The 1997 Chevrolet Camaro represents the fourth generation of this iconic American pony car, which ran from 1993 to 2002. Available as a sporty 2-door coupe or convertible, it maintained its reputation for raw power and aggressive styling. Key trims included the base V6, Z28, and the high-performance SS package. New, prices ranged from roughly $16,000 to $25,000. It stood out for its potent V8 engine options and excellent performance-to-price ratio, making it a popular choice for enthusiasts seeking accessible speed.
The Good
The 1997 Camaro offers exhilarating performance, especially with the LT1 V8, appealing to emotional buyers craving speed. Its aggressive design remains timeless. Practical buyers appreciate its robust construction and strong aftermarket support, contributing to reasonable long-term value. While not a fuel economy leader, it provides significant power for the dollar, making it a compelling package.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1997 Camaro include interior quality with many plastic components prone to rattles and wear, limited rear visibility, and some common issues like opti-spark ignition problems (especially in earlier LT1s) and T-top leaks. Fuel efficiency can be a concern, particularly with V8 models.
1997 Chevrolet Camaro: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 3.8L V6 (L36): Standard engine for base models.
- 5.7L LT1 V8: Standard for Z28 and SS trims.
- Horsepower:
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 200 hp @ 5200 rpm.
- 5.7L LT1 V8: Approximately 285 hp @ 5200 rpm (Z28); 305 hp @ 5800 rpm (SS, with performance exhaust and intake).
- Torque:
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 225 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm.
- 5.7L LT1 V8: Approximately 325 lb-ft @ 2400 rpm (Z28); 335 lb-ft @ 2400 rpm (SS).
- Fuel Economy (EPA Estimates):
- 3.8L V6 (Automatic/Manual): Around 19-20 MPG city / 28-30 MPG highway.
- 5.7L LT1 V8 (Automatic/Manual): Around 16-17 MPG city / 24-25 MPG highway. (These are general estimates and can vary).
- 0-60 MPH Times:
- 3.8L V6: Approximately 7.0-8.0 seconds.
- 5.7L LT1 V8 (Z28/SS): Approximately 5.5-6.0 seconds, with SS models often slightly quicker.
- Towing Capacity: Not officially rated or recommended for towing, as it's a performance-oriented sports car.
- Key Trim-Level Features:
- Base (V6): Standard features included air conditioning, AM/FM stereo, power steering, power brakes, and dual airbags. Available options often included power windows/locks, cruise control, and an upgraded sound system.
- Z28 (V8): Added the more powerful LT1 V8 engine, sport-tuned suspension, larger wheels and tires, fog lamps, and unique exterior badging. Standard features usually included power windows/locks, remote keyless entry, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel.
- SS (V8, SLP Engineering Conversion): Built on the Z28, the SS package offered by SLP Engineering included a functional hood scoop for ram air induction, a performance exhaust system, unique 17-inch wheels, a modified rear spoiler, and a stronger suspension for enhanced handling and increased horsepower. Optional SLP features included Hurst short-throw shifter, Torsen limited-slip differential, and performance brake packages.
1997 Chevrolet Camaro Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1997 |
| Make | Chevrolet |
| Model | Camaro |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Coupe |
| Type | Coupe |
| Category | Subcompact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Canada |
| Manufacturing City | STE. THERESE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3454 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 52.00 inches |
| Overall Length | 193.20 inches |
| Overall Width | 74.10 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 101.10 inches |
| Standard Seating | 4 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 3.8-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 3.8L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $23,170 |
| Invoice Price | $21,201 |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro Have?
The 1997 Chevrolet Camaro, while generally robust for a performance car, has its share of frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns. A prominent issue with the LT1 V8 engine is the Opti-Spark distributor. This unit is mounted directly behind the water pump and is highly susceptible to moisture, leading to misfires, rough idle, and eventual failure. While later versions of the Opti-Spark (from '95 onwards) were vented to mitigate this, it remains a common failure point, and replacement is labor-intensive. Another common fluid leak stems from the power steering system, often from the high-pressure hose or pump.
