern vans introduced around or after 2013, like the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter or Ford's own Transit (which replaced the E-Series), offered significantly more advanced technology, better ergonomics, and more refined driving dynamics.
Reliability: The Ford E-Series has a long-standing reputation for robust mechanical reliability, particularly its powertrains. The Chevrolet Express also boasts a proven track record for durability. Both are workhorses built to last. The E-250's reliability is generally considered strong, though like any vehicle of its age, it will require regular maintenance.
Price: At launch, the E-250 was competitively priced against the Express 2500. Used, both tend to hold their value due to demand for durable commercial vehicles. The Ram ProMaster might have offered a different value proposition due to its unique FWD design and cargo optimization.
Alternatives: For those prioritizing modern technology, better fuel efficiency, or more refined driving comfort, a used Ford Transit (introduced for the 2015 model year) or a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter would be superior, albeit typically more expensive, alternatives. However, for pure, unadulterated workhorse capability and a lower used price point, the 2013 Ford E-250 remains a strong contender against its direct peers of the era like the Chevrolet Express 2500.
Final Verdict: Is the 2013 Ford E-250 a Good Cargo?
The 2013 Ford E-250 is ideal for small business owners, tradespeople, fleet operators, or individuals who require a no-nonsense, heavy-duty work van focused on maximum cargo capacity and towing prowess over modern amenities. It is worth buying primarily on the used market, where its value proposition as a durable workhorse shines. New, it would be a poor choice compared to more modern options.
Buying used, prioritize models with a documented maintenance history, especially for the transmission and engine. Cargo van configurations are generally more sought-after for utility purposes, while passenger versions are suitable for shuttle services. Avoid models that appear heavily abused or have exceptionally high mileage without recent servicing. If reliability and raw utility are paramount and a modern interior isn't a priority, the 2013 E-250 remains a solid, capable choice.
Buying used, prioritize models with a documented maintenance history, especially for the transmission and engine. Cargo van configurations are generally more sought-after for utility purposes, while passenger versions are suitable for shuttle services. Avoid models that appear heavily abused or have exceptionally high mileage without recent servicing. If reliability and raw utility are paramount and a modern interior isn't a priority, the 2013 E-250 remains a solid, capable choice.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.