The 1995 Chevrolet Blazer marked the debut of its redesigned second generation (S-10 based), solidifying its position as a popular mid-size SUV. Available in both practical four-door and sporty two-door body styles, it offered a blend of utility and comfort. Key trims included the Base, LS, and LT, with the ZR2 package for enhanced off-road capability. New, prices ranged from approximately $18,000 to $25,000. It stood out for its rugged build, available 4x4, and versatility, appealing to families and adventurers alike.
The Good
The 1995 Chevrolet Blazer offers a compelling mix of advantages. Its robust V6 engine and available 4x4 capability appeal to adventurous spirits, while the spacious, comfortable interior (especially the 4-door) serves practical family needs. Its classic, rugged design holds timeless appeal. Furthermore, its strong reliability reputation, widespread parts availability, and very low used market value make it an economical and practical choice for buyers seeking a versatile, dependable SUV.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer include susceptibility to rust, particularly on the frame, rocker panels, and wheel wells. Owners often report issues with intake manifold gaskets, leading to coolant leaks, and various electrical gremlins like malfunctioning gauges or power accessories. Worn suspension and steering components, such as ball joints and tie rods, are also common, requiring attention to maintain safe handling.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer: Quick Overview
Here is a summary of the key specifications for the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer:
- Engine Options: The primary engine offered for the 1995 Blazer was the robust 4.3-liter "Vortec" V6. This particular year featured the Throttle Body Injection (TBI) version before the multi-port fuel injection update in 1996. While a 2.2-liter four-cylinder was available in the S-10 pickup, it was rarely, if ever, seen in the Blazer, which typically came standard with the V6.
- Horsepower: The 4.3L TBI V6 produced approximately 160 horsepower at 4000 rpm and 230 lb-ft of torque at 2800 rpm, providing adequate power for daily driving and light hauling.
- Fuel Economy:
- 2WD models: Around 16 MPG city / 21 MPG highway.
- 4WD models: Around 15 MPG city / 19 MPG highway.
- 0-60 Times: The 1995 Blazer, equipped with the 4.3L V6, typically achieved 0-60 mph acceleration times in the 9.0 to 10.0 second range, which was competitive for a mid-size SUV of its era but not considered fast by modern standards.
- Towing Capacity: When properly equipped with the 4.3L V6 and a towing package, the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer could tow up to 5,500 pounds, making it capable for hauling small boats, utility trailers, or light campers.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: This entry-level trim offered essential features, often including manual windows and door locks, an AM/FM stereo, and basic cloth seating. Air conditioning was typically an option.
- LS: A more popular trim, the LS added conveniences such as power windows and door locks, cruise control, often standard air conditioning, an upgraded stereo, and frequently included alloy wheels as an option.
- LT: Positioned as the premium trim, the LT provided more luxury features. These could include leather seating surfaces (optional), a power driver's seat, remote keyless entry, a premium sound system, automatic climate control (optional), and more distinctive alloy wheel designs.
- ZR2 (2-door only): This specialized off-road package transformed the 2-door Blazer with a wider stance, unique wheels, larger tires, heavy-duty suspension components, skid plates for underbody protection, and a limited-slip differential, enhancing its capability for challenging terrain.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1995 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Blazer |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Door 2WD 5-Speed |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | SPRINGHILL |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4071 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 67.00 inches |
| Overall Length | 181.20 inches |
| Overall Width | 67.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 107.00 inches |
| Standard Seating | 6 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.3L V6 |
| Engine Size | 4.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $18,470 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer Have?
The 1995 Chevrolet Blazer, while generally robust, is known for several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns that potential owners should be aware of. One of the most notorious issues across the 4.3L V6 engine (especially the TBI version) is the intake manifold gasket leak. This common failure often leads to coolant loss, engine overheating, and can cause significant internal damage if left unaddressed. It's a persistent issue that often requires costly repair.
Another common complaint is related to the fuel pump, which is situated inside the fuel tank. These pumps are known to fail, often without prior warning, leaving the vehicle inoperable. Furthermore, many owners report issues with the Anti-lock Brake System (ABS), where the ABS light illuminates due to faulty wheel speed sensors or problems with the ABS module itself, disabling the crucial safety system.
