The 1992 Chevrolet Camaro represents the final year of the third-generation F-body, a pony car known for its aggressive styling and performance. Introduced in 1982, the third-gen Camaro featured a sleek hatchback body style, a significant departure from its predecessors. Key trims included the base RS, the sportier Z28, and the top-tier IROC-Z (though the IROC-Z designation was dropped after 1990, its spirit lived on in the Z28). With new prices ranging from approximately $12,000 to over $20,000, its sharp looks and V8 power made it a popular, accessible American muscle car.
The Good
For emotional buyers, the 1992 Camaro offers thrilling V8 performance, iconic '90s styling, and a raw driving experience. Practically, it provides a strong value proposition in the used market. Its robust drivetrain, especially the small-block V8s, boasts decent reliability and parts availability. The hatchback design offers surprising cargo utility for a sports car, balancing fun with some everyday practicality.
The Bad
Common weaknesses for the 1992 Camaro include interior plastics that degrade over time, T-top leaks, and occasional power window motor failures. Fuel economy, especially with the V8s, is not a strong suit. Rust can be a concern in northern climates, particularly around the rear wheel wells and floor pans. The ride can also be firm, and rear visibility is somewhat limited.
1992 Chevrolet Camaro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 3.1L LG4 V6 (Standard on RS)
- 5.0L LO3 V8 (Optional on RS, Standard on Z28)
- 5.0L L98 Tuned Port Injection (TPI) V8 (Optional on Z28)
- 5.7L B2L L98 Tuned Port Injection (TPI) V8 (Optional on Z28, with automatic transmission only) - Horsepower:
- 3.1L V6: Approximately 140 hp
- 5.0L LO3 V8: Approximately 170 hp
- 5.0L L98 TPI V8: Approximately 205-220 hp
- 5.7L B2L L98 TPI V8: Approximately 245 hp (this was the most powerful engine offered in 1992) - Fuel Economy (EPA estimates, vary by transmission and engine):
- V6: Around 17-20 MPG city / 25-28 MPG highway
- 5.0L V8: Around 15-17 MPG city / 22-25 MPG highway
- 5.7L V8: Around 14-16 MPG city / 20-23 MPG highway - 0-60 MPH Times:
- 3.1L V6: High 9s to low 10s seconds
- 5.0L LO3 V8: Low to mid 8s seconds
- 5.0L L98 TPI V8: Low 7s seconds
- 5.7L B2L L98 TPI V8: Mid to high 6s seconds (some sources claim sub-6.0 seconds for optimal conditions) - Towing Capacity:
- While not primarily a towing vehicle, a properly equipped 1992 Camaro (typically V8 models with a factory towing package or aftermarket hitch) could have a small towing capacity, generally around 1,000-2,000 lbs. It's rarely a listed spec for these cars and not recommended for heavy loads. - Trim-Level Features:
- RS (Rally Sport): Entry-level. Features included a V6 engine, 5-speed manual or 4-speed automatic, 15-inch styled steel wheels, power steering, power brakes, and often basic cloth interior. Air conditioning and power windows were common options.
- Z28: Performance-oriented. Standard 5.0L V8 (LO3), sport suspension, 16-inch alloy wheels, unique body cladding, ground effects, fog lamps, and a more aggressive interior with sport seats. Higher-output TPI V8s were optional, along with T-tops, leather seats, and premium sound systems. The 1992 Z28 also featured "25th Anniversary" badging and stripe options.
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1992 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Camaro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Convertible |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | SLEEPY HOLLOW |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 3.1 L 6-Cyl. |
| Engine Size | 3.1L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1992 Chevrolet Camaro Have?
The 1992 Chevrolet Camaro, as the final iteration of the third generation, had many of its initial kinks worked out, but several common problems persist across the third-gen platform. Frequently reported problems include electrical issues, particularly with power windows, door locks, and dash gauges. Window motors are notorious for failing. The "Check Engine" light often illuminates due to faulty oxygen sensors, EGR valves, or vacuum leaks, common across all engine types.
T-top leaks are a very prevalent issue, leading to water intrusion into the cabin, which can damage interior components and promote rust. The plastic interior trim, dashboards, and door panels are prone to cracking and fading, especially with sun exposure. Headliner sagging is almost universal.
Mechanically, the 700R4 automatic transmission (later 4L60) can be a weak point, often exhibiting hard shifts or complete failure, particularly in vehicles driven hard or not meticulously maintained. Fuel pump failures are also common, usually signaled by intermittent starting problems or the car suddenly stalling. Suspension components like ball joints, tie rods, and bushings wear out, contributing to a loose steering feel.
