The 2000 GMC Yukon XL marked the introduction of the GMT800 platform for GMC's extended-length full-size SUV, succeeding the Suburban nameplate. This robust body-on-frame vehicle, available in SL, SLE, and SLT trims, offered impressive space and utility. Its powerful V8 engines, exceptional towing capacity, and cavernous interior made it a popular choice for large families and those needing significant hauling capabilities, standing out for its blend of ruggedness and passenger comfort. New prices ranged from approximately $30,000 to $45,000.
The Good
The 2000 GMC Yukon XL boasts key advantages like powerful V8 performance for confident towing and acceleration, coupled with strong reliability when maintained. Its spacious, comfortable interior accommodates large families or gear, offering a smooth ride for a full-size SUV. The classic, robust design appeals to those seeking a commanding presence, while its practical value as a versatile hauler makes it an enduring choice for both emotional connection and everyday utility.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 2000 GMC Yukon XL include its notably poor fuel economy, which is a significant operating cost. Owners should also watch out for common issues like brake system wear, premature steering component failures (e.g., pitman/idler arms), and potential rust on the frame and brake lines, especially in regions with road salt. Interior plastics can also show age and wear.
2000 GMC Yukon XL: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 2000 GMC Yukon XL primarily offered two robust Vortec V8 engines. The most common was the 5.3-liter (LM7) V8, while the heavier-duty 2500 series often featured a 6.0-liter (LQ4) V8.
- Horsepower: The 5.3L V8 produced a respectable 285 horsepower, providing ample power for daily driving and towing. The 6.0L V8 bumped output to 300 horsepower, ideal for maximum hauling needs.
- Fuel Economy: Given its size and V8 engines, fuel economy was not a strong suit. The 5.3L 2WD models typically achieved around 13-14 MPG in the city and 17-18 MPG on the highway. 4WD versions saw a slight dip, averaging 12-13 MPG city and 16-17 MPG highway. The 6.0L engine generally yielded lower figures.
- 0-60 MPH Times: Estimates for the 5.3L V8 2WD models were in the range of 9-10 seconds, sufficient for a vehicle of this size.
- Towing Capacity: A major highlight, the 5.3L V8 2WD models could tow up to approximately 8,600 pounds, while 4WD versions managed around 8,400 pounds. The 6.0L V8 in the 2500 series could impressively tow up to 10,000 pounds when properly equipped.
- Trim-Level Features: The Yukon XL was available in several trims:
- SL: A more basic fleet-oriented model, typically with cloth or vinyl seating, manual controls (though rare), and essential features.
- SLE: The popular mid-range trim, adding power windows, locks, mirrors, air conditioning, remote keyless entry, cloth upholstery, and an AM/FM/Cassette stereo.
- SLT: The top-tier luxurious trim included leather seating surfaces, automatic climate control, power-adjustable front seats, steering wheel audio controls, a premium sound system with a CD player, fog lights, and chrome accents. Optional features like a sunroof and rear-seat entertainment were often found on SLT models.
2000 GMC Yukon XL Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2000 |
| Make | GMC |
| Model | Yukon XL |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Wagon |
| Category | Minivan Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Mexico |
| Manufacturing City | SILAO |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | LQ4 |
| Engine Size | 2.2L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2000 GMC Yukon XL Have?
The 2000 GMC Yukon XL, while generally reliable, has several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns. One of the most common issues is fuel pump failure, which often occurs without warning and can leave owners stranded. Another prevalent problem involves the instrument cluster, where gauges (speedometer, fuel, oil pressure) can become erratic or cease functioning due to faulty stepper motors.
Power window regulators are also known to fail, requiring replacement of the motor and regulator assembly. The AC system frequently experiences issues, including compressor failures, condenser leaks, and faulty blend door actuators, especially with the auxiliary rear AC system.
Steering components, such as the pitman and idler arms, are prone to wear, leading to loose steering and requiring regular replacement. Critically, brake line corrosion is a significant long-term concern, particularly in regions that use road salt, as steel lines can rust through, causing brake fluid leaks and potential brake failure. ABS module failures also contribute to braking issues.