Electrical gremlins are also prevalent in these vehicles. These can manifest as malfunctioning gauges (e.g., erratic speedometer or fuel gauge readings), power window and door lock failures, or issues with the radio and interior lighting. Over time, steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rod ends, idler arms, and pitman arms, wear out, leading to loose steering, clunking noises, and compromised handling, necessitating regular replacement.
While the 4L60E automatic transmission is generally durable, high-mileage examples can develop problems like delayed shifts, slipping, or harsh engagement. Long-term, rust remains a significant concern, particularly in regions exposed to road salt. The frame, rocker panels, rear quarter panels, and door bottoms are especially susceptible, which can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult.
Regarding recalls, the 1995 Blazer, like many GM vehicles of its era, did have several. A notable, although broad, concern for many 1990s GM vehicles was related to cruise control modules causing potential fires, which could sometimes apply to the Blazer depending on specific build dates and parts. Other recalls often addressed issues like rear axle shaft integrity, seat belt buckle functionality, or wiper motor operation. It's always advisable to check a specific VIN for open recalls.
Another common complaint is related to the fuel pump, which is situated inside the fuel tank. These pumps are known to fail, often without prior warning, leaving the vehicle inoperable. Furthermore, many owners report issues with the Anti-lock Brake System (ABS), where the ABS light illuminates due to faulty wheel speed sensors or problems with the ABS module itself, disabling the crucial safety system.
Electrical gremlins are also prevalent in these vehicles. These can manifest as malfunctioning gauges (e.g., erratic speedometer or fuel gauge readings), power window and door lock failures, or issues with the radio and interior lighting. Over time, steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rod ends, idler arms, and pitman arms, wear out, leading to loose steering, clunking noises, and compromised handling, necessitating regular replacement.
While the 4L60E automatic transmission is generally durable, high-mileage examples can develop problems like delayed shifts, slipping, or harsh engagement. Long-term, rust remains a significant concern, particularly in regions exposed to road salt. The frame, rocker panels, rear quarter panels, and door bottoms are especially susceptible, which can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult.
Regarding recalls, the 1995 Blazer, like many GM vehicles of its era, did have several. A notable, although broad, concern for many 1990s GM vehicles was related to cruise control modules causing potential fires, which could sometimes apply to the Blazer depending on specific build dates and parts. Other recalls often addressed issues like rear axle shaft integrity, seat belt buckle functionality, or wiper motor operation. It's always advisable to check a specific VIN for open recalls.
How long will the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer last?
Based on owner data and diligent maintenance habits, a 1995 Chevrolet Blazer can reliably achieve between 150,000 and 200,000 miles, with many well-cared-for examples exceeding 250,000 miles. It's not uncommon to see these vehicles still on the road well over 25 years after production, a testament to their fundamental long-term durability. The 4.3L V6 engine and 4L60E automatic transmission are generally robust powerplants capable of enduring significant mileage if fluid changes and routine servicing are not neglected.
However, several weaknesses emerge over time. Rust is arguably the biggest long-term durability concern, especially in northern climates, often leading to structural compromise or extensive repair costs that outweigh the vehicle's value. Electrical system components can degrade, causing intermittent issues with gauges, lighting, and power accessories. Constant wear and tear on suspension and steering parts require ongoing replacement, and interior plastics can become brittle or faded, detracting from the overall condition. These factors mean that while the core mechanicals can last, the ancillary systems and body integrity often dictate its ultimate lifespan.
However, several weaknesses emerge over time. Rust is arguably the biggest long-term durability concern, especially in northern climates, often leading to structural compromise or extensive repair costs that outweigh the vehicle's value. Electrical system components can degrade, causing intermittent issues with gauges, lighting, and power accessories. Constant wear and tear on suspension and steering parts require ongoing replacement, and interior plastics can become brittle or faded, detracting from the overall condition. These factors mean that while the core mechanicals can last, the ancillary systems and body integrity often dictate its ultimate lifespan.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1995 Chevrolet Blazer, reflecting automotive technology of its era, offered a relatively spartan set of built-in tech, entertainment, driver-assistance, and safety features compared to today's vehicles.