Transmission issues can also arise. The 4L60E automatic transmission, while widespread, can suffer from hard shifts, delayed engagement, or complete failure, particularly in vehicles subjected to hard driving or inadequate maintenance. Manual transmissions, specifically the T-56, are generally robust but can experience shifter linkage wear or clutch master/slave cylinder failures.
Interior components often show their age, with plastic trim pieces rattling, breaking, or fading. Dash cracks, sagging headliners, and worn seat bolsters are common. The convertible tops and T-tops are known for leaks, leading to water intrusion and potential electrical problems if left unaddressed. Electrical gremlins can manifest as intermittent power window operation, faulty gauge readings, or problems with the headlights (pop-up motor issues on earlier 4th-gen, though less prevalent by '97).
As for recalls, a significant one for this era of GM vehicles, including the 1997 Camaro, involved potential issues with the park/neutral position switch on automatic transmission models, which could allow the vehicle to be started in gear. Another common recall involved the headlight switch for models with automatic headlamps, where the headlamps might fail to operate under certain conditions. Owners should always check specific VINs for any open recalls.
Transmission issues can also arise. The 4L60E automatic transmission, while widespread, can suffer from hard shifts, delayed engagement, or complete failure, particularly in vehicles subjected to hard driving or inadequate maintenance. Manual transmissions, specifically the T-56, are generally robust but can experience shifter linkage wear or clutch master/slave cylinder failures.
Interior components often show their age, with plastic trim pieces rattling, breaking, or fading. Dash cracks, sagging headliners, and worn seat bolsters are common. The convertible tops and T-tops are known for leaks, leading to water intrusion and potential electrical problems if left unaddressed. Electrical gremlins can manifest as intermittent power window operation, faulty gauge readings, or problems with the headlights (pop-up motor issues on earlier 4th-gen, though less prevalent by '97).
As for recalls, a significant one for this era of GM vehicles, including the 1997 Camaro, involved potential issues with the park/neutral position switch on automatic transmission models, which could allow the vehicle to be started in gear. Another common recall involved the headlight switch for models with automatic headlamps, where the headlamps might fail to operate under certain conditions. Owners should always check specific VINs for any open recalls.
How long will the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro last?
With good maintenance habits, a 1997 Chevrolet Camaro can easily reach 150,000 to 200,000 miles or more, offering 20-25+ years of service. Its core drivetrain, particularly the LT1 V8 and T-56 manual transmission, is known for strong long-term durability if issues like the Opti-Spark are proactively addressed. The V6 engines are also very reliable workhorses. However, weaknesses over time typically involve the aging electrical system, rubber components (hoses, bushings, weatherstripping), and interior plastics, which degrade and become brittle. Suspension components will also require refreshing over two decades of use. Regular fluid changes and prompt attention to minor leaks or electrical quirks are crucial for maximizing its lifespan and preventing more costly repairs down the line.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1997 Chevrolet Camaro, as a product of its era, featured relatively basic built-in technology compared to modern vehicles. For entertainment, standard offerings included an AM/FM stereo, often with a cassette player, and sometimes an optional CD player. An upgraded Monsoon sound system was a popular option, offering enhanced audio quality through a more powerful amplifier and additional speakers. Base models typically had manual windows and locks, while power windows, power door locks, and remote keyless entry were common options or standard on higher trims like the Z28 and SS.
Driver-assistance features were minimal, primarily limited to a cruise control system, which was often optional on base models and standard on V8 variants. Traction control was an available option, particularly for V8 models, helping to manage wheel spin under acceleration. This was a significant technological feature for the time, enhancing safety and control, especially in adverse conditions.
In terms of safety, the 1997 Camaro came standard with dual front airbags, providing essential occupant protection in a frontal collision. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were also standard across all trims, a critical safety feature for maintaining steering control during hard braking. The vehicle's unibody construction provided a reasonably stiff chassis for crash protection. Crash test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA for the 1997 model year are somewhat limited by modern standards. However, the 1997 Camaro received 4 out of 5 stars for the driver in frontal crash tests and 3 out of 5 stars for the front passenger, indicating adequate but not outstanding frontal impact protection. Side-impact ratings were generally not as detailed for this period, but the structural integrity was considered typical for a sports coupe of its time.
