The 1983 Toyota Celica, part of the third generation (1981-1985), arrived as a stylish front-wheel-drive coupe and hatchback. It offered a range of trims including the ST, GT, and performance-oriented GT-S. Initially priced in the $9,000-$12,000 range, its popularity stemmed from its sporty design, dependable Toyota engineering, and engaging driving experience, making it a desirable option for those seeking affordable performance and reliability.
The Good
The 1983 Celica offered a compelling blend of sharp, sporty design and proven Toyota reliability. Its agile handling provided driving fun for enthusiasts, while its comfortable interior and practical fuel efficiency appealed to daily drivers seeking value and peace of mind.
The Bad
Common issues for the 1983 Celica include rust, particularly in the wheel wells and rocker panels. Older examples may suffer from worn suspension components, electrical gremlins, and potential engine oil leaks. Automatic transmission issues can also arise with age and mileage.
1983 Toyota Celica: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1983 Toyota Celica primarily featured two engine options:
- A 1.8-liter 4-cylinder engine (carbureted in base models).
- A 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine (fuel-injected, available in certain trims).
- Horsepower:
- The 1.8-liter engine typically produced around 96-101 horsepower.
- The 2.4-liter engine offered approximately 105-116 horsepower, depending on the specific application and fuel injection system.
- Fuel Economy:
- Expected fuel economy varied but generally ranged from the mid-20s to low 30s miles per gallon (MPG) combined, depending on the engine and transmission.
- 0-60 Times:
- Acceleration was respectable for its class, with 0-60 mph times typically falling in the 9-11 second range for models equipped with the more powerful engine options.
- Towing Capacity:
- The Toyota Celica was not designed or equipped for towing, and therefore, towing capacity is not applicable.
- Trim-Level Features:
- ST (Sport Touring): Often included standard power steering, power brakes, adjustable steering wheel, and a decent audio system.
- GT (Grand Touring): Typically added features like alloy wheels, sport seats, and upgraded interior trim.
- GT-S (Grand Touring-Sport): This was the sportiest trim, usually featuring the more potent engine, sport-tuned suspension, limited-slip differential (on some manual transmissions), power windows, air conditioning, and often a more aggressive aerodynamic package.
1983 Toyota Celica Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1983 |
| Make | Toyota |
| Model | Celica |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Hatchback |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Japan |
| Manufacturing City | TOYOTA CITY |
Dimensions
| Doors | 3-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.4L L4 DOHC 16V |
| Engine Size | 2.4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1983 Toyota Celica Have?
The 1983 Toyota Celica, like many vehicles of its era, is susceptible to certain age-related issues. One of the most prevalent concerns is rust. Areas prone to corrosion include the rocker panels, wheel wells, rear quarter panels, and the undercarriage, especially in regions where salt is used on roads during winter. Prospective buyers should thoroughly inspect the body for any signs of significant rust or past repairs that might not have been done properly.
Engine and transmission issues, while not overwhelmingly common for Toyota products, can still occur with high mileage. Owners have reported occasional oil leaks from gaskets and seals. For automatic transmissions, wear and tear can lead to rough shifting or a failure to engage properly. Manual transmissions are generally more robust, but clutch wear is a consideration.
Electrical gremlins are another potential concern. This can manifest as intermittent issues with power windows, door locks, dashboard lights, or the radio. The aging wiring harnesses and components can become brittle or corroded over time.
Suspension components such as ball joints, tie rods, and bushings can wear out, leading to clunking noises, imprecise steering, and a less stable ride. The brake system, including calipers and rotors, may also require attention on older vehicles.
While there were no major widespread recalls specifically targeting critical failures for the 1983 model year that are widely documented, it is always advisable to check the vehicle's VIN with the NHTSA database for any outstanding recalls. Overall, the 1983 Celica is considered reliable for its time, but thorough inspection and maintenance are crucial for long-term dependability. There are no specific known major issues tied to a particular model year within the 1983 production run that significantly deviate from these general concerns.
Engine and transmission issues, while not overwhelmingly common for Toyota products, can still occur with high mileage. Owners have reported occasional oil leaks from gaskets and seals. For automatic transmissions, wear and tear can lead to rough shifting or a failure to engage properly. Manual transmissions are generally more robust, but clutch wear is a consideration.
Electrical gremlins are another potential concern. This can manifest as intermittent issues with power windows, door locks, dashboard lights, or the radio. The aging wiring harnesses and components can become brittle or corroded over time.
Suspension components such as ball joints, tie rods, and bushings can wear out, leading to clunking noises, imprecise steering, and a less stable ride. The brake system, including calipers and rotors, may also require attention on older vehicles.
