The 1989 Ford F-150 is a quintessential American full-size pickup, part of the robust eighth generation (1987-1991) of the F-Series. Available in Regular Cab and SuperCab configurations with various bed lengths, its classic, utilitarian body style and "Built Ford Tough" reputation made it incredibly popular. Key trims included Custom, XL, and the more upscale XLT Lariat. New prices ranged from approximately $10,000 to $18,000. It stood out for its legendary durability, powerful engine options, and versatility as a workhorse or daily driver.
The Good
Its key advantages include legendary reliability, particularly the 4.9L I6 engine, and a design that's both iconic and practical for work. Performance is solid for hauling and towing. For practical buyers, it offers excellent long-term value due to widespread parts availability and DIY-friendliness. Emotionally, it evokes nostalgia for a simpler, rugged era of American trucking.
The Bad
Known weaknesses include pervasive rust issues on body panels, frame, and bed, problematic dual fuel tank switching valves and sending units, and various electrical gremlins like malfunctioning gauges. Worn out suspension components and potential automatic transmission issues (AOD) are also common concerns for these older trucks.
1989 Ford F-150: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 4.9L (300 cu in) Inline-6: Renowned for its durability and torque, often considered the most reliable engine option.
- 5.0L (302 cu in) V8: A popular choice, offering a good balance of power and efficiency.
- 5.8L (351 cu in) V8: The most powerful factory option, ideal for heavier hauling and towing. - Horsepower:
- 4.9L I6: Approximately 145-150 hp
- 5.0L V8: Approximately 185 hp
- 5.8L V8: Approximately 210 hp (High Output versions existed) - Fuel Economy: Varies significantly by engine, transmission, and drivetrain (2WD/4WD).
- 4.9L I6: Roughly 14-17 MPG combined.
- V8 engines: Typically 10-14 MPG combined, often less in 4x4 configurations. - 0-60 Times: Not designed for speed, 0-60 times for these trucks were generally in the 10-14 second range, depending on engine, transmission, and rear axle ratio.
- Towing Capacity: Highly dependent on engine, axle ratio, and specific equipment.
- Light-duty configurations (I6, 2WD): Around 3,500-5,000 lbs.
- Heavy-duty configurations (V8, proper gearing): Could exceed 8,000 lbs, with some reaching 8,500+ lbs. - Trim-Level Features:
- Custom: The base work truck trim. Featured vinyl bench seats, rubber floor mats, manual windows and locks, and minimal exterior chrome. Designed for practicality and ruggedness.
- XL: A step up from Custom, offering cloth upholstery, carpeting, and often optional amenities like air conditioning, power steering, and a basic radio. More chrome trim was typically present.
- XLT Lariat: The top-tier trim, focusing on comfort and convenience. Included plush cloth or velour seats, full carpeting, power windows and door locks, cruise control, tilt steering, an upgraded audio system, and extensive chrome exterior trim. Two-tone paint schemes and alloy wheels were common options, giving it a more luxurious appearance for its era.
1989 Ford F-150 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1989 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | F-150 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab Long Bed 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | OAKVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4013 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 73.20 inches |
| Overall Length | 210.20 inches |
| Overall Width | 79.00 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 133.00 inches |
| Standard Seating | 3 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.9-L L-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 3-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 3-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | Non-ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $13,355 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1989 Ford F-150 Have?
The 1989 Ford F-150, while robust, is susceptible to several common problems associated with its age and design. The most pervasive issue is rust, which commonly affects the frame, wheel wells, bed supports, cab corners, rocker panels, and even the fuel tank straps. This can be a significant structural and cosmetic concern.
Another frequently reported problem is with the dual fuel tank system. The switching valve, fuel pumps (one in each tank and a high-pressure frame-mounted pump), and sending units are prone to failure, often leading to one tank being unusable or incorrect fuel gauge readings. Electrical gremlins are also common, including intermittent dashboard gauges (especially the fuel gauge), malfunctioning interior lights, and power window motor failures. These can often be traced to aging wiring or poor grounds.
