The 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is the final year of the third generation (1982-1992), a significant evolution from its predecessors. Offered as a sporty coupe and convertible, it featured an iconic long hood, short deck design. Key trims included the sporty Berlinetta, the performance-oriented IROC-Z, and the Z28. This model year is popular for its aggressive styling, V8 power options, and its role as a performance icon of its era, making it a desirable classic.
The Good
The 1987 Camaro offers thrilling V8 performance and a striking, aggressive design that appeals to the enthusiast. Its relatively simple mechanicals can contribute to decent reliability for its age. For practical buyers, it represents attainable performance and a stylish choice compared to more mundane vehicles.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1987 Camaro include aging interior components, particularly dashboard cracks and worn upholstery. Electrical gremlins and rust, especially around wheel wells and rocker panels, are common concerns. Fuel injection systems can also develop issues over time.
1987 Chevrolet Camaro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1987 Chevrolet Camaro was available with several engine choices, catering to different performance levels. The base engine was typically a 2.8L V6. Higher trims and performance packages offered more potent V8 engines.
- Horsepower: V6 engines generally produced around 135-145 horsepower. The 5.0L V8 engines, particularly in the Z28 and IROC-Z trims, could offer horsepower figures ranging from approximately 170 to 215 horsepower, depending on the specific engine and carburetor/fuel injection setup. The optional 5.7L V8, available in the IROC-Z, delivered around 225 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy varied significantly based on the engine and transmission. V6 models generally achieved better mileage, often in the range of 18-22 MPG city and 25-30 MPG highway. V8 models were less efficient, with figures typically falling between 15-19 MPG city and 20-24 MPG highway. These are estimates and can be affected by driving style and vehicle condition.
- 0-60 Times: Acceleration varied greatly. V6 models could take around 9-10 seconds to reach 60 mph. With the 5.0L V8, 0-60 times could be in the 7-8 second range. The more powerful 5.7L V8 in the IROC-Z could achieve 0-60 times in the low 7-second range, offering genuine sports car performance for its time.
- Towing Capacity: The Chevrolet Camaro was not designed or marketed as a towing vehicle. Towing capacity is generally not applicable or would be extremely limited, suitable only for very light trailers or utility purposes. Owners generally do not use Camaros for towing.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Berlinetta: Often featured more comfort-oriented options, upgraded interior materials, and a focus on a smoother ride.
- Z28: A performance-oriented trim with a V8 engine, sport suspension, and aggressive styling cues.
- IROC-Z: The pinnacle of performance for the third-gen Camaro, named after the International Race of Champions. It came standard with the 5.0L V8, enhanced suspension (often with larger sway bars and stiffer springs), better brakes, and distinctive IROC-Z badging and decals. Optional features included the 5.7L V8, limited-slip differential, and power everything.
1987 Chevrolet Camaro Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1987 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Camaro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Coupe |
| Type | Coupe |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | NORWOOD |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.8-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 2.8L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1987 Chevrolet Camaro Have?
The 1987 Chevrolet Camaro, like many vehicles of its era, is prone to specific issues as it ages. One of the most commonly reported problems is related to the fuel injection system, particularly the Throttle Body Injection (TBI) on V8 engines. Issues with fuel pumps, injectors, and sensors can lead to poor running conditions, stalling, and difficulty starting.
Electrical gremlins are also a frequent complaint. This can manifest as intermittent issues with lights, gauges, power windows, and other accessories. Aging wiring harnesses and corroded connectors are often the culprits. The dashboard is another common area of concern; due to the materials used and sun exposure, dashboards are notorious for cracking and deteriorating, impacting both aesthetics and the functionality of integrated components.
Rust is a significant long-term reliability concern for third-generation Camaros. Areas prone to rust include the rear wheel arches, rocker panels, floor pans, and the lower sections of doors. Thorough inspection for rust is crucial when considering a purchase.
Mechanical issues can include premature wear of suspension components, such as bushings and ball joints, especially in performance-oriented trims like the IROC-Z which were driven harder. Transmission issues, while not universally widespread, can occur with age and mileage, particularly with automatic transmissions.
Regarding recalls, while specific major recalls for the 1987 model year are not extensively documented as widespread safety defects, it is always advisable to check with the NHTSA for any applicable recalls that may have been issued. Overall, while the core powertrain can be robust if maintained, attention to body integrity, electrical systems, and fuel delivery are key to long-term reliability.
Electrical gremlins are also a frequent complaint. This can manifest as intermittent issues with lights, gauges, power windows, and other accessories. Aging wiring harnesses and corroded connectors are often the culprits. The dashboard is another common area of concern; due to the materials used and sun exposure, dashboards are notorious for cracking and deteriorating, impacting both aesthetics and the functionality of integrated components.
Rust is a significant long-term reliability concern for third-generation Camaros. Areas prone to rust include the rear wheel arches, rocker panels, floor pans, and the lower sections of doors. Thorough inspection for rust is crucial when considering a purchase.
Mechanical issues can include premature wear of suspension components, such as bushings and ball joints, especially in performance-oriented trims like the IROC-Z which were driven harder. Transmission issues, while not universally widespread, can occur with age and mileage, particularly with automatic transmissions.
Regarding recalls, while specific major recalls for the 1987 model year are not extensively documented as widespread safety defects, it is always advisable to check with the NHTSA for any applicable recalls that may have been issued. Overall, while the core powertrain can be robust if maintained, attention to body integrity, electrical systems, and fuel delivery are key to long-term reliability.
How long will the 1987 Chevrolet Camaro last?
Estimating average mileage for a 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is challenging due to its nature as a performance-oriented car and a classic. Many have been driven sparingly as weekend cruisers or have been restored and are maintained meticulously. However, a well-maintained example with regular servicing and attention to its known weaknesses (like rust prevention and electrical checks) can realistically see 200,000 to 250,000 miles or more.
The long-term durability largely depends on the owner's commitment to maintenance. The V8 engines are generally robust and can last hundreds of thousands of miles if oil changes are frequent and cooling systems are kept in good order. The primary weaknesses that impact longevity are body integrity due to rust and the potential for electrical system failures as components age. Cars kept in dry climates with regular garage storage will far outlast those exposed to harsh weather and road salt. For those who treat them well, these Camaros can remain reliable drivers for decades.
The long-term durability largely depends on the owner's commitment to maintenance. The V8 engines are generally robust and can last hundreds of thousands of miles if oil changes are frequent and cooling systems are kept in good order. The primary weaknesses that impact longevity are body integrity due to rust and the potential for electrical system failures as components age. Cars kept in dry climates with regular garage storage will far outlast those exposed to harsh weather and road salt. For those who treat them well, these Camaros can remain reliable drivers for decades.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1987 Chevrolet Camaro reflects the technology and safety standards of its era. Built-in tech was relatively basic by today's standards. The entertainment system typically consisted of an AM/FM radio, with optional cassette tape players or even CD players becoming available on some higher trims or as dealer-installed options. Speaker systems were generally modest, with options for upgraded sound packages.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. The focus was on the driving experience rather than electronic aids. Features like cruise control were available, and some models offered power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors as optional convenience items. The dashboard instrumentation provided essential information, including speedometer, tachometer, fuel gauge, and engine temperature.
Safety features for the 1987 Camaro included standard seat belts, a padded dashboard, and energy-absorbing steering column. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were becoming available but were often optional, particularly on performance models like the IROC-Z. Airbags were not standard equipment in 1987 for the Camaro; they were still a relatively new technology in the automotive industry.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this period are less comprehensive and standardized than modern tests. However, the third-generation Camaro was generally designed with a focus on structural integrity for its time. While specific crash-test data for the 1987 model year might be scarce or only represent older testing methodologies, the vehicle featured a relatively strong unibody construction. It's important to note that compared to modern vehicles, safety features and crash performance would be significantly different.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. The focus was on the driving experience rather than electronic aids. Features like cruise control were available, and some models offered power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors as optional convenience items. The dashboard instrumentation provided essential information, including speedometer, tachometer, fuel gauge, and engine temperature.
Safety features for the 1987 Camaro included standard seat belts, a padded dashboard, and energy-absorbing steering column. Anti-lock braking systems (ABS) were becoming available but were often optional, particularly on performance models like the IROC-Z. Airbags were not standard equipment in 1987 for the Camaro; they were still a relatively new technology in the automotive industry.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from this period are less comprehensive and standardized than modern tests. However, the third-generation Camaro was generally designed with a focus on structural integrity for its time. While specific crash-test data for the 1987 model year might be scarce or only represent older testing methodologies, the vehicle featured a relatively strong unibody construction. It's important to note that compared to modern vehicles, safety features and crash performance would be significantly different.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1987 Chevrolet Camaro Prices and Market Value
When new in 1987, the Chevrolet Camaro had a starting price that varied by trim level. Base models might have begun in the low to mid-$10,000s, while higher-performance trims like the IROC-Z could easily push the price upwards of $18,000 to $20,000, especially with optional equipment.
Currently, used market prices for a 1987 Camaro range widely based on condition, mileage, and trim. Well-maintained, low-mileage examples of sought-after trims like the IROC-Z can fetch anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000+. More common V6 models in average condition might be found for $4,000 to $8,000.
Depreciation was steep in the initial years, as is typical for most cars. However, these cars have long since passed the steepest part of their depreciation curve and are now considered collector vehicles. Factors significantly affecting resale value include the specific trim level (IROC-Z being most desirable), the engine size (V8s command higher prices), overall condition (rust, interior wear, mechanical soundness), mileage, and the presence of original documentation and modifications.
Currently, used market prices for a 1987 Camaro range widely based on condition, mileage, and trim. Well-maintained, low-mileage examples of sought-after trims like the IROC-Z can fetch anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000+. More common V6 models in average condition might be found for $4,000 to $8,000.
Depreciation was steep in the initial years, as is typical for most cars. However, these cars have long since passed the steepest part of their depreciation curve and are now considered collector vehicles. Factors significantly affecting resale value include the specific trim level (IROC-Z being most desirable), the engine size (V8s command higher prices), overall condition (rust, interior wear, mechanical soundness), mileage, and the presence of original documentation and modifications.
1987 Chevrolet Camaro Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is generally considered moderately costly, especially when prioritizing performance and condition. Insurance costs can vary; classic car insurance might be more economical for a well-maintained model, while standard insurance for a daily driver could be higher due to its sporty nature. Fuel costs depend heavily on the engine; V8 models are thirsty, making them less economical. Maintenance requires attention to potential rust, aging electrical components, and typical wear-and-tear items. Repair costs can be moderate, with parts generally available but potentially more expensive for performance-specific items or body panels. Overall, it is not an economical vehicle to own in terms of fuel and potential repairs compared to a modern economy car, but it offers significant emotional value for enthusiasts.
1987 Chevrolet Camaro Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1987 Chevrolet Camaro Recalls & Defects
Seat Belts:front:buckle Assembly
Recall date
1990-05-14
Recall no.
90v105000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Plastic Components OF Seat Belt Buckle Assemblies DO NOT Contain AN Ultra Violet Stabilizer, and Exposure TO Direct Sunlight and Elevated Interior Temperatures Could Weaken THE Plastic Components.
Consequence
This Could Result IN Breakage OF Plastic Components Whichcould Prevent Buckle From Latching and Protecting Occupant IN A Sudden Stop Oraccident.
Remedy
Replace or Repair Seat Belt Buckle.
Notes
System: Seat Belt Buckle.vehicle Description: Passenger Cars.
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-05-19
Recall no.
06e043000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Replacement Fuel Filters, Fram Brand Name P/N G3727, With Date Codes X52911 Through X60801 Sequentially or X600141 and A Mexico Country or Origin Marking ON THE Fuel Filter Housing Manufactured From October 18, 2005, Through March 21, 2006, Sold FOR USE ON THE Vehicles Listed Above and ON Certain School Buses. (TO SEE THE School Bus Engine Sizes, Click ON "document Search" and Then "bus Applications"). THE Connector ON THE Fuel Filter WAS NOT Manufactured TO Honeywell's Specification. AS A Result, THE O-Ring MAY NOT Seat Correctly ON THE Fuel Line.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause AN Inadequate Seal AT THE Connection, Potentially Leading TO A Fuel Leak. IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Fuel Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON October 18, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Fram Customer Service AT 1-800-890-2075 (Option 1).
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Fram Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Vehicles Listed.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Equipment
Recall date
2007-10-24
Recall no.
07e088000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Honeywell Fram Racing Brand HP4 and HP8 OIL Filters That Were Manufactured From MAY 25, 2006, Through September 14, 2007, and Sold FOR USE AS Replacement Equipment FOR Vehicles List Above. THE Affected Filters ARE Marked With A Date Code A61451 Through A72571 Sequentially. THE Date Code and Part Number Appear ON THE Filter Housing. Fram Racing HP4 and HP8 OIL Filters NOT Bearing A Date Code IN This Range ARE NOT Affected BY This Recall. THE Gasket OF THE OIL Filter Becomes More Pliable Under High Temperatures and Pressures.
Consequence
This Condition MAY Cause Inadequate Sealing and Loss OF Engine Oil, Possibly Resulting IN A Fire.
Remedy
Honeywell Will Replace THE Affected OIL Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began During November 2007. Owners CAN Contact Fram Customer Service Toll-Free AT 1-800-890-2075.
Notes
Customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1987 Chevrolet Camaro Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1987 Chevrolet Camaro Insurance
Insurance for a 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Coupe with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1987 Chevrolet Camaro Compare to Other Coupe?
The 1987 Chevrolet Camaro competed in the sporty coupe segment against rivals like the Ford Mustang, Pontiac Firebird (which shared much of its platform), and the Dodge Daytona/Chrysler Laser.
Performance: In its IROC-Z guise, the Camaro offered competitive V8 performance, often matching or exceeding the Ford Mustang GT of the same era. The handling was generally praised, especially with the upgraded suspension packages. The Pontiac Firebird Trans Am offered a similar performance envelope due to shared components.
Features: By 1987 standards, the Camaro offered a decent array of optional convenience features like power accessories and upgraded sound systems. However, in terms of advanced technology, it lagged behind some newer competitors or less performance-oriented vehicles that might have offered more electronic amenities. The Ford Mustang offered a similar feature set.
Reliability: Reliability for all these American sports cars of the era could be a mixed bag. The Camaro, with its complex fuel injection and electrical systems, could be prone to gremlins. The Ford Mustang, particularly with its 5.0L V8, was known for its robust powertrain but could also suffer from rust and electrical issues. The shared platform of the Camaro and Firebird meant similar reliability concerns.
Price: The Camaro and Mustang were generally priced competitively, making them accessible performance cars. The Camaro's IROC-Z trim often commanded a higher price than a comparable Mustang GT due to its performance pedigree and styling.
Alternatives:
Performance: In its IROC-Z guise, the Camaro offered competitive V8 performance, often matching or exceeding the Ford Mustang GT of the same era. The handling was generally praised, especially with the upgraded suspension packages. The Pontiac Firebird Trans Am offered a similar performance envelope due to shared components.
Features: By 1987 standards, the Camaro offered a decent array of optional convenience features like power accessories and upgraded sound systems. However, in terms of advanced technology, it lagged behind some newer competitors or less performance-oriented vehicles that might have offered more electronic amenities. The Ford Mustang offered a similar feature set.
Reliability: Reliability for all these American sports cars of the era could be a mixed bag. The Camaro, with its complex fuel injection and electrical systems, could be prone to gremlins. The Ford Mustang, particularly with its 5.0L V8, was known for its robust powertrain but could also suffer from rust and electrical issues. The shared platform of the Camaro and Firebird meant similar reliability concerns.
Price: The Camaro and Mustang were generally priced competitively, making them accessible performance cars. The Camaro's IROC-Z trim often commanded a higher price than a comparable Mustang GT due to its performance pedigree and styling.
Alternatives:
- Ford Mustang GT (1987-1993): A very similar competitor offering strong V8 performance and a dedicated enthusiast following. Often considered slightly more raw than the Camaro.
- Pontiac Firebird (1987-1992): Particularly the Trans Am and Formula models, these offered very similar performance and handling to the Camaro due to shared engineering. Styling is distinct and a matter of preference.
- Dodge Daytona/Chrysler Laser: Offered a different approach with front-wheel drive and turbocharged 4-cylinder or V6 engines. Performance could be brisk, but they lacked the V8 muscle car appeal of the Camaro.
Final Verdict: Is the 1987 Chevrolet Camaro a Good Coupe?
The 1987 Chevrolet Camaro is ideal for car enthusiasts, particularly those who appreciate 1980s muscle car aesthetics and V8 performance. It's a great choice for collectors looking for a slice of automotive history or weekend drivers seeking an engaging and stylish classic.
Whether it's worth buying depends heavily on the buyer's priorities and budget. As a used vehicle, it represents attainable performance and iconic styling, but requires diligent inspection for rust and mechanical condition. It is worth buying for those who understand its quirks and are prepared for ongoing maintenance.
Conditions for buying:
Whether it's worth buying depends heavily on the buyer's priorities and budget. As a used vehicle, it represents attainable performance and iconic styling, but requires diligent inspection for rust and mechanical condition. It is worth buying for those who understand its quirks and are prepared for ongoing maintenance.
Conditions for buying:
- Used is the only option, as it's a classic.
- Prioritize well-maintained examples, especially those with documentation.
- IROC-Z and Z28 trims offer the most performance and collectibility.
- Inspect thoroughly for rust, particularly in the common areas.
- V8 engines are generally preferred for performance and sound.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.