
The 1985 Toyota Celica, part of the third generation (1981-1985), is a popular Japanese sports coupe known for its sleek design and sporty handling. Available as a liftback and coupe, key trims included the ST, GT, and the performance-oriented GT-S. It stood out with its pop-up headlights and a rear-wheel-drive platform that appealed to driving enthusiasts, offering a compelling blend of style and performance for its era.
The Good
The 1985 Celica boasts a strong reputation for Toyota's legendary reliability, engaging rear-wheel-drive performance, and a distinctive sporty design. Its comfortable interior and efficient engines provide practical appeal, while its enduring style and driving fun satisfy emotional desires for a classic sports coupe.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1985 Toyota Celica include rust, particularly in the wheel wells and rocker panels. Electrical gremlins can also be an issue, especially with age. Engine oil leaks and worn suspension components are common concerns that require attention during inspection.
1985 Toyota Celica: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.4L 22R-E SOHC 4-cylinder engine
- 2.0L 3S-GE DOHC 4-cylinder engine (GT-S trim)
- Horsepower:
- 22R-E: Approximately 97 hp
- 3S-GE: Approximately 135 hp
- Fuel Economy:
- Varies by engine and transmission, but generally in the range of 20-25 MPG combined for manual transmission models.
- 0-60 Times:
- Approximately 9-11 seconds for the GT-S, depending on conditions. Base models would be slower.
- Towing Capacity:
- Not applicable; the Celica is not designed or rated for towing.
- Trim-Level Features:
- ST: Base model, typically featuring manual windows, basic stereo, and cloth interior.
- GT: Mid-range trim, often including power steering, upgraded interior, and optional power windows/mirrors.
- GT-S: Top-tier performance trim, usually equipped with the more powerful 3S-GE engine, sportier suspension, limited-slip differential (on some models), performance wheels and tires, and often enhanced interior trim. Features like air conditioning and power amenities were often optional across trims.
1985 Toyota Celica Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 1985 |
Make | Toyota |
Model | Celica |
Trim | - |
Style | - |
Type | Coupe |
Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | Japan |
Manufacturing City | TOYOTA CITY |
Dimensions
Doors | 2-Door |
Curb Weight | - |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
Overall Height | - |
Overall Length | - |
Overall Width | - |
Wheelbase Length | - |
Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 22R |
Engine Size | 2.4L |
Engine Cylinders | 4 |
Transmission | - |
Transmission Type | - |
Transmission Speeds | - |
Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | - |
Steering Type | - |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
Invoice Price | - |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1985 Toyota Celica Have?
The 1985 Toyota Celica, like many vehicles of its era, is susceptible to certain age-related issues that impact long-term reliability. One of the most prevalent concerns is rust, especially in areas exposed to road salt and moisture. Common rust points include the rocker panels, wheel wells, rear quarter panels, and the underside of the vehicle. Thorough inspection for corrosion is crucial for any buyer.
Electrical issues are another frequently reported problem. Over time, wiring harnesses can degrade, leading to intermittent problems with lights, gauges, power windows, and other accessories. Loose connections, corroded grounds, and failing relays are common culprits. The pop-up headlight system, while stylish, can also develop issues with motors and linkages.
The engine, particularly the 22R-E, is generally robust but can develop oil leaks from seals and gaskets with age. The cooling system should be checked for leaks and the radiator's condition. Timing belts require regular replacement to prevent catastrophic engine damage.
The transmission, whether manual or automatic, is usually durable, but clutch wear on manual transmissions and potential seal leaks on automatics are points to monitor. Worn suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and bushings, are also common due to mileage and age, leading to poor handling and alignment issues.
While specific recalls for the 1985 model year are not widely documented as major systemic issues, it's always advisable to check with the NHTSA or Toyota for any applicable recalls. Generally, the third-generation Celica is known for its solid engineering, but consistent maintenance and proactive attention to these common wear-and-tear items are key to ensuring its longevity.
Electrical issues are another frequently reported problem. Over time, wiring harnesses can degrade, leading to intermittent problems with lights, gauges, power windows, and other accessories. Loose connections, corroded grounds, and failing relays are common culprits. The pop-up headlight system, while stylish, can also develop issues with motors and linkages.
The engine, particularly the 22R-E, is generally robust but can develop oil leaks from seals and gaskets with age. The cooling system should be checked for leaks and the radiator's condition. Timing belts require regular replacement to prevent catastrophic engine damage.
