The 1983 Honda Accord, part of the second generation (1982-1985), solidified Honda's reputation for practical, reliable, and fuel-efficient vehicles. Available as a sedan and a popular hatchback, it offered a blend of European styling and Japanese engineering. Key trims included the DX, LX, and the sporty EX. New pricing typically ranged from $8,000 to $11,000. Its popularity stemmed from its exceptional fuel economy, solid build quality, and a comfortable, well-appointed interior for its class, making it a sensible choice for everyday transportation.
The Good
The 1983 Honda Accord excels in reliability, offering peace of mind for practical buyers. Its efficient engine appeals to budget-conscious owners, while its comfortable ride and timeless design resonate with those seeking everyday practicality and understated style. A true value proposition.
The Bad
Potential buyers of the 1983 Honda Accord should be aware of rust, particularly around wheel wells and rocker panels, and potential carburetor issues. Aging suspension components and electrical gremlins can also surface with age and mileage. Check for evidence of regular maintenance.
1983 Honda Accord: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The primary engine for the 1983 Honda Accord was a 1.8-liter (1830cc) inline-four cylinder engine.
- Horsepower: This engine typically produced around 73 horsepower (SAE net). Some sources may list slightly higher figures depending on specific market variations or tuning, but 73-75 hp is the generally accepted range for the US market.
- Fuel Economy: The Accord was renowned for its excellent fuel efficiency. Expect EPA estimates in the range of 25-30 MPG in the city and 30-38 MPG on the highway, making it a very economical choice for its era.
- 0-60 Times: Given its focus on economy rather than performance, 0-60 MPH times were not a highlight. Expect acceleration to be leisurely, likely in the 12-15 second range.
- Towing Capacity: The 1983 Honda Accord was not designed for towing. It does not have a specified towing capacity.
- Trim-Level Features:
- DX (Base): Typically featured manual windows, manual locks, AM/FM radio, and basic cloth upholstery. It was the most affordable option.
- LX: Added power steering, a more premium stereo system, intermittent wipers, and often had a higher-grade interior fabric.
- EX (Often referred to as LXi in some markets or as a package): This trim usually included features like air conditioning, power windows, power door locks, cruise control, and a cassette player. The EX/LXi models offered a more luxurious experience.
- Hatchback Specifics: The hatchback models often came with a rear wiper/washer, enhancing practicality.
- Optional Features: Depending on the trim and market, optional features could include a sunroof, alloy wheels, and automatic transmission (though the 5-speed manual was more common and preferred for fuel economy).
1983 Honda Accord Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1983 |
| Make | Honda |
| Model | Accord |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 4-Door Sedan |
| Type | Sedan |
| Category | Compact Car |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | SAYAMA |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 1.8-L L-4 |
| Engine Size | 1.8L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Front-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1983 Honda Accord Have?
The 1983 Honda Accord, while generally reliable, is not immune to issues that commonly affect vehicles of its age. One of the most prevalent concerns is rust. Due to its age and the materials used in its construction, rust can be a significant problem, especially in areas with harsh winters or high humidity. Areas to inspect thoroughly include the wheel wells, rocker panels, floor pans, and the area around the windshield and rear window. Significant rust can compromise structural integrity and lead to costly repairs.
Carburetor issues are also frequently reported. The 1.8-liter engine relies on a carburetor for fuel delivery, and these can become clogged or misadjusted over time, leading to rough idling, poor acceleration, and decreased fuel efficiency. Rebuilding or replacing the carburetor might be necessary. Clutch wear is another common issue on manual transmission models, as expected with any manual transmission vehicle that has seen significant use.
Electrical gremlins can also appear. Aging wiring harnesses, corroded connectors, and failing sensors can cause a variety of minor and major problems, from non-functioning gauges to intermittent starting issues. Power windows and locks, if equipped, can also become slow or inoperative. Suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings will also likely be worn after decades of use, leading to less precise handling and potential alignment issues.
While specific recalls for the 1983 model year are less commonly cited for major widespread defects compared to later models, it's always advisable to check with Honda or NHTSA for any open recalls associated with the VIN. Long-term reliability is generally good if the car has been consistently maintained. However, with a 1983 vehicle, the extent of previous maintenance is a critical factor. A well-maintained Accord can still be a dependable car, but neglected examples are likely to have more immediate repair needs across various systems.
Carburetor issues are also frequently reported. The 1.8-liter engine relies on a carburetor for fuel delivery, and these can become clogged or misadjusted over time, leading to rough idling, poor acceleration, and decreased fuel efficiency. Rebuilding or replacing the carburetor might be necessary. Clutch wear is another common issue on manual transmission models, as expected with any manual transmission vehicle that has seen significant use.
Electrical gremlins can also appear. Aging wiring harnesses, corroded connectors, and failing sensors can cause a variety of minor and major problems, from non-functioning gauges to intermittent starting issues. Power windows and locks, if equipped, can also become slow or inoperative. Suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings will also likely be worn after decades of use, leading to less precise handling and potential alignment issues.