Regarding the drivetrain, the automatic overdrive (AOD) transmission can be a weak point if not properly maintained, sometimes leading to shifting issues or premature failure. The C6 (3-speed automatic) is more robust but less efficient. The Twin I-Beam front suspension, while durable, requires regular maintenance of ball joints, tie rods, and bushings to prevent sloppy steering and alignment problems. Power steering pump leaks are also common.
Engine-wise, while the 4.9L I6, 5.0L V8, and 5.8L V8 are known for longevity, older engines will often develop oil leaks (valve cover gaskets, rear main seal), vacuum leaks, and issues with the early electronic fuel injection (EFI) or carburetor systems if not well-maintained. Emissions components also tend to fail over time.
Regarding recalls, while specific to the 1989 model year, various F-Series trucks from this era had recalls related to potential fire hazards from the cruise control deactivation switch, which could short circuit. Other recalls sometimes addressed fuel tank strap corrosion or steering column components. Long-term reliability concerns primarily revolve around mitigating rust, ensuring the fuel system functions correctly, and proactive maintenance of wear-and-tear components like suspension and rubber hoses.
Another frequently reported problem is with the dual fuel tank system. The switching valve, fuel pumps (one in each tank and a high-pressure frame-mounted pump), and sending units are prone to failure, often leading to one tank being unusable or incorrect fuel gauge readings. Electrical gremlins are also common, including intermittent dashboard gauges (especially the fuel gauge), malfunctioning interior lights, and power window motor failures. These can often be traced to aging wiring or poor grounds.
Regarding the drivetrain, the automatic overdrive (AOD) transmission can be a weak point if not properly maintained, sometimes leading to shifting issues or premature failure. The C6 (3-speed automatic) is more robust but less efficient. The Twin I-Beam front suspension, while durable, requires regular maintenance of ball joints, tie rods, and bushings to prevent sloppy steering and alignment problems. Power steering pump leaks are also common.
Engine-wise, while the 4.9L I6, 5.0L V8, and 5.8L V8 are known for longevity, older engines will often develop oil leaks (valve cover gaskets, rear main seal), vacuum leaks, and issues with the early electronic fuel injection (EFI) or carburetor systems if not well-maintained. Emissions components also tend to fail over time.
Regarding recalls, while specific to the 1989 model year, various F-Series trucks from this era had recalls related to potential fire hazards from the cruise control deactivation switch, which could short circuit. Other recalls sometimes addressed fuel tank strap corrosion or steering column components. Long-term reliability concerns primarily revolve around mitigating rust, ensuring the fuel system functions correctly, and proactive maintenance of wear-and-tear components like suspension and rubber hoses.
How long will the 1989 Ford F-150 last?
The 1989 Ford F-150 is renowned for its long-term durability, with many examples still operating well beyond 200,000 miles. Engines like the 4.9L I6 are particularly famous for consistently reaching 300,000 to 400,000 miles or more with proper maintenance. Owners frequently report these trucks lasting 25-35+ years. Long-term durability is a testament to their simple, robust mechanical design and heavy-duty frame construction.
However, this longevity is highly dependent on maintenance habits. Neglect leads to premature wear. Over time, the primary weakness is rust, attacking body panels and the frame. Other aging components include fuel system parts, electrical wiring, rubber hoses, and suspension bushings, which all degrade and require replacement to keep the truck reliable. Regular fluid changes and rust prevention are key to maximizing its service life.
However, this longevity is highly dependent on maintenance habits. Neglect leads to premature wear. Over time, the primary weakness is rust, attacking body panels and the frame. Other aging components include fuel system parts, electrical wiring, rubber hoses, and suspension bushings, which all degrade and require replacement to keep the truck reliable. Regular fluid changes and rust prevention are key to maximizing its service life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1989 Ford F-150 reflects the technology of its era, meaning built-in tech was rudimentary by today's standards. The most advanced "tech" involved the Engine Electronic Control (EEC-IV) system managing the multi-point fuel injection on some engines, a significant upgrade from carburetors. The dashboard featured analog gauges for speed, fuel level, temperature, oil pressure, and voltage. There was no complex digital display or onboard computer beyond basic engine management.
