The Good
The 1984 F-350 Super Duty offers unmatched practical advantages with its "Built Ford Tough" reliability and impressive towing/hauling performance. Its simple, durable design appeals to practical buyers seeking a no-nonsense work truck, while its iconic styling and perceived capability evoke an emotional connection for enthusiasts. It represents excellent long-term value for heavy-duty applications.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1984 F-350 include susceptibility to rust in common areas like cab corners, bed, and fenders. Owners should also watch for carburetor issues, aging suspension components leading to steering slop, and potential electrical gremlins. Fuel efficiency is notably poor, and dual tank systems can have their own complexities.
1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty: Quick Overview
The 1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty was offered with a range of robust powertrains designed for heavy-duty work.
- Engine Options:
- 4.9L (300 cu in) "Big Six" Inline-6 gasoline engine, renowned for its torque and durability.
- 5.8L (351 cu in) Windsor V8 gasoline engine, offering a good balance of power and economy for its size.
- 7.5L (460 cu in) V8 gasoline engine, the most powerful gasoline option, ideal for maximum towing.
- 6.9L (420 cu in) IDI (Indirect Injection) V8 diesel engine, introduced in 1983, known for its longevity and fuel efficiency relative to the big-block gas engines.
- Horsepower:
- 4.9L I6: Approximately 115-122 hp.
- 5.8L V8: Approximately 150-180 hp.
- 7.5L V8: Approximately 245 hp.
- 6.9L Diesel: Approximately 170 hp.
- Fuel Economy: Generally poor, ranging from single digits to low teens (e.g., 8-12 MPG) depending heavily on engine, configuration, load, and driving conditions. The diesel offered better economy than the gasoline V8s.
- 0-60 Times: Not a performance metric for these trucks; times would be slow, likely in the 12-18+ second range, varying significantly with engine, gearing, and load. Official figures were not typically published.
- Towing Capacity: A major strength. Depending on configuration (single rear wheel vs. dually, engine, gearing), conventional towing capacity could reach approximately 10,000 lbs. With a fifth-wheel or gooseneck setup and proper equipment, capacities could exceed 16,000 lbs for dually models.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Custom: The base model, featuring vinyl bench seating, rubber floor mats, basic instrumentation, and minimal amenities.
- XL: An upgrade from Custom, typically including cloth and vinyl upholstery, full carpeting, AM/FM radio, and some exterior chrome accents.
- XLT Lariat: The top-tier trim, offering more luxurious features such as plush cloth seating, power windows, power door locks, air conditioning, upgraded stereo systems, full gauge cluster, and distinctive exterior chrome and two-tone paint options.
1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty Specifications
Vehicle History Report
What Problems Does the 1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty Have?
The 1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty, while revered for its durability, is not without its common problems and long-term reliability concerns, particularly due to its age and intended heavy usage. One of the most frequently reported issues is extensive rust, especially in areas like the cab corners, rocker panels, fender arches, and bed sides. Frame rust can also be a significant concern, particularly in regions exposed to road salt.
For gasoline engine variants, carburetor issues are common. The original carburetors can suffer from vacuum leaks, worn components, and tuning difficulties, leading to poor idling, decreased power, and poor fuel economy. The complex dual fuel tank system often experiences problems with the selector valve, which can fail and cause fuel to transfer between tanks or lead to fuel starvation.
Electrical gremlins are also prevalent with age, manifesting as malfunctioning gauges, intermittent lighting, power window issues, or general wiring degradation. Steering components, such as kingpins (common on these generation F-350s) and tie rod ends, are prone to wear, resulting in excessive steering slop and a less precise feel. Suspension components like leaf springs and bushings also degrade over time, impacting ride quality and handling.
While the C6 automatic transmission is known for its robustness, prolonged heavy use without proper maintenance can lead to eventual failure. The 6.9L IDI diesel engine is generally reliable but can suffer from fuel injection system issues or glow plug problems. Brake components, especially rear drums, require regular maintenance and can seize or wear unevenly.
Specific recalls for the 1984 F-350 were relatively minor compared to later models. Historical records indicate some recalls related to parking brake assemblies, certain wiring harness routing, and seat belt anchorages. However, no widespread, catastrophic structural or powertrain recalls are commonly cited for this specific model year that would fundamentally undermine its heavy-duty design. Long-term ownership primarily focuses on combating rust and addressing wear-and-tear components typical of a utilitarian vehicle of its era.
How long will the 1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty, as a product of its era, featured minimal built-in technology, entertainment, driver-assistance, or advanced safety features by today's standards. Its focus was unequivocally on utility and rugged mechanical design, not electronic sophistication.
