The 2003 Jeep Cherokee, part of the XJ generation that ran from 1984 to 2001 (though still often referred to as such due to its enduring legacy and the subsequent KK model), is a compact SUV renowned for its rugged capability and iconic design. Key trims included the Sport, Classic, and Limited. While production officially ended in 2001, its spirit lives on in the hearts of off-road enthusiasts. It stands out for its legendary off-road prowess and utilitarian charm, making it a beloved choice for adventurers and everyday drivers alike.
The Good
The 2003 Jeep Cherokee excels in off-road performance and rugged reliability, offering a robust driving experience. Its timeless design evokes a sense of adventure. Practically, it provides good value for its capabilities, while emotionally, it delivers the freedom and confidence associated with the Jeep brand.
The Bad
Potential buyers of a 2003 Jeep Cherokee should watch out for rust, particularly on the unibody frame and wheel wells. Interior wear and tear, aging suspension components, and potential issues with the transmission or cooling system are also common concerns.
2003 Jeep Cherokee: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 4.0L Inline 6-Cylinder Engine
- 2.4L Inline 4-Cylinder Engine (less common) - Horsepower:
- 4.0L I6: Approximately 190 hp
- 2.4L I4: Approximately 150 hp - Fuel Economy:
- 4.0L I6 (2WD): Around 15 mpg city / 20 mpg highway
- 4.0L I6 (4WD): Around 14 mpg city / 19 mpg highway
- 2.4L I4 (2WD): Around 17 mpg city / 22 mpg highway - 0-60 Times:
- 4.0L I6: Typically in the 8.5 to 9.5 second range
- 2.4L I4: Significantly slower, often exceeding 11 seconds - Towing Capacity:
- Typically around 2,000 lbs for the 4-cylinder and up to 5,000 lbs for the 6-cylinder models with proper towing packages. - Key Trim-Level Features:
- Sport: Often the base model, offering essential features for off-road capability like 4WD options, standard durability, and functional interior. Usually came with cloth seats and basic power amenities.
- Classic: Typically added some comfort and convenience features over the Sport, such as upgraded interior trim, power windows and locks, and sometimes a better stereo system. Still retained core Jeep ruggedness.
- Limited: The top-tier trim, which included more luxury and convenience features. This could encompass leather seating, power seats, improved sound system, alloy wheels, and sometimes body-colored exterior accents. Offered a more refined experience while maintaining off-road capability.
2003 Jeep Cherokee Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2003 |
| Make | Jeep |
| Model | Cherokee |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Wagon |
| Category | Minivan |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | TOLEDO |
Dimensions
| Doors | 4-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 5.9L V8 |
| Engine Size | 5.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 |
| Transmission | 5 Manual/Standard |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Four-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2003 Jeep Cherokee Have?
While the 2003 Jeep Cherokee (often referring to the later XJ models as the platform was discontinued after 2001, but the question implies the spirit of the XJ) is generally praised for its robust nature, certain common issues are reported by owners over time. Rust is a significant concern, particularly affecting the unibody structure, rocker panels, and rear quarter panels. This can compromise structural integrity and lead to expensive repairs. The 4.0L inline-six engine is renowned for its durability, but can experience issues like oil leaks from the valve cover or oil pan gaskets, and cracked cylinder heads (though more prevalent in earlier years, it's worth noting).
Transmission problems, particularly with the automatic transmissions, can arise with age and mileage, including slipping, harsh shifting, or complete failure. The cooling system is another area to monitor; radiator leaks, thermostat failures, and water pump issues are not uncommon. Suspension components, such as worn ball joints, tie rod ends, and leaf springs (in the rear), can lead to poor handling and ride quality. Electrical gremlins, including power window failures, issues with the instrument cluster, and sensor malfunctions, can also crop up.
Brake wear and tear, especially on the front rotors, is another common item. While specific recalls for the 2003 model year might be limited, it's crucial to check the VIN for any outstanding safety recalls. Long-term reliability hinges heavily on maintenance. Vehicles that have been regularly serviced, particularly with fluid changes and rust prevention measures, tend to fare much better than neglected examples. Despite these potential issues, many Cherokees, especially the 4.0L models, are known to reach high mileage figures if properly cared for.
Transmission problems, particularly with the automatic transmissions, can arise with age and mileage, including slipping, harsh shifting, or complete failure. The cooling system is another area to monitor; radiator leaks, thermostat failures, and water pump issues are not uncommon. Suspension components, such as worn ball joints, tie rod ends, and leaf springs (in the rear), can lead to poor handling and ride quality. Electrical gremlins, including power window failures, issues with the instrument cluster, and sensor malfunctions, can also crop up.
Brake wear and tear, especially on the front rotors, is another common item. While specific recalls for the 2003 model year might be limited, it's crucial to check the VIN for any outstanding safety recalls. Long-term reliability hinges heavily on maintenance. Vehicles that have been regularly serviced, particularly with fluid changes and rust prevention measures, tend to fare much better than neglected examples. Despite these potential issues, many Cherokees, especially the 4.0L models, are known to reach high mileage figures if properly cared for.
