The 1996 Chevrolet Blazer, part of the second generation (1995-2005), is a popular mid-size SUV known for its rugged capability and approachable styling. Available as a two-door or four-door, it offered various trims like the base, LS, and LT. Its enduring appeal stemmed from its blend of SUV utility with a comfortable, car-like ride, making it a versatile choice for families and adventurers alike.
The Good
The 1996 Chevrolet Blazer offered a compelling mix of capable performance with its V6 engine, respectable reliability for its era, and a comfortable ride. Its practical design appealed to those needing utility, while its adventurous spirit and accessible pricing offered emotional value for a wider audience.
The Bad
When considering a 1996 Chevrolet Blazer, potential buyers should watch out for common issues like transmission problems, particularly with automatic transmissions, and potential rear main seal leaks. Electrical gremlins and rust, especially in northern climates, are also areas that require careful inspection.
1996 Chevrolet Blazer: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1996 Chevrolet Blazer was primarily offered with two engine choices:
- 4.3L V6 (LW1): This was the standard engine for most models.
- 4.3L V6 (L35): An enhanced version of the 4.3L V6, often featuring sequential fuel injection (SFI) and sometimes producing slightly more power.
- 4.3L V6 (LW1): This was the standard engine for most models.
- Horsepower:
- The standard 4.3L V6 typically produced around 155-160 horsepower.
- The enhanced 4.3L V6 (L35) could offer up to 190-195 horsepower.
- The standard 4.3L V6 typically produced around 155-160 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy:
- Estimates for the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (4WD automatic) were roughly 14 MPG city and 18 MPG highway. These figures can vary significantly based on driving conditions, maintenance, and engine/drivetrain configuration.
- Estimates for the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (4WD automatic) were roughly 14 MPG city and 18 MPG highway. These figures can vary significantly based on driving conditions, maintenance, and engine/drivetrain configuration.
- 0-60 Times:
- With the 4.3L V6, 0-60 mph times generally ranged from around 9.5 to 10.5 seconds, depending on the specific configuration (2WD/4WD, transmission, etc.).
- With the 4.3L V6, 0-60 mph times generally ranged from around 9.5 to 10.5 seconds, depending on the specific configuration (2WD/4WD, transmission, etc.).
- Towing Capacity:
- When properly equipped with the towing package, the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer could tow up to approximately 5,000 to 6,500 pounds, making it suitable for smaller boats, trailers, or recreational vehicles.
- When properly equipped with the towing package, the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer could tow up to approximately 5,000 to 6,500 pounds, making it suitable for smaller boats, trailers, or recreational vehicles.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base Trim: Typically included essential features like power steering, power brakes, AM/FM stereo, cloth seating, and a rear defogger.
- LS Trim: Added features over the base model such as upgraded cloth or optional leather seating, power windows and door locks, cruise control, tilt steering wheel, and often a better sound system.
- LT Trim: The top-tier trim, usually offering the most premium features like leather upholstery, power driver's seat, automatic climate control, premium audio system, and sometimes alloy wheels.
- Common optional features across trims included anti-lock brakes (ABS), airbags, sunroof, roof rack, and upgraded exterior styling packages.
- Base Trim: Typically included essential features like power steering, power brakes, AM/FM stereo, cloth seating, and a rear defogger.
1996 Chevrolet Blazer Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1996 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Blazer |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Door 2WD |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | MORAINE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3691 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 6000 pounds |
| Overall Height | 65.90 inches |
| Overall Length | 181.20 inches |
| Overall Width | 66.50 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 107.00 inches |
| Standard Seating | 3 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.3-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $21,150 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer Have?
The 1996 Chevrolet Blazer, while generally well-regarded for its era, is not without its common issues. One of the most frequently reported problems centers around the automatic transmission. Owners often report premature failure, slipping gears, or rough shifting. This can be a significant expense to repair or replace, and it's a recurring concern across various model years of this generation.
Another notable area for concern is leaks, particularly the rear main seal. This oil leak can be insidious, leading to low oil levels if not addressed promptly and can be labor-intensive to fix.
Rust is also a significant long-term reliability concern, especially for vehicles that have spent their lives in areas with harsh winters and road salt. Frame rust, rocker panels, and wheel wells are common areas to inspect. The severity of rust can vary greatly depending on the vehicle's history and location.
Electrical issues are also occasionally reported. This can manifest in various ways, from malfunctioning power windows and door locks to more complex problems with the instrument cluster or engine control module. These can be challenging to diagnose and repair.
While not specific to 1996, issues with the transfer case actuator on 4WD models can arise over time, leading to the inability to engage or disengage four-wheel drive.
Regarding recalls, specific recalls for the 1996 model year would need to be checked against its VIN. However, general recalls for this generation sometimes involved issues with steering components, airbags, or brake systems. It's crucial for potential buyers to research any outstanding recalls for the specific vehicle they are considering. Long-term reliability is often dependent on diligent maintenance, especially fluid changes for the transmission and engine, and proactive rust prevention measures.
Another notable area for concern is leaks, particularly the rear main seal. This oil leak can be insidious, leading to low oil levels if not addressed promptly and can be labor-intensive to fix.