For entertainment, the standard offering was an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player. Higher trim levels like the XLT Lariat might have offered an upgraded sound system, but features like CD players, Bluetooth connectivity, or USB ports were decades away. The cabin experience was purely mechanical and analog.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent in the modern sense. Power steering and power brakes were standard or common options, easing the driving effort. The only notable "assistance" system was the Rear Anti-lock Braking System (RABS), which was standard on most models to prevent rear wheel lock-up during hard braking. Cruise control was an optional convenience feature for highway driving.
Safety features were also basic. There were no airbags; passive safety relied on the vehicle's sturdy ladder frame construction and seatbelts (lap belts were standard, lap/shoulder belts common in the front). A collapsible steering column was designed to reduce injury in frontal impacts. Official crash-test ratings from organizations like NHTSA or IIHS, as we know them today, were not conducted or publicized for vehicles of this vintage. While robust, these trucks lacked modern crumple zones and active safety technologies like traction control, stability control, or advanced driver-assistance systems.
For entertainment, the standard offering was an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player. Higher trim levels like the XLT Lariat might have offered an upgraded sound system, but features like CD players, Bluetooth connectivity, or USB ports were decades away. The cabin experience was purely mechanical and analog.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent in the modern sense. Power steering and power brakes were standard or common options, easing the driving effort. The only notable "assistance" system was the Rear Anti-lock Braking System (RABS), which was standard on most models to prevent rear wheel lock-up during hard braking. Cruise control was an optional convenience feature for highway driving.
Safety features were also basic. There were no airbags; passive safety relied on the vehicle's sturdy ladder frame construction and seatbelts (lap belts were standard, lap/shoulder belts common in the front). A collapsible steering column was designed to reduce injury in frontal impacts. Official crash-test ratings from organizations like NHTSA or IIHS, as we know them today, were not conducted or publicized for vehicles of this vintage. While robust, these trucks lacked modern crumple zones and active safety technologies like traction control, stability control, or advanced driver-assistance systems.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1989 Ford F-150 Prices and Market Value
When new in 1989, a base F-150 Regular Cab 2WD typically started around $10,000-$12,000, while a well-equipped XLT Lariat SuperCab 4WD could easily reach $16,000-$18,000 or more with options. Like most vehicles, initial depreciation was significant, with values plummeting over the first decade.
However, the 1989 F-150 has now largely passed its depreciation floor. Current used market prices (2024) vary wildly: projects might fetch $500-$2,000, running drivers $3,000-$7,000, and exceptionally well-maintained or restored examples can command $10,000-$25,000+. Factors affecting resale value include condition (especially rust-free status), low mileage, desirable engine (like the 300 I6), 4x4 capability, transmission type (manuals can be sought after), and trim level. These trucks are now appreciating classics, especially in clean, original form.
However, the 1989 F-150 has now largely passed its depreciation floor. Current used market prices (2024) vary wildly: projects might fetch $500-$2,000, running drivers $3,000-$7,000, and exceptionally well-maintained or restored examples can command $10,000-$25,000+. Factors affecting resale value include condition (especially rust-free status), low mileage, desirable engine (like the 300 I6), 4x4 capability, transmission type (manuals can be sought after), and trim level. These trucks are now appreciating classics, especially in clean, original form.
1989 Ford F-150 Cost of Ownership
Overall, a 1989 Ford F-150 can be economical to own, primarily due to low purchase prices and affordable parts. Insurance costs are typically very low, especially if qualified for classic car insurance. Fuel costs are the main expenditure; with 10-17 MPG, it's a thirsty vehicle for daily driving.
Maintenance is generally inexpensive, as parts are plentiful and many repairs are DIY-friendly due to the truck's simple mechanical design. Repair costs are also low compared to modern vehicles, thanks to widely available and cheap components. However, major restoration work for rust can be costly. While fuel consumption makes it expensive to operate daily, the low initial cost and maintenance often make it a budget-friendly option for a work or enthusiast truck.
Maintenance is generally inexpensive, as parts are plentiful and many repairs are DIY-friendly due to the truck's simple mechanical design. Repair costs are also low compared to modern vehicles, thanks to widely available and cheap components. However, major restoration work for rust can be costly. While fuel consumption makes it expensive to operate daily, the low initial cost and maintenance often make it a budget-friendly option for a work or enthusiast truck.
