The 1982 Toyota Celica marked the debut of the third generation, renowned for its aerodynamic styling and sporty aspirations. Available as a coupe and liftback, it spanned model years from 1982 to 1985. Key trims included the ST, GT, and the performance-oriented GT-S. While new pricing varied, its popularity stemmed from a blend of accessible performance, Toyota's reputation for reliability, and a distinctive, wedge-shaped design that appealed to a youthful demographic seeking style and value.
The Good
The 1982 Celica offered a compelling mix of sporty handling and peppy performance for its era, backed by Toyota's legendary reliability. Its sleek design evoked excitement, while surprisingly comfortable interiors and good fuel economy made it a practical daily driver. This duality appealed to both the heart and the wallet.
The Bad
Potential buyers should be aware of rust, particularly in the lower body panels and wheel arches. The fuel injection systems, while generally reliable, can develop issues. Older examples may also suffer from worn suspension components and interior trim degradation due to age.
1982 Toyota Celica: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1982 Toyota Celica offered several engine choices depending on the trim level and market. The base models typically featured a 2.4-liter 22R inline-four engine. Higher trims, particularly the GT-S, often came equipped with a more powerful 2.4-liter 22R-E engine, which was fuel-injected. Some international markets may have had different engine configurations.
- Horsepower: Horsepower figures varied significantly. The base 22R engine produced around 96 horsepower, while the fuel-injected 22R-E in the GT-S variant offered approximately 112 horsepower. These figures were competitive for its class at the time.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy was a strong point for the Celica. Owners could expect to achieve EPA estimates ranging from the mid-20s to low 30s miles per gallon (MPG) on the highway, depending on the engine, transmission, and driving conditions. This made it an economical choice for daily commuting.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration figures were respectable for a sporty coupe of its era. The GT-S model, with its more potent engine and sportier tuning, could achieve 0-60 mph in roughly 9 to 10 seconds. Base models would be slightly slower.
- Towing Capacity: The 1982 Toyota Celica was not designed or intended for towing. As a sporty passenger car, it did not have a designated towing capacity.
- Trim-Level Features:
ST (Sport Touring Automatic): Typically the base trim, it offered essential features like power steering, an AM/FM radio, and a comfortable interior. It was usually paired with the less powerful engine and a manual transmission.
GT (Grand Touring): Stepping up, the GT trim added more creature comforts such as upgraded upholstery, a tachometer, and sometimes air conditioning as standard or optional.
GT-S (Grand Touring Sport): This was the performance flagship. It featured the more powerful fuel-injected engine, sportier suspension tuning, wider wheels and tires, often a limited-slip differential, and aggressive styling cues like spoilers and fender flares. Interior enhancements often included sport seats and more comprehensive instrumentation. Optional features across trims could include power windows, power mirrors, cruise control, and upgraded sound systems.
1982 Toyota Celica Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1982 |
| Make | Toyota |
| Model | Celica |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Hatchback |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Japan |
| Manufacturing City | - |
Dimensions
| Doors | 3-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 3L I6 |
| Engine Size | 3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1982 Toyota Celica Have?
The 1982 Toyota Celica, like many vehicles of its vintage, has certain commonly reported issues that owners should be aware of. One of the most prevalent concerns, particularly for cars that have spent time in rust-prone areas, is body corrosion. Rust can aggressively attack the lower body panels, rocker panels, wheel arches, and the undercarriage. Thorough inspection for rust is paramount when considering a purchase.
In terms of mechanicals, the fuel injection system, especially on the GT-S models, can become a source of trouble as the vehicle ages. Issues might include clogged injectors, faulty fuel pressure regulators, or sensor problems, leading to rough idling, hesitation, or poor performance. While the 22R engine series is generally robust, seals and gaskets can degrade over time, leading to oil leaks. The cooling system, including the radiator and water pump, may also require attention due to age.
The suspension and steering components are also susceptible to wear. Worn ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings can lead to sloppy handling, premature tire wear, and clunking noises. Brake components, including calipers and lines, should be inspected for leaks and wear. The clutch in manual transmission models can also wear out over time.
Electrical gremlins are not uncommon in older cars. Issues with the wiring harness, such as frayed wires or corroded connections, can affect various systems, from the lighting to the ignition and fuel injection. Power windows and door locks may become slow or inoperable. The dashboard warning lights can also be intermittent or fail.
Regarding recalls, it's important to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any applicable recalls for this specific model year and VIN. However, for vehicles of this age, most major safety recalls would have been addressed decades ago. Long-term reliability is generally good for the drivetrain if maintained properly, but the aging of various rubber and plastic components, along with exposure to the elements, presents the primary challenges.
In terms of mechanicals, the fuel injection system, especially on the GT-S models, can become a source of trouble as the vehicle ages. Issues might include clogged injectors, faulty fuel pressure regulators, or sensor problems, leading to rough idling, hesitation, or poor performance. While the 22R engine series is generally robust, seals and gaskets can degrade over time, leading to oil leaks. The cooling system, including the radiator and water pump, may also require attention due to age.
