The 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe marked a pivotal year, introducing the renowned "Tahoe" nameplate as a replacement for the full-size K5 Blazer. Available in both a classic 2-door and a new, highly practical 4-door SUV body style, it was part of GM's GMT400 platform. Key trims included the Base, LS, and LT. New pricing ranged approximately from $25,000 to $35,000. Its blend of V8 power, rugged capability, and spacious interior made it immensely popular as a versatile family hauler and workhorse, standing out for its robust, truck-like durability.
The Good
The 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe offers strong V8 performance, excellent towing capability, and legendary reliability with proper maintenance. Its spacious, comfortable interior and classic, functional design appeal to practical buyers needing utility and room. Emotionally, it evokes a sense of rugged American freedom, providing a commanding presence and dependable value in the used market despite its modest efficiency. It's a solid choice for both work and adventure.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe include its relatively poor fuel economy due to the V8 engine, and truck-like handling that isn't as refined as modern SUVs. Owners should also watch out for common issues like rust on the frame and body panels, worn steering components (idler/pitman arms), and potential for 4L60E transmission issues if not properly maintained. Interior plastics can also be prone to aging and cracking.
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe primarily featured one robust engine option: the 5.7-liter (350 cubic inch) Small Block V8 with Throttle Body Injection (TBI). This engine was known for its durability and strong low-end torque.
- Horsepower: The 5.7L TBI V8 in the 1995 model produced approximately 200 horsepower at 4,000 RPM and 310 lb-ft of torque at 2,400 RPM. This provided ample power for daily driving, hauling, and light towing.
- Fuel Economy: Given its large V8 engine and considerable weight, fuel economy was not a strong suit. Owners could expect an estimated 12-15 MPG in the city and 16-18 MPG on the highway for both 2WD and 4WD models, depending on driving conditions and maintenance.
- 0-60 Times: The 0-60 mph acceleration for the 1995 Tahoe, equipped with the 200 hp 5.7L V8, typically ranged from 9.5 to 10.5 seconds, which was respectable for a full-size SUV of its era.
- Towing Capacity: The towing capacity for the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe was a significant advantage, ranging from approximately 6,500 pounds to 7,000 pounds, depending on the configuration (2WD/4WD, axle ratio, and specific hitch setup). This made it a popular choice for towing boats, campers, and utility trailers.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: The entry-level trim offered essential features, typically including cloth upholstery, manual windows and door locks (though power options were often added), an AM/FM stereo, air conditioning, and a robust suspension system. It focused on utility and affordability.
- LS: Building upon the Base model, the LS trim added more convenience features. These commonly included power windows and door locks, cruise control, a tilt steering wheel, upgraded cloth seating, an improved AM/FM cassette stereo (often with a CD player option), and possibly alloy wheels.
- LT: The top-tier LT trim provided a more luxurious experience. Standard features typically included leather upholstery, power-adjustable front seats, a premium sound system, keyless entry, heated power mirrors, full instrumentation, and distinct exterior trim. It aimed to offer maximum comfort and convenience for the time.
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1995 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Tahoe |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Door 2WD |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | JANESVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4768 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 6250 pounds |
| Overall Height | 70.20 inches |
| Overall Length | 199.10 inches |
| Overall Width | 76.40 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 117.50 inches |
| Standard Seating | 6 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 5.7-L V-8 OHV 16V |
| Engine Size | 5.7L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $26,385 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Have?
The 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe, while generally reliable, does have several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns common to vehicles of its age and platform.
One prevalent issue revolves around the steering and suspension components. Owners often report premature wear of parts like the idler arm, pitman arm, ball joints, and tie rods, leading to loose steering, wandering, and clunking noises. This is exacerbated by heavy use or off-road driving.
The 4L60E automatic transmission, standard in these models, is another common concern. While generally durable, it can develop issues like delayed shifts, slipping, or complete failure, especially if the fluid isn't regularly changed or if the vehicle is frequently used for heavy towing. Overheating is a major culprit for transmission longevity.
Regarding the engine, the 5.7L TBI V8 is largely robust, but issues with the Throttle Body Injection (TBI) system can arise, leading to rough idling, stalling, or poor fuel delivery. Less common but still possible are oil leaks from various gaskets. For later models (1996+ with Vortec engines), intake manifold gasket leaks became a very common problem, but the 1995 TBI engine generally avoids this specific issue.