1989 Ford F-150 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
19.00 gallons
City Mileage
14 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
15 miles/gallon
1989 Ford F-150 Recalls & Defects
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:auxillary Tank:selector Devices
Recall date
1991-09-04
Recall no.
91v146000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Dual Fuel Tank Selector Valve MAY Malfunction and Cause AN Overfill Condition IN ONE OF THE Fuel Tanks, Resulting IN AN Overflow OF Fuel Past THE Filler Cap.
Consequence
THE Overflow OF Fuel Past THE Filler CAP Causes A Fuelleakage, Which CAN Result IN A Fire When Exposed TO A Source OF Ignition.
Remedy
Replace THE Dual Fuel Tank Selector Valve.
Notes
System: Fuel Tank, Auxilliary.vehicle Description: Vans and Light Trucks With Dual Fuel Tanks Produced IN Thefollowing Periods: F150, F250, and F350 Light Trucks Built Between February 28,1989 and July, 1989; Econoline Built Between February 28, 1989 Andfebruary 11, 1991.note: Ford HAS Agreed TO Recall These Vehicles BUT Parts ARE NOT YET Available.parts Will BE Available IN December 1991. YOU Will Receive A Letter From Fordadvising YOU When TO Schedule AN Appointment With Your Dealer TO Have THE Recallwork Performed. IN THE Mean Time, YOU CAN Take THE Following Precautions:fill Each Tank TO Only 1/3 Full.if Your Vehicle Leaks Fuel or IF YOU Smell Fuel, Stop Using THE Vehicle Andcall Ford AT (313) 446-4654 and Advise Them OF Your Problem. Refer TO Fordsafety Recall Number 91s39. AN Operator Will Take Your Name and Telephonenumber. A Ford Representative Will Call YOU Back.
Power Train:automatic Transmission:gear Position Indication (Prndl)
Recall date
1990-06-01
Recall no.
90v101000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Under Certain Conditions, THE Snap Ring That Locates THE Park Gear ON THE Output Shaft OF THE Transmission MAY Fracture.
Consequence
When THE Gear IS Placed IN Park, THE Park Gear Would Notengage, Allowing THE Truck TO Roll Freely IF THE Parking Brake IS NOT Properlyset. This Could Result IN AN Accident.
Remedy
Install Improved Snap Ring and Revised Transmission Extension Housing.
Notes
System: Park Gear Snap Ring.vehicle Description: 4 X 2 Light Trucks and Vans Equipped With One-Piecedriveshaft and AN E40d Transmission.
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:auxillary Tank
Recall date
1989-07-14
Recall no.
89v114000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Shields ON THE Fronts OF THE Midship Mounted Fuel Tanks Were Omitted During Assembly.
Consequence
Trucks Would NOT Comply With 30 MPH Impact Test Offmvss NO. 301, Fuel System Integrity.
Remedy
Install Fuel Tank Shields.
Notes
System:fuel Tank Shields/Fmvss 301.vehicle Description:4 X 2 Pickup Trucks With 133 Inch Wheelbase and Manualtransmissions.
Electrical System:ignition
Recall date
1996-04-25
Recall no.
96v071000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Ignition Switch Could Experience AN Internal Short Circuit.
Consequence
This Condition Could Cause Overheating, Smoke, and Possibly Fire IN THE Steering Column Area OF THE Vehicle.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Ignition Switch.
Notes
System: Electrical; Ignition Switch. Vehicle Description: Passenger and Multi-Purpose Vehicles and Light Duty Trucks. Note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time, Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
1989 Ford F-150 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1989 Ford F-150 Insurance
Insurance for a 1989 Ford F-150 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1989 Ford F-150 Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
Against its key rivals, the 1989 Ford F-150 held its own as a formidable contender. Its primary competitors were the Chevrolet C/K 1500 (specifically the new GMT400 generation starting in 1988) and the Dodge Ram D/W 150.
In terms of performance, the F-150 offered a strong lineup of engines, from the famously durable 4.9L I6 to the capable 5.0L and 5.8L V8s, providing ample power for work. The Chevy C/K models, with their new-for-'88 TBI (Throttle Body Injection) V8s, were also strong performers and often praised for a slightly more refined ride. The Dodge Ram, while robust, often lagged slightly in engine refinement and overall power figures compared to Ford and Chevy.
