The 1982 Ford E-350 is a full-size van known for its robust construction and versatility. As part of the E-Series, which saw production from 1961 to 2014, the 1982 model represented a mature iteration of this workhorse. Available in various body styles including cargo vans, passenger vans, and cutaway chassis, it catered to a wide range of commercial and personal needs. Key trims often included base models and more optioned XL and XLT versions. While exact new pricing varied significantly with options, these vans were built for durability and utility, making them a popular choice for businesses and customizers.
The Good
The 1982 E-350 boasts legendary Ford toughness, offering dependable performance for demanding tasks. Its spacious interior provides ample room for passengers or cargo, appealing to practical needs, while its utilitarian design evokes a sense of rugged capability for enthusiasts.
The Bad
Potential weaknesses for the 1982 E-350 include rust, especially in the body panels and frame, and aging interior components. Fuel economy is not a strong suit, and older models may require significant maintenance due to wear and tear on drivetrain and suspension.
1982 Ford E-350: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1982 Ford E-350 was offered with a range of robust engines to suit different needs. Standard on many models was the 4.9L (300 cubic inch) inline-six engine. Optional V8 engines included the 5.0L (302 cubic inch) and the larger 5.8L (351 cubic inch). For heavy-duty applications, a 7.5L (460 cubic inch) V8 was also available.
- Horsepower: Horsepower varied significantly depending on the engine. The 4.9L inline-six typically produced around 120-130 horsepower. The 5.0L V8 offered approximately 135-145 horsepower, the 5.8L V8 around 160-180 horsepower, and the mighty 7.5L V8 could deliver upwards of 200-220 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy: As a large, heavy-duty vehicle from this era, fuel economy was not a primary focus and was generally poor. Expect figures in the range of 8-12 miles per gallon (MPG) combined, heavily dependent on engine choice, load, and driving conditions.
- 0-60 Times: Specific 0-60 MPH times were not widely published for these utilitarian vehicles, as they were not designed for acceleration. However, with the larger engines, acceleration would have been leisurely, likely in the 12-18 second range, and significantly slower when loaded or towing.
- Towing Capacity: The E-350 was built for towing and hauling. Towing capacities varied greatly based on the configuration, engine, rear axle ratio, and optional towing packages. Properly equipped models could tow upwards of 7,000 to 10,000 pounds or more.
- Trim-Level Features: Key trims included the base model, which offered essential functionality. The XL trim added some creature comforts and appearance upgrades. The XLT trim was the most luxurious, often featuring upgraded upholstery, enhanced interior trim, better sound insulation, and optional amenities like air conditioning and power accessories. Standard features across most models included durable vinyl or cloth seating, manual windows and locks, and a basic radio.
1982 Ford E-350 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1982 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | E-350 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Van |
| Category | Cargo Van |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | LORAIN |
Dimensions
| Doors | - |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 7.5-L V-8 OHV 16V |
| Engine Size | 7.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | 3-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 3-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1982 Ford E-350 Have?
The 1982 Ford E-350, like many vehicles of its era, is susceptible to certain long-term issues. One of the most prevalent concerns is rust. The body panels, particularly around wheel wells, rocker panels, and the lower sections of doors, are prone to corrosion, especially in regions with harsh winters or high humidity. The frame itself can also be affected by rust, which is a more serious structural concern.
Mechanical components, while generally robust, can wear out over time. This includes the transmission, which may develop shifting issues or leaks. Engine problems can arise, such as oil leaks, cooling system failures (radiators, water pumps), and carburetor issues if not properly maintained. The exhaust system is also a common area for rust and leaks.
Suspension and steering components can experience wear, leading to clunking noises, loose steering, or premature tire wear. This includes ball joints, tie rod ends, and shock absorbers.
Electrical systems, while less complex than modern vehicles, can still present problems. Aging wiring harnesses can degrade, leading to intermittent electrical faults. Alternators, starters, and batteries are also wear items that will eventually need replacement.