While specific recalls for the 1983 model year are less commonly cited for major widespread defects compared to later models, it's always advisable to check with Honda or NHTSA for any open recalls associated with the VIN. Long-term reliability is generally good if the car has been consistently maintained. However, with a 1983 vehicle, the extent of previous maintenance is a critical factor. A well-maintained Accord can still be a dependable car, but neglected examples are likely to have more immediate repair needs across various systems.
How long will the 1983 Honda Accord last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits for a vehicle of this vintage, a well-maintained 1983 Honda Accord can reasonably be expected to reach 200,000 to 250,000 miles. Some exceptionally cared-for examples have even surpassed 300,000 miles. The long-term durability is a testament to Honda's engineering and build quality, particularly regarding the powertrain. However, over time, weaknesses manifest primarily in areas prone to corrosion and wear-and-tear. Rust is the most significant long-term adversary, capable of rendering a car unserviceable if left unchecked. While the engine and transmission are robust, suspension components, exhaust systems, and interior materials will likely require attention and replacement throughout the vehicle's extended service life.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1983 Honda Accord offered a pragmatic approach to technology and safety for its time, prioritizing functionality over flashy features. For built-in tech and entertainment, base models typically came with a basic AM/FM radio. Higher trim levels, such as the LX and EX/LXi, often upgraded to an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player, which was considered quite advanced for the early 1980s. The HVAC system was manually controlled, featuring simple knobs for temperature and fan speed, and the dashboard instruments were clear and analog, providing essential information like speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent by modern standards. Power steering was an option or standard on higher trims, making maneuvering easier. Cruise control was also an available option on some models, enhancing highway driving comfort. There were no electronic stability controls, traction control systems, or advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) like adaptive cruise control or lane-keeping assist. The focus was on the fundamentals of driving.
Safety features for the 1983 Accord were basic but present. All models were equipped with seat belts, and front disc brakes combined with rear drum brakes provided stopping power. Some higher trims might have featured a rear defroster and intermittent wipers for improved visibility. While official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for this specific model year are not readily available or comparable to today's rigorous standards, the Accord was built with a focus on structural integrity for its era. Its independent suspension contributed to a stable ride, and Honda's reputation for solid construction meant it offered a reasonable level of protection for its occupants within the context of 1980s automotive safety technology.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent by modern standards. Power steering was an option or standard on higher trims, making maneuvering easier. Cruise control was also an available option on some models, enhancing highway driving comfort. There were no electronic stability controls, traction control systems, or advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) like adaptive cruise control or lane-keeping assist. The focus was on the fundamentals of driving.
Safety features for the 1983 Accord were basic but present. All models were equipped with seat belts, and front disc brakes combined with rear drum brakes provided stopping power. Some higher trims might have featured a rear defroster and intermittent wipers for improved visibility. While official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for this specific model year are not readily available or comparable to today's rigorous standards, the Accord was built with a focus on structural integrity for its era. Its independent suspension contributed to a stable ride, and Honda's reputation for solid construction meant it offered a reasonable level of protection for its occupants within the context of 1980s automotive safety technology.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1983 Honda Accord Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1983 Honda Accord typically ranged from approximately $8,000 for a base DX sedan to around $11,000 for a well-equipped LX or EX/LXi model. As with most vehicles from this era, depreciation was significant in its early years. However, the Accord has achieved a unique status as a collectible classic, especially in well-preserved, low-mileage examples. Current used market prices vary wildly, from a few hundred dollars for project cars needing extensive work to several thousand dollars for pristine, original condition vehicles. Factors affecting resale value include mileage, overall condition, the presence of rust, originality of parts, maintenance history, and the desirability of specific trims (hatchbacks and higher trims often command more). A well-maintained, rust-free Accord is a rare find and will always fetch a premium.
1983 Honda Accord Cost of Ownership
The 1983 Honda Accord is generally an economical car to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and low market value, though classic car insurance policies can offer better rates for well-maintained examples. Fuel costs are minimal thanks to its excellent MPG. Routine maintenance, like oil changes and filter replacements, is inexpensive. Repair costs can be moderate; while parts are becoming harder to find for some specific components, many common items are still readily available and affordable. The biggest variable in long-term ownership cost will be the potential for rust repair and the occasional need for more involved mechanical work on aging systems. Overall, it remains a cost-effective vehicle to keep on the road.
1983 Honda Accord Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1983 Honda Accord Recalls & Defects
Fuel System, Gasoline:storage:tank Assembly:filler Pipe and CAP
Recall date
1992-03-03
Recall no.
92v028000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
IF THE Plastic Coating OF THE Fuel Filler And/Or Breather Pipe IS Damaged, Salt Water MAY Accumulate Between THE Plastic Coating and THE Steel Pipes, and THE Accumulation Could Cause Corrossion Which Would Eventually Rust Through THE Affected Pipes, Allowing Gasoline Fumes and Fuel TO Leak.