The suspension and steering components are also susceptible to wear. Worn ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings can lead to sloppy handling, premature tire wear, and clunking noises. Brake components, including calipers and lines, should be inspected for leaks and wear. The clutch in manual transmission models can also wear out over time.
Electrical gremlins are not uncommon in older cars. Issues with the wiring harness, such as frayed wires or corroded connections, can affect various systems, from the lighting to the ignition and fuel injection. Power windows and door locks may become slow or inoperable. The dashboard warning lights can also be intermittent or fail.
Regarding recalls, it's important to check the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) database for any applicable recalls for this specific model year and VIN. However, for vehicles of this age, most major safety recalls would have been addressed decades ago. Long-term reliability is generally good for the drivetrain if maintained properly, but the aging of various rubber and plastic components, along with exposure to the elements, presents the primary challenges.
How long will the 1982 Toyota Celica last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1982 Toyota Celica can achieve well over 200,000 miles, and many have surpassed the 300,000-mile mark. Toyota's robust 22R engine series is known for its longevity. However, typical years of service are heavily influenced by the owner's commitment to regular oil changes, coolant flushes, and addressing minor issues promptly. Neglect can significantly shorten its lifespan. While the powertrain demonstrates impressive durability, its weaknesses over time lie in the susceptibility of body panels to rust and the gradual degradation of rubber and plastic components (hoses, seals, interior parts) due to age and environmental factors. Proper rust prevention and corrosion control are crucial for maximizing its service life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1982 Toyota Celica represents a transitional period in automotive technology, with features focused on the essentials rather than advanced electronics.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player as an optional upgrade. Some higher trim levels might have offered more sophisticated speaker systems. Basic climate control, including heating and ventilation, was standard. Features like power steering were common, and power windows and mirrors were available as options on mid-to-upper trims. Cruise control was also an optional convenience feature.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance technologies as we know them today were virtually non-existent. The focus was on the driving experience itself. Features that could be considered rudimentary driver aids included the power steering, which reduced steering effort, and the availability of rear-wheel anti-lock brakes (ABS) as an optional, albeit rare, feature on some models towards the end of the generation, though it wasn't widely available on the 1982 model.
Safety Features: Safety features for the 1982 Celica were rudimentary by modern standards. Standard safety equipment included three-point seatbelts (lap and shoulder belts), padded dashboards and steering wheels, and energy-absorbing crumple zones in the body structure. Side-impact door beams were also becoming standard. Headrests were integrated into the seats. Given the era, advanced safety technologies like airbags or electronic stability control were not available.
Optional Features: Beyond the aforementioned power accessories and cruise control, options could include air conditioning, a more advanced sound system, and special interior or exterior trim packages.
Crash-Test Ratings: Comprehensive crash-test data from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 1982 model year is not readily available or comparable to modern standards. Vehicle safety testing was less standardized and publicly reported in the early 1980s compared to today. However, based on the automotive safety advancements of the time, it offered standard safety provisions for its class.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player as an optional upgrade. Some higher trim levels might have offered more sophisticated speaker systems. Basic climate control, including heating and ventilation, was standard. Features like power steering were common, and power windows and mirrors were available as options on mid-to-upper trims. Cruise control was also an optional convenience feature.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance technologies as we know them today were virtually non-existent. The focus was on the driving experience itself. Features that could be considered rudimentary driver aids included the power steering, which reduced steering effort, and the availability of rear-wheel anti-lock brakes (ABS) as an optional, albeit rare, feature on some models towards the end of the generation, though it wasn't widely available on the 1982 model.
Safety Features: Safety features for the 1982 Celica were rudimentary by modern standards. Standard safety equipment included three-point seatbelts (lap and shoulder belts), padded dashboards and steering wheels, and energy-absorbing crumple zones in the body structure. Side-impact door beams were also becoming standard. Headrests were integrated into the seats. Given the era, advanced safety technologies like airbags or electronic stability control were not available.
Optional Features: Beyond the aforementioned power accessories and cruise control, options could include air conditioning, a more advanced sound system, and special interior or exterior trim packages.
Crash-Test Ratings: Comprehensive crash-test data from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for the 1982 model year is not readily available or comparable to modern standards. Vehicle safety testing was less standardized and publicly reported in the early 1980s compared to today. However, based on the automotive safety advancements of the time, it offered standard safety provisions for its class.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1982 Toyota Celica Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1982 Toyota Celica had an MSRP that ranged from approximately $8,000 for a base ST model to over $12,000 for a well-equipped GT-S. These prices were competitive for a sporty coupe in the early 1980s. Today, used market prices for the 1982 Celica vary widely, typically from $2,000 for project cars needing significant work to $8,000-$15,000 or more for exceptionally well-maintained, low-mileage examples, especially sought-after GT-S models. The vehicle has experienced significant depreciation over the decades, as is typical for most cars of this age. Factors affecting resale value include the car's overall condition (especially rust), originality, mileage, maintenance history, and the desirability of specific trims like the GT-S. Pristine, unmodified examples command the highest prices.
