The Good
The 2013 NV200 offers excellent fuel efficiency, appealing to practical buyers seeking cost savings. Its compact design allows for easy navigation in urban environments. While not luxurious, it provides basic comfort for work. It's a value-driven choice for businesses needing a reliable and affordable cargo solution.
The Bad
The 2013 NV200's weaknesses include its modest engine power, which can feel strained when fully loaded. The interior materials are basic and lack refinement. Suspension may feel stiff. Potential buyers should watch for transmission issues and ensure regular maintenance has been performed.
2013 Nissan NV200: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: 2.0-liter 4-cylinder
- Horsepower: 131 hp
- Fuel Economy: EPA estimated 24 mpg city / 25 mpg highway / 24 mpg combined
- 0-60 Times: Around 10.5 seconds (estimated)
- Towing Capacity: Not recommended/rated for significant towing. Max around 1,100 lbs (consult owner's manual)
- Trim-Level Features:
- S: Standard features include: 15-inch steel wheels, cloth upholstery, air conditioning, a two-speaker sound system, a cargo area work light, and 40/60-split rear cargo doors.
- SV: Adds power heated mirrors, cruise control, remote keyless entry, an additional 12-volt power outlet, and exterior chrome accents. Some SV models may include available technology packages.
- Cargo Capacity: 122.7 cubic feet behind the front seats
- Payload Capacity: Approximately 1,500 pounds.
- Drivetrain: Front-wheel drive.
- Transmission: Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT).
- Safety Features: Standard antilock brakes, stability control, traction control, and front-seat side airbags and side curtain airbags.
2013 Nissan NV200 Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 2013 |
Make | Nissan |
Model | NV200 |
Trim | - |
Style | - |
Type | Truck |
Category | Cargo Van |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | Mexico |
Manufacturing City | CUERNAVACA |
Dimensions
Doors | - |
Curb Weight | - |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 6000 pounds |
Overall Height | - |
Overall Length | - |
Overall Width | - |
Wheelbase Length | - |
Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
Engine | - |
Engine Size | 2L |
Engine Cylinders | - |
Transmission | - |
Transmission Type | - |
Transmission Speeds | - |
Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | Standard |
Steering Type | - |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
Invoice Price | - |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2013 Nissan NV200 Have?
Recalls for the 2013 NV200 have included concerns about potential fuel leaks due to faulty fuel tank welds and issues with the side airbag inflators. It is crucial to check the vehicle's VIN with the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) to verify if all applicable recalls have been addressed.
Long-term reliability concerns revolve around the longevity of the CVT, especially under heavy use or if proper maintenance (fluid changes) is neglected. Rust can be a concern in regions with harsh winters and road salt. Potential buyers should inspect the undercarriage and body panels for signs of corrosion. Regular maintenance, including fluid changes and inspections, is crucial for maximizing the lifespan and reliability of the 2013 NV200.
How long will the 2013 Nissan NV200 last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Safety features include standard antilock brakes (ABS), electronic stability control, traction control, front-seat side airbags, and side curtain airbags. These are essential for safety but are not advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS).
Crash-test ratings from the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) and NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) should be consulted for detailed safety performance. However, the NV200's crash test performance was not particularly stellar. It is advised to research specific ratings for the 2013 model year to understand its crashworthiness in various scenarios. The absence of advanced safety tech is a notable drawback compared to newer vehicles.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
2013 Nissan NV200 Prices and Market Value
2013 Nissan NV200 Cost of Ownership
2013 Nissan NV200 Fuel Efficiency
2013 Nissan NV200 Safety Rating
NHTSA
2013 Nissan NV200 Recalls & Defects
Electrical System
Steering:column
AIR Bags:frontal
Electrical System:software
AIR Bags:sensor:occupant Classification
2013 Nissan NV200 Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2013 Nissan NV200 Compare to Other Truck?
In terms of reliability, the NV200's CVT is a potential weakness compared to the Ford's traditional automatic transmission. The NV200's features are basic, lacking the advanced tech available in some competitors. Price-wise, the NV200 is often competitive, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
Alternatives to consider include the used Ford Transit Connect, particularly if reliability is a major concern, or a newer Ram ProMaster City for potentially more features and a more modern design. If budget allows, newer models of these competitors often offer improved safety features and technology.
Ranks #212 Truck
1 | 2023 Toyota Tundra | (5.0★) |
2 | 2022 Honda Ridgeline | (5.0★) |
3 | 2023 Ford E-Transit Chassis | (0.0★) |
4 | 2020 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Cab Chassis | (0.0★) |
5 | 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD | (0.0★) |
6 | 2023 Hyundai Santa Cruz | (5.0★) |
7 | 2023 Nissan Frontier | (5.0★) |
8 | 2024 GMC Sierra 2500HD | (0.0★) |
9 | 2023 Ram 4500 | (0.0★) |
10 | 2022 Jeep Gladiator | (5.0★) |
11 | 2012 Suzuki Equator | (0.0★) |
12 | 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | (5.0★) |
212 | 2013 Nissan NV200 | (5.0★) |
Final Verdict: Is the 2013 Nissan NV200 a Good Truck?