While there were no major widespread recalls specifically targeting critical failures for the 1983 model year that are widely documented, it is always advisable to check the vehicle's VIN with the NHTSA database for any outstanding recalls. Overall, the 1983 Celica is considered reliable for its time, but thorough inspection and maintenance are crucial for long-term dependability. There are no specific known major issues tied to a particular model year within the 1983 production run that significantly deviate from these general concerns.
How long will the 1983 Toyota Celica last?
With proper and consistent maintenance, a 1983 Toyota Celica can easily achieve over 200,000 miles, and many examples have surpassed the 300,000-mile mark. Toyota's reputation for robust powertrains and durable chassis engineering shines through here. However, long-term durability is heavily influenced by how the vehicle has been cared for. Weaknesses like rust can significantly shorten its usable lifespan if left unaddressed. Cars that have been garaged, regularly serviced, and kept in drier climates tend to fare much better over time. Despite its age, the Celica demonstrates impressive longevity, a testament to its build quality when maintained.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1983 Toyota Celica was a product of its time, meaning its technology, entertainment, driver-assistance, and safety features are relatively basic by modern standards.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard equipment typically included an AM/FM radio with a cassette player. Higher trim levels or optional packages might have offered a more advanced sound system with more speakers. Features like power windows, power door locks, and air conditioning were often optional or standard on premium trims (GT, GT-S), contributing to driver and passenger convenience. Cruise control was also an available option on some models.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance systems as we know them today (like ABS, traction control, lane departure warnings) did not exist in the 1983 Celica. The primary driver-assistance feature was power steering, which made maneuvering easier. Manual transmissions were common, offering a more engaging driving experience for enthusiasts. The focus was on mechanical feedback rather than electronic aids.
Safety Features: Standard safety features were limited. This included three-point seatbelts for front occupants and lap belts for rear passengers. Crumple zones were designed into the vehicle structure, typical for the era. Disc brakes were usually found on the front wheels, with drum brakes on the rear, providing adequate stopping power. ABS was not an available option.
Optional Features: Beyond what's mentioned, options could include a power sunroof, upgraded interior upholstery, and different wheel designs.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 1983 model year are not readily available or comparable to modern testing protocols. However, vehicles from this era generally performed less favorably in crash tests compared to contemporary vehicles due to advancements in safety engineering, structural integrity, and airbag technology, which were not standard or even widely developed then.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard equipment typically included an AM/FM radio with a cassette player. Higher trim levels or optional packages might have offered a more advanced sound system with more speakers. Features like power windows, power door locks, and air conditioning were often optional or standard on premium trims (GT, GT-S), contributing to driver and passenger convenience. Cruise control was also an available option on some models.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance systems as we know them today (like ABS, traction control, lane departure warnings) did not exist in the 1983 Celica. The primary driver-assistance feature was power steering, which made maneuvering easier. Manual transmissions were common, offering a more engaging driving experience for enthusiasts. The focus was on mechanical feedback rather than electronic aids.
Safety Features: Standard safety features were limited. This included three-point seatbelts for front occupants and lap belts for rear passengers. Crumple zones were designed into the vehicle structure, typical for the era. Disc brakes were usually found on the front wheels, with drum brakes on the rear, providing adequate stopping power. ABS was not an available option.
Optional Features: Beyond what's mentioned, options could include a power sunroof, upgraded interior upholstery, and different wheel designs.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 1983 model year are not readily available or comparable to modern testing protocols. However, vehicles from this era generally performed less favorably in crash tests compared to contemporary vehicles due to advancements in safety engineering, structural integrity, and airbag technology, which were not standard or even widely developed then.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1983 Toyota Celica Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1983 Toyota Celica had a sticker price typically ranging from approximately $9,000 for base models to over $12,000 for higher trims like the GT-S. As with most vehicles, it experienced significant depreciation in its early years. However, today, the current used market prices for the 1983 Celica can vary widely, from a few thousand dollars for project cars or those in fair condition, to upwards of $8,000-$15,000+ for exceptionally well-maintained, low-mileage, or rare GT-S models. Factors affecting resale value include condition (especially rust and mechanical integrity), mileage, originality, trim level (GT-S is most desirable), and historical documentation. Well-preserved examples are increasingly sought after by collectors and enthusiasts, bucking the trend of typical older car depreciation.
1983 Toyota Celica Cost of Ownership
The 1983 Toyota Celica is generally economical to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and market value. Fuel economy is respectable for its era, especially with the smaller engine, making it efficient for daily driving. Routine maintenance, such as oil changes and filter replacements, is affordable. Repair costs can be moderate; while many parts are readily available and affordable, specialized repairs or dealing with rust can increase expenses. Overall, with diligent maintenance and addressing potential rust issues proactively, the Celica is a cost-effective and rewarding vehicle to own long-term.
