The Good
The 2000 BMW X5 offers strong performance, especially the 4.4i V8. Comfort is high, with a well-appointed interior. The design is classic BMW, appealing to those seeking a sporty, luxurious SUV. From a practical standpoint, it provides decent cargo space. It appeals to emotional buyers who want a status symbol and performance, and practical buyers need space and utility.
The Bad
The 2000 BMW X5 is known for potential electrical issues, including problems with the instrument cluster and sensors. The cooling system is also a common weak point, with potential leaks and overheating. Suspension components, particularly the air suspension (if equipped), can be prone to failure. Oil leaks are common as the vehicle ages, especially from the valve cover gaskets and oil pan.
2000 BMW X5: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 3.0i: 3.0L Inline-6
- 4.4i: 4.4L V8
- Horsepower:
- 3.0i: 225 hp
- 4.4i: 282 hp
- Fuel Economy (estimated):
- 3.0i: 16 mpg city / 22 mpg highway
- 4.4i: 14 mpg city / 18 mpg highway
- 0-60 mph Times (estimated):
- 3.0i: 8.3 seconds
- 4.4i: 7.0 seconds
- Towing Capacity (both models): 6,000 lbs (with proper equipment)
- Trim-Level Features (Examples):
- 3.0i (Base): Leatherette upholstery, automatic climate control, premium sound system, alloy wheels, power seats, sunroof.
- 4.4i (Upgrade): Leather upholstery, upgraded wood trim, premium audio system, sport suspension (optional), larger wheels, heated front seats.
- Optional Packages: Sport Package (sport suspension, sport seats), Premium Package (upgraded leather, wood trim), Cold Weather Package (heated seats, ski bag).
- Standard Features (both trims): All-wheel drive, anti-lock brakes (ABS), stability control, front and side airbags.
2000 BMW X5 Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2000 |
| Make | BMW |
| Model | X5 |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle |
| Category | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Germany |
| Manufacturing City | GREER |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | 4795 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 6005 pounds |
| Overall Height | 67.20 inches |
| Overall Length | 183.70 inches |
| Overall Width | 73.70 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 111.00 inches |
| Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.4-L V-8 DOHC 32V |
| Engine Size | 4.4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 4-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Rack & Pinion |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $49,400 |
| Invoice Price | $44,620 |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2000 BMW X5 Have?
How long will the 2000 BMW X5 last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2000 X5 did not have advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) like lane departure warning or automatic emergency braking, which are common in newer vehicles. Its tech was considered advanced for its time but is relatively basic compared to today's standards.
Crash test ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) should be consulted to get the best possible overview on the vehicle's safety. Always check the specific ratings to factor crash performance and potential safety advantages and disadvantages of the vehicle.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
2000 BMW X5 Prices and Market Value
2000 BMW X5 Cost of Ownership
2000 BMW X5 Fuel Efficiency
2000 BMW X5 Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2000 BMW X5 Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
2000 BMW X5 Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2000 BMW X5 Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle?
The X5 stood out for its blend of luxury and performance but lagged in reliability compared to its Japanese rivals. Feature-wise, it was competitive, offering similar amenities. Price-wise, it was on the higher end.
Better alternatives in terms of reliability would be the Lexus RX 300 or Acura MDX. If performance is less of a priority, these options offer greater peace of mind. A similar alternative, if a sportier driving experience is desired, could be a well-maintained Porsche Cayenne of similar vintage, but with potentially even higher maintenance costs. However, consider a newer, more reliable SUV if dependability is paramount.
Ranks #712 SUV
| 1 | 2023 Toyota 4Runner | (5.0★) |
| 2 | 2023 Honda CR-V Hybrid | (5.0★) |
| 3 | 2023 Lexus GX | (0.0★) |
| 4 | 2024 Mazda CX-90 PHEV | (0.0★) |
| 5 | 2024 Subaru Crosstrek | (5.0★) |
| 6 | 2024 BMW iX | (0.0★) |
| 7 | 2023 Ford Bronco Sport | (3.0★) |
| 8 | 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB | (0.0★) |
| 9 | 2024 Chevrolet Trax | (5.0★) |
| 10 | 2023 Audi A4 allroad | (0.0★) |
| 11 | 2023 Hyundai Kona N | (0.0★) |
| 12 | 2023 Nissan ARIYA | (5.0★) |
| 712 | 2000 BMW X5 | (0.0★) |