The transmission, whether manual or automatic, is usually durable, but clutch wear on manual transmissions and potential seal leaks on automatics are points to monitor. Worn suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and bushings, are also common due to mileage and age, leading to poor handling and alignment issues.
While specific recalls for the 1985 model year are not widely documented as major systemic issues, it's always advisable to check with the NHTSA or Toyota for any applicable recalls. Generally, the third-generation Celica is known for its solid engineering, but consistent maintenance and proactive attention to these common wear-and-tear items are key to ensuring its longevity.
How long will the 1985 Toyota Celica last?
With proper and consistent maintenance, a 1985 Toyota Celica can reasonably achieve well over 200,000 miles, with many examples exceeding 250,000 miles. The long-term durability of the Toyota powertrain is legendary, and the chassis, if protected from significant rust, holds up well over time. Weaknesses that can shorten its service life include neglect of rust prevention and maintenance. Neglecting oil changes, cooling system flushes, and timely replacement of wear items like timing belts can lead to premature component failure. However, for a well-cared-for example, it can provide many more years of enjoyable service, often lasting 25-35 years or more.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1985 Toyota Celica reflects the technology available in the mid-1980s, focusing on core driving functions rather than extensive digital integration. Standard tech features typically included a radio with an AM/FM tuner, often with a cassette player as an upgrade. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were available as options, particularly on higher trims like the GT and GT-S, enhancing convenience. Air conditioning was also a popular option. The dashboard featured an array of analog gauges for speed, tachometer, fuel, and temperature, providing clear and immediate driver feedback.
Driver-assistance features were rudimentary by today's standards. Power steering was common, improving maneuverability. Some models might have featured intermittent wipers. Cruise control was an available option on some trims for highway cruising.
Safety features for the 1985 Celica included three-point seatbelts for front occupants and lap belts for rear passengers. Crumple zones were engineered into the body structure to absorb impact energy. Power-assisted disc brakes were standard on the front and often on the rear as well, providing effective stopping power. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not yet widely available or standard on vehicles of this class in 1985.
Regarding crash-test ratings, specific official ratings for the 1985 Toyota Celica from agencies like the NHTSA or IIHS from that period are not readily available or as comprehensive as modern tests. However, vehicles from this era generally performed less favorably in frontal and side impact tests compared to contemporary vehicles due to differences in safety standards, airbag technology, and structural engineering. The focus was on passive safety features like seatbelts and a robust chassis structure.
Driver-assistance features were rudimentary by today's standards. Power steering was common, improving maneuverability. Some models might have featured intermittent wipers. Cruise control was an available option on some trims for highway cruising.
Safety features for the 1985 Celica included three-point seatbelts for front occupants and lap belts for rear passengers. Crumple zones were engineered into the body structure to absorb impact energy. Power-assisted disc brakes were standard on the front and often on the rear as well, providing effective stopping power. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were not yet widely available or standard on vehicles of this class in 1985.
Regarding crash-test ratings, specific official ratings for the 1985 Toyota Celica from agencies like the NHTSA or IIHS from that period are not readily available or as comprehensive as modern tests. However, vehicles from this era generally performed less favorably in frontal and side impact tests compared to contemporary vehicles due to differences in safety standards, airbag technology, and structural engineering. The focus was on passive safety features like seatbelts and a robust chassis structure.
What Colors Options are Available?
1985 Toyota Celica Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1985 Toyota Celica had an MSRP typically ranging from approximately $9,000 for base models to upwards of $14,000 for fully equipped GT-S trims. As a product of its time, the Celica experienced typical depreciation, with its value decreasing significantly in its first decade. However, well-maintained examples, especially the sought-after GT-S models, have seen their values stabilize and even appreciate in recent years due to their classic status and the enduring appeal of Japanese sports cars. Factors affecting current used market prices include condition, mileage, originality, trim level (GT-S being most desirable), and the presence of rust. Clean, low-mileage examples can fetch anywhere from $4,000 to $10,000+, while project cars are available for much less.
1985 Toyota Celica Cost of Ownership
The 1985 Toyota Celica is generally economical to own. Insurance premiums are typically low for classic or collector vehicles, especially compared to modern sports cars. Fuel economy is respectable for its era, averaging around 20-25 MPG. Maintenance costs are moderate; while parts are generally available and affordable, some specialized components might be harder to find for older trims. Routine maintenance like oil changes, filter replacements, and tune-ups are straightforward. Repair costs are reasonable, thanks to Toyota's reliability and the availability of aftermarket parts. However, addressing rust or significant electrical issues can increase costs. Overall, it offers a cost-effective entry into classic sports car ownership.