Rust is a significant long-term concern, especially in regions exposed to road salt. Areas to watch include the rear quarter panels, floor pans, subframe connectors, and around the T-tops and windshield. Brake components, especially the rear drums on earlier models or calipers on later disc setups, can stick or wear unevenly.
Recalls for the 1992 model specifically are fewer as it was late in its production run, but general third-gen F-body recalls might include issues related to fuel lines, seat belt buckles, or headlight switch malfunctions, though these would likely have been addressed early in the vehicle's life or are rare to find uncorrected today. Overall, while generally robust, consistent maintenance is key to mitigating these age-related issues.
T-top leaks are a very prevalent issue, leading to water intrusion into the cabin, which can damage interior components and promote rust. The plastic interior trim, dashboards, and door panels are prone to cracking and fading, especially with sun exposure. Headliner sagging is almost universal.
Mechanically, the 700R4 automatic transmission (later 4L60) can be a weak point, often exhibiting hard shifts or complete failure, particularly in vehicles driven hard or not meticulously maintained. Fuel pump failures are also common, usually signaled by intermittent starting problems or the car suddenly stalling. Suspension components like ball joints, tie rods, and bushings wear out, contributing to a loose steering feel.
Rust is a significant long-term concern, especially in regions exposed to road salt. Areas to watch include the rear quarter panels, floor pans, subframe connectors, and around the T-tops and windshield. Brake components, especially the rear drums on earlier models or calipers on later disc setups, can stick or wear unevenly.
Recalls for the 1992 model specifically are fewer as it was late in its production run, but general third-gen F-body recalls might include issues related to fuel lines, seat belt buckles, or headlight switch malfunctions, though these would likely have been addressed early in the vehicle's life or are rare to find uncorrected today. Overall, while generally robust, consistent maintenance is key to mitigating these age-related issues.
How long will the 1992 Chevrolet Camaro last?
Based on owner data and maintenance habits, a 1992 Chevrolet Camaro can realistically achieve 150,000 to 200,000 miles, with many examples surpassing 250,000 miles, especially if equipped with the TPI V8s and a well-maintained transmission. The small-block V8 engines (LO3, L98) are renowned for their long-term durability if oil changes are regular and cooling systems are kept in check. However, years of service are often more limited by body and interior degradation than mechanical failure. Weaknesses over time include widespread cracking of plastic interior components and dashboards, persistent T-top leaks leading to water damage, and rust becoming significant in chassis, floorpans, and body panels. Electrical gremlins often multiply with age, affecting windows, locks, and lighting. While the core mechanicals are strong, neglected maintenance will severely shorten its lifespan, particularly for transmissions and fuel systems.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1992 Chevrolet Camaro, being a product of the early '90s, featured technology that was relatively basic by today's standards but respectable for its era. Built-in tech was primarily focused on engine management with Tuned Port Injection (TPI) systems offering relatively sophisticated electronic fuel injection for improved performance and efficiency compared to carbureted engines. The dashboard featured an analog gauge cluster, though some models, particularly earlier third-gens, offered a digital dash. Creature comforts included power steering and power brakes as standard across all trims.
For entertainment, the standard setup was usually an AM/FM stereo, often with a cassette player. Optional upgrades included a premium sound system, usually a Delco unit, with features like a graphic equalizer and CD player capability. Steering wheel audio controls were not common for this model year.
Driver-assistance features were minimal. The most advanced "assistance" was typically cruise control. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were an important optional safety feature, particularly for Z28 models, providing enhanced stopping performance. Traction control was not available. Safety features included a driver's side airbag, which became standard in 1990 for the third-gen Camaro, along with three-point seatbelts. Passenger side airbags were not offered. Crumple zones were integrated into the body structure to absorb impact energy.
Crash-test ratings from agencies like the NHTSA are not as readily available or as comprehensive for vehicles of this vintage compared to modern cars. However, general observations suggest that the third-generation F-body offered reasonable protection for its time, especially with the inclusion of a driver's airbag. Despite this, it would not compare favorably to the advanced safety systems and structural integrity of contemporary vehicles. Features like electronic stability control, lane departure warning, or backup cameras were decades away from becoming standard or even optional on cars like the Camaro.
For entertainment, the standard setup was usually an AM/FM stereo, often with a cassette player. Optional upgrades included a premium sound system, usually a Delco unit, with features like a graphic equalizer and CD player capability. Steering wheel audio controls were not common for this model year.
Driver-assistance features were minimal. The most advanced "assistance" was typically cruise control. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were an important optional safety feature, particularly for Z28 models, providing enhanced stopping performance. Traction control was not available. Safety features included a driver's side airbag, which became standard in 1990 for the third-gen Camaro, along with three-point seatbelts. Passenger side airbags were not offered. Crumple zones were integrated into the body structure to absorb impact energy.