Rust is also a significant long-term reliability concern, especially for vehicles that have spent their lives in areas with harsh winters and road salt. Frame rust, rocker panels, and wheel wells are common areas to inspect. The severity of rust can vary greatly depending on the vehicle's history and location.
Electrical issues are also occasionally reported. This can manifest in various ways, from malfunctioning power windows and door locks to more complex problems with the instrument cluster or engine control module. These can be challenging to diagnose and repair.
While not specific to 1996, issues with the transfer case actuator on 4WD models can arise over time, leading to the inability to engage or disengage four-wheel drive.
Regarding recalls, specific recalls for the 1996 model year would need to be checked against its VIN. However, general recalls for this generation sometimes involved issues with steering components, airbags, or brake systems. It's crucial for potential buyers to research any outstanding recalls for the specific vehicle they are considering. Long-term reliability is often dependent on diligent maintenance, especially fluid changes for the transmission and engine, and proactive rust prevention measures.
How long will the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1996 Chevrolet Blazer can realistically achieve 150,000 to 200,000 miles, and sometimes even more. Owner data suggests that vehicles with regular oil changes, transmission fluid flushes, and timely attention to potential leaks or minor issues tend to endure better. However, the inherent weaknesses, particularly the automatic transmission and susceptibility to rust in certain climates, can limit its long-term durability. Owners who address these potential issues proactively, such as by investing in transmission maintenance or rustproofing, are likely to enjoy a longer service life from their Blazer. Neglecting these common problem areas can significantly shorten its usable lifespan.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1996 Chevrolet Blazer was equipped with technology and safety features that were standard for its mid-90s era, offering a decent level of convenience and occupant protection.
Built-in Tech and Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio with a cassette player. Higher trim levels, like the LS and LT, often offered upgraded stereo systems, which could include a CD player and more speakers for enhanced audio quality. Power windows, power door locks, and cruise control were becoming more common, especially on the LS and LT trims, adding to driver convenience. Features like remote keyless entry were often optional.
Driver-Assistance Features: The most significant driver-assistance feature available was Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), which was often optional. This system helped prevent wheel lock-up during hard braking, improving steering control and stability. Other driver aids were limited to what was considered standard for the time, such as power steering for easier maneuverability.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included driver and passenger airbags, three-point seatbelts for all occupants, and a collapsible steering column. The Blazer was built on a body-on-frame construction, which provided a perceived sense of robustness.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings for the 1996 model year from organizations like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) or the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) can be difficult to find in a directly comparable format to modern vehicles. However, vehicles of this era generally performed moderately in frontal and side-impact tests for their time. It's important to note that safety standards and testing methodologies have evolved significantly since 1996, so these older ratings should be viewed in historical context. Advanced safety technologies like electronic stability control or traction control were not available on the 1996 Blazer.
Built-in Tech and Entertainment: Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio with a cassette player. Higher trim levels, like the LS and LT, often offered upgraded stereo systems, which could include a CD player and more speakers for enhanced audio quality. Power windows, power door locks, and cruise control were becoming more common, especially on the LS and LT trims, adding to driver convenience. Features like remote keyless entry were often optional.
Driver-Assistance Features: The most significant driver-assistance feature available was Anti-lock Braking System (ABS), which was often optional. This system helped prevent wheel lock-up during hard braking, improving steering control and stability. Other driver aids were limited to what was considered standard for the time, such as power steering for easier maneuverability.
Safety Features: Standard safety equipment included driver and passenger airbags, three-point seatbelts for all occupants, and a collapsible steering column. The Blazer was built on a body-on-frame construction, which provided a perceived sense of robustness.
Crash-Test Ratings: Specific crash-test ratings for the 1996 model year from organizations like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) or the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) can be difficult to find in a directly comparable format to modern vehicles. However, vehicles of this era generally performed moderately in frontal and side-impact tests for their time. It's important to note that safety standards and testing methodologies have evolved significantly since 1996, so these older ratings should be viewed in historical context. Advanced safety technologies like electronic stability control or traction control were not available on the 1996 Blazer.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1996 Chevrolet Blazer Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer had a starting Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) that generally ranged from around $19,000 to $26,000, depending on the trim level and optional equipment. Like most vehicles, the Blazer experienced significant depreciation in its early years.
Currently, on the used market, prices for a 1996 Chevrolet Blazer can vary widely, typically falling between $2,000 and $6,000. This range is heavily influenced by condition, mileage, maintenance history, and the presence of rust. Blazers in excellent, well-maintained condition with lower mileage and minimal rust can fetch prices at the higher end, while those with extensive wear, mechanical issues, or rust will be at the lower end. Factors affecting resale value include the rarity of certain configurations (e.g., 2-door 4x4), the overall market demand for older SUVs, and the perceived reliability of the specific vehicle.
Currently, on the used market, prices for a 1996 Chevrolet Blazer can vary widely, typically falling between $2,000 and $6,000. This range is heavily influenced by condition, mileage, maintenance history, and the presence of rust. Blazers in excellent, well-maintained condition with lower mileage and minimal rust can fetch prices at the higher end, while those with extensive wear, mechanical issues, or rust will be at the lower end. Factors affecting resale value include the rarity of certain configurations (e.g., 2-door 4x4), the overall market demand for older SUVs, and the perceived reliability of the specific vehicle.