1985 Toyota Celica Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1985 Toyota Celica Insurance
Insurance for a 1985 Toyota Celica is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Coupe with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1985 Toyota Celica Compare to Other Coupe?
The 1985 Toyota Celica competed in a vibrant sports coupe segment. Key rivals included the Nissan 240SX (S12 chassis), Mazda RX-7 (FB chassis), and domestic offerings like the Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro.
Performance: The Celica GT-S, with its 3S-GE engine, offered competitive performance, particularly in handling due to its independent rear suspension and rear-wheel-drive dynamics. The RX-7, especially with its rotary engine, often provided a more exhilarating, albeit less torquey, performance experience. The 240SX offered a balanced performance package. Domestic rivals like the Mustang and Camaro often boasted more raw horsepower but could be less refined in handling.
Features: In the mid-80s, the Celica offered a good balance of features, especially with optional power amenities and a decent stereo. Rivals like the 240SX and RX-7 were similarly equipped. Domestic options might have offered more creature comforts in higher trims, but often at the expense of Japanese reliability.
Reliability: This is where the Toyota Celica consistently shone. Toyota's reputation for robust engineering and build quality made the Celica a standout for reliability compared to many of its rivals, which could be more prone to mechanical gremlins or rust.
Price: The Celica was competitively priced, offering good value for its performance and reliability. The Mustang and Camaro could often be found at lower entry prices, while the RX-7 sometimes commanded a higher premium. The 240SX was a strong contender in terms of price-to-performance ratio.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Celica GT-S, with its 3S-GE engine, offered competitive performance, particularly in handling due to its independent rear suspension and rear-wheel-drive dynamics. The RX-7, especially with its rotary engine, often provided a more exhilarating, albeit less torquey, performance experience. The 240SX offered a balanced performance package. Domestic rivals like the Mustang and Camaro often boasted more raw horsepower but could be less refined in handling.
Features: In the mid-80s, the Celica offered a good balance of features, especially with optional power amenities and a decent stereo. Rivals like the 240SX and RX-7 were similarly equipped. Domestic options might have offered more creature comforts in higher trims, but often at the expense of Japanese reliability.
Reliability: This is where the Toyota Celica consistently shone. Toyota's reputation for robust engineering and build quality made the Celica a standout for reliability compared to many of its rivals, which could be more prone to mechanical gremlins or rust.
Price: The Celica was competitively priced, offering good value for its performance and reliability. The Mustang and Camaro could often be found at lower entry prices, while the RX-7 sometimes commanded a higher premium. The 240SX was a strong contender in terms of price-to-performance ratio.
Alternatives:
- Similar: The Nissan 240SX (S12) is a very comparable alternative, offering similar rear-wheel-drive fun, distinct styling, and good reliability, though perhaps slightly less bulletproof than the Toyota.
- Performance-focused: If pure driving excitement and unique engineering are priorities, an Mazda RX-7 (FB) is a compelling choice, but expect higher maintenance costs and potentially lower fuel economy.
- Classic American Muscle: For those prioritizing straight-line acceleration and a more classic aesthetic, a well-maintained Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro from the era could be considered, though reliability might be a compromise.
Final Verdict: Is the 1985 Toyota Celica a Good Coupe?
The 1985 Toyota Celica is ideal for enthusiasts seeking a stylish, fun-to-drive, and historically reliable Japanese sports coupe without the exorbitant costs associated with more exotic classics. It's perfect for individuals who appreciate 80s automotive design and the engaging experience of rear-wheel-drive handling.
It is absolutely worth buying, particularly in good condition. The GT-S trim is highly recommended for those prioritizing performance. When buying used, prioritize examples with minimal rust and a well-documented maintenance history. While finding a pristine, low-mileage example can be challenging, a well-cared-for car with average mileage can still offer years of enjoyment. It represents excellent value as a reliable and stylish classic that won't break the bank for ownership costs.
It is absolutely worth buying, particularly in good condition. The GT-S trim is highly recommended for those prioritizing performance. When buying used, prioritize examples with minimal rust and a well-documented maintenance history. While finding a pristine, low-mileage example can be challenging, a well-cared-for car with average mileage can still offer years of enjoyment. It represents excellent value as a reliable and stylish classic that won't break the bank for ownership costs.