How long will the 2003 Jeep Cherokee last?
Based on owner data and maintenance habits, the 2003 Jeep Cherokee, particularly those equipped with the 4.0L inline-six engine, can achieve remarkable longevity. Many owners report reaching well over 200,000 miles, with some even surpassing 300,000 miles. This durability is a testament to the robust powertrain. However, long-term durability is significantly impacted by how the vehicle has been maintained. Rust is the primary weakness that can shorten its service life if not addressed promptly. Other components like the transmission, suspension, and cooling system may require attention between 150,000 and 250,000 miles, depending on driving conditions and service history. With diligent upkeep, these vehicles can offer years of reliable service and off-road adventures.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2003 Jeep Cherokee, being part of an older design generation, offers a more straightforward approach to technology and safety compared to modern vehicles.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
Standard entertainment typically included an AM/FM radio with an auxiliary input or a single-disc CD player. Higher trims, like the Limited, might have offered an upgraded sound system with more speakers. Options for cassette players were also common. Bluetooth connectivity and touchscreens were non-existent in this era. Climate control was usually manual, with basic A/C and heating systems.
Driver-Assistance Features:
Driver-assistance technology was minimal to non-existent. Features like cruise control were standard or optional depending on the trim. Anti-lock braking system (ABS) was generally available, especially on higher trims and 4WD models, to aid in stopping power. Electronic Stability Control (ESC) and traction control were not typically offered.
Safety Features:
Standard safety features included front airbags for the driver and passenger. Seat belts were a given. Side-impact airbags were not a common option. The chassis and body-on-frame (though XJ is unibody) construction provided a degree of perceived robustness.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Crash-test data for vehicles from this era is less comprehensive than for modern cars. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provided ratings, and generally, vehicles from this period scored moderate results in frontal and side impacts. Specific scores for the 2003 model year can be found in NHTSA archives, but expect them to be lower than contemporary standards. For instance, side impacts often showed vulnerability, and rollover resistance, while a Jeep strength, was not as advanced as newer SUVs with electronic stability control. Overall, safety was more passive (relying on airbags and structural integrity) rather than active (using electronic aids to prevent accidents).
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
Standard entertainment typically included an AM/FM radio with an auxiliary input or a single-disc CD player. Higher trims, like the Limited, might have offered an upgraded sound system with more speakers. Options for cassette players were also common. Bluetooth connectivity and touchscreens were non-existent in this era. Climate control was usually manual, with basic A/C and heating systems.
Driver-Assistance Features:
Driver-assistance technology was minimal to non-existent. Features like cruise control were standard or optional depending on the trim. Anti-lock braking system (ABS) was generally available, especially on higher trims and 4WD models, to aid in stopping power. Electronic Stability Control (ESC) and traction control were not typically offered.
Safety Features:
Standard safety features included front airbags for the driver and passenger. Seat belts were a given. Side-impact airbags were not a common option. The chassis and body-on-frame (though XJ is unibody) construction provided a degree of perceived robustness.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Crash-test data for vehicles from this era is less comprehensive than for modern cars. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provided ratings, and generally, vehicles from this period scored moderate results in frontal and side impacts. Specific scores for the 2003 model year can be found in NHTSA archives, but expect them to be lower than contemporary standards. For instance, side impacts often showed vulnerability, and rollover resistance, while a Jeep strength, was not as advanced as newer SUVs with electronic stability control. Overall, safety was more passive (relying on airbags and structural integrity) rather than active (using electronic aids to prevent accidents).
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
2003 Jeep Cherokee Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2003 Jeep Cherokee typically ranged from approximately $20,000 for a base Sport model to upwards of $27,000-$30,000 for a well-equipped Limited trim. Its depreciation was moderate initially, common for SUVs. Currently, the used market prices for a 2003 Jeep Cherokee vary significantly based on condition, mileage, trim level, and whether it's a desirable 4.0L engine with 4WD. Expect prices to range from around $3,000 to $8,000, with pristine, low-mileage examples or highly modified off-road versions commanding higher figures. Factors heavily influencing resale value include the presence of rust (a major detractor), the mechanical condition of the powertrain and drivetrain, and overall cosmetic appearance. Well-maintained Cherokees with extensive service records hold their value better, appealing to enthusiasts and those seeking a capable, affordable off-roader.
2003 Jeep Cherokee Cost of Ownership
Owning a 2003 Jeep Cherokee can be moderately economical, but it depends on usage and mechanical condition. Insurance costs are generally reasonable, often lower than newer SUVs. Fuel economy, especially for the 4.0L engine, is not its strong suit (around 15-20 mpg), making fuel a significant ongoing cost. Maintenance is relatively straightforward, with parts widely available and many DIY options. However, repair costs can escalate if major issues like transmission failure or significant rust repair arise. Long-term ownership is most economical when purchased at a good price and maintained diligently. It's not a luxury vehicle to own but offers great value if mechanical soundness is prioritized over cutting-edge tech.