Brake system components, such as warped rotors and premature pad wear, are also frequently reported, often requiring more frequent replacement than on lighter vehicles. The brake lines themselves can also rust and fail on older models, particularly in salt-prone climates.
Electrical issues, though often minor, can crop up. These include power window motor failures, intermittent dash lights, and issues with the blower motor.
Finally, rust is a significant long-term concern. Body panels, rocker panels, wheel wells, and especially the frame can show considerable rust, particularly in regions with harsh winters and road salt. This can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult.
As for recalls, general NHTSA records for the GMT400 platform (which includes the Tahoe) from that era indicate a few recalls, but nothing exceptionally widespread or critical specific to the 1995 Tahoe that would overshadow typical wear-and-tear issues. Common recalls for GM trucks of that period often involved steering components, fuel systems, or brake light switches, but specific details should be verified with the VIN.
One prevalent issue revolves around the steering and suspension components. Owners often report premature wear of parts like the idler arm, pitman arm, ball joints, and tie rods, leading to loose steering, wandering, and clunking noises. This is exacerbated by heavy use or off-road driving.
The 4L60E automatic transmission, standard in these models, is another common concern. While generally durable, it can develop issues like delayed shifts, slipping, or complete failure, especially if the fluid isn't regularly changed or if the vehicle is frequently used for heavy towing. Overheating is a major culprit for transmission longevity.
Regarding the engine, the 5.7L TBI V8 is largely robust, but issues with the Throttle Body Injection (TBI) system can arise, leading to rough idling, stalling, or poor fuel delivery. Less common but still possible are oil leaks from various gaskets. For later models (1996+ with Vortec engines), intake manifold gasket leaks became a very common problem, but the 1995 TBI engine generally avoids this specific issue.
Brake system components, such as warped rotors and premature pad wear, are also frequently reported, often requiring more frequent replacement than on lighter vehicles. The brake lines themselves can also rust and fail on older models, particularly in salt-prone climates.
Electrical issues, though often minor, can crop up. These include power window motor failures, intermittent dash lights, and issues with the blower motor.
Finally, rust is a significant long-term concern. Body panels, rocker panels, wheel wells, and especially the frame can show considerable rust, particularly in regions with harsh winters and road salt. This can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult.
As for recalls, general NHTSA records for the GMT400 platform (which includes the Tahoe) from that era indicate a few recalls, but nothing exceptionally widespread or critical specific to the 1995 Tahoe that would overshadow typical wear-and-tear issues. Common recalls for GM trucks of that period often involved steering components, fuel systems, or brake light switches, but specific details should be verified with the VIN.
How long will the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits, a well-cared-for 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe can easily achieve 200,000 to 250,000 miles, with many examples exceeding 300,000 miles. It's not uncommon to see these vehicles providing 25-30 years of service. Its long-term durability stems from a robust body-on-frame construction and a fundamentally strong 5.7L V8 engine.
However, this longevity is highly dependent on consistent maintenance, including regular oil changes, fluid flushes for the transmission and differentials, and timely replacement of wear items. Over time, weaknesses tend to emerge in the suspension and steering components, such as ball joints and tie rods, which require replacement. Rust is also a major long-term issue, particularly on the frame, brake lines, and rocker panels in areas exposed to road salt. The 4L60E transmission, while durable, can also become a weak point if subjected to heavy towing without proper cooling and servicing. Interior plastics will inevitably degrade, showing cracks and fading with age.
However, this longevity is highly dependent on consistent maintenance, including regular oil changes, fluid flushes for the transmission and differentials, and timely replacement of wear items. Over time, weaknesses tend to emerge in the suspension and steering components, such as ball joints and tie rods, which require replacement. Rust is also a major long-term issue, particularly on the frame, brake lines, and rocker panels in areas exposed to road salt. The 4L60E transmission, while durable, can also become a weak point if subjected to heavy towing without proper cooling and servicing. Interior plastics will inevitably degrade, showing cracks and fading with age.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe, being a product of the mid-90s, featured technology and convenience typical of its era, which is quite basic by today's standards.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: The dashboard was primarily analog, with traditional gauges for speed, RPM, fuel, temperature, oil pressure, and voltage. The standard entertainment system was an AM/FM stereo, often with a cassette player. Higher trims or optional packages could include an AM/FM CD player. Sound quality was decent for the time, and some models offered premium speaker upgrades. There were no integrated touchscreens, navigation, or advanced connectivity features like Bluetooth. Power outlets were limited, typically a single 12V cigarette lighter style outlet.