Ed the Handyman on February 12, 2020
Six years in serviceI bought it new for my handyman/construction business and never had any issue. I added the GPS/Bluetooth/Camera package. Other then regular oil change every 5000 miles I didn't have any mechanical issue. Added a heavy duty roof rack to carry plywood sheetrock and lumber. Most trips are local so my average mileage is 10,000-12,000/yr with average 20.1 miles/gallon. Saved $$$$ compared to the Chevy 2500 I had before. Cons: insufficient AC in extreme weather temps, requires payment to update the GPS (I'm using Google maps on my cellphone)
VGM on May 24, 2019
Easiest Car Dealership to deal with.I love my new van. Great experience and good price. Fun showroom and knowledgeable helpful staff. I'll buy every car from here from now on.
FMB on July 9, 2018
light handlingThis car has met our needs dfor many months. It is lightweight and drives smoothly. Best of all it is not a gas guzzler. We can fit our floor machines in easily and trap them into the driver dividning wall we had installed and can easily organize our chemicals in the cabin shelves.
NssanNV200 on November 26, 2017
Best cargo van for general contractors.If using this vehicle for business,its gonna save you a lot of money on gas. For 4 years that i own this vehicle,i had issue only with AC compressor and just recently replaced break paths,rotors and drum shoes and realized that it could wait another year.
eval on November 9, 2017
Very reliable cargo vanPerfect for construction , has two sided shelves for tools or other equipment, perfect for delivery. Great on gas.
Earl on March 14, 2015
not built for big peopleThe Company I work for bought a 2015. Been driving it now for a couple of months. I find I get backaches from the driver's seat. The seat is narrow, hard and uncomfortable for long drives and the space is very cramped. I have to slide over to the right side of the seat so I have room to move my left arm for steering or I bang my elbow into the hard plastic door panel. The gas pedal is too close to the console, my leg is up tight against it, and the brake pedal is too close to the gas. I cannot wear boots to drive because the side of the boot catches on the brake pedal when I try to move my foot over to apply the brake. The visors are also poorly designed. They do not slide along the arm and only cover a small portion of the front view, and the sun is always in the spot not covered. They hang down diagonally over the side windows and block a large portion of the view out of the window. They do not fold up to cover only the top of the window. The visibility out of the vehicle is also very bad. The large pillars in the front and small side windows make seeing lights, signs, pedestrians and cyclists a challenge, especially if the visor is down on the side window. Backing out of a parking space is done totally blind, you cannot see any approaching vehicles with the small mirrors and lack of windows in the back. The small fuel tank and the fact the filler is on the passenger side are negatives too. Good gas mileage, adequate space inside, lack of power when loaded, not much clearance underneath for bumpy roads, easy to park. The main problem is they are designed for small people. I find the driver's area is very cramped, and I'm not a really large person. I occasionally bang the shifter out of gear because it sticks out into the space when reaching for the heater controls. Same with the wiper lever. It's easy to bump using the steering wheel. Just too small for larger people.
Famepot on June 12, 2014
Great vehicle for the money.Then NV200 turned out to be the perfect choice. Plenty of hauling space, sufficient power, excellent gas mileage and modern technology. The ride is relatively smooth and quiet. The handling feels solid and the turning radius is amazing. I've owned mine for a month now, and my only complaint is that the seats could be a little more comfortable. My reliability rating is mostly based on my other Nissan which in 4 years of ownership with 40K miles, not one problem. As a service vehicle, I wasn't expecting a whole lot from the NV200, but it has surprised me in how much fun it is to drive. The Tech Package is well worth the money, with Pandora Radio from your iPhone, Google Send to Car and Points of Interest, and text messaging functionality. Twice the gas mileage of a full size van, and better ride and handling than its competition, make the NV200 a great choice if it meets your cargo size and weight requirements.
KJ on May 25, 2014
Excellant Mini Cargo VanWe love this mini cargo van that meets our needs of occasional hauling of merchandise. Pros : good gas mileage, easy to drive, just enough power Cons : too small gas tank , sun visors that won't stay partially up either fully up or down
Backporch Music on April 15, 2014
EZload Gig vanSaw nv200 in commercial fleet of service vehicles and saw NO LEDGE to lift equipment over. Started search that day. Took my presentation package of wheeled one man band(Amp,mixer,keyboard and mics) in the subcompact van I've been loading by lifting over rear lip to dealership to test load. Expected to fit rear only and found my package loads easily from rear, from left or right. Load locked easily into "D": rings at floor level. Ready for load specific clamp down use in less than an hour. It is EXACTLY what I wanted and needed. Even though it was evident that I had already made up my mind, my dealership treated me fairly. This is a functional utilitarian transport for my 3-400 lb. load and handles easily. The loss or high rev gear shifting makes steep grades a non-issue. Would like to have a grab bar on the passenger side but having loaded and unloaded 20 times in the first month of ownership, I take a lot of pride in the new "case" for my musical equipment . I'm 69 and could never justify the expense of a brand new vehicle but the NV200 is the best match I've ever found for my specific need. Yes, I like it a LOT. .
Zane Dzikonski on April 2, 2014
Solid econmical VanNice little van. Alot of my driving is unloaded, and i see on average 24.8 to 25.1 with mixed driving. the 130hp engine puts out more power than you would expect. As long as your not in a hurry fully loaded ( i estimate 1,200lb) the handling, acceleration and braking is adequate for what it is. (remember its not a sports car or, large van or pickup -dont expect amazing) Didn't notice too much drop in gas mileage either. (loweset was 21.4 so far). The CVT transmission takes a bit getting used to and might not be for everyone but i really like it. I test drove both the NV200 and the Transit connect, Both have their plus and minus but overall i chose the NV200. Biggest selling points for me -Better mileage, 60 40 rear door, Price. I also liked the interior and over all driving experience a bit better. (nothing specific-just liked it better)