While robust, the 4L60E automatic transmission (common in 1500 series) can develop problems like slipping or hard shifts, particularly if subjected to heavy towing or inadequate fluid changes. The 4L80E in 2500 models is more durable. Furthermore, intake manifold gasket leaks are not uncommon. Recalls for 2000 GMT800 vehicles have included issues like brake light switch malfunctions and potential fuel tank strap corrosion. Overall, rust on the frame and body panels also presents a long-term durability challenge, especially in northern climates.
Power window regulators are also known to fail, requiring replacement of the motor and regulator assembly. The AC system frequently experiences issues, including compressor failures, condenser leaks, and faulty blend door actuators, especially with the auxiliary rear AC system.
Steering components, such as the pitman and idler arms, are prone to wear, leading to loose steering and requiring regular replacement. Critically, brake line corrosion is a significant long-term concern, particularly in regions that use road salt, as steel lines can rust through, causing brake fluid leaks and potential brake failure. ABS module failures also contribute to braking issues.
While robust, the 4L60E automatic transmission (common in 1500 series) can develop problems like slipping or hard shifts, particularly if subjected to heavy towing or inadequate fluid changes. The 4L80E in 2500 models is more durable. Furthermore, intake manifold gasket leaks are not uncommon. Recalls for 2000 GMT800 vehicles have included issues like brake light switch malfunctions and potential fuel tank strap corrosion. Overall, rust on the frame and body panels also presents a long-term durability challenge, especially in northern climates.
How long will the 2000 GMC Yukon XL last?
The 2000 GMC Yukon XL, with its sturdy body-on-frame construction and robust V8 engines, is renowned for its long-term durability. Many well-maintained examples regularly exceed 200,000 to 250,000 miles, and it's not uncommon to see these vehicles still in service after 20 years or more. This longevity speaks volumes about its fundamental engineering.
However, long-term ownership highlights certain weaknesses. Rust is a significant concern, particularly on the frame, brake lines, and lower body panels in climates using road salt. Electrical components, such as the instrument cluster and power window motors, tend to fail with age. Suspension components like ball joints and bushings also wear out over time. The HVAC system and fuel pump are other common points of failure that require attention to keep these venerable SUVs on the road.
However, long-term ownership highlights certain weaknesses. Rust is a significant concern, particularly on the frame, brake lines, and lower body panels in climates using road salt. Electrical components, such as the instrument cluster and power window motors, tend to fail with age. Suspension components like ball joints and bushings also wear out over time. The HVAC system and fuel pump are other common points of failure that require attention to keep these venerable SUVs on the road.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2000 GMC Yukon XL, being a vehicle from the turn of the millennium, featured technology and safety commensurate with its era. Built-in tech was relatively basic, typically including an AM/FM stereo, often with a cassette player, and sometimes an optional CD player. Higher trims offered automatic climate control, steering wheel audio controls, and an optional premium Bose sound system. Rear-seat audio controls with headphone jacks were a popular family-friendly option. While not universal for 2000, some later production models or specific trims might have offered an early version of a rear-seat entertainment system, likely VHS-based.
Driver-assistance features were minimal, primarily limited to standard anti-lock brakes (ABS) and daytime running lights. Traction control was available on some models, though not universally standard.
Safety features included dual front airbags for the driver and passenger, along with three-point seatbelts for most seating positions. Child seat tether anchors were present. An optional early version of OnStar provided emergency services, roadside assistance, and remote diagnostics, offering a nascent form of connected car technology.
Other optional creature comforts included heated leather seats, power-adjustable pedals, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, and a power sunroof.
In terms of crash-test ratings by the NHTSA for the GMT800 platform, the 2000 Yukon XL generally received a 3-star rating for the driver's side in frontal crash tests and a 4-star rating for the passenger's side. Side-impact ratings were often not available or were combined with similar models, but newer SUVs have significantly advanced in this area. Rollover resistance was typically rated around 3 stars for both 2WD and 4WD variants. It's crucial to remember that these ratings reflect standards and testing methodologies of two decades ago, which are less stringent than today's.
Driver-assistance features were minimal, primarily limited to standard anti-lock brakes (ABS) and daytime running lights. Traction control was available on some models, though not universally standard.
Safety features included dual front airbags for the driver and passenger, along with three-point seatbelts for most seating positions. Child seat tether anchors were present. An optional early version of OnStar provided emergency services, roadside assistance, and remote diagnostics, offering a nascent form of connected car technology.