1996 Chevrolet Blazer Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1996 Chevrolet Blazer can be reasonably economical in terms of insurance and routine maintenance. Premiums are typically moderate due to its age and market value. Fuel costs, however, can be higher than modern SUVs due to its less efficient V6 engine, averaging around 14-18 MPG. Routine maintenance like oil changes and tire rotations are standard. The main cost concern lies in potential repairs, especially for the automatic transmission and the possibility of rust-related issues, which can be significant. Overall, it's not an overly expensive vehicle to own if you can find one in good condition and are prepared for potential age-related repairs.
1996 Chevrolet Blazer Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
18.00 gallons
City Mileage
17 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
22 miles/gallon
1996 Chevrolet Blazer Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1996 Chevrolet Blazer Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1996 Chevrolet Blazer Insurance
Insurance for a 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1996 Chevrolet Blazer competed in a crowded mid-size SUV segment. Key rivals included the Ford Explorer, Jeep Cherokee, and Toyota 4Runner.
Performance: The Blazer's 4.3L V6 offered respectable power for its class, often outperforming the base engines of some competitors. The Ford Explorer, especially with its V6 options, provided comparable or better performance. The Jeep Cherokee was known for its robust off-road performance with its inline-six engine. The Toyota 4Runner, particularly with its V6, offered a good balance of on-road comfort and capability.
Features: In 1996, feature content was evolving. The Blazer offered common amenities like power accessories and optional ABS, but rivals like the Explorer often had more advanced optional features available earlier. The 4Runner was known for its build quality and often offered a more refined interior.
Reliability: This is where the Blazer often lagged behind some competitors. While the 4.3L V6 engine itself is generally robust, the automatic transmission and susceptibility to rust were noted weaknesses. The Toyota 4Runner consistently ranked high for long-term reliability. The Ford Explorer had its own set of common issues, often related to its rear suspension or frame. The Jeep Cherokee, while mechanically simple and durable, could also develop issues related to its age.
Price: The Blazer was often priced competitively, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers. It generally offered good value for the money when purchased new. Used prices reflect its market position.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Blazer's 4.3L V6 offered respectable power for its class, often outperforming the base engines of some competitors. The Ford Explorer, especially with its V6 options, provided comparable or better performance. The Jeep Cherokee was known for its robust off-road performance with its inline-six engine. The Toyota 4Runner, particularly with its V6, offered a good balance of on-road comfort and capability.
Features: In 1996, feature content was evolving. The Blazer offered common amenities like power accessories and optional ABS, but rivals like the Explorer often had more advanced optional features available earlier. The 4Runner was known for its build quality and often offered a more refined interior.
Reliability: This is where the Blazer often lagged behind some competitors. While the 4.3L V6 engine itself is generally robust, the automatic transmission and susceptibility to rust were noted weaknesses. The Toyota 4Runner consistently ranked high for long-term reliability. The Ford Explorer had its own set of common issues, often related to its rear suspension or frame. The Jeep Cherokee, while mechanically simple and durable, could also develop issues related to its age.
Price: The Blazer was often priced competitively, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers. It generally offered good value for the money when purchased new. Used prices reflect its market position.
Alternatives:
- Similar: If you're looking for a similar experience with potentially better long-term reliability, consider a Toyota 4Runner from the same era. It offers a similar blend of utility and comfort, albeit often at a higher used price point. A Ford Explorer is also a direct competitor, offering comparable features and performance but with its own set of potential issues to research.
- Better: For a more robust and legendary off-road experience, a Jeep Cherokee XJ (which ended production in 2001) is a strong contender. If on-road comfort and a more modern feel are priorities, and budget allows, newer generations of SUVs or even crossovers might offer significant advantages in safety and efficiency.
Final Verdict: Is the 1996 Chevrolet Blazer a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is ideal for budget-conscious individuals or families seeking a capable, mid-size SUV with decent towing and hauling capacity for light-duty tasks. It's best suited for those who prioritize utility and a traditional SUV feel over cutting-edge technology or ultimate long-term reliability.
Whether it's worth buying hinges heavily on condition and price. A well-maintained example with minimal rust and a documented service history, especially regarding the transmission, can be a good value proposition for its intended use. It is certainly worth buying as a used vehicle; buying new is not an option. Specific trims like the LS or LT offer more creature comforts. It's crucial to have any potential purchase thoroughly inspected, paying close attention to the transmission, frame, and body for rust. For those with realistic expectations and a willingness for potential repairs, it can be a dependable choice.
Whether it's worth buying hinges heavily on condition and price. A well-maintained example with minimal rust and a documented service history, especially regarding the transmission, can be a good value proposition for its intended use. It is certainly worth buying as a used vehicle; buying new is not an option. Specific trims like the LS or LT offer more creature comforts. It's crucial to have any potential purchase thoroughly inspected, paying close attention to the transmission, frame, and body for rust. For those with realistic expectations and a willingness for potential repairs, it can be a dependable choice.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.