The Good
The 1999 Camaro offers compelling advantages: thrilling V8 performance with strong acceleration for emotional buyers, and outstanding value on the used market for practical ones. Its aggressive, timeless design still turns heads. The LS1 engine boasts impressive reliability, and parts are generally affordable and abundant, simplifying maintenance. While not luxurious, it delivers an uncompromised, visceral driving experience.
The Bad
Known weaknesses include a dated interior with cheaper plastics prone to rattling, and limited rear visibility, especially in coupe models. Owners frequently report failing headlight motors, T-top leaks, and issues with the ABS/Traction Control system. While the powertrain is robust, overall build quality isn't as refined as some competitors, leading to various minor electrical and trim annoyances over time.
1999 Chevrolet Camaro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 3.8L L36 Series II V6
- 5.7L LS1 V8 (aluminum block) - Horsepower:
- V6: 200 hp @ 5200 rpm
- Z28 (LS1 V8): 305 hp @ 5200 rpm
- SS (LS1 V8 with Ram Air): 320-325 hp @ 5200 rpm - Fuel Economy (EPA estimates):
- V6 (Automatic): 19 MPG City / 30 MPG Highway
- V8 (Automatic): 18 MPG City / 25 MPG Highway
- V8 (Manual): 18 MPG City / 26 MPG Highway - 0-60 MPH Times (approximate):
- V6: 7.0-8.0 seconds
- Z28 (LS1 V8): 5.2-5.5 seconds
- SS (LS1 V8): 4.9-5.1 seconds - Towing Capacity:
- Not officially rated for significant towing. Generally, towing is not recommended for performance vehicles like the Camaro, but minimal capacities (e.g., 1,000 lbs) might be theoretical. - Trim-Level Features:
- Base (V6): Standard features include a 3.8L V6 engine, 5-speed manual transmission (4-speed automatic optional), cloth bucket seats, AM/FM stereo, air conditioning, power windows, and 16-inch steel wheels with wheel covers.
- Z28 (V8): Builds on the Base trim, adding the powerful 5.7L LS1 V8 engine, performance-tuned suspension, larger four-wheel disc brakes with ABS, limited-slip differential, fog lights, specific Z28 badging, power driver's seat, and 16-inch aluminum alloy wheels. Optional T-tops and a premium audio system were popular.
- SS (V8): The top-tier performance model, typically an optional package by SLP Engineering. It includes the LS1 V8 with Ram Air induction for increased horsepower, a unique composite hood with functional air scoops, high-performance exhaust system, specific SS badging, 17-inch alloy wheels, and often a Hurst short-throw shifter for manual transmissions. Performance suspension tuning and optional Torsen differential further enhanced its capabilities.
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 1999 |
Make | Chevrolet |
Model | Camaro |
Trim | - |
Style | Coupe |
Type | Coupe |
Category | Subcompact Car |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | Canada |
Manufacturing City | STE. THERESE |
Dimensions
Doors | 2-Door |
Curb Weight | 3501 pounds |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
Overall Height | 52.00 inches |
Overall Length | 193.20 inches |
Overall Width | 74.10 inches |
Wheelbase Length | 101.10 inches |
Standard Seating | 4 |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 3.8-L |
Engine Size | 3.8L |
Engine Cylinders | 6 |
Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
Transmission Type | Automatic |
Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $22,205 |
Invoice Price | $20,318 |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1999 Chevrolet Camaro Have?
Interior quality is a recurring complaint, with brittle plastics, dashboard cracking, and malfunctioning power window motors being prevalent. Rattles and squeaks from the interior trim are also common. HVAC blend door actuators can fail, leading to inconsistent temperature control. While the LS1 V8 engine is remarkably robust, some owners report higher-than-average oil consumption, which is often considered within "normal" parameters for these engines but should be monitored. Leaky intake manifold gaskets are also a known, albeit less frequent, issue.
Regarding recalls, the 1999 model year typically saw fewer major recalls compared to earlier models. However, it's always advisable to check the NHTSA database using the VIN for specific recalls that may apply, which could include minor electrical or safety component issues like seatbelt retractors or exterior lighting. Long-term reliability concerns often center on these accessory and interior components, rather than the core engine and transmission, which are generally durable if properly maintained. Suspension bushings and ball joints will naturally wear out with age and mileage, requiring replacement.
How long will the 1999 Chevrolet Camaro last?
Weaknesses over time mainly manifest in electrical components like headlight motors and power window regulators. Interior plastics and upholstery can degrade, leading to rattles or tears. Weather stripping often deteriorates, contributing to T-top leaks. Rust can become an issue in regions exposed to road salt. Regular fluid changes and prompt attention to minor electrical issues are key to maximizing its service life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
For entertainment, standard equipment included an AM/FM stereo, often with either a cassette player or a single-disc CD player. An optional upgrade was the Monsoon premium sound system, which included an external amplifier and better speakers, significantly enhancing audio quality. A power antenna was also a common feature.