In terms of built-in tech, the Blazer featured a straightforward, analog dashboard with traditional gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Climate control was typically manual, though higher trims like the LT could offer an optional automatic climate control system. There were no advanced onboard computers or digital displays beyond a basic odometer.
For entertainment, the standard offering was an AM/FM stereo, often paired with a cassette player. Higher trim levels or optional packages could include a single-disc CD player and an upgraded sound system with more speakers, but multi-CD changers or satellite radio were not available. Connectivity was limited to the radio itself; auxiliary inputs or Bluetooth were decades away.
Driver-assistance features were essentially non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, lane departure warning, or blind-spot monitoring. The most "advanced" driver aid available was cruise control, which was standard on LS and LT trims and optional on the Base model.
Regarding safety features, the 1995 Blazer saw an improvement over previous generations. A driver-side airbag was standard, providing a critical layer of protection for the driver in frontal collisions. Anti-lock brakes were standard, typically a rear-wheel ABS system, with four-wheel ABS being an option or standard on higher trims. All seating positions were equipped with three-point seatbelts, and four-door models included child safety locks on the rear doors. A passenger-side airbag was not standard and was likely introduced in later model years of this generation.
Crash-test ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 1995 S-10 Blazer/Jimmy indicated a 3-star rating for the driver and a 4-star rating for the passenger in frontal impact tests. It is crucial to understand that these ratings are relative to vehicles of that specific model year and are not comparable to the more stringent testing and higher standards of modern crash tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) did not conduct crash tests on vehicles of this vintage, making NHTSA ratings the primary source for safety assessment from that period.
In terms of built-in tech, the Blazer featured a straightforward, analog dashboard with traditional gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Climate control was typically manual, though higher trims like the LT could offer an optional automatic climate control system. There were no advanced onboard computers or digital displays beyond a basic odometer.
For entertainment, the standard offering was an AM/FM stereo, often paired with a cassette player. Higher trim levels or optional packages could include a single-disc CD player and an upgraded sound system with more speakers, but multi-CD changers or satellite radio were not available. Connectivity was limited to the radio itself; auxiliary inputs or Bluetooth were decades away.
Driver-assistance features were essentially non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, lane departure warning, or blind-spot monitoring. The most "advanced" driver aid available was cruise control, which was standard on LS and LT trims and optional on the Base model.
Regarding safety features, the 1995 Blazer saw an improvement over previous generations. A driver-side airbag was standard, providing a critical layer of protection for the driver in frontal collisions. Anti-lock brakes were standard, typically a rear-wheel ABS system, with four-wheel ABS being an option or standard on higher trims. All seating positions were equipped with three-point seatbelts, and four-door models included child safety locks on the rear doors. A passenger-side airbag was not standard and was likely introduced in later model years of this generation.
Crash-test ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 1995 S-10 Blazer/Jimmy indicated a 3-star rating for the driver and a 4-star rating for the passenger in frontal impact tests. It is crucial to understand that these ratings are relative to vehicles of that specific model year and are not comparable to the more stringent testing and higher standards of modern crash tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) did not conduct crash tests on vehicles of this vintage, making NHTSA ratings the primary source for safety assessment from that period.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Prices and Market Value
When new in 1995, the Chevrolet Blazer carried a sticker price that varied significantly by trim and options. A base 2WD model might have started around $17,000 to $19,000, while a well-equipped LS or LT 4WD model could easily push into the $24,000 to $27,000 range.
Today, on the current used market, the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer has experienced its full depreciation cycle, reaching extremely low price points. Prices are highly variable, ranging from just $500 to $1,500 for examples in rough or non-running condition, up to $1,500 to $3,500 for a decent, running driver. Exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or specific models like the ZR2 can command higher prices, potentially reaching $4,000 to $8,000 or more, though these are rare finds.
Depreciation insights show that this vehicle has long since reached the bottom of its value curve; any changes now are more about individual vehicle condition and collector interest rather than standard depreciation. Factors significantly affecting current resale value include the overall condition, with a particular emphasis on the presence and severity of rust, which can be a deal-breaker. Maintenance history, mileage, and the desirability of certain trim levels (like the off-road capable ZR2) or 4WD configurations also play a crucial role in determining its value in the used market.
