The 1983 Chevrolet Camaro, a popular pony car, continued its legacy with a sporty coupe body style. This generation spanned from 1982 to 1992. Key trims included the base Sport Coupe, Berlinetta, and the performance-oriented Z28. New pricing ranged from approximately $10,000 to $15,000. Its enduring appeal lies in its aggressive styling, attainable performance, and association with American muscle car heritage.
The Good
The 1983 Camaro offered exciting performance, especially in Z28 trim, and a striking, aggressive design. While not prioritizing ultimate comfort, it provided a driver-focused experience. Its value proposition as an attainable sports coupe appealed to enthusiasts seeking a blend of style and spirited driving without breaking the bank.
The Bad
When considering a 1983 Camaro, watch out for potential rust issues, particularly in the lower body panels and wheel wells. Electrical system gremlins can also be a concern. Interior wear and tear, especially on seats and dashboard plastics, is common due to age. Engine and transmission issues may arise if maintenance was neglected.
1983 Chevrolet Camaro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1983 Chevrolet Camaro was offered with several engine choices, catering to different performance needs. The base engine was typically a 2.8L V6. For those seeking more power, a 5.0L V8 (LG4) was available, and the Z28 model often came with a higher-output version of the 5.0L V8, sometimes featuring the Cross-Fire Injection system.
- Horsepower: Horsepower figures varied significantly by engine and trim. The 2.8L V6 produced around 112 horsepower. The standard 5.0L V8 (LG4) offered roughly 145-150 horsepower. The Z28's Cross-Fire injected 5.0L V8 could produce around 175-180 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy was not a primary focus for performance vehicles of this era. The V6 models might achieve in the range of 20-25 MPG combined, while the V8 engines would be significantly lower, likely in the 15-20 MPG range, depending on driving conditions and specific engine configuration.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph times were respectable for the time. The V6 models might take around 10-12 seconds. The 5.0L V8 variants could achieve 0-60 mph in roughly 8-9 seconds, with the Z28 being the quickest of the bunch.
- Towing Capacity: The 1983 Chevrolet Camaro was not designed for towing. It did not have a dedicated towing capacity rating.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Sport Coupe (Base): Standard features included a decent interior, power steering, and brakes. Optional upgrades were available for comfort and convenience.
- Berlinetta: Positioned as a more upscale and comfortable model, the Berlinetta typically featured upgraded interior trim, including plush seating, power windows, and air conditioning as standard or commonly optioned. It often had a more refined suspension setup.
- Z28: This was the performance-oriented trim. It featured distinct styling cues like a unique hood, body kit, and larger wheels. Mechanically, it received performance-tuned suspension, upgraded brakes, and the more powerful V8 engine options. Interior sport seats and gauges were also common.
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1983 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Camaro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Coupe |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | NORWOOD |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 5 L 8-Cyl. |
| Engine Size | 5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1983 Chevrolet Camaro Have?
The 1983 Chevrolet Camaro, like many vehicles of its era, is not immune to common issues that arise with age and mileage. One of the most frequently reported problems is related to the cooling system. Radiator leaks, failing water pumps, and deteriorated hoses can lead to overheating. The electrical system is another area to be cautious of. Issues with the alternator, starter, and various sensors can cause intermittent problems or complete failure. Owners have also reported problems with the carburetor (on non-fuel-injected models), requiring regular maintenance and tuning to ensure proper operation. For the 5.0L V8 engines, especially those with the Cross-Fire Injection, issues with the fuel injectors or the injection system itself can be problematic and costly to repair.
Rust is a significant concern for any classic car, and the 1983 Camaro is no exception. Areas prone to rust include the rocker panels, floor pans, rear quarter panels, and around the windows. Thorough inspection for rust damage is crucial before purchasing.
While specific major recalls for the 1983 model year are not widely publicized as critical widespread defects, routine maintenance and addressing minor issues promptly are key to long-term reliability. Some general recalls for Camaros of this generation might have involved brake systems or emissions controls. The transmission, whether automatic or manual, can also experience wear over time, especially if driven hard or not maintained. Clutch issues are common on manual transmissions. Interior components, such as the dashboard, seats, and headliner, are susceptible to sun damage and wear and tear, which isn't a mechanical issue but affects the overall experience.