In terms of driver-assistance, the primary features were Anti-lock Brakes (ABS), which were standard on Z28 and SS models and optional on the V6, and a Traction Control System (TCS), also standard on V8s and optional for the V6. These systems helped maintain control during hard braking or acceleration on slippery surfaces. No other active driver aids were available.
Safety features were basic but effective for the era. The 1999 Camaro came standard with dual front airbags for the driver and passenger, along with three-point seatbelts featuring pre-tensioners. Side-impact protection was integrated into the doors. Crash-test ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 1999 Camaro were:
- Frontal Driver: 4 out of 5 stars
- Frontal Passenger: 4 out of 5 stars
- Side Driver (Coupe): 3 out of 5 stars
- Side Rear Passenger (Coupe): 3 out of 5 stars
What Colors Options are Available?
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Prices and Market Value
Today, current used market prices are highly variable. Base V6 models typically range from $3,000-$8,000. Z28s command $5,000-$15,000. SS models, especially well-maintained, low-mileage examples, can fetch $10,000-$25,000+, with some pristine examples going higher.
The Camaro experienced significant initial depreciation, like most cars. However, it has largely passed its steepest depreciation curve. Factors affecting resale value now include overall condition, mileage, trim level (SS is king), manual transmission preference, originality versus modifications, and regional demand. Clean, unmolested V8 models hold their value best, often appreciating as collector's items.
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Cost of Ownership
Overall, the 1999 Camaro can be considered relatively economical to own for a performance vehicle, particularly if it's a well-maintained V6. V8 models offer excellent performance-for-the-dollar, but higher fuel consumption and potentially more expensive performance-oriented repairs make them slightly more costly in the long term.
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Fuel Efficiency
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Recalls & Defects
Power Train:clutch Assembly
Exterior Lighting
Exterior Lighting
Exterior Lighting
Exterior Lighting:headlights
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1999 Chevrolet Camaro Compare to Other Coupe?
In terms of Performance, the Camaro Z28 and SS models, powered by the potent 5.7L LS1 V8 (305-325 hp), generally held a significant power advantage over the Ford Mustang GT's 4.6L SOHC V8 (260 hp). The F-body cars were often quicker in a straight line. The Mustang SVT Cobra, with its DOHC 4.6L V8 (320 hp), was a direct competitor to the Camaro SS, offering comparable straight-line speed and often superior handling thanks to its independent rear suspension in some years (though not 1999). The Pontiac Firebird/Trans Am offered identical mechanicals to the Camaro, differing primarily in exterior styling and interior aesthetics.
Features were quite basic across all these muscle cars, reflecting their enthusiast-focused nature and price point. The Camaro's interior was often criticized for its quality and dated design more than the Mustang's. The Firebird/Trans Am typically offered slightly more aggressive styling, including distinctive pop-up headlights and more stylized bodywork, which some preferred.
Reliability was a strong point for the LS1 engine in the Camaro and Firebird, known for its robustness. The Mustang's 4.6L V8 was also generally reliable. All models shared common issues of the era, such as electrical gremlins, interior trim problems, and wear-and-tear items. The F-bodies, however, had well-documented issues with headlight motors and T-top leaks.
Price new, these vehicles were competitively positioned. In the current used market, prices for all have stabilized well past their depreciation curve. SS Camaros and SVT Cobra Mustangs command premiums, while Base V6 and GT models are more affordable.
Similar Alternatives:
- Pontiac Firebird/Trans Am: Mechanically identical, offering a different styling preference. A great alternative if you prefer the aesthetics.
- Ford Mustang GT/SVT Cobra: The direct competitor. Offers a different driving feel, especially with its live rear axle (vs. F-body's solid axle) and interior. The SVT Cobra provides comparable performance to the SS.
- Later 4th-Gen F-body Models (2000-2002): Offer very minor updates but essentially the same experience, potentially with slightly refined components.
Final Verdict: Is the 1999 Chevrolet Camaro a Good Coupe?
It is absolutely worth buying, but only as a used vehicle, as new models are long gone. The best value is typically found in well-maintained Z28 or SS trims; the Z28 offers a fantastic performance-to-cost ratio, while the SS provides peak 4th-gen F-body performance. V6 models are a budget-friendly entry into RWD coupes but lack the true muscle car punch.
Buyers should be prepared for common F-body quirks like interior rattles, potential T-top leaks, and headlight motor issues. A thorough pre-purchase inspection is crucial. If you prioritize raw power, aggressive styling, and a direct driving feel over interior refinement and cutting-edge tech, the 1999 Camaro remains an outstanding choice for its price.