Today, on the current used market, the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer has experienced its full depreciation cycle, reaching extremely low price points. Prices are highly variable, ranging from just $500 to $1,500 for examples in rough or non-running condition, up to $1,500 to $3,500 for a decent, running driver. Exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or specific models like the ZR2 can command higher prices, potentially reaching $4,000 to $8,000 or more, though these are rare finds.
Depreciation insights show that this vehicle has long since reached the bottom of its value curve; any changes now are more about individual vehicle condition and collector interest rather than standard depreciation. Factors significantly affecting current resale value include the overall condition, with a particular emphasis on the presence and severity of rust, which can be a deal-breaker. Maintenance history, mileage, and the desirability of certain trim levels (like the off-road capable ZR2) or 4WD configurations also play a crucial role in determining its value in the used market.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Cost of Ownership
The 1995 Chevrolet Blazer presents a mixed bag regarding long-term ownership costs. Insurance is typically quite low due to the vehicle's age and depreciated value, making it an affordable aspect of ownership. However, fuel costs are a significant ongoing expense; with combined MPG figures often in the mid-teens, the 4.3L V6 is not economical.
On the positive side, maintenance and repair costs for basic items are generally low. Parts are abundant and inexpensive, and many repairs are manageable for a DIY enthusiast. However, tackling known issues like intake manifold gasket replacements, fuel pump failures, or extensive rust repair can be moderately to very costly if professional help is required. Over time, recurring wear on suspension and steering components also contributes to repair bills. In summary, while the initial purchase price is very low and parts are cheap, the Blazer can be economical to own if well-maintained and you're mechanically inclined. Otherwise, high fuel consumption and potential for significant repairs make it more costly for the average owner.
On the positive side, maintenance and repair costs for basic items are generally low. Parts are abundant and inexpensive, and many repairs are manageable for a DIY enthusiast. However, tackling known issues like intake manifold gasket replacements, fuel pump failures, or extensive rust repair can be moderately to very costly if professional help is required. Over time, recurring wear on suspension and steering components also contributes to repair bills. In summary, while the initial purchase price is very low and parts are cheap, the Blazer can be economical to own if well-maintained and you're mechanically inclined. Otherwise, high fuel consumption and potential for significant repairs make it more costly for the average owner.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
19.00 gallons
City Mileage
16 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
21 miles/gallon
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Recalls & Defects
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:pedals and Linkages
Recall date
1994-12-12
Recall no.
94v242000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Brake Pedal Pivot Bolt WAS Started IN THE Weld Nut, BUT WAS NOT Torqued Correctly Causing THE Bolt TO Disengage From THE Weld Nut.
Consequence
This Condition CAN Result IN A Total Loss OF Brakingcapability.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect FOR Hand-Started Brake Pedal Bolts and Torque Them TO Correct Specifications.
Notes
System: Brakes; Hydraulic; Linkage; Pedal.vehicle Description: Light Duty Utility Vehicles.note: IF THE Vehicle IS Presented TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Uponservice Date and THE Remedy IS NOT Provided Free OF Charge Within Areasonable Time, Please Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC At1-810-456-4547. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safetyadministration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Engine and Engine Cooling:cooling System:fan
Recall date
1995-09-22
Recall no.
95v180000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
FAN Blade Rivet Breakage CAN Occur Causing THE FAN Blade TO Separate From THE Spider.
Consequence
IF This Occurred While THE Hood WAS Open, A Person Working Under THE Hood OF THE Vehicle or IN THE Vicinity OF THE Vehicle Could BE Struck BY THE FAN Blade and Injured.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect and Replace, IF Necessary, THE FAN With A Newer FAN Having Thicker-Headed Rivets.
Notes
System: Engine Cooling System; Fan.vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks and Utility Vehicles Equipped With Air-C0nditioning and 4.3l Engines.note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Suspension:front:control Arm:upper Ball Joint
Recall date
1995-04-24
Recall no.
95v080000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Upper Ball Joint Nuts Were Under-Torqued Resulting IN Improper Seating IN THE Steering Knuckle.