1982 Toyota Celica Cost of Ownership
The 1982 Toyota Celica is generally economical to own. Insurance costs are typically low for classic or enthusiast vehicles of this age, though it depends on coverage and driver history. Fuel costs are moderate, with good highway MPG for its era. Routine maintenance, like oil changes and filter replacements, is inexpensive. Parts are generally available and affordable, although some specialized components for rarer trims might be harder to find. Repairs are often straightforward due to its simpler mechanicals. Overall, the Celica is a cost-effective choice for long-term ownership, provided it has been well-maintained and rust is not a major issue.
1982 Toyota Celica Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1982 Toyota Celica Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1982 Toyota Celica Insurance
Insurance for a 1982 Toyota Celica is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Hatchback with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1982 Toyota Celica Compare to Other Hatchback?
The 1982 Toyota Celica occupied the sporty coupe segment, directly competing with vehicles like the Datsun 280ZX (later Nissan 300ZX), Mazda RX-7, and Ford Mustang.
Performance: In terms of performance, the Celica GT-S, with its fuel-injected engine and sport-tuned suspension, offered competitive acceleration and handling for its time. The RX-7 often had a performance edge due to its rotary engine and lighter weight, while the 280ZX provided a smoother, more luxurious grand touring experience. The Mustang offered a range of performance from economical to more potent V8 options.
Features: The Celica offered a good balance of sporty features and creature comforts. While not as luxurious as the 280ZX, it provided more modern amenities than some base-model competitors. The GT-S trim was well-equipped for its class, though advanced tech was limited across all rivals.
Reliability: Toyota's reputation for reliability was a significant advantage for the Celica. While the Mazda RX-7 was engaging, rotary engines could be more temperamental and costly to maintain long-term. Datsun/Nissan vehicles were generally reliable, but some earlier models had electrical issues. The Ford Mustang, particularly with its V8 engines, could be robust but often required more maintenance than its Japanese counterparts.
Price: The Celica was generally priced competitively, offering good value for money compared to some of its rivals, especially when factoring in its reliability and fuel efficiency. The Mustang could often be found at a lower entry price, particularly in its base configurations.
Alternatives:
Similar: The Mazda RX-7 (especially the earlier generations like the FB) is a strong contender if performance and a unique driving experience are prioritized. The Nissan 240SX (later S13) would be a successor to the Datsun Z cars and offers a good blend of sportiness and everyday usability, though it came later.
Better (depending on priorities): If outright performance is key, a V8-powered Mustang of the era might be considered, though reliability can be a question mark. For a more refined and comfortable grand touring experience, a Datsun 280ZX or its successor, the Nissan 300ZX, would be superior. However, for a blend of sporty driving, bulletproof reliability, and reasonable running costs, the 1982 Celica remains an excellent choice in its peer group.
Performance: In terms of performance, the Celica GT-S, with its fuel-injected engine and sport-tuned suspension, offered competitive acceleration and handling for its time. The RX-7 often had a performance edge due to its rotary engine and lighter weight, while the 280ZX provided a smoother, more luxurious grand touring experience. The Mustang offered a range of performance from economical to more potent V8 options.
Features: The Celica offered a good balance of sporty features and creature comforts. While not as luxurious as the 280ZX, it provided more modern amenities than some base-model competitors. The GT-S trim was well-equipped for its class, though advanced tech was limited across all rivals.
Reliability: Toyota's reputation for reliability was a significant advantage for the Celica. While the Mazda RX-7 was engaging, rotary engines could be more temperamental and costly to maintain long-term. Datsun/Nissan vehicles were generally reliable, but some earlier models had electrical issues. The Ford Mustang, particularly with its V8 engines, could be robust but often required more maintenance than its Japanese counterparts.
Price: The Celica was generally priced competitively, offering good value for money compared to some of its rivals, especially when factoring in its reliability and fuel efficiency. The Mustang could often be found at a lower entry price, particularly in its base configurations.
Alternatives:
Similar: The Mazda RX-7 (especially the earlier generations like the FB) is a strong contender if performance and a unique driving experience are prioritized. The Nissan 240SX (later S13) would be a successor to the Datsun Z cars and offers a good blend of sportiness and everyday usability, though it came later.
Better (depending on priorities): If outright performance is key, a V8-powered Mustang of the era might be considered, though reliability can be a question mark. For a more refined and comfortable grand touring experience, a Datsun 280ZX or its successor, the Nissan 300ZX, would be superior. However, for a blend of sporty driving, bulletproof reliability, and reasonable running costs, the 1982 Celica remains an excellent choice in its peer group.
Final Verdict: Is the 1982 Toyota Celica a Good Hatchback?
The 1982 Toyota Celica is ideal for enthusiasts seeking an affordable, reliable, and stylish classic coupe with a sporty flair. It's perfect for someone who appreciates its distinctive 80s design and enjoys the rewarding driving experience it offers without the high maintenance costs of some European counterparts. It is definitely worth buying, especially in the used market, provided it has been well-maintained and inspected for rust. Buying a GT-S trim is recommended for those prioritizing performance. While never sold new, a well-preserved example in good condition offers excellent value as a dependable classic that can be enjoyed for years to come.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.