Long-term reliability largely depends on how well the vehicle has been maintained. A well-cared-for 1983 Camaro with regular fluid changes, proper tune-ups, and rust prevention can be quite dependable. However, neglected examples may require significant investment to bring them up to reliable condition. There aren't specific widespread known issues that plague all 1983 models more than others within this generation, but the general wear and tear associated with 40-year-old vehicles is a constant consideration.
Rust is a significant concern for any classic car, and the 1983 Camaro is no exception. Areas prone to rust include the rocker panels, floor pans, rear quarter panels, and around the windows. Thorough inspection for rust damage is crucial before purchasing.
While specific major recalls for the 1983 model year are not widely publicized as critical widespread defects, routine maintenance and addressing minor issues promptly are key to long-term reliability. Some general recalls for Camaros of this generation might have involved brake systems or emissions controls. The transmission, whether automatic or manual, can also experience wear over time, especially if driven hard or not maintained. Clutch issues are common on manual transmissions. Interior components, such as the dashboard, seats, and headliner, are susceptible to sun damage and wear and tear, which isn't a mechanical issue but affects the overall experience.
Long-term reliability largely depends on how well the vehicle has been maintained. A well-cared-for 1983 Camaro with regular fluid changes, proper tune-ups, and rust prevention can be quite dependable. However, neglected examples may require significant investment to bring them up to reliable condition. There aren't specific widespread known issues that plague all 1983 models more than others within this generation, but the general wear and tear associated with 40-year-old vehicles is a constant consideration.
How long will the 1983 Chevrolet Camaro last?
Estimating average mileage for a 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is challenging due to its age and varied usage. Many have likely accumulated well over 100,000 miles, with some well-maintained examples reaching 200,000 miles or more. Years of service can easily extend beyond 30-40 years if properly cared for. Long-term durability is highly dependent on maintenance. The chassis and body can be susceptible to rust over time, which is a primary weakness. The mechanical components, particularly the V8 engines, are generally robust and can last a long time with regular oil changes, cooling system maintenance, and attention to the ignition and fuel systems. However, neglect can quickly lead to significant repair costs, affecting its longevity. Electrical components and interior wear are also common weaknesses that develop over extended periods.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1983 Chevrolet Camaro was a product of its time, meaning its technology, entertainment, and safety features are quite basic by today's standards. Built-in tech was limited to essential functions. The primary entertainment source was an AM/FM radio, with an optional cassette player or a premium sound system offering more speakers. Air conditioning was typically an optional extra, not standard on all trims. Power windows and door locks were also often optional, especially on the base models, but could be found on higher trims like the Berlinetta.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Modern aids like cruise control were available as options and were considered advanced at the time. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were not yet common or available on this model. Steering was power-assisted, making it easier to maneuver.
Safety features were primarily passive. Seat belts were standard, as were padded dashboards and energy-absorbing steering columns. The car's construction provided a basic level of crash protection. As for crash-test ratings, standardized testing as we know it today (like NHTSA's star ratings) was not as comprehensive or publicly available for vehicles of this vintage. However, the general trend for cars in this era was that they offered less sophisticated safety structures compared to modern vehicles. Side-impact protection was minimal, and airbags were not a feature offered on the 1983 Camaro. The focus was on occupant restraint through seat belts and the car's overall structural integrity, which was evolving but still rudimentary by contemporary standards. The Z28 trim might have offered slightly more robust suspension and braking components as part of its performance package, indirectly contributing to active safety by improving vehicle control.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Modern aids like cruise control were available as options and were considered advanced at the time. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were not yet common or available on this model. Steering was power-assisted, making it easier to maneuver.