Interior components such as upholstery, dashboard materials, and seals can deteriorate with age and exposure to sunlight, leading to cracking, fading, and reduced sealing effectiveness against the elements.
Specific recalls for the 1982 model year are not as readily available or as numerous as for more modern vehicles. However, general maintenance and addressing known wear items are crucial for maintaining reliability. For older E-350s, it is essential to meticulously inspect for rust and ensure all major mechanical systems are in good working order. By addressing these common issues proactively, the long-term reliability of a 1982 Ford E-350 can be significantly improved.
Mechanical components, while generally robust, can wear out over time. This includes the transmission, which may develop shifting issues or leaks. Engine problems can arise, such as oil leaks, cooling system failures (radiators, water pumps), and carburetor issues if not properly maintained. The exhaust system is also a common area for rust and leaks.
Suspension and steering components can experience wear, leading to clunking noises, loose steering, or premature tire wear. This includes ball joints, tie rod ends, and shock absorbers.
Electrical systems, while less complex than modern vehicles, can still present problems. Aging wiring harnesses can degrade, leading to intermittent electrical faults. Alternators, starters, and batteries are also wear items that will eventually need replacement.
Interior components such as upholstery, dashboard materials, and seals can deteriorate with age and exposure to sunlight, leading to cracking, fading, and reduced sealing effectiveness against the elements.
Specific recalls for the 1982 model year are not as readily available or as numerous as for more modern vehicles. However, general maintenance and addressing known wear items are crucial for maintaining reliability. For older E-350s, it is essential to meticulously inspect for rust and ensure all major mechanical systems are in good working order. By addressing these common issues proactively, the long-term reliability of a 1982 Ford E-350 can be significantly improved.
How long will the 1982 Ford E-350 last?
The 1982 Ford E-350 is renowned for its long-term durability, with many examples exceeding 200,000 miles and some even reaching 300,000 miles or more with consistent and diligent maintenance. These vans were built with robust powertrains and heavy-duty chassis components designed for commercial use, contributing to their longevity.
However, their lifespan is heavily influenced by maintenance habits. Vehicles used for heavy hauling or subjected to harsh operating conditions will naturally experience more wear. Rust is the primary long-term weakness that can significantly shorten a vehicle's usable life, particularly in corrosive environments. With regular fluid changes, proactive rust prevention, and timely repairs of worn components, the 1982 E-350 can remain a dependable workhorse for many years and miles.
However, their lifespan is heavily influenced by maintenance habits. Vehicles used for heavy hauling or subjected to harsh operating conditions will naturally experience more wear. Rust is the primary long-term weakness that can significantly shorten a vehicle's usable life, particularly in corrosive environments. With regular fluid changes, proactive rust prevention, and timely repairs of worn components, the 1982 E-350 can remain a dependable workhorse for many years and miles.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1982 Ford E-350 represents a simpler era of automotive technology, focusing on core functionality rather than advanced electronics. Built-in tech and entertainment features were rudimentary by today's standards. Standard equipment typically included a basic AM radio, with an AM/FM stereo radio often available as an optional upgrade. Cassette tape players were also an option for those seeking more entertainment choices. There was no integrated navigation, Bluetooth connectivity, or advanced infotainment systems found in modern vehicles.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. The primary safety focus was on passive systems. Standard safety features included seat belts (lap and shoulder belts for front occupants), rearview mirrors, and brake lights. Some models might have offered power steering and power brakes, which aided in control and reducing driver fatigue. Exterior lighting included headlights, taillights, turn signals, and side marker lights.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this age and class are not readily available in the standardized formats we see today. Ford's design philosophy for the E-350 emphasized a sturdy body-on-frame construction, intended to withstand significant loads and impacts. However, without modern safety advancements like airbags, anti-lock braking systems (ABS), or advanced crumple zones, the vehicle's passive safety performance in a collision would be considerably lower compared to contemporary standards. Optional features would have been limited to items enhancing comfort and utility, such as air conditioning, cruise control (though less common and basic), and various seating configurations for passenger vans.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. The primary safety focus was on passive systems. Standard safety features included seat belts (lap and shoulder belts for front occupants), rearview mirrors, and brake lights. Some models might have offered power steering and power brakes, which aided in control and reducing driver fatigue. Exterior lighting included headlights, taillights, turn signals, and side marker lights.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this age and class are not readily available in the standardized formats we see today. Ford's design philosophy for the E-350 emphasized a sturdy body-on-frame construction, intended to withstand significant loads and impacts. However, without modern safety advancements like airbags, anti-lock braking systems (ABS), or advanced crumple zones, the vehicle's passive safety performance in a collision would be considerably lower compared to contemporary standards. Optional features would have been limited to items enhancing comfort and utility, such as air conditioning, cruise control (though less common and basic), and various seating configurations for passenger vans.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1982 Ford E-350 Prices and Market Value
When new in 1982, the Ford E-350's price varied significantly based on body style, engine, and options, but typically ranged from approximately $10,000 to $20,000 for a well-equipped model.