Driver-Assistance Features: Modern driver-assistance technologies were non-existent. The most advanced "assistance" feature would have been cruise control, available on most trims, and power steering for ease of maneuverability. There were no blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, or parking sensors. Drivers relied solely on their own observation and skill.
Safety Features: Safety features were also fundamental. Standard equipment included 3-point seatbelts for front occupants and most rear outboard positions. A driver-side airbag was standard, but a passenger airbag was not yet universally mandated and often not present in this model year. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available, usually as a rear-wheel-only system or optional 4-wheel ABS on higher trims. There was no electronic stability control, traction control, or advanced crumple zones and side-impact protection seen in modern vehicles.
Optional Features: Beyond the standard and trim-level specific items, optional features could include keyless entry, power-adjustable front seats, a rear-window defogger, a limited-slip differential for better traction, and various towing packages.
Crash-Test Ratings: Comprehensive crash-test ratings from independent organizations like the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) were not as prevalent or detailed for vehicles of this vintage. The NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) did conduct some frontal crash tests. For large SUVs of this era, they typically offered a decent level of protection in frontal impacts due to their mass and sturdy body-on-frame construction, but they would not score well against today's much stricter and more comprehensive crash safety standards, especially concerning side impact or rollover resistance.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment: The dashboard was primarily analog, with traditional gauges for speed, RPM, fuel, temperature, oil pressure, and voltage. The standard entertainment system was an AM/FM stereo, often with a cassette player. Higher trims or optional packages could include an AM/FM CD player. Sound quality was decent for the time, and some models offered premium speaker upgrades. There were no integrated touchscreens, navigation, or advanced connectivity features like Bluetooth. Power outlets were limited, typically a single 12V cigarette lighter style outlet.
Driver-Assistance Features: Modern driver-assistance technologies were non-existent. The most advanced "assistance" feature would have been cruise control, available on most trims, and power steering for ease of maneuverability. There were no blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, or parking sensors. Drivers relied solely on their own observation and skill.
Safety Features: Safety features were also fundamental. Standard equipment included 3-point seatbelts for front occupants and most rear outboard positions. A driver-side airbag was standard, but a passenger airbag was not yet universally mandated and often not present in this model year. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available, usually as a rear-wheel-only system or optional 4-wheel ABS on higher trims. There was no electronic stability control, traction control, or advanced crumple zones and side-impact protection seen in modern vehicles.
Optional Features: Beyond the standard and trim-level specific items, optional features could include keyless entry, power-adjustable front seats, a rear-window defogger, a limited-slip differential for better traction, and various towing packages.
Crash-Test Ratings: Comprehensive crash-test ratings from independent organizations like the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) were not as prevalent or detailed for vehicles of this vintage. The NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) did conduct some frontal crash tests. For large SUVs of this era, they typically offered a decent level of protection in frontal impacts due to their mass and sturdy body-on-frame construction, but they would not score well against today's much stricter and more comprehensive crash safety standards, especially concerning side impact or rollover resistance.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Prices and Market Value
When new in 1995, the Chevrolet Tahoe typically ranged from approximately $25,000 for a base 2-door 2WD model to over $35,000 for a loaded 4-door 4x4 LT trim. Like most vehicles, it experienced significant depreciation in its first decade, losing a substantial portion of its original value.
However, in today's used market, the 1995 Tahoe has reached a unique phase. Prices are highly variable, ranging from as low as $3,000 for a running project car to $15,000 or even $20,000+ for exceptionally well-maintained, low-mileage, or professionally restored examples, especially the rarer 2-door 4x4 models.
Factors affecting its current resale value include overall condition, lack of rust, mileage, maintenance history, presence of 4x4, and whether it's a desirable 2-door or 4-door configuration. Pristine examples are now appreciating as collectible "classic" trucks, showing an inverse depreciation trend for specific, well-preserved units. A clean title and original, unmolested condition also significantly boost value.