Safety features were primarily passive. Seat belts were standard, as were padded dashboards and energy-absorbing steering columns. The car's construction provided a basic level of crash protection. As for crash-test ratings, standardized testing as we know it today (like NHTSA's star ratings) was not as comprehensive or publicly available for vehicles of this vintage. However, the general trend for cars in this era was that they offered less sophisticated safety structures compared to modern vehicles. Side-impact protection was minimal, and airbags were not a feature offered on the 1983 Camaro. The focus was on occupant restraint through seat belts and the car's overall structural integrity, which was evolving but still rudimentary by contemporary standards. The Z28 trim might have offered slightly more robust suspension and braking components as part of its performance package, indirectly contributing to active safety by improving vehicle control.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1983 Chevrolet Camaro had a starting price around $10,000 for the base model, with higher trims like the Z28 retailing for upwards of $14,000-$15,000. As a typical new car, it experienced significant depreciation in its early years. Currently, used market prices for a 1983 Camaro vary greatly based on condition, mileage, trim level, and originality. Well-maintained, low-mileage Z28 models can fetch anywhere from $5,000 to $15,000+, while project cars or models with significant wear might be found for under $3,000. Factors affecting resale value include the presence of the original engine and transmission, minimal rust, a clean interior, and documentation of maintenance. Rarity of specific options or color combinations can also increase desirability and value.
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1983 Chevrolet Camaro can be moderately economical for enthusiasts, but requires diligence. Insurance costs can vary but are often reasonable for classic or enthusiast vehicles, especially for V6 models. Fuel costs will depend on the engine; V6s are more economical than V8s, which can be thirsty. Maintenance is crucial; regular oil changes, tune-ups, and coolant checks are essential. Repairs can range from affordable for common parts to expensive for specialized V8 engine components or rare trim pieces. Overall, it's not the cheapest car to own due to potential age-related issues, but with careful ownership and prompt repairs, it can be manageable, especially if you can perform some work yourself.
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Recalls & Defects
Parking Brake:conventional
Recall date
1991-04-11
Recall no.
91v055000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Parking Brake Adjuster Fails TO Operate and DO NOT Work After Brake PAD Wear.
Consequence
Parking Brakes Will NOT Completely Hold A Parked Vehiclewhen Parked ON A Slope, Causing Unintended Vehicle Rollaway Which Could Resultin A Vehicle Accident.
Remedy
Replace Nonfunctioning Parking Brake Adjusters.
Notes
System: Parking Brake.vehicle Description: Passenger Cars; Firebirds and Camaros With Manualtransmissions and Rear Disk Brakes and Fieros With Manual Transmissions.
Seat Belts:front:webbing
Recall date
1985-12-20
Recall no.
85v169000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Dislocation OF A Spring Cover Will NOT Allow THE Shoulder Belt TO Retract After Being Extended. Consequence OF Defect: Although Inertial Feature That Locks THE LAP Belt and Shoulder Belt IN THE Event OF AN Accident ARE NOT Affected, IF Slack IS More Than Recommended IN Owners Manual, Injuries TO Upper Body and Head Would BE Increased IN AN Accident.
Consequence
Remedy
Install Retaining Springs ON Spring Cover OF Front Shoulder Belt Retractor And, When Required, Retractors Will BE Replaced.
Notes
System: Shoulder Seat Belt Retractor. Vehicle Description: Passenger Cars.
Structure:body:hood
Recall date
1983-05-02
Recall no.
83v049000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Inner and Outer Panels OF THE Fiberglass Hood Could Separate During Vehicle Operation.
Consequence
Remedy
Dealer Will Inspect THE Hood And, IF Necessary, Install A NEW ONE AT NO Charge.
Notes
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles Equipped With 5 Liter Engines.system: Structure; Fiberglass Hoods.consequences OF Defect: IF This Separation Occurs While THE Vehicle IS Inmotion, THE Outer Panel MAY Fold Back and Block THE Driver"s View. This Couldcause A Loss OF Control Without Prior Warning, Possibly Resulting IN Anaccident.
Equipment
Recall date
2007-10-24
Recall no.
07e088000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Honeywell Fram Racing Brand HP4 and HP8 OIL Filters That Were Manufactured From MAY 25, 2006, Through September 14, 2007, and Sold FOR USE AS Replacement Equipment FOR Vehicles List Above. THE Affected Filters ARE Marked With A Date Code A61451 Through A72571 Sequentially. THE Date Code and Part Number Appear ON THE Filter Housing. Fram Racing HP4 and HP8 OIL Filters NOT Bearing A Date Code IN This Range ARE NOT Affected BY This Recall. THE Gasket OF THE OIL Filter Becomes More Pliable Under High Temperatures and Pressures.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause Inadequate Sealing and Loss OF Engine Oil, Possibly Resulting IN A Fire.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Replace THE Affected OIL Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began During November 2007. Owners CAN Contact Fram Customer Service Toll-Free AT 1-800-890-2075.