Crash-test ratings from agencies like the NHTSA are not as readily available or as comprehensive for vehicles of this vintage compared to modern cars. However, general observations suggest that the third-generation F-body offered reasonable protection for its time, especially with the inclusion of a driver's airbag. Despite this, it would not compare favorably to the advanced safety systems and structural integrity of contemporary vehicles. Features like electronic stability control, lane departure warning, or backup cameras were decades away from becoming standard or even optional on cars like the Camaro.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1992 Chevrolet Camaro ranged significantly in price. A base RS V6 model could start around $12,000, while a well-optioned Z28 with the 5.7L V8 could easily exceed $20,000 to $23,000. Today, current used market prices vary wildly based on condition, mileage, engine, and trim. A rough, high-mileage RS might fetch $2,000-$5,000. A clean, lower-mileage Z28, especially with the 5.7L TPI, can command $10,000-$20,000 or even higher for truly pristine, original examples. Depreciation was steep during its initial years, like many performance cars. Factors affecting current resale value include the originality and rarity of the trim (e.g., specific 25th Anniversary editions), presence of the most powerful L98 V8, manual transmission, overall cosmetic condition (interior and exterior), and documented maintenance. Undocumented modifications generally decrease value, while factory options and meticulous care enhance it, pushing certain examples into collector territory.
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1992 Chevrolet Camaro can be a mixed bag in terms of cost. Insurance for a vintage sports car is often reasonable, sometimes surprisingly low if it's not a daily driver or falls under classic car insurance. Fuel costs are significant for V8 models, with their lower MPG. Maintenance is generally affordable due to readily available parts and straightforward mechanicals. Many repairs can be DIY-friendly. However, certain specialized parts for TPI systems or unique body pieces might be harder to source. Long-term ownership can lean towards costly if you desire a pristine example, due to the need for rust repair, interior restoration, and potential transmission rebuilds. Overall, it's not particularly economical for daily V8 driving, but manageable for a hobby car with careful planning and some DIY aptitude.
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Safety Rating
NHTSA
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Recalls & Defects
Power Train:automatic Transmission
Recall date
1992-10-23
Recall no.
92v154000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Automatic Transmission Shift Control Cable CAN Separate.
Consequence
Separation OF THE Transmission Shift Cable CAN Preventthe Transmission From Being Shifted Into THE Proper Position. This Condition Cancause Unexpected Vehicle Movement When THE Transimission Indicator IS IN Park Orneutral Position and THE Transmission IS IN A Drive Mode; This Could Result INA Vehicle Crash Without Prior Warning.
Remedy
THE Dealer Will Replace THE Shift Cable.
Notes
System: Transmission.vehicle Description: Passenger Cars With Automatic Transmissions.
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:filler Pipe and CAP
Recall date
1994-04-25
Recall no.
94v077000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Fuel Filler Neck Solder Joint CAN Develop Cracks or PIN Hole Leaks, Which Does NOT Comply With Fmvss NO. 301, "fuel System Integrity." THE Cracks and Holes CAN Allow Fuel Vapor and Fuel Leakage.
Consequence
Consequence OF Non-Compliance: Gasoline Vapors and Fuel Leaks CAN Result IN A Fire IF Exposed TO A Source OF Ignition.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect THE Fuel Tank Assembly and Replace Those Which Exhibit THE Cracks or PIN Hole Leaks.
Notes
System: Fuel; Fuel Tank Assembly; Pipe; Filler; Neck; Fmvss 301.vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles.note: IF Your Vehicle IS Presented TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and THE Remedy IS NOT Provided Within A Reasonable Amount OF Time or THE Remedy Does NOT Correct THE Noncompliance, Please Contact Chevrolet At1-800-222-1020 or Pontiac AT 1-800-762-2737. Also, Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-05-19
Recall no.
06e043000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Replacement Fuel Filters, Fram Brand Name P/N G3727, With Date Codes X52911 Through X60801 Sequentially or X600141 and A Mexico Country or Origin Marking ON THE Fuel Filter Housing Manufactured From October 18, 2005, Through March 21, 2006, Sold FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above and ON Certain School Buses. (TO SEE THE School Bus Engine Sizes, Click ON "document Search" and Then "bus Applications"). THE Connector ON THE Fuel Filter WAS NOT Manufactured TO Honeywell's Specification. AS A Result, THE O-Ring MAY NOT Seat Correctly ON THE Fuel Line.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause AN Inadequate Seal AT THE Connection, Potentially Leading TO A Fuel Leak. IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Fuel Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 18, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Fram Customer Service AT 1-800-890-2075 (Option 1).
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Fram Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Vehicles Listed.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Equipment
Recall date
2007-10-24
Recall no.