Other optional creature comforts included heated leather seats, power-adjustable pedals, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, and a power sunroof.
In terms of crash-test ratings by the NHTSA for the GMT800 platform, the 2000 Yukon XL generally received a 3-star rating for the driver's side in frontal crash tests and a 4-star rating for the passenger's side. Side-impact ratings were often not available or were combined with similar models, but newer SUVs have significantly advanced in this area. Rollover resistance was typically rated around 3 stars for both 2WD and 4WD variants. It's crucial to remember that these ratings reflect standards and testing methodologies of two decades ago, which are less stringent than today's.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2000 GMC Yukon XL Prices and Market Value
When new in 2000, the GMC Yukon XL had a broad price range depending on the trim and options. The base SL started around $30,000, the popular SLE trim was typically in the mid-$30,000s, and a fully loaded SLT model could easily exceed $45,000.
Today, the used market prices reflect over two decades of depreciation. Current prices vary widely based on condition, mileage, and region. A fair-condition model might fetch $1,000 to $3,000, while good examples range from $4,000 to $7,000. Exceptionally well-preserved, low-mileage Yukon XLs can still command $8,000 to $12,000 or more, though these are rare.
Depreciation for this vehicle has largely bottomed out; the initial significant loss in value occurred within its first decade. Factors strongly affecting current resale value include the overall mechanical and cosmetic condition (especially rust-free status), comprehensive maintenance records, lower mileage, and the presence of desirable SLT features like leather and premium sound. Demand for these rugged, spacious SUVs helps stabilize their minimal residual value.
Today, the used market prices reflect over two decades of depreciation. Current prices vary widely based on condition, mileage, and region. A fair-condition model might fetch $1,000 to $3,000, while good examples range from $4,000 to $7,000. Exceptionally well-preserved, low-mileage Yukon XLs can still command $8,000 to $12,000 or more, though these are rare.
Depreciation for this vehicle has largely bottomed out; the initial significant loss in value occurred within its first decade. Factors strongly affecting current resale value include the overall mechanical and cosmetic condition (especially rust-free status), comprehensive maintenance records, lower mileage, and the presence of desirable SLT features like leather and premium sound. Demand for these rugged, spacious SUVs helps stabilize their minimal residual value.
2000 GMC Yukon XL Cost of Ownership
Long-term ownership of a 2000 GMC Yukon XL presents a mixed bag regarding costs. Insurance is generally affordable due to its age and lower current market value. However, fuel costs are a significant expense; its poor fuel economy means frequent trips to the pump.
Routine maintenance, such as oil changes and tire rotations, is relatively inexpensive, as parts are widely available and often budget-friendly. Many repairs are also manageable for DIY enthusiasts. However, more substantial repairs, like fuel pump replacement, AC system overhauls, or extensive rust remediation, can be costly due to labor hours or complex component replacement. While the purchase price is very economical, the ongoing fuel consumption and potential for age-related repairs mean it can be a costly vehicle to own over the long haul, especially if neglecting preventative maintenance.
Routine maintenance, such as oil changes and tire rotations, is relatively inexpensive, as parts are widely available and often budget-friendly. Many repairs are also manageable for DIY enthusiasts. However, more substantial repairs, like fuel pump replacement, AC system overhauls, or extensive rust remediation, can be costly due to labor hours or complex component replacement. While the purchase price is very economical, the ongoing fuel consumption and potential for age-related repairs mean it can be a costly vehicle to own over the long haul, especially if neglecting preventative maintenance.
2000 GMC Yukon XL Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2000 GMC Yukon XL Insurance
Insurance for a 2000 GMC Yukon XL is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Wagon with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2000 GMC Yukon XL Compare to Other Wagon?
When stacking the 2000 GMC Yukon XL against its key rivals, such as the 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (its identical twin), the Ford Expedition, and the larger Ford Excursion, and to a lesser extent, the emerging 2001 Toyota Sequoia, distinct characteristics emerge.
In terms of performance, the Yukon XL's 5.3L and 6.0L Vortec V8s offer strong, reliable power and excellent towing capabilities, often outperforming the Ford Expedition's Triton V8s in long-term durability and refinement, though the Excursion offered a more powerful diesel option. The Sequoia's 4.7L i-Force V8 provided smoother power delivery and often better fuel economy.