Consequence
This Condition CAN Cause THE Ball Joint Stud TO Loosen, and Fracture Resulting IN A Loss OF Steering Control.
Remedy
Dealers Will Retorque THE Upper Ball Joint NUT ON Both Sides OF THE Vehicle TO THE Correct Torque Values.
Notes
System: Suspension; Front Control Arm; Upper; Ball Joint.vehicle Description: Multipurpose Vehicles Equipped With 4-Wheel Drive. Note: IF Your Vehicle IS Presented TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and THE Remedy IS NOT Provided Free OF Charge Within A Reasonable Time, Please Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly
Recall date
1996-11-14
Recall no.
96v234000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: 4-Door, 4-Wheel Drive and All-wheel Drive Multi-purpose Passenger Vehicles. During Development Testing, THE Prop Shaft Contacted THE Inboard Side OF THE Fuel Tank Allowing Fuel Leakage. This Leakage WAS IN Excess OF THE Amount Permitted BY Fmvss 301, "fuel System Integrity."
Consequence
IF AN Ignition Source IS Present, and There IS A Fuel Leak, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install Additional Shielding OF THE Fuel Tank. This Will BE Added Without Removing or Disassembling THE Fuel System.
Notes
Owner Notification:owner Notification Began During Late November 1996.note:owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020, Oldsmobile AT 1-800-442-6537, or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Visibility:windshield Wiper/Washer
Recall date
1998-07-01
Recall no.
98v150001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks and Sport Utility Vehicles, 2 and 4-Wheel Drive. Solder Joints Near THE Wiring Harness Connector CAN Crack Causing THE Windshield Wipers TO Work Intermittently.
Consequence
This Condition CAN Result IN Inoperative Wipers, Reducing A Driver's Visibility, and Increasing THE Risk OF A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Wiper Motor Circuit Board and Cover.
Notes
Owner Notification Began December 15, 1998.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Recall date
1999-07-19
Recall no.
99i006000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Vehicle Description: Certain Light Duty Pickup Trucks, Sport Utility Vehicles, or Minivans Equipped With 3-Sensor ABS (Antilock Braking System) Ebc4 Units.
Consequence
These Vehicles CAN Experience Extended Stopping Distances During ABS Stops ON Certain Multiple Surfaces, Increasing THE Risk OF A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Modify THE Computer Program Which Operates THE ABS Unit ON Some Vehicles, or Replace THE Computer ON Others TO Improve THE Performance OF THE ABS ON These Surfaces.
Notes
ON Vehicles Which Required THE Computer Program TO BE Modified, Owner Notification HAS Began.for Vehicles Which Require A NEW Computer Module, GM HAS Scheduled Owner Notificatiion TO Begin During THE Last Week OF MAY 2000.a Phased Mailing Will BE Required, With THE Last Mailing Scheduled TO BE Completed BY December 2000.owners CAN Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782.
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
Recall date
1999-07-19
Recall no.
99v193000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Certain 4-Wheel Drive Pickup Trucks and Sport Utility Vehicles Equipped With ABS (Antilock Braking System) Manufactured From September 1989 Through August 1996. Under Certain Driving Conditions THE Switch Which Signals THE ABS System Whether THE Vehicle IS IN 2-Wheel or 4-wheel Drive CAN Malfunction Causing Increased Stopping Distances During ABS Stops While IN THE Two-wheel Drive Mode.
Consequence
IF This Occurred AT A Time When Minimum Stopping Distance WAS Required, A Vehicle Crash Could Occur Without Prior Warning.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace or Repair THE 4-Wheel/2-Wheel Drive Switch.
Notes
THE First Phase OF Owner Notification Letters Began MAY 31, 2000,with THE Last Mailing Completed BY October 2000. Owners CAN Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-05-19
Recall no.