07e088000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Honeywell Fram Racing Brand HP4 and HP8 OIL Filters That Were Manufactured From MAY 25, 2006, Through September 14, 2007, and Sold FOR USE AS Replacement Equipment FOR Vehicles List Above. THE Affected Filters ARE Marked With A Date Code A61451 Through A72571 Sequentially. THE Date Code and Part Number Appear ON THE Filter Housing. Fram Racing HP4 and HP8 OIL Filters NOT Bearing A Date Code IN This Range ARE NOT Affected BY This Recall. THE Gasket OF THE OIL Filter Becomes More Pliable Under High Temperatures and Pressures.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause Inadequate Sealing and Loss OF Engine Oil, Possibly Resulting IN A Fire.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Replace THE Affected OIL Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began During November 2007. Owners CAN Contact Fram Customer Service Toll-Free AT 1-800-890-2075.
Notes
Customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Insurance
Insurance for a 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Convertible with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1992 Chevrolet Camaro Compare to Other Convertible?
The 1992 Chevrolet Camaro faced stiff competition from its perennial rival, the Ford Mustang (Foxbody), and also from imports like the Nissan 300ZX and Toyota Supra, though these were often in a higher price bracket. Against the Foxbody Mustang, the Camaro (especially the Z28 with the 5.7L TPI) generally offered superior handling dynamics thanks to its more advanced suspension setup (MacPherson struts front, torque arm rear) compared to the Mustang's live rear axle. Performance-wise, a top-tier Z28 was competitive with the Mustang 5.0L, often slightly outperforming it in straight-line acceleration and cornering. Features were quite similar – both offered V8 power, manual or automatic transmissions, and a range of power accessories. Reliability was comparable, with both cars suffering from age-related electrical gremlins and interior wear.
Compared to Japanese rivals like the Nissan 300ZX (Z32) or Toyota Supra (Mk3), the Camaro offered a more raw, American muscle experience. The 300ZX and Supra, particularly their turbocharged variants, generally surpassed the Camaro in terms of refinement, interior quality, and often outright performance, albeit at a significantly higher price point both new and used. They also offered more sophisticated independent rear suspensions and advanced tech features. Reliability for the Japanese sports cars could be excellent, but repairs, when needed, were often more complex and expensive than for the simpler Camaro.
For alternatives, if raw performance and a V8 rumble are priorities, a Ford Mustang LX 5.0 or Mustang GT of the same era is a direct and excellent alternative, often with more aftermarket support. If a balance of performance, features, and slightly better reliability is desired and budget allows, a Nissan 300ZX (naturally aspirated) or even a Corvette C4 from the late '80s/early '90s could be considered, offering a more premium feel, though with potentially higher maintenance costs. Ultimately, the 1992 Camaro stands out for its distinctive style and accessible V8 power relative to its peers.
Compared to Japanese rivals like the Nissan 300ZX (Z32) or Toyota Supra (Mk3), the Camaro offered a more raw, American muscle experience. The 300ZX and Supra, particularly their turbocharged variants, generally surpassed the Camaro in terms of refinement, interior quality, and often outright performance, albeit at a significantly higher price point both new and used. They also offered more sophisticated independent rear suspensions and advanced tech features. Reliability for the Japanese sports cars could be excellent, but repairs, when needed, were often more complex and expensive than for the simpler Camaro.
For alternatives, if raw performance and a V8 rumble are priorities, a Ford Mustang LX 5.0 or Mustang GT of the same era is a direct and excellent alternative, often with more aftermarket support. If a balance of performance, features, and slightly better reliability is desired and budget allows, a Nissan 300ZX (naturally aspirated) or even a Corvette C4 from the late '80s/early '90s could be considered, offering a more premium feel, though with potentially higher maintenance costs. Ultimately, the 1992 Camaro stands out for its distinctive style and accessible V8 power relative to its peers.
Final Verdict: Is the 1992 Chevrolet Camaro a Good Convertible?
The 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is ideal for enthusiasts seeking an authentic '90s American pony car experience without breaking the bank. It's perfect for someone who appreciates classic V8 power, aggressive styling, and the relatively straightforward mechanics of a third-generation F-body. It's worth buying for those who enjoy working on cars, as most examples will require ongoing maintenance and some restoration. As a used vehicle, it offers significant bang for the buck, especially the Z28 trims with the 5.7L TPI engine, which provide exhilarating performance. Avoid base V6 models if performance is a priority. Purchase one in the best condition your budget allows, focusing on rust-free bodies and well-maintained engines. Be prepared for potential T-top leaks, interior plastic degradation, and possible electrical quirks. It serves well as a weekend cruiser, a project car, or a budget-friendly entry into classic American muscle, but less so as a primary, reliable daily driver without significant investment.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.