The Good
The 1999 Toyota Celica offered compelling advantages. For practical buyers, its legendary Toyota reliability and impressive fuel efficiency meant low running costs and peace of mind. Emotionally, its sporty, timeless design and engaging, responsive handling delivered a fun driving experience without breaking the bank. It provided a great balance of everyday usability and a dash of athletic appeal, making it a well-rounded and high-value proposition for its segment.
The Bad
While generally robust, the 1999 Toyota Celica has known weaknesses to watch out for. Age-related issues are common, including worn suspension components, potential rust around the rear wheel arches and rocker panels, and degradation of interior plastics. Its engines, particularly the ST, aren't powerhouses compared to some rivals, and rear seat space is very limited. Potential oil leaks from gaskets and cooling system wear should also be checked during inspection.
1999 Toyota Celica: Quick Overview
Here is a bullet-point summary of the 1999 Toyota Celica's key specifications:
- Engine Options: The 1999 US market Celica typically came with two inline-four engine options:
- ST Trim: Featured the 1.8-liter 7A-FE engine, known for its fuel efficiency and durability.
- GT Trim: Equipped with the more potent 2.2-liter 5S-FE engine, offering a better balance of power and economy.
- Horsepower:
- ST (1.8L 7A-FE): Approximately 105 horsepower at 5,200 rpm.
- GT (2.2L 5S-FE): Approximately 135 horsepower at 5,400 rpm.
- Fuel Economy (EPA Estimates, combined city/highway):
- ST (1.8L): Ranged from approximately 25-30 miles per gallon (MPG), depending on transmission (manual or automatic).
- GT (2.2L): Ranged from approximately 23-28 MPG, also varying by transmission type.
- 0-60 MPH Times: These were not blistering performance figures but respectable for the class.
- ST: Around 9.5 to 10.5 seconds.
- GT: Closer to 8.0 to 9.0 seconds, offering a noticeably quicker acceleration.
- Towing Capacity: The 1999 Toyota Celica was not designed or typically rated for significant towing capacity. While some very light towing (e.g., a small utility trailer under 1,000 lbs) might theoretically be possible with an aftermarket hitch, it is generally not recommended and owners rarely fit them for towing purposes.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Celica ST: This was the base model, providing essential features. Standard inclusions typically were power steering, power-assisted front disc/rear drum brakes, a basic AM/FM stereo with cassette player, cloth bucket seats, and 14-inch steel wheels. Air conditioning, power windows, and power door locks were often optional.
- Celica GT: The GT trim elevated the experience with a more powerful engine and a host of upgrades. Standard features included the larger 2.2L engine, 15-inch alloy wheels, a sport-tuned suspension, power windows, power door locks, cruise control, sport seats, and a more integrated rear spoiler. Optional features for the GT included Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), an electric sunroof, a premium sound system with a CD player, and leather upholstery.
1999 Toyota Celica Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 1999 |
Make | Toyota |
Model | Celica |
Trim | - |
Style | - |
Type | Hatchback Hatchback |
Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | Japan |
Manufacturing City | - |
Dimensions
Doors | - |
Curb Weight | - |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
Overall Height | - |
Overall Length | - |
Overall Width | - |
Wheelbase Length | - |
Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 2.2 L 4-Cyl. |
Engine Size | 2.2L |
Engine Cylinders | 4 |
Transmission | - |
Transmission Type | - |
Transmission Speeds | - |
Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | - |
Steering Type | - |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
Invoice Price | - |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1999 Toyota Celica Have?
Engine-wise, the 7A-FE and 5S-FE engines are durable, but oil leaks from valve cover gaskets and oil pan seals are common age-related issues. The cooling system, including radiators, hoses, and water pumps, can show signs of wear, necessitating replacement to prevent overheating. Electrical issues, while typically minor, can include failing power window motors, unreliable dashboard lighting, and issues with the stock radio.
Interior degradation, such as sagging headliners, cracked dashboards (especially in sunny climates), and worn seat fabric, is also frequently observed. Catalytic converter failures, though less common, can occur, particularly if the engine has been running rich. While specific widespread recalls for the 1999 model year are limited, older vehicles may have had minor recalls related to accessories or specific component adjustments. Owners should always check the NHTSA database for any applicable recall information by VIN. Regular and proactive maintenance is key to mitigating these age-related issues and ensuring the Celica's celebrated longevity.
How long will the 1999 Toyota Celica last?
However, weaknesses over time typically manifest in ancillary systems. Suspension components will wear, requiring replacement to maintain ride quality and handling. Rust, as mentioned, is a significant long-term threat in certain climates. Minor electrical gremlins and interior wear are also expected. Proactive fluid changes, timing belt replacements (on the 7A-FE engine), and addressing minor issues promptly are crucial for hitting those high mileage figures and ensuring its continued reliability for many years.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent by today's standards. The vehicle relied on the driver's skill, with power steering being a standard convenience. Optional cruise control was available on the GT trim for longer journeys, but there were no automated aids like blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, or adaptive cruise control.