Today, the used market prices for a 1982 Ford E-350 are highly variable, ranging from as low as $2,000-$5,000 for models needing substantial work, up to $10,000-$20,000 or even more for exceptionally well-maintained, low-mileage, or customized examples (like camper van conversions).
Depreciation for this model has long since plateaued, as these are now considered classic or utility vehicles. Factors significantly affecting resale value include the condition of the body (especially rust), mechanical soundness, mileage, originality, and any conversions or custom work performed. Well-preserved, original E-350s, particularly those with desirable engine options or in specific configurations (e.g., cargo vans with low mileage), command higher prices.
Today, the used market prices for a 1982 Ford E-350 are highly variable, ranging from as low as $2,000-$5,000 for models needing substantial work, up to $10,000-$20,000 or even more for exceptionally well-maintained, low-mileage, or customized examples (like camper van conversions).
Depreciation for this model has long since plateaued, as these are now considered classic or utility vehicles. Factors significantly affecting resale value include the condition of the body (especially rust), mechanical soundness, mileage, originality, and any conversions or custom work performed. Well-preserved, original E-350s, particularly those with desirable engine options or in specific configurations (e.g., cargo vans with low mileage), command higher prices.
1982 Ford E-350 Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1982 Ford E-350 can be economical for its utility, but costly in certain aspects. Insurance is typically affordable, especially for classic or commercial use policies. Fuel costs are high due to its poor MPG, often requiring premium fuel for larger engines. Maintenance is generally straightforward with readily available parts, but regular upkeep is essential for longevity. Repair costs can vary; while parts are common, labor for complex issues or rust repair can be significant. Overall, while the initial purchase price might be low, the significant fuel consumption and potential for age-related repairs make it a moderate to costly vehicle to own and operate long-term, especially for daily driving.
1982 Ford E-350 Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1982 Ford E-350 Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1982 Ford E-350 Insurance
Insurance for a 1982 Ford E-350 is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Van with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1982 Ford E-350 Compare to Other Van?
In the 1982 full-size van segment, the Ford E-350 primarily competed against the Chevrolet C/K Vans (G-Series) and the Dodge Ram Van.
Performance: All three offered robust engine options, with Ford and Chevrolet generally having a slight edge in sheer V8 power availability, particularly the Ford's larger 7.5L option. The Dodge Ram Van often had slightly more refined ride characteristics in its passenger versions. Fuel economy was poor across the board for all these vehicles.
Features: In 1982, features were basic. Ford's E-Series often offered a good range of customization for commercial use and a decent array of comfort options on higher trims (XL, XLT). Chevrolet's G-Series was known for its widespread aftermarket support. Dodge's Ram Van sometimes felt a bit more utilitarian inside compared to its rivals' upscale trims.