06e043000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Replacement Fuel Filters, Fram Brand Name P/N G3727, With Date Codes X52911 Through X60801 Sequentially or X600141 and A Mexico Country or Origin Marking ON THE Fuel Filter Housing Manufactured From October 18, 2005, Through March 21, 2006, Sold FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above and ON Certain School Buses. (TO SEE THE School Bus Engine Sizes, Click ON "document Search" and Then "bus Applications"). THE Connector ON THE Fuel Filter WAS NOT Manufactured TO Honeywell's Specification. AS A Result, THE O-Ring MAY NOT Seat Correctly ON THE Fuel Line.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause AN Inadequate Seal AT THE Connection, Potentially Leading TO A Fuel Leak. IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Fuel Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 18, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Fram Customer Service AT 1-800-890-2075 (Option 1).
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Fram Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Vehicles Listed.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
2006-05-18
Recall no.
06e041000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain R&b, Inc. Central Multiport Fuel Injection (Cmfi) Fuel Return Lines, Models Help 55163, Napa Balkamp 700-3270, and THE Connection 2560001, Sold FOR USE AS Replacement Equipment FOR THE Vehicles Listed Above. THE Fuel Return Line HAS A Mechanical Bleed Valve Which WAS NOT Installed AT THE Proper Torque.
Consequence
A Fuel Leak CAN Occur AT THE Valve, Possibly Resulting IN A Fire.
Remedy
R&b, Inc. Will Notify Owners and AT THE Customers Request, Either Replace THE Fuel Line or Offer A Full Refund. THE Recall Began ON MAY 4, 2006. Owners MAY Contact R&b, Inc. AT 215-712-5330.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO R&b, Inc. Aftermarket Cmfi Return Fuel Lines and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2006-03-13
Recall no.
06e023000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Anzo Combination Headlamp Assemblies Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles. Some Combination Lamps ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Which Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment."
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Anzo Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Headlamps Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began MAY 9, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Anzo USA AT 909-468-3688.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Headlamp Assemblies Manufactured BY Anzo and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2009-04-07
Recall no.
09e012000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Sabersport IS Recalling 16,270 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Sabersport Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON MAY 11, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Sabersport AT 1-909-598-7589.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Sabersport.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Insurance
Insurance for a 1995 Chevrolet Blazer is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
When stacking the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer against its key rivals in the mid-size SUV class, it presents a compelling, albeit flawed, package. Its primary competitors included the Ford Explorer, Jeep Cherokee (XJ generation), Nissan Pathfinder, and Toyota 4Runner.
In terms of performance, the Blazer's 4.3L V6, producing 160 horsepower and 230 lb-ft of torque, was competitive with its direct American rival, the Ford Explorer's 4.0L V6 (which also started around 160hp for 1995, later getting more powerful SOHC versions). The Jeep Cherokee, particularly with its venerable 4.0L inline-six, often felt more robust with 190hp and legendary durability. Japanese competitors like the Nissan Pathfinder (3.0L V6, ~153hp) and Toyota 4Runner (3.0L V6, ~150hp, or 2.7L I4) offered adequate power but were often perceived as less potent. The Blazer offered capable 4x4, especially with the unique ZR2 off-road package for 2-door models, making it a decent choice for varied terrains.
Regarding features, all these SUVs offered similar levels of basic comfort and convenience for the era, including power accessories, air conditioning, and cassette/CD players on higher trims. The Blazer's interior, while functional, wasn't as refined as the Explorer's in some aspects, nor as minimalist-rugged as the Cherokee's.
Reliability is where distinctions become clearer. While the Blazer's core engine and transmission are durable, it suffers from well-documented issues like intake manifold gasket leaks, fuel pump failures, and electrical gremlins. The Ford Explorer, particularly its earlier generations, had its share of transmission and rust problems. The Jeep Cherokee with the 4.0L I6 is renowned for its engine's bulletproof reliability, though it also battled rust and various electrical issues. The Nissan Pathfinder and especially the Toyota 4Runner are generally considered to have superior overall long-term reliability and build quality, albeit at potentially higher parts costs.
In terms of price, both new and used, the Blazer and its badge-engineered twin, the GMC Jimmy, were typically among the more affordable options in their class. On the used market today, the Blazer often fetches lower prices than a comparable condition Cherokee and significantly less than a 4Runner, which consistently holds its value exceptionally well due to its reputation for longevity.