Safety features included standard dual front airbags for both the driver and front passenger, a significant advancement for its time. Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was an important optional safety feature, particularly on the GT model, enhancing braking control during emergency stops. However, stability control, traction control, or side airbags were not offered.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this vintage are often less comprehensive than modern assessments. Based on similar models from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) from that period, the Celica typically performed adequately, often receiving 4 stars for frontal driver impact and 3 stars for frontal passenger impact. Side-impact ratings, if available for this specific year, were generally in the 3-star range. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) did not conduct its rigorous small overlap front or side impact tests on vehicles from this generation, so comparable data is not available.
What Colors Options are Available?
1999 Toyota Celica Prices and Market Value
Today, the current used market prices vary significantly based on condition, mileage, and maintenance history. A 1999 Celica can typically be found for anywhere from $2,000 for a running example with high mileage and some wear, up to $8,000 or even more for pristine, low-mileage, well-preserved, and unmolested examples. Its depreciation curve flattened out many years ago; most of its value was lost within its first decade. Factors affecting its current resale value include the absence of rust, complete service records, originality (unmodified cars often fetch more), and regional demand from enthusiasts or those seeking a reliable budget car. Exceptional examples may even see slight appreciation as "modern classics."
1999 Toyota Celica Cost of Ownership
Maintenance and repair costs tend to be reasonable. Toyota parts are widely available, often inexpensive, and many common repairs can be performed by a competent DIY mechanic. While age-related repairs like suspension components, hoses, or minor electrical fixes will eventually arise, they are usually manageable and not overly complex or expensive. Compared to many other sporty coupes, the Celica proves to be an economical vehicle to own over the long haul, provided you factor in standard preventative maintenance.
1999 Toyota Celica Fuel Efficiency
1999 Toyota Celica Recalls & Defects
AIR Bags:frontal:driver Side:inflator Module
1999 Toyota Celica Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1999 Toyota Celica Compare to Other Hatchback Hatchback?
In terms of performance, the Celica GT's 135 horsepower was respectable but generally outmatched by top-tier rivals. The Honda Civic Si (especially the 1999-2000 models with 160 hp) and the Acura Integra GS-R (170 hp) offered more high-revving power and superior handling dynamics, making them more engaging for aggressive driving. The Nissan 240SX (with 155-160 hp) provided the unique advantage of rear-wheel drive, appealing to enthusiasts for its drift potential. The Ford Probe and Mazda MX-6, often sharing platforms, offered V6 options in their higher trims, providing more torque but often less nimble handling than the Celica or its Honda/Acura rivals.
For features, the Celica GT was well-appointed for its segment, but luxury-oriented rivals like the Integra GS-R often offered a slightly more refined interior and additional standard amenities. The Probe and MX-6 also competed well on features, sometimes offering more comfort-oriented options. The Celica's tech and safety features were comparable to its direct Japanese competitors but generally lacked any "premium" feel.
Reliability was a strong suit for the Celica, often on par with or exceeding its Japanese counterparts like the Civic and Integra. All three were renowned for their longevity. The 240SX was also quite robust. The Ford Probe and Mazda MX-6 were generally reliable but perhaps not quite to Toyota's "bulletproof" standard.
Regarding price, all these vehicles were similarly positioned new, offering affordable sporty driving. On the used market today, prices vary greatly, with clean Civic Si and Integra GS-R models, and especially Nissan 240SXs, often commanding significantly higher prices than the Celica due to enthusiast demand and rarity.
Recommended Alternatives:
- For better performance/handling: A 1999-2000 Honda Civic Si or an Acura Integra GS-R would be superior choices, offering more power and a more focused driving experience.
- For RWD fun: A Nissan 240SX if you can find a clean, unmolested example, though prices have risen sharply.
- For similar balance/value: The Celica remains a solid choice, but a Honda Civic EX coupe from the same era also offers great reliability and efficiency, albeit with less "sporty coupe" styling.
Final Verdict: Is the 1999 Toyota Celica a Good Hatchback Hatchback?
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, under the right conditions. As a used vehicle, it represents excellent value. Buyers should prioritize examples with comprehensive service records, minimal rust (especially in high-corrosion areas), and a clean title. Opting for the GT trim is recommended for its more powerful engine and additional features. While the ST offers great efficiency, the GT provides a more satisfying driving experience. Avoid heavily modified or neglected examples, as deferred maintenance can quickly erode its value proposition. A well-maintained 1999 Celica is a smart purchase for a reliable, fun, and economical "modern classic" that promises many more years of service.