Regarding features, all three offered various trims from utilitarian base models to more creature-comfort-laden options. The F-150's XLT Lariat provided a good level of amenities for the time (power accessories, cruise control). The new GMT400 Chevy C/K often felt a bit more modern inside with a redesigned dashboard, while the Dodge Ram was typically the most spartan.
Reliability was a strong suit for all three, though each had its quirks. The F-150's 300 I6 engine is legendary. Chevy's TBI V8s were also known for great longevity. All three suffered from eventual rust issues and aging electrical components. Ford's dual fuel tank issues were a specific weakness. Dodge Rams were known for tough drivetrains but could suffer from body rust and simpler interiors.
Pricing when new was competitive across the board. In today's used market, clean examples of the F-150 and Chevy C/K can command similar, often appreciating prices, reflecting their classic status and utility. Dodge Rams tend to be slightly less valued historically, though good examples are now sought after.
Similar alternatives would be the 1988-1991 Chevrolet C/K 1500 for a slightly more modern feel and ride, or an earlier 7th generation (1980-1986) F-150 if seeking even greater simplicity and classic styling. For maximum simplicity and a different brand, the 1st generation Dodge Ram D/W series is also an option.
In terms of performance, the F-150 offered a strong lineup of engines, from the famously durable 4.9L I6 to the capable 5.0L and 5.8L V8s, providing ample power for work. The Chevy C/K models, with their new-for-'88 TBI (Throttle Body Injection) V8s, were also strong performers and often praised for a slightly more refined ride. The Dodge Ram, while robust, often lagged slightly in engine refinement and overall power figures compared to Ford and Chevy.
Regarding features, all three offered various trims from utilitarian base models to more creature-comfort-laden options. The F-150's XLT Lariat provided a good level of amenities for the time (power accessories, cruise control). The new GMT400 Chevy C/K often felt a bit more modern inside with a redesigned dashboard, while the Dodge Ram was typically the most spartan.
Reliability was a strong suit for all three, though each had its quirks. The F-150's 300 I6 engine is legendary. Chevy's TBI V8s were also known for great longevity. All three suffered from eventual rust issues and aging electrical components. Ford's dual fuel tank issues were a specific weakness. Dodge Rams were known for tough drivetrains but could suffer from body rust and simpler interiors.
Pricing when new was competitive across the board. In today's used market, clean examples of the F-150 and Chevy C/K can command similar, often appreciating prices, reflecting their classic status and utility. Dodge Rams tend to be slightly less valued historically, though good examples are now sought after.
Similar alternatives would be the 1988-1991 Chevrolet C/K 1500 for a slightly more modern feel and ride, or an earlier 7th generation (1980-1986) F-150 if seeking even greater simplicity and classic styling. For maximum simplicity and a different brand, the 1st generation Dodge Ram D/W series is also an option.
Final Verdict: Is the 1989 Ford F-150 a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1989 Ford F-150 is ideal for enthusiasts, DIY mechanics, those seeking a dependable work truck on a budget, or anyone nostalgic for classic American truck styling. It's an excellent choice for light hauling, towing, or as a secondary utility vehicle, farm truck, or weekend cruiser.
It is definitely worth buying, but with specific conditions. As a used vehicle, finding a rust-free example is paramount, as rust remediation can be prohibitively expensive. Focus on models with solid frames and body panels. The 4.9L I6 engine offers the best long-term reliability for general use, while V8s provide more power for heavier tasks. Opt for an XLT Lariat for more comfort features. It's not recommended as a primary daily driver for those concerned about fuel economy or modern safety/convenience features, but for its intended purposes, a well-maintained 1989 F-150 offers immense value and character.
It is definitely worth buying, but with specific conditions. As a used vehicle, finding a rust-free example is paramount, as rust remediation can be prohibitively expensive. Focus on models with solid frames and body panels. The 4.9L I6 engine offers the best long-term reliability for general use, while V8s provide more power for heavier tasks. Opt for an XLT Lariat for more comfort features. It's not recommended as a primary daily driver for those concerned about fuel economy or modern safety/convenience features, but for its intended purposes, a well-maintained 1989 F-150 offers immense value and character.
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.