Features across this class were generally competitive, offering various levels of comfort and utility depending on the trim. The Yukon XL, like the Suburban, provided ample interior space, available leather, automatic climate control, and optional rear-seat audio. The Expedition offered similar amenities, while the Sequoia, being a year newer, often felt a bit more modern inside.
Reliability is where the distinction sharpens. While the Yukon XL's core powertrain is robust, it's plagued by common electrical issues (instrument clusters), AC problems, and significant rust concerns in certain climates. The Ford Expedition also had its share of issues, notably with spark plugs and intake manifolds on its Triton engines. The Toyota Sequoia, however, typically offered superior long-term reliability and fewer systemic issues, benefiting from Toyota's reputation for engineering.
Regarding price, the used market for the 2000 Yukon XL is comparable to the Ford Expedition, often slightly higher due to GMC's perceived premium. The Toyota Sequoia, despite being a year newer, generally commands higher used prices due to its legendary reliability.
Recommended alternatives:
In terms of performance, the Yukon XL's 5.3L and 6.0L Vortec V8s offer strong, reliable power and excellent towing capabilities, often outperforming the Ford Expedition's Triton V8s in long-term durability and refinement, though the Excursion offered a more powerful diesel option. The Sequoia's 4.7L i-Force V8 provided smoother power delivery and often better fuel economy.
Features across this class were generally competitive, offering various levels of comfort and utility depending on the trim. The Yukon XL, like the Suburban, provided ample interior space, available leather, automatic climate control, and optional rear-seat audio. The Expedition offered similar amenities, while the Sequoia, being a year newer, often felt a bit more modern inside.
Reliability is where the distinction sharpens. While the Yukon XL's core powertrain is robust, it's plagued by common electrical issues (instrument clusters), AC problems, and significant rust concerns in certain climates. The Ford Expedition also had its share of issues, notably with spark plugs and intake manifolds on its Triton engines. The Toyota Sequoia, however, typically offered superior long-term reliability and fewer systemic issues, benefiting from Toyota's reputation for engineering.
Regarding price, the used market for the 2000 Yukon XL is comparable to the Ford Expedition, often slightly higher due to GMC's perceived premium. The Toyota Sequoia, despite being a year newer, generally commands higher used prices due to its legendary reliability.
Recommended alternatives:
- Better Alternative: A 2001-2006 Toyota Sequoia offers superior overall long-term reliability, better fuel efficiency, and a more refined ride, albeit with slightly less maximum towing capacity than the Yukon XL 2500. A later model GMT800 (e.g., 2004-2006 Yukon XL/Suburban) might also offer some refinements while still providing the core utility.
- Similar Alternative: The 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is an identical vehicle and offers the same package. The 2000-2002 Ford Expedition is also a strong competitor if its specific common issues are addressed.
Final Verdict: Is the 2000 GMC Yukon XL a Good Wagon?
The 2000 GMC Yukon XL is an ideal vehicle for large families, individuals requiring significant towing or cargo capacity, and budget-conscious buyers prioritizing maximum space and utility. It's particularly suited for those who appreciate rugged, traditional SUV characteristics over modern technological refinement.
Is it worth buying today? Absolutely, but with specific caveats. As a used vehicle, it represents immense value for its size and capability. It is best to seek out well-maintained examples, preferably SL or SLE trims for practicality, or SLT for added comfort features, that come with detailed service records and are as rust-free as possible. A thorough pre-purchase inspection is paramount to uncover common age-related issues. Buyers must be prepared for its considerable fuel consumption and the inevitability of age-related repairs, understanding that its initial low purchase price is offset by higher ongoing operational costs. For the right buyer with a specific need and realistic expectations, the 2000 Yukon XL remains a solid, dependable workhorse.
Is it worth buying today? Absolutely, but with specific caveats. As a used vehicle, it represents immense value for its size and capability. It is best to seek out well-maintained examples, preferably SL or SLE trims for practicality, or SLT for added comfort features, that come with detailed service records and are as rust-free as possible. A thorough pre-purchase inspection is paramount to uncover common age-related issues. Buyers must be prepared for its considerable fuel consumption and the inevitability of age-related repairs, understanding that its initial low purchase price is offset by higher ongoing operational costs. For the right buyer with a specific need and realistic expectations, the 2000 Yukon XL remains a solid, dependable workhorse.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.