For someone prioritizing ultimate reliability and resale value, the Toyota 4Runner (though more expensive used) or a Jeep Cherokee (XJ) with the 4.0L inline-six (beware of rust) would be better alternatives. If seeking a similar, budget-friendly option, a GMC Jimmy is mechanically identical, or a later model Ford Explorer (post-1995, after some initial kinks were worked out) could be considered.
In terms of performance, the Blazer's 4.3L V6, producing 160 horsepower and 230 lb-ft of torque, was competitive with its direct American rival, the Ford Explorer's 4.0L V6 (which also started around 160hp for 1995, later getting more powerful SOHC versions). The Jeep Cherokee, particularly with its venerable 4.0L inline-six, often felt more robust with 190hp and legendary durability. Japanese competitors like the Nissan Pathfinder (3.0L V6, ~153hp) and Toyota 4Runner (3.0L V6, ~150hp, or 2.7L I4) offered adequate power but were often perceived as less potent. The Blazer offered capable 4x4, especially with the unique ZR2 off-road package for 2-door models, making it a decent choice for varied terrains.
Regarding features, all these SUVs offered similar levels of basic comfort and convenience for the era, including power accessories, air conditioning, and cassette/CD players on higher trims. The Blazer's interior, while functional, wasn't as refined as the Explorer's in some aspects, nor as minimalist-rugged as the Cherokee's.
Reliability is where distinctions become clearer. While the Blazer's core engine and transmission are durable, it suffers from well-documented issues like intake manifold gasket leaks, fuel pump failures, and electrical gremlins. The Ford Explorer, particularly its earlier generations, had its share of transmission and rust problems. The Jeep Cherokee with the 4.0L I6 is renowned for its engine's bulletproof reliability, though it also battled rust and various electrical issues. The Nissan Pathfinder and especially the Toyota 4Runner are generally considered to have superior overall long-term reliability and build quality, albeit at potentially higher parts costs.
In terms of price, both new and used, the Blazer and its badge-engineered twin, the GMC Jimmy, were typically among the more affordable options in their class. On the used market today, the Blazer often fetches lower prices than a comparable condition Cherokee and significantly less than a 4Runner, which consistently holds its value exceptionally well due to its reputation for longevity.
For someone prioritizing ultimate reliability and resale value, the Toyota 4Runner (though more expensive used) or a Jeep Cherokee (XJ) with the 4.0L inline-six (beware of rust) would be better alternatives. If seeking a similar, budget-friendly option, a GMC Jimmy is mechanically identical, or a later model Ford Explorer (post-1995, after some initial kinks were worked out) could be considered.
Final Verdict: Is the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1995 Chevrolet Blazer is ideal for a specific niche of buyers today. It's perfect for budget-conscious individuals or families seeking a highly affordable, versatile SUV for light utility, occasional hauling, or as a secondary "beater" vehicle. Off-road enthusiasts, particularly those looking for a capable and inexpensive platform to modify, will find the 2-door ZR2 models particularly appealing. It also suits those who are mechanically inclined and comfortable performing common repairs themselves, leveraging the abundant and cheap parts availability.
Is it worth buying? Yes, but strictly under the right conditions. You should only consider buying a 1995 Blazer as a used vehicle, and its value hinges almost entirely on its present condition. Focus on examples with minimal to no significant rust, a strong-running 4.3L V6, and a well-maintained transmission. While the LS or LT trims offer a good balance of features, the ZR2 is the standout for specialized off-road use. Be prepared for its known weaknesses, such as intake manifold gaskets and electrical issues. It's a solid choice for a reliable, no-frills workhorse or a fun project, but perhaps not the most refined or fuel-efficient daily driver without ongoing attention.
Is it worth buying? Yes, but strictly under the right conditions. You should only consider buying a 1995 Blazer as a used vehicle, and its value hinges almost entirely on its present condition. Focus on examples with minimal to no significant rust, a strong-running 4.3L V6, and a well-maintained transmission. While the LS or LT trims offer a good balance of features, the ZR2 is the standout for specialized off-road use. Be prepared for its known weaknesses, such as intake manifold gaskets and electrical issues. It's a solid choice for a reliable, no-frills workhorse or a fun project, but perhaps not the most refined or fuel-efficient daily driver without ongoing attention.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.