Driver-assistance features were minimal, primarily limited to a cruise control system, which was often optional on base models and standard on V8 variants. Traction control was an available option, particularly for V8 models, helping to manage wheel spin under acceleration. This was a significant technological feature for the time, enhancing safety and control, especially in adverse conditions.
In terms of safety, the 1997 Camaro came standard with dual front airbags, providing essential occupant protection in a frontal collision. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were also standard across all trims, a critical safety feature for maintaining steering control during hard braking. The vehicle's unibody construction provided a reasonably stiff chassis for crash protection. Crash test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA for the 1997 model year are somewhat limited by modern standards. However, the 1997 Camaro received 4 out of 5 stars for the driver in frontal crash tests and 3 out of 5 stars for the front passenger, indicating adequate but not outstanding frontal impact protection. Side-impact ratings were generally not as detailed for this period, but the structural integrity was considered typical for a sports coupe of its time.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1997 Chevrolet Camaro Prices and Market Value
When new in 1997, the Chevrolet Camaro had a base MSRP starting around $16,000 for the V6 coupe, while a well-optioned Z28 coupe could approach $22,000-$24,000, and an SS convertible with SLP options could easily exceed $28,000. These cars depreciated significantly in their first 10-15 years, as is typical for most mass-produced performance vehicles. Today, used market prices vary widely. A basic V6 model in fair condition might fetch $2,000-$6,000. Z28 models, especially with lower mileage and in good shape, typically range from $6,000-$15,000. SS models, particularly those with authentic SLP documentation, command the highest prices, often $12,000 to $25,000 or more for exceptional examples. Factors affecting resale value include mileage, overall condition, originality, the presence of desirable options (like T-tops, leather, SS package), and meticulous maintenance records. Modified examples often fetch less unless professionally done and highly sought after.
1997 Chevrolet Camaro Cost of Ownership
Ownership costs for a 1997 Chevrolet Camaro can be a mixed bag. Insurance costs are moderate to high, especially for younger drivers or V8 models, due to its "sports car" designation and performance potential. Fuel costs are significant for the V8 (requiring premium fuel for optimal performance), while V6 models are more reasonable. Maintenance, while generally straightforward for a domestic vehicle, can accumulate. Common repairs like Opti-Spark replacement can be costly due to labor involved. Parts availability is excellent thanks to a large aftermarket. Overall, it's not an "economical" car to own in terms of fuel and potentially higher repair bills for specific issues, but its low purchase price can offset some of these long-term ownership costs, making it a relatively affordable way into performance car ownership.
1997 Chevrolet Camaro Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
15.50 gallons
City Mileage
19 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
29 miles/gallon
1997 Chevrolet Camaro Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1997 Chevrolet Camaro Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1997 Chevrolet Camaro Insurance
Insurance for a 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Coupe with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro Compare to Other Coupe?
The 1997 Chevrolet Camaro primarily competed against its long-standing rival, the Ford Mustang, and to a lesser extent, the Pontiac Firebird (its platform mate) and the more upscale but less powerful Japanese coupes like the Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T/GSX or the Toyota Supra (though the Supra was in a different price league).
Performance: The Camaro Z28/SS with its 5.7L LT1 V8 generally offered superior straight-line performance compared to the contemporary Ford Mustang GT (4.6L SOHC V8, ~215 hp). The Camaro's LT1 provided more horsepower and torque, translating to quicker 0-60 mph times and quarter-mile runs. While the Mustang Cobra (with its DOHC 4.6L V8) offered comparable power, it was typically more expensive. The Camaro's handling, especially with the optional Z28 or SS performance packages, was also very competent for a car of its size, often praised for its high limits. The Firebird Trans Am was essentially identical in performance, sharing the same engines and chassis.