1983 Toyota Celica Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1983 Toyota Celica Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1983 Toyota Celica Insurance
Insurance for a 1983 Toyota Celica is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Hatchback with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1983 Toyota Celica Compare to Other Hatchback?
The 1983 Toyota Celica competed in a lively sports coupe segment. Its primary rivals included cars like the Nissan 200SX (S110 generation), Mazda RX-7 (FB generation), and the Ford Mustang.
Performance: The Celica, especially in GT-S trim with its fuel-injected engine, offered competitive performance for its class, characterized by eager acceleration and good handling. The Nissan 200SX offered similar performance characteristics, often with a slightly sportier feel in some configurations. The Mazda RX-7, with its rotary engine, provided a unique and exhilarating performance experience, albeit with potentially higher maintenance costs. The Ford Mustang offered a more classic American muscle car experience, with a focus on straight-line power.
Features: In 1983, the Celica offered a reasonable set of features, including power steering, AC, and decent audio systems on higher trims. Rivals like the 200SX and Mustang also offered comparable amenities. The RX-7 tended to be more driver-focused, sometimes with fewer creature comforts in its base form.
Reliability: This is where the Celica often stood out. Toyota's reputation for bulletproof reliability generally surpassed that of its rivals. While the 200SX was also quite reliable, the Celica was often perceived as having fewer long-term issues. The RX-7's rotary engine, while unique, could be more temperamental and costly to maintain if not properly cared for. The Mustang, being a more performance-oriented domestic car of the era, sometimes faced more reliability challenges compared to its Japanese counterparts.
Price: The Celica was typically priced competitively, offering a good balance of performance, features, and reliability for its cost. The 200SX was a direct competitor in terms of price. The RX-7 could sometimes be a bit pricier, especially higher-performance variants. The Mustang's price varied greatly depending on the engine and trim.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Celica, especially in GT-S trim with its fuel-injected engine, offered competitive performance for its class, characterized by eager acceleration and good handling. The Nissan 200SX offered similar performance characteristics, often with a slightly sportier feel in some configurations. The Mazda RX-7, with its rotary engine, provided a unique and exhilarating performance experience, albeit with potentially higher maintenance costs. The Ford Mustang offered a more classic American muscle car experience, with a focus on straight-line power.
Features: In 1983, the Celica offered a reasonable set of features, including power steering, AC, and decent audio systems on higher trims. Rivals like the 200SX and Mustang also offered comparable amenities. The RX-7 tended to be more driver-focused, sometimes with fewer creature comforts in its base form.
Reliability: This is where the Celica often stood out. Toyota's reputation for bulletproof reliability generally surpassed that of its rivals. While the 200SX was also quite reliable, the Celica was often perceived as having fewer long-term issues. The RX-7's rotary engine, while unique, could be more temperamental and costly to maintain if not properly cared for. The Mustang, being a more performance-oriented domestic car of the era, sometimes faced more reliability challenges compared to its Japanese counterparts.
Price: The Celica was typically priced competitively, offering a good balance of performance, features, and reliability for its cost. The 200SX was a direct competitor in terms of price. The RX-7 could sometimes be a bit pricier, especially higher-performance variants. The Mustang's price varied greatly depending on the engine and trim.
Alternatives:
- Similar Alternative: The Nissan 200SX (S110) is a very similar alternative, offering a comparable sporty experience and good reliability.
- Performance Alternative: If raw performance and unique engineering are prioritized, the Mazda RX-7 (FB) is a compelling choice, though potentially more demanding to maintain.
- Classic American Alternative: For those preferring American design and a different driving feel, a well-maintained Ford Mustang (Fox body) from the early 80s could be considered, though reliability may be a greater concern.
Final Verdict: Is the 1983 Toyota Celica a Good Hatchback?
The 1983 Toyota Celica is ideal for budget-conscious enthusiasts and daily drivers seeking a reliable, stylish, and fun-to-drive coupe or hatchback. It's worth buying if you value dependability, straightforward mechanics, and a classic 80s aesthetic. It is a wise purchase as a used vehicle, as new ones are obviously unavailable. Prioritize models in good condition, with minimal rust and well-documented maintenance history. The GT-S trim offers the most engaging performance, while the GT provides a good balance of sportiness and comfort. Avoid vehicles with significant rust or major mechanical issues, as restoration can be costly. For its price point and era, it represents excellent value.
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.