Built-in Tech: Technology was rudimentary. The gasoline engines were primarily carbureted, predating widespread electronic fuel injection. The instrument cluster provided essential gauges like speedometer, odometer, fuel level, temperature, oil pressure, and voltage. There were no integrated digital displays, trip computers, or advanced diagnostic systems.
Entertainment: Basic entertainment options included an AM/FM radio, with higher trims potentially offering an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player. Sound quality was typically delivered through simple, mono or basic stereo speaker setups. There were no infotainment screens, CD players, or auxiliary inputs.
Driver-Assistance Features: True driver-assistance technologies like ABS, traction control, stability control, or even cruise control (which was an option on higher trims) were non-existent. Power steering and power brakes were common features, but these were standard hydraulic systems, not "assistance" in the modern sense.
Safety Features: Safety features were fundamental. The primary safety equipment included three-point seat belts for front occupants and lap belts for middle or rear passengers in SuperCab models. The vehicle's sheer mass and robust steel construction offered a degree of passive protection. However, there were no airbags (neither driver nor passenger), no anti-lock braking systems (ABS), and no crumple zones designed to modern specifications. The fuel tank locations and designs were typical for the era.
Optional Features: Common optional features included factory air conditioning, power windows and door locks (primarily on the XLT Lariat trim), a sliding rear window, dual fuel tanks for extended range, heavy-duty cooling packages for towing, and various trailer towing packages. Upgraded interior trim and two-tone paint schemes were also popular options.
Crash-Test Ratings: Official crash-test ratings from organizations like NHTSA or IIHS, as we know them today, were not conducted for vehicles of this vintage. Safety standards and testing methodologies were vastly different, making direct comparisons to modern vehicles impossible.
What Colors Options are Available?
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty Prices and Market Value
1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty Cost of Ownership
1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty Fuel Efficiency
1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty Compare to Other Vehicle?
The 1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty stacked up against formidable rivals in the heavy-duty truck segment, primarily the Chevrolet C/K 30 Series (often referred to as the "squarebody" trucks) and the Dodge D/W 350 Series. All these trucks were designed with similar utilitarian philosophies.
Performance: The F-350's 7.5L (460 V8) gasoline engine was a powerhouse, directly competitive with Chevrolet's 7.4L (454 V8). Ford's 6.9L IDI diesel, introduced in 1983, was a strong contender against Chevy's 6.2L Detroit Diesel, offering comparable or slightly better power and perceived durability. Dodge, pre-Cummins (which arrived in 1989), relied on its 360 and 440 V8s, which were robust but arguably less favored for continuous heavy-duty work than Ford's 460 or the new diesels.
Features: Feature sets were largely comparable across all brands for this era of heavy-duty trucks. All offered basic cabs, available extended cabs (SuperCab for Ford, Extended Cab for Chevy, Club Cab for Dodge), and various bed lengths. Trim levels like Ford's XLT Lariat, Chevy's Scottsdale/Silverado, and Dodge's Royal SE offered increasing levels of interior comfort and exterior brightwork. None boasted significant technological advantages over the others; air conditioning, power accessories, and upgraded radios were common options across the board.
Reliability: All three manufacturers built exceptionally tough trucks in this period. Ford's 4.9L "Big Six" and 6.9L IDI diesel engines, along with its C6 automatic transmission, are legendary for their longevity. Chevrolet's small-block and big-block V8s, paired with the TH400 automatic, also had a reputation for stoutness. Dodge trucks from this era were also durable but sometimes suffered from more pronounced rust issues and their gasoline engines, while solid, didn't always inspire the same confidence as Ford or Chevy for extreme heavy-duty applications before the Cummins arrived. Overall, the F-350's mechanicals were exceptionally reliable.
Price: New prices were competitive, reflecting similar levels of equipment and capability. In the current used market, well-preserved Ford F-350s and Chevrolet C/K 30 series trucks tend to command stronger prices, especially 4x4, diesel, or big-block gasoline models, due to their iconic status and strong enthusiast following. Dodge D/W 350s from this exact year (pre-Cummins) typically fetch slightly less unless in exceptional condition.
Recommended Alternatives: For a similar vintage heavy-duty workhorse, the 1980-1987 Chevrolet C/K 30 Series is an excellent alternative, offering comparable ruggedness and a strong parts supply. The 1981-1993 Dodge Ram D/W 350 is also an option, particularly if you find a later model with the desirable Cummins diesel. For modern heavy-duty capability, current Ford F-350 Super Duty, Ram 3500, or Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD trucks offer vastly superior performance, safety, and comfort.
Final Verdict: Is the 1984 Ford F-350 Super Duty a Good Vehicle?
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.