Reliability: All three were generally considered reliable workhorses, built for durability. Ford's E-Series often gets high marks for its stout chassis and powertrain longevity. Chevrolet's vans were also known for their toughness. Dodge vans, while capable, sometimes had a reputation for being slightly more prone to certain electrical or minor mechanical issues over time compared to the Ford and Chevy. However, rust was a common enemy for all three, especially in certain regions.
Price: Pricing was competitive across the segment. The E-350 was positioned as a capable and often cost-effective choice for commercial applications.
Alternatives: For those seeking a similar utility and robust build, other Ford E-Series models from slightly different years (e.g., late 80s or early 90s) might offer slightly improved features or more readily available parts. The Chevrolet G-Series vans are strong competitors, often having a similar cult following for conversions and utility. For a more modern feel with better efficiency and safety, newer generation vans like the Ford Transit or Mercedes-Benz Sprinter are vastly superior but come at a significantly higher price point and are a different class of vehicle altogether. However, for a classic, utilitarian van experience, the 1982 E-350 remains a strong contender among its direct peers.
Performance: All three offered robust engine options, with Ford and Chevrolet generally having a slight edge in sheer V8 power availability, particularly the Ford's larger 7.5L option. The Dodge Ram Van often had slightly more refined ride characteristics in its passenger versions. Fuel economy was poor across the board for all these vehicles.
Features: In 1982, features were basic. Ford's E-Series often offered a good range of customization for commercial use and a decent array of comfort options on higher trims (XL, XLT). Chevrolet's G-Series was known for its widespread aftermarket support. Dodge's Ram Van sometimes felt a bit more utilitarian inside compared to its rivals' upscale trims.
Reliability: All three were generally considered reliable workhorses, built for durability. Ford's E-Series often gets high marks for its stout chassis and powertrain longevity. Chevrolet's vans were also known for their toughness. Dodge vans, while capable, sometimes had a reputation for being slightly more prone to certain electrical or minor mechanical issues over time compared to the Ford and Chevy. However, rust was a common enemy for all three, especially in certain regions.
Price: Pricing was competitive across the segment. The E-350 was positioned as a capable and often cost-effective choice for commercial applications.
Alternatives: For those seeking a similar utility and robust build, other Ford E-Series models from slightly different years (e.g., late 80s or early 90s) might offer slightly improved features or more readily available parts. The Chevrolet G-Series vans are strong competitors, often having a similar cult following for conversions and utility. For a more modern feel with better efficiency and safety, newer generation vans like the Ford Transit or Mercedes-Benz Sprinter are vastly superior but come at a significantly higher price point and are a different class of vehicle altogether. However, for a classic, utilitarian van experience, the 1982 E-350 remains a strong contender among its direct peers.
Final Verdict: Is the 1982 Ford E-350 a Good Van?
The 1982 Ford E-350 is ideal for DIY enthusiasts, tradespeople needing a reliable workhorse, or individuals looking for a base for a custom van build (like a camper or mobile workshop). It's not suited for daily commuting due to its poor fuel economy and lack of modern amenities.
Buying one is worth considering if you prioritize ruggedness, simplicity, and a low initial cost over creature comforts and efficiency. It is absolutely a used vehicle purchase. Look for examples with minimal rust, a well-maintained engine and transmission, and a solid frame. Specific trims like the cargo van are excellent for utility, while passenger versions can be a good starting point for conversions. Be prepared for ongoing maintenance and fuel expenses. It's a vehicle for those who appreciate old-school engineering and are willing to invest some effort into upkeep.
Buying one is worth considering if you prioritize ruggedness, simplicity, and a low initial cost over creature comforts and efficiency. It is absolutely a used vehicle purchase. Look for examples with minimal rust, a well-maintained engine and transmission, and a solid frame. Specific trims like the cargo van are excellent for utility, while passenger versions can be a good starting point for conversions. Be prepared for ongoing maintenance and fuel expenses. It's a vehicle for those who appreciate old-school engineering and are willing to invest some effort into upkeep.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma