The Good
The 1995 Chevrolet Blazer offers a compelling mix of advantages. Its robust V6 engine and available 4x4 capability appeal to adventurous spirits, while the spacious, comfortable interior (especially the 4-door) serves practical family needs. Its classic, rugged design holds timeless appeal. Furthermore, its strong reliability reputation, widespread parts availability, and very low used market value make it an economical and practical choice for buyers seeking a versatile, dependable SUV.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer include susceptibility to rust, particularly on the frame, rocker panels, and wheel wells. Owners often report issues with intake manifold gaskets, leading to coolant leaks, and various electrical gremlins like malfunctioning gauges or power accessories. Worn suspension and steering components, such as ball joints and tie rods, are also common, requiring attention to maintain safe handling.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer: Quick Overview
Here is a summary of the key specifications for the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer:
- Engine Options: The primary engine offered for the 1995 Blazer was the robust 4.3-liter "Vortec" V6. This particular year featured the Throttle Body Injection (TBI) version before the multi-port fuel injection update in 1996. While a 2.2-liter four-cylinder was available in the S-10 pickup, it was rarely, if ever, seen in the Blazer, which typically came standard with the V6.
- Horsepower: The 4.3L TBI V6 produced approximately 160 horsepower at 4000 rpm and 230 lb-ft of torque at 2800 rpm, providing adequate power for daily driving and light hauling.
- Fuel Economy:
- 2WD models: Around 16 MPG city / 21 MPG highway.
- 4WD models: Around 15 MPG city / 19 MPG highway.
- 0-60 Times: The 1995 Blazer, equipped with the 4.3L V6, typically achieved 0-60 mph acceleration times in the 9.0 to 10.0 second range, which was competitive for a mid-size SUV of its era but not considered fast by modern standards.
- Towing Capacity: When properly equipped with the 4.3L V6 and a towing package, the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer could tow up to 5,500 pounds, making it capable for hauling small boats, utility trailers, or light campers.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: This entry-level trim offered essential features, often including manual windows and door locks, an AM/FM stereo, and basic cloth seating. Air conditioning was typically an option.
- LS: A more popular trim, the LS added conveniences such as power windows and door locks, cruise control, often standard air conditioning, an upgraded stereo, and frequently included alloy wheels as an option.
- LT: Positioned as the premium trim, the LT provided more luxury features. These could include leather seating surfaces (optional), a power driver's seat, remote keyless entry, a premium sound system, automatic climate control (optional), and more distinctive alloy wheel designs.
- ZR2 (2-door only): This specialized off-road package transformed the 2-door Blazer with a wider stance, unique wheels, larger tires, heavy-duty suspension components, skid plates for underbody protection, and a limited-slip differential, enhancing its capability for challenging terrain.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1995 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Blazer |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Door 2WD 5-Speed Manual |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | SPRINGHILL |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3509 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 66.00 inches |
| Overall Length | 174.70 inches |
| Overall Width | 67.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 100.50 inches |
| Standard Seating | 2 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.3-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $18,470 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer Have?
Another common complaint is related to the fuel pump, which is situated inside the fuel tank. These pumps are known to fail, often without prior warning, leaving the vehicle inoperable. Furthermore, many owners report issues with the Anti-lock Brake System (ABS), where the ABS light illuminates due to faulty wheel speed sensors or problems with the ABS module itself, disabling the crucial safety system.
Electrical gremlins are also prevalent in these vehicles. These can manifest as malfunctioning gauges (e.g., erratic speedometer or fuel gauge readings), power window and door lock failures, or issues with the radio and interior lighting. Over time, steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rod ends, idler arms, and pitman arms, wear out, leading to loose steering, clunking noises, and compromised handling, necessitating regular replacement.
While the 4L60E automatic transmission is generally durable, high-mileage examples can develop problems like delayed shifts, slipping, or harsh engagement. Long-term, rust remains a significant concern, particularly in regions exposed to road salt. The frame, rocker panels, rear quarter panels, and door bottoms are especially susceptible, which can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult.
Regarding recalls, the 1995 Blazer, like many GM vehicles of its era, did have several. A notable, although broad, concern for many 1990s GM vehicles was related to cruise control modules causing potential fires, which could sometimes apply to the Blazer depending on specific build dates and parts. Other recalls often addressed issues like rear axle shaft integrity, seat belt buckle functionality, or wiper motor operation. It's always advisable to check a specific VIN for open recalls.
How long will the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer last?
However, several weaknesses emerge over time. Rust is arguably the biggest long-term durability concern, especially in northern climates, often leading to structural compromise or extensive repair costs that outweigh the vehicle's value. Electrical system components can degrade, causing intermittent issues with gauges, lighting, and power accessories. Constant wear and tear on suspension and steering parts require ongoing replacement, and interior plastics can become brittle or faded, detracting from the overall condition. These factors mean that while the core mechanicals can last, the ancillary systems and body integrity often dictate its ultimate lifespan.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
In terms of built-in tech, the Blazer featured a straightforward, analog dashboard with traditional gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Climate control was typically manual, though higher trims like the LT could offer an optional automatic climate control system. There were no advanced onboard computers or digital displays beyond a basic odometer.
For entertainment, the standard offering was an AM/FM stereo, often paired with a cassette player. Higher trim levels or optional packages could include a single-disc CD player and an upgraded sound system with more speakers, but multi-CD changers or satellite radio were not available. Connectivity was limited to the radio itself; auxiliary inputs or Bluetooth were decades away.
Driver-assistance features were essentially non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, lane departure warning, or blind-spot monitoring. The most "advanced" driver aid available was cruise control, which was standard on LS and LT trims and optional on the Base model.
Regarding safety features, the 1995 Blazer saw an improvement over previous generations. A driver-side airbag was standard, providing a critical layer of protection for the driver in frontal collisions. Anti-lock brakes were standard, typically a rear-wheel ABS system, with four-wheel ABS being an option or standard on higher trims. All seating positions were equipped with three-point seatbelts, and four-door models included child safety locks on the rear doors. A passenger-side airbag was not standard and was likely introduced in later model years of this generation.
Crash-test ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 1995 S-10 Blazer/Jimmy indicated a 3-star rating for the driver and a 4-star rating for the passenger in frontal impact tests. It is crucial to understand that these ratings are relative to vehicles of that specific model year and are not comparable to the more stringent testing and higher standards of modern crash tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) did not conduct crash tests on vehicles of this vintage, making NHTSA ratings the primary source for safety assessment from that period.
What Colors Options are Available?
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Prices and Market Value
Today, on the current used market, the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer has experienced its full depreciation cycle, reaching extremely low price points. Prices are highly variable, ranging from just $500 to $1,500 for examples in rough or non-running condition, up to $1,500 to $3,500 for a decent, running driver. Exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or specific models like the ZR2 can command higher prices, potentially reaching $4,000 to $8,000 or more, though these are rare finds.
Depreciation insights show that this vehicle has long since reached the bottom of its value curve; any changes now are more about individual vehicle condition and collector interest rather than standard depreciation. Factors significantly affecting current resale value include the overall condition, with a particular emphasis on the presence and severity of rust, which can be a deal-breaker. Maintenance history, mileage, and the desirability of certain trim levels (like the off-road capable ZR2) or 4WD configurations also play a crucial role in determining its value in the used market.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Cost of Ownership
On the positive side, maintenance and repair costs for basic items are generally low. Parts are abundant and inexpensive, and many repairs are manageable for a DIY enthusiast. However, tackling known issues like intake manifold gasket replacements, fuel pump failures, or extensive rust repair can be moderately to very costly if professional help is required. Over time, recurring wear on suspension and steering components also contributes to repair bills. In summary, while the initial purchase price is very low and parts are cheap, the Blazer can be economical to own if well-maintained and you're mechanically inclined. Otherwise, high fuel consumption and potential for significant repairs make it more costly for the average owner.
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Fuel Efficiency
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
1995 Chevrolet Blazer Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
In terms of performance, the Blazer's 4.3L V6, producing 160 horsepower and 230 lb-ft of torque, was competitive with its direct American rival, the Ford Explorer's 4.0L V6 (which also started around 160hp for 1995, later getting more powerful SOHC versions). The Jeep Cherokee, particularly with its venerable 4.0L inline-six, often felt more robust with 190hp and legendary durability. Japanese competitors like the Nissan Pathfinder (3.0L V6, ~153hp) and Toyota 4Runner (3.0L V6, ~150hp, or 2.7L I4) offered adequate power but were often perceived as less potent. The Blazer offered capable 4x4, especially with the unique ZR2 off-road package for 2-door models, making it a decent choice for varied terrains.
Regarding features, all these SUVs offered similar levels of basic comfort and convenience for the era, including power accessories, air conditioning, and cassette/CD players on higher trims. The Blazer's interior, while functional, wasn't as refined as the Explorer's in some aspects, nor as minimalist-rugged as the Cherokee's.
Reliability is where distinctions become clearer. While the Blazer's core engine and transmission are durable, it suffers from well-documented issues like intake manifold gasket leaks, fuel pump failures, and electrical gremlins. The Ford Explorer, particularly its earlier generations, had its share of transmission and rust problems. The Jeep Cherokee with the 4.0L I6 is renowned for its engine's bulletproof reliability, though it also battled rust and various electrical issues. The Nissan Pathfinder and especially the Toyota 4Runner are generally considered to have superior overall long-term reliability and build quality, albeit at potentially higher parts costs.
In terms of price, both new and used, the Blazer and its badge-engineered twin, the GMC Jimmy, were typically among the more affordable options in their class. On the used market today, the Blazer often fetches lower prices than a comparable condition Cherokee and significantly less than a 4Runner, which consistently holds its value exceptionally well due to its reputation for longevity.
For someone prioritizing ultimate reliability and resale value, the Toyota 4Runner (though more expensive used) or a Jeep Cherokee (XJ) with the 4.0L inline-six (beware of rust) would be better alternatives. If seeking a similar, budget-friendly option, a GMC Jimmy is mechanically identical, or a later model Ford Explorer (post-1995, after some initial kinks were worked out) could be considered.
Final Verdict: Is the 1995 Chevrolet Blazer a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
Is it worth buying? Yes, but strictly under the right conditions. You should only consider buying a 1995 Blazer as a used vehicle, and its value hinges almost entirely on its present condition. Focus on examples with minimal to no significant rust, a strong-running 4.3L V6, and a well-maintained transmission. While the LS or LT trims offer a good balance of features, the ZR2 is the standout for specialized off-road use. Be prepared for its known weaknesses, such as intake manifold gaskets and electrical issues. It's a solid choice for a reliable, no-frills workhorse or a fun project, but perhaps not the most refined or fuel-efficient daily driver without ongoing attention.