However, in today's used market, the 1995 Tahoe has reached a unique phase. Prices are highly variable, ranging from as low as $3,000 for a running project car to $15,000 or even $20,000+ for exceptionally well-maintained, low-mileage, or professionally restored examples, especially the rarer 2-door 4x4 models.
Factors affecting its current resale value include overall condition, lack of rust, mileage, maintenance history, presence of 4x4, and whether it's a desirable 2-door or 4-door configuration. Pristine examples are now appreciating as collectible "classic" trucks, showing an inverse depreciation trend for specific, well-preserved units. A clean title and original, unmolested condition also significantly boost value.
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Cost of Ownership
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
30.00 gallons
City Mileage
12 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
16 miles/gallon
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Recalls & Defects
Visibility:windshield Wiper/Washer
Recall date
1998-07-01
Recall no.
98v150001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks and Sport Utility Vehicles, 2 and 4-Wheel Drive. Solder Joints Near THE Wiring Harness Connector CAN Crack Causing THE Windshield Wipers TO Work Intermittently.
Consequence
This Condition CAN Result IN Inoperative Wipers, Reducing A Driver's Visibility, and Increasing THE Risk OF A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Wiper Motor Circuit Board and Cover.
Notes
Owner Notification Began December 15, 1998.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1996-04-04
Recall no.
96v057000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
These Vehicles Were Assembled With THE Throttle Cable Contacting THE Dash MAT Which Could Bind THE Throttle. This Does NOT Meet With THE Maximum Return Times Required BY Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 124, "accelerator Control Systems."
Consequence
Consequence OF Non-Compliance: THE Engine Speed MAY NOT Return TO Idle Increasing THE Potential FOR A Vehicle Accident.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect FOR Adequate Throttle Cable TO Dash MAT Clearance, and IF There IS Insufficient Clearance, CUT OUT A Portion OF THE Dash MAT TO Provide Proper Clearance.
Notes
System: Fuel; Throttle Linkages and Control; Fmvss NO. 124. Vehicle Description: Pickup Trucks, Cab/Chassis, Utility and Multi-Purpose Trucks Equipped With Gasoline Engines. Note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time, Should Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Power Train:automatic Transmission
Recall date
1995-07-26
Recall no.
95v139000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Transmission Shift-Cable Lock Clip CAN Back OUT OF ITS Installed Position Resulting IN A Loss OF Cable Adjustment. When THE Shift Lever IS Placed IN THE "park" Position, THE "park" Indicator Light MAY NOT Illuminate.
Consequence
THE Vehicle CAN Move Unintentionally IF THE Driver Does NOT Notice That THE Indicator Light IS NOT ON and Does NOT Apply THE Parking Brake.
Remedy
Dealers Will Adjust THE Shift Cable and Install A Lock Clip.
Notes
System: Powertrain; Automatic Transmission.vehicle Description: Light Duty Trucks Equipped With M30/Mt1 Automatic Transmissions.note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time,should Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
AIR Bags
Recall date
1995-07-25
Recall no.
95v140000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Vehicles Have Both THE Supplemental Inflatable Restraint (Sir) Label and AN Engine Start Label Installed ON THE Same Side OF THE SUN Visor. This Does NOT Comply With Fmvss No.208, "occupant Crash Protection."
Consequence
Consequence OF Non-Compliance: Operators Could Fail TO Notice and Heed THE Warning Label.
Remedy
THE Engine Start Label Will BE Removed From THE Stowed Side OF THE SUN Visor and A NEW Engine Start Label Will BE Installed ON THE Headliner IN THE SUN Visor Depression. Owners Will Receive THE NEW Label and CAN Install THE Label Themselves or Have A Dealer Install IT.
Notes
System: Interior; Passive Restraints; AIR Bag; Fmvss No.208.vehicle Description: Light Duty Trucks and Multi Purpose Passenger Vehicles Equipped With L56/L65 Diesel Engines.note: IF YOU DO NOT Receive A NEW Label IN A Reasonable Time Free OF Charge Please Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Seat Belts:rear/Other
Recall date
1995-04-24
Recall no.
95v081000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicles Fail TO Conform TO Fmvss NO. 210, "seat Belt Anchorages." THE Center Rear Seat LAP Belt WAS Improperly Routed.
Consequence
Consequence OF Non-Compliance: THE Occupant OF This Seat Will NOT BE Properly Restrained IN THE Event OF A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Instructions FOR Rerouting THE Center Rear Seat LAP Belt Will BE Sent TO THE Vehicle Owners. IF THE Owner Prefers, They CAN Take Their Vehicle TO Their Dealer and Have IT Rerouted Free OF Charge BY THE Dealer.
Notes
System: Interior; Seat Belts; Lap; Fmvss NO. 210.vehicle Description: Light Duty 4-Wheel Drive, 2-Door Multi-purpose Vehicle.note: IF YOU DO NOT Receive A Letter With Instructions Within A Reasonabletime, Please Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020 or GMC AT 1-800-462-8782.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safetyhotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Visibility:windshield Wiper/Washer
Recall date
2003-04-28
Recall no.
03v159000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Minivans, Pickup Trucks, and Sport Utility Vehicles With Certain Model-Engine Combinations, THE Windshield Wiper Motor MAY Fail DUE TO Cracked Solder Joints ON THE Controller Circuit Board. THE Windshield Wipers Could Work Intermittently or NOT AT All.
Consequence
IF This Were TO Occur During BAD Weather, Driver Visibility Would BE Reduced, Which Could Result IN A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Wiper Motor Circuit Board and Cover. Owner Notification Began ON June 19, 2003. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Chevrolet AT 1-800-222-1020, GMC AT 1-800-462-8782, or Oldsmobile AT 1-800-442-6537.
Notes
GM Recall NO. 03023.customers CAN Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-Dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-05-19
Recall no.
06e043000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Replacement Fuel Filters, Fram Brand Name P/N G3727, With Date Codes X52911 Through X60801 Sequentially or X600141 and A Mexico Country or Origin Marking ON THE Fuel Filter Housing Manufactured From October 18, 2005, Through March 21, 2006, Sold FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above and ON Certain School Buses. (TO SEE THE School Bus Engine Sizes, Click ON "document Search" and Then "bus Applications"). THE Connector ON THE Fuel Filter WAS NOT Manufactured TO Honeywell's Specification. AS A Result, THE O-Ring MAY NOT Seat Correctly ON THE Fuel Line.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause AN Inadequate Seal AT THE Connection, Potentially Leading TO A Fuel Leak. IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Fuel Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 18, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Fram Customer Service AT 1-800-890-2075 (Option 1).
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Fram Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Vehicles Listed.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Equipment
Recall date
2007-10-24
Recall no.
07e088000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Honeywell Fram Racing Brand HP4 and HP8 OIL Filters That Were Manufactured From MAY 25, 2006, Through September 14, 2007, and Sold FOR USE AS Replacement Equipment FOR Vehicles List Above. THE Affected Filters ARE Marked With A Date Code A61451 Through A72571 Sequentially. THE Date Code and Part Number Appear ON THE Filter Housing. Fram Racing HP4 and HP8 OIL Filters NOT Bearing A Date Code IN This Range ARE NOT Affected BY This Recall. THE Gasket OF THE OIL Filter Becomes More Pliable Under High Temperatures and Pressures.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause Inadequate Sealing and Loss OF Engine Oil, Possibly Resulting IN A Fire.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Replace THE Affected OIL Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began During November 2007. Owners CAN Contact Fram Customer Service Toll-Free AT 1-800-890-2075.
Notes
Customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Insurance
Insurance for a 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
When stacking the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe against its contemporaries, it holds a strong position, especially within the American full-size SUV segment. Key rivals included its platform twin, the GMC Yukon, and other domestic offerings like the Ford Bronco (which was nearing the end of its run in 1996) and later, the Ford Expedition (introduced in 1997). Japanese competitors like the Toyota Land Cruiser and Nissan Pathfinder also vied for market share, though often in slightly different price brackets or with different philosophies.
Performance: The Tahoe's 5.7L V8 offered competitive power and excellent torque for towing and hauling, outperforming many V6-equipped rivals and standing toe-to-toe with the larger V8s in the Bronco. While the Land Cruiser of the era offered exceptional off-road prowess, its on-road performance was generally less robust than the Tahoe's V8.