Notes
Customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Insurance
Insurance for a 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Coupe with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1983 Chevrolet Camaro Compare to Other Coupe?
The 1983 Chevrolet Camaro competed in the sporty coupe segment against rivals like the Ford Mustang, Pontiac Firebird (a close sibling), and sometimes even more upscale imports. In terms of performance, the V8-powered Camaros, particularly the Z28, offered competitive acceleration and handling for their price point. The 5.0L V8 provided a decent punch, though often lagged behind muscle cars of earlier eras. The Mustang offered similar V8 performance and styling, often at a comparable price. The Firebird shared much of its platform and mechanicals with the Camaro, so performance and reliability were very similar, often differentiated by styling and suspension tuning.
Feature-wise, the 1983 Camaro was relatively basic. While offering sporty seats and gauges, it lacked many of the creature comforts and advanced tech found in more luxurious coupes. Rivals might have offered more refined interiors or slightly more advanced optional features. Reliability was a mixed bag for American cars of this period. While the V8 engines were generally robust, electrical gremlins and susceptibility to rust were common concerns across the board, including competitors. The Camaro and Firebird often shared similar reliability profiles.
Price-wise, the Camaro was generally an attractive option for those seeking sporty styling and performance without a premium price tag. It offered a strong value proposition against both domestic and some import competitors.
Alternatives:
Feature-wise, the 1983 Camaro was relatively basic. While offering sporty seats and gauges, it lacked many of the creature comforts and advanced tech found in more luxurious coupes. Rivals might have offered more refined interiors or slightly more advanced optional features. Reliability was a mixed bag for American cars of this period. While the V8 engines were generally robust, electrical gremlins and susceptibility to rust were common concerns across the board, including competitors. The Camaro and Firebird often shared similar reliability profiles.
Price-wise, the Camaro was generally an attractive option for those seeking sporty styling and performance without a premium price tag. It offered a strong value proposition against both domestic and some import competitors.
Alternatives:
- Ford Mustang: A direct and strong competitor. The Mustang offered similar performance with V8 options, often a slightly more modern interior feel, and was readily available.
- Pontiac Firebird: As mentioned, very similar to the Camaro, but often with slightly more aggressive styling and tuning. If you like the Camaro's essence but want a different look, the Firebird is an excellent alternative.
- Dodge Challenger/Plymouth Barracuda (older models): While earlier models were more potent, these represented the classic American pony car heritage. However, finding good examples of these older cars could be more challenging and potentially more expensive than a 1983 Camaro.
- Datsun 280ZX/Nissan 300ZX: For those seeking a more refined and reliable import alternative with sporty pretensions, these offered good performance and a higher level of comfort and build quality, albeit at a potentially higher price point and with different driving dynamics.
Final Verdict: Is the 1983 Chevrolet Camaro a Good Coupe?
The 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is ideal for classic car enthusiasts and those who appreciate the styling and spirit of American muscle cars from the 1980s. It's a good buy for individuals seeking an affordable entry into the pony car hobby, especially if they enjoy moderate DIY maintenance and are willing to address age-related issues. It is definitely a used-only proposition.
Whether it's worth buying hinges on condition and price. A well-maintained Z28 with minimal rust and original components represents a solid investment and a fun driver. Base models or V6 variants offer a more economical entry point but less performance. Avoid cars with extensive rust or major mechanical problems unless you have the budget and skills for a substantial restoration. For someone looking for a weekend cruiser with a touch of nostalgia and sporty appeal, the 1983 Camaro can be a rewarding purchase.
Whether it's worth buying hinges on condition and price. A well-maintained Z28 with minimal rust and original components represents a solid investment and a fun driver. Base models or V6 variants offer a more economical entry point but less performance. Avoid cars with extensive rust or major mechanical problems unless you have the budget and skills for a substantial restoration. For someone looking for a weekend cruiser with a touch of nostalgia and sporty appeal, the 1983 Camaro can be a rewarding purchase.
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.