2003 Jeep Cherokee Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
2003 Jeep Cherokee Safety Rating
NHTSA
2003 Jeep Cherokee Insurance
Insurance for a 2003 Jeep Cherokee is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Wagon with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2003 Jeep Cherokee Compare to Other Wagon?
The 2003 Jeep Cherokee, though technically discontinued in 2001, often competed in spirit and market segment with vehicles like the Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, Ford Escape, and Subaru Forester of that era.
Performance: The Cherokee, especially with the 4.0L inline-six, offered superior off-road performance and towing capacity compared to most front-wheel-drive-based compact SUVs like the RAV4 and CR-V. Its rugged chassis and available Command-Trac 4WD system made it a true trail warrior. The Escape offered a more car-like ride and acceptable performance, while the Forester provided excellent all-wheel-drive grip on-road and decent capability off-pavement.
Features: In terms of features, the Cherokee was generally more spartan than its rivals, especially in base trims. Competitors like the CR-V and RAV4 offered more modern interior amenities, better fuel economy, and a more comfortable on-road experience. The Limited trims of the Cherokee could equip leather and power accessories, but it never reached the sophistication of some rivals.
Reliability: Toyota and Honda generally held a reputation for superior long-term reliability and fewer reported issues than the Jeep Cherokee of this era, particularly concerning rust and occasional transmission troubles. The Cherokee's 4.0L engine is robust, but its unibody construction was more susceptible to corrosion. The Forester also has a good reliability record.
Price: The Cherokee often offered more capability for its price point, especially for used models, making it a value proposition for off-road enthusiasts. Its competitors often commanded higher used prices due to their overall reliability and on-road manners.
Alternatives:
- Similar Alternative (for capability): If off-road prowess is paramount, older Toyota 4Runners or Nissan Pathfinders (pre-2005) offer similar ruggedness, though often with higher mileage.
- Better Alternative (for on-road comfort & reliability): For a more reliable daily driver with better fuel economy and on-road comfort, a 2003-2006 Toyota RAV4 or Honda CR-V would be superior choices. A Subaru Forester (2003-2008) offers a good balance of AWD performance and reliability.
- More Modern Alternative: If budget allows for something newer, a first-generation Toyota FJ Cruiser or a Jeep Wrangler (JK generation) would offer more modern off-road capability.
Performance: The Cherokee, especially with the 4.0L inline-six, offered superior off-road performance and towing capacity compared to most front-wheel-drive-based compact SUVs like the RAV4 and CR-V. Its rugged chassis and available Command-Trac 4WD system made it a true trail warrior. The Escape offered a more car-like ride and acceptable performance, while the Forester provided excellent all-wheel-drive grip on-road and decent capability off-pavement.
Features: In terms of features, the Cherokee was generally more spartan than its rivals, especially in base trims. Competitors like the CR-V and RAV4 offered more modern interior amenities, better fuel economy, and a more comfortable on-road experience. The Limited trims of the Cherokee could equip leather and power accessories, but it never reached the sophistication of some rivals.
Reliability: Toyota and Honda generally held a reputation for superior long-term reliability and fewer reported issues than the Jeep Cherokee of this era, particularly concerning rust and occasional transmission troubles. The Cherokee's 4.0L engine is robust, but its unibody construction was more susceptible to corrosion. The Forester also has a good reliability record.
Price: The Cherokee often offered more capability for its price point, especially for used models, making it a value proposition for off-road enthusiasts. Its competitors often commanded higher used prices due to their overall reliability and on-road manners.
Alternatives:
- Similar Alternative (for capability): If off-road prowess is paramount, older Toyota 4Runners or Nissan Pathfinders (pre-2005) offer similar ruggedness, though often with higher mileage.
- Better Alternative (for on-road comfort & reliability): For a more reliable daily driver with better fuel economy and on-road comfort, a 2003-2006 Toyota RAV4 or Honda CR-V would be superior choices. A Subaru Forester (2003-2008) offers a good balance of AWD performance and reliability.
- More Modern Alternative: If budget allows for something newer, a first-generation Toyota FJ Cruiser or a Jeep Wrangler (JK generation) would offer more modern off-road capability.
Final Verdict: Is the 2003 Jeep Cherokee a Good Wagon?
The 2003 Jeep Cherokee is ideal for budget-conscious individuals or families who prioritize off-road capability, a classic rugged aesthetic, and mechanical simplicity over modern creature comforts and cutting-edge technology. It's a fantastic choice for weekend adventurers, off-road enthusiasts, or those needing a durable vehicle for less-than-ideal road conditions. It is definitely worth buying, but only under specific conditions. Focus on well-maintained, rust-free examples, ideally with the 4.0L engine and 4WD. Thorough pre-purchase inspections are crucial, paying close attention to the unibody structure and powertrain. Used is the only option as it's long out of production. Opting for a Sport or Classic trim is often more practical for modifications, while a Limited offers more creature comforts for daily driving, but may have more complex systems to fail.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.