Features: In terms of features, the Tahoe was on par with its domestic rivals, offering power amenities, air conditioning, and a decent stereo. The LT trim pushed for more comfort with leather and premium audio. Japanese competitors like the Land Cruiser often boasted slightly more refined interiors and often more advanced 4x4 systems, but at a higher price point. Driver-assistance and sophisticated tech were minimal across the board in this class and era.
Reliability: The Tahoe, like the GMC Yukon, is renowned for its long-term durability, often reaching high mileage with consistent maintenance. Its body-on-frame construction and robust drivetrain contribute significantly to this. While Land Cruisers are often perceived as the gold standard for reliability, the Tahoe is a very close contender, often being easier and cheaper to repair due to widespread parts availability. The Ford Bronco of the era also had a strong reputation for ruggedness.
Price: When new, the Tahoe was competitively priced against domestic rivals. In today's used market, its price can be lower than an equivalent Land Cruiser but higher than some other older SUVs, especially for well-preserved examples.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Tahoe's 5.7L V8 offered competitive power and excellent torque for towing and hauling, outperforming many V6-equipped rivals and standing toe-to-toe with the larger V8s in the Bronco. While the Land Cruiser of the era offered exceptional off-road prowess, its on-road performance was generally less robust than the Tahoe's V8.
Features: In terms of features, the Tahoe was on par with its domestic rivals, offering power amenities, air conditioning, and a decent stereo. The LT trim pushed for more comfort with leather and premium audio. Japanese competitors like the Land Cruiser often boasted slightly more refined interiors and often more advanced 4x4 systems, but at a higher price point. Driver-assistance and sophisticated tech were minimal across the board in this class and era.
Reliability: The Tahoe, like the GMC Yukon, is renowned for its long-term durability, often reaching high mileage with consistent maintenance. Its body-on-frame construction and robust drivetrain contribute significantly to this. While Land Cruisers are often perceived as the gold standard for reliability, the Tahoe is a very close contender, often being easier and cheaper to repair due to widespread parts availability. The Ford Bronco of the era also had a strong reputation for ruggedness.
Price: When new, the Tahoe was competitively priced against domestic rivals. In today's used market, its price can be lower than an equivalent Land Cruiser but higher than some other older SUVs, especially for well-preserved examples.
Alternatives:
- Similar Alternatives: The GMC Yukon is virtually identical, offering the same capabilities. The Ford Bronco (last generation, pre-1996) is another excellent choice for a robust, two-door full-size SUV experience.
- Better Alternatives (depending on priorities): If off-road capability and legendary reliability without domestic parts availability concerns are paramount, a Toyota Land Cruiser (80-series) of a similar vintage is an excellent but pricier option. For slightly more modern comfort and safety features, looking at a later generation Tahoe (e.g., 2000+ GMT800) would be "better" but outside the scope of this specific model year comparison. If strictly on-road comfort and fuel efficiency are desired, any large SUV from the mid-90s would be a poor choice, and a crossover would be more appropriate.
Final Verdict: Is the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe a Good Sport Utility Vehicle?
The 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe is an excellent vehicle for specific buyers. It's ideal for DIY enthusiasts, those needing a robust utility vehicle for towing or hauling, and individuals seeking a classic, rugged American SUV experience. It's also great for families on a budget who prioritize space and capability over modern creature comforts and fuel economy.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, if you understand its limitations and are prepared for the realities of owning a nearly 30-year-old vehicle. It's an undeniable used-market purchase. Look for well-maintained examples with documented service history, particularly those from rust-free climates.
Conditions for purchase: Prioritize an extensive pre-purchase inspection. For comfort, the LT trim is best; for a balance of features and value, the LS is a strong choice. Always consider a 4x4 model for added versatility. Be prepared for higher fuel costs and potential age-related repairs, but with proactive maintenance, these Tahoes can continue to be reliable, versatile workhorses for many years.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, if you understand its limitations and are prepared for the realities of owning a nearly 30-year-old vehicle. It's an undeniable used-market purchase. Look for well-maintained examples with documented service history, particularly those from rust-free climates.
Conditions for purchase: Prioritize an extensive pre-purchase inspection. For comfort, the LT trim is best; for a balance of features and value, the LS is a strong choice. Always consider a 4x4 model for added versatility. Be prepared for higher fuel costs and potential age-related repairs, but with proactive maintenance, these Tahoes can continue to be reliable, versatile workhorses for many years.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.