Consequence
Gasoline Fumes And/Or Fuel Leakage Through THE Filler Orbreather Pipes Could Result IN A Fire When Exposed TO A Source OF Ignition.
Remedy
Corroded Filler or Breather Pipes Will BE Cleaned and Recoated or Replaced AS Needed.
Notes
System: Fuel System.vehicle Description: Passenger Cars IN Areas Where Salt and Calcium Chloride Areused IN Snow and ICE Control.
1983 Honda Accord Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1983 Honda Accord Insurance
Insurance for a 1983 Honda Accord is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sedan with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1983 Honda Accord Compare to Other Sedan?
In the early 1980s, the 1983 Honda Accord competed against a strong field of compact and mid-size sedans and hatchbacks. Key rivals included the Toyota Camry (though the Camry was still establishing itself), Nissan Sentra/Stanza, Mazda 626, Ford Escort, and Chevrolet Cavalier.
Performance: The Accord's 1.8-liter engine, producing around 73 horsepower, was focused on efficiency rather than outright speed. In this regard, it was comparable to most economy-focused rivals like the Sentra or Escort, offering adequate acceleration for daily driving. Performance-oriented rivals might have included sportier versions of the Mazda 626 or certain European imports, but the Accord prioritized smoothness and economy.
Features: Honda's reputation for well-appointed interiors shone through. Even base models felt more thoughtfully designed than some competitors. Higher trims offered features like power windows and cassette players, often ahead of comparable American models. While some Japanese rivals like Toyota also offered good features, Honda's ergonomics were particularly praised.
Reliability: This is where the Accord truly excelled. Honda's build quality and engineering were a significant advantage over many American offerings like the Cavalier and Escort, which were known for more frequent mechanical issues. Toyota and Nissan also offered strong reliability, making them close competitors. The Accord consistently earned high marks for its dependability and longevity.
Price: The Accord was generally positioned as a slightly more premium offering than entry-level economy cars but often priced competitively with well-equipped models from Toyota and Nissan. Its value proposition was its blend of reliability, fuel economy, and comfort for the price.
Alternatives: The 1983 Toyota Camry or Corolla, Nissan Sentra or Pulsar, and Mazda 626 are very similar alternatives in terms of size, intent, and reliability. For a more performance-oriented option in a similar price bracket, one might look at a Ford Mustang or a sporty version of the Toyota Corolla. However, for a balanced combination of reliability, efficiency, and comfortable daily driving, the 1983 Honda Accord remains a benchmark. If a modern equivalent is desired, one might look at current Honda Civic models for a successor in spirit.
Performance: The Accord's 1.8-liter engine, producing around 73 horsepower, was focused on efficiency rather than outright speed. In this regard, it was comparable to most economy-focused rivals like the Sentra or Escort, offering adequate acceleration for daily driving. Performance-oriented rivals might have included sportier versions of the Mazda 626 or certain European imports, but the Accord prioritized smoothness and economy.
Features: Honda's reputation for well-appointed interiors shone through. Even base models felt more thoughtfully designed than some competitors. Higher trims offered features like power windows and cassette players, often ahead of comparable American models. While some Japanese rivals like Toyota also offered good features, Honda's ergonomics were particularly praised.
Reliability: This is where the Accord truly excelled. Honda's build quality and engineering were a significant advantage over many American offerings like the Cavalier and Escort, which were known for more frequent mechanical issues. Toyota and Nissan also offered strong reliability, making them close competitors. The Accord consistently earned high marks for its dependability and longevity.
Price: The Accord was generally positioned as a slightly more premium offering than entry-level economy cars but often priced competitively with well-equipped models from Toyota and Nissan. Its value proposition was its blend of reliability, fuel economy, and comfort for the price.
Alternatives: The 1983 Toyota Camry or Corolla, Nissan Sentra or Pulsar, and Mazda 626 are very similar alternatives in terms of size, intent, and reliability. For a more performance-oriented option in a similar price bracket, one might look at a Ford Mustang or a sporty version of the Toyota Corolla. However, for a balanced combination of reliability, efficiency, and comfortable daily driving, the 1983 Honda Accord remains a benchmark. If a modern equivalent is desired, one might look at current Honda Civic models for a successor in spirit.
Final Verdict: Is the 1983 Honda Accord a Good Sedan?
The 1983 Honda Accord is ideal for classic car enthusiasts, budget-conscious commuters seeking ultimate fuel efficiency, or anyone who appreciates the simplicity and reliability of vintage Japanese engineering. It is absolutely worth buying for individuals who prioritize long-term durability and low running costs, provided they can find a well-maintained example. This vehicle is strictly a used purchase, as new ones are no longer available. Specific trims like the LX or EX/LXi offer a more comfortable and feature-rich experience, making them more desirable. Buyers should prioritize finding a car with minimal rust and a documented maintenance history. For those willing to put in a little effort for classic charm and exceptional economy, the 1983 Accord is a rewarding choice.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.