Features: Both the Camaro and Mustang offered similar levels of interior amenities for the era, including power accessories, air conditioning, and optional premium sound systems. Neither was particularly renowned for high-quality interiors, often utilizing hard plastics. Japanese rivals like the Eclipse offered more refined interiors and often more advanced electronics, but at a higher price point for comparable performance.
Reliability: Reliability for both the Camaro and Mustang was generally good, but each had its quirks. The Camaro's LT1 was known for the Opti-Spark distributor issues, while the Mustang's modular V8 was generally solid but could develop intake manifold cracks. Both had common issues with aging electrical components, suspension wear, and interior deterioration. The Firebird's reliability was identical to the Camaro's.
Price: New, the Camaro and Mustang were closely matched in price, offering excellent performance value. On the used market today, this trend continues, with both being very affordable ways to get into V8 muscle. The Camaro SS often commands a premium over a Z28, similar to how a Mustang Cobra commands more than a GT.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Camaro Z28/SS with its 5.7L LT1 V8 generally offered superior straight-line performance compared to the contemporary Ford Mustang GT (4.6L SOHC V8, ~215 hp). The Camaro's LT1 provided more horsepower and torque, translating to quicker 0-60 mph times and quarter-mile runs. While the Mustang Cobra (with its DOHC 4.6L V8) offered comparable power, it was typically more expensive. The Camaro's handling, especially with the optional Z28 or SS performance packages, was also very competent for a car of its size, often praised for its high limits. The Firebird Trans Am was essentially identical in performance, sharing the same engines and chassis.
Features: Both the Camaro and Mustang offered similar levels of interior amenities for the era, including power accessories, air conditioning, and optional premium sound systems. Neither was particularly renowned for high-quality interiors, often utilizing hard plastics. Japanese rivals like the Eclipse offered more refined interiors and often more advanced electronics, but at a higher price point for comparable performance.
Reliability: Reliability for both the Camaro and Mustang was generally good, but each had its quirks. The Camaro's LT1 was known for the Opti-Spark distributor issues, while the Mustang's modular V8 was generally solid but could develop intake manifold cracks. Both had common issues with aging electrical components, suspension wear, and interior deterioration. The Firebird's reliability was identical to the Camaro's.
Price: New, the Camaro and Mustang were closely matched in price, offering excellent performance value. On the used market today, this trend continues, with both being very affordable ways to get into V8 muscle. The Camaro SS often commands a premium over a Z28, similar to how a Mustang Cobra commands more than a GT.
Alternatives:
- Ford Mustang GT (1996-1998): A direct and strong rival. While slightly less powerful in GT trim, it offered similar styling, a V8 rumble, and a vast aftermarket. It's a similar buy if you prefer its styling or slightly different driving dynamics.
- Pontiac Firebird Trans Am (1997): Mechanically identical to the Camaro Z28/SS, offering the same performance but with a more aggressive, "Banshee"-inspired styling. A great alternative if you prefer the Pontiac's aesthetics.
- Chevrolet Corvette C4 (early to mid-90s): If budget allows a slight stretch, an older Corvette offers a more premium sports car experience with similar LT1 power in a lighter, more focused chassis.
Final Verdict: Is the 1997 Chevrolet Camaro a Good Coupe?
The 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is ideal for performance enthusiasts, budget-conscious muscle car lovers, and those seeking a project car with significant aftermarket support. It's worth buying as a used vehicle, specifically looking for Z28 or SS trims for the full V8 experience. It's an excellent choice for someone who appreciates raw, unrefined power and isn't overly concerned with luxury or cutting-edge technology. Buy it if you're willing to invest in maintenance, particularly addressing known LT1 issues like the Opti-Spark, and if you can find a well-preserved, unmolested example. A mechanically sound car, even with higher mileage, is preferable to a low-mileage neglected one. Avoid heavily modified examples unless you know the quality of the work. For V6 models, ensure they meet your performance expectations; they offer better fuel economy but lack the V8's punch. Overall, it's a fun, engaging, and increasingly classic American pony car for the right owner.
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.