The 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty is a robust member of Ford's eighth-generation F-Series (1987-1991), embodying the era's "Built Ford Tough" ethos. Available in Regular Cab and SuperCab body styles, typically with an 8-foot bed, key trims included the utilitarian Custom, the balanced XL, and the more upscale XLT Lariat. New prices ranged from approximately $15,000 to over $20,000. It stood out for its legendary durability, strong towing capabilities, and the availability of the formidable 7.3L IDI diesel engine, making it a popular workhorse for construction, farming, and heavy hauling.
The Good
Its key advantages lie in formidable towing and hauling performance, bulletproof mechanical reliability, and a classic, no-nonsense design. Practical buyers appreciate its straightforward repairability and current affordability as a used truck. Emotionally, it evokes nostalgia for a simpler, tougher era of pickups, offering a timeless aesthetic and a sense of enduring capability.
The Bad
Known weaknesses include significant rust issues, particularly on cab corners, wheel wells, and bed supports. Electrical gremlins, worn suspension components, and age-related fuel system problems (especially with the IDI diesel) are common. The interiors can show considerable wear, and braking performance is not up to modern standards.
1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 4.9L (300 cu in) I6 (Inline-Six) with EFI (Electronic Fuel Injection)
- 5.0L (302 cu in) V8 with EFI
- 5.8L (351 cu in) V8 with EFI
- 7.5L (460 cu in) V8 with EFI
- 7.3L (445 cu in) IDI (Indirect Injection) Diesel V8 (naturally aspirated) - Horsepower (Approximate):
- 4.9L I6: 150-170 hp
- 5.0L V8: 185 hp
- 5.8L V8: 210 hp
- 7.5L V8: 230 hp
- 7.3L IDI Diesel: 185 hp (with substantial torque) - Fuel Economy: Poor by modern standards. Gas engines typically saw 8-13 MPG, while the 7.3L IDI diesel offered slightly better, often in the 12-16 MPG range, depending on load and driving conditions.
- 0-60 Times: Not a performance metric for these work trucks. 0-60 mph times were generally slow, estimated between 10-15+ seconds, varying significantly with engine, transmission, and load.
- Towing Capacity: Impressive for its era, ranging from approximately 7,000 lbs to over 10,000 lbs, depending on engine, axle ratio, transmission, and configuration (2WD vs. 4WD, Regular Cab vs. SuperCab).
- Trim-Level Features:
- Custom (Base): A bare-bones work truck with vinyl seating, manual windows and locks, basic instrument cluster, and an AM radio.
- XL: Offered slight upgrades over the Custom, often with cloth seats, potentially an AM/FM radio, and still largely manual features.
- XLT Lariat (Top Trim): Featured more luxurious cloth or premium vinyl interiors, power windows and door locks, air conditioning (often optional on lower trims), cruise control, a full gauge package, improved stereo options (AM/FM cassette), and exterior chrome accents.
1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty Specifications
No records to be displayed
Vehicle History Report
What Problems Does the 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty Have?
The 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty, while revered for its toughness, does have several frequently reported problems, largely due to age and materials of the era.
Rust is arguably the most pervasive issue, attacking cab corners, rocker panels, fender arches, bed floor supports, and frame rails, particularly in regions exposed to road salt. This significantly impacts structural integrity and aesthetic value.
Fuel system problems are common. Gas models, though mostly EFI by 1989, can suffer from aging fuel pumps, clogged injectors, or faulty sending units in the dual fuel tanks. The 7.3L IDI diesel is prone to injection pump failures, injector issues, and fuel line degradation. Furthermore, the IDI diesel requires specific coolant additives (SCAs) to prevent cavitation erosion within the engine block, a critical maintenance item often overlooked, leading to costly engine damage.
Electrical gremlins are also common, including failing headlight switches, intermittent gauge cluster operation, and general wiring harness deterioration leading to power accessory failures. The primitive electrical systems can be challenging to diagnose.
Steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and power steering pumps, wear out over decades of heavy use. Power steering leaks are a frequent complaint.
Regarding transmissions, the C6 automatic is very durable but inefficient. The E4OD automatic, introduced around this generation, can be problematic if not properly serviced or if subjected to consistent heavy loads without an external cooler. Manual transmissions like the ZF5 are generally robust.
Formal recalls for the 1989 F-250 Super Duty are limited and typically minor, such as those related to seat belt buckles or wiper motor function, not indicative of pervasive design flaws. Long-term reliability, while excellent for the major drivetrain components (with proper maintenance), is primarily compromised by widespread rust and the natural degradation of electrical and accessory systems due to age.
Rust is arguably the most pervasive issue, attacking cab corners, rocker panels, fender arches, bed floor supports, and frame rails, particularly in regions exposed to road salt. This significantly impacts structural integrity and aesthetic value.
Fuel system problems are common. Gas models, though mostly EFI by 1989, can suffer from aging fuel pumps, clogged injectors, or faulty sending units in the dual fuel tanks. The 7.3L IDI diesel is prone to injection pump failures, injector issues, and fuel line degradation. Furthermore, the IDI diesel requires specific coolant additives (SCAs) to prevent cavitation erosion within the engine block, a critical maintenance item often overlooked, leading to costly engine damage.
Electrical gremlins are also common, including failing headlight switches, intermittent gauge cluster operation, and general wiring harness deterioration leading to power accessory failures. The primitive electrical systems can be challenging to diagnose.
Steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and power steering pumps, wear out over decades of heavy use. Power steering leaks are a frequent complaint.
Regarding transmissions, the C6 automatic is very durable but inefficient. The E4OD automatic, introduced around this generation, can be problematic if not properly serviced or if subjected to consistent heavy loads without an external cooler. Manual transmissions like the ZF5 are generally robust.
Formal recalls for the 1989 F-250 Super Duty are limited and typically minor, such as those related to seat belt buckles or wiper motor function, not indicative of pervasive design flaws. Long-term reliability, while excellent for the major drivetrain components (with proper maintenance), is primarily compromised by widespread rust and the natural degradation of electrical and accessory systems due to age.
How long will the 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty last?
The 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty boasts exceptional long-term durability. With diligent maintenance, these trucks routinely achieve 200,000 to 300,000 miles, and many examples, particularly those with the 4.9L I6 or 7.3L IDI diesel, are still operating well over 30 years later. The robust frame and heavy-duty drivetrain are highlights of its longevity. However, over time, rust becomes the primary adversary, severely weakening body panels and even the frame. Electrical components become prone to failure, and interior plastics and fabrics degrade. Bushings, seals, and hoses require regular replacement due to age. While the core mechanicals are incredibly resilient, neglecting these age-related weaknesses can significantly shorten its practical service life. Proactive rust prevention and electrical system checks are crucial for maximizing its years of service.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty, originating from an era predating sophisticated automotive electronics, offered very basic built-in technology.
Built-in Tech: Standard features included an analog gauge cluster displaying speed, fuel level, temperature, oil pressure, and voltage. Optional amenities focused on convenience, such as factory-installed air conditioning, intermittent windshield wipers, and a tilt steering wheel. Higher trims, like the XLT Lariat, could be optioned with power windows and power door locks, a significant luxury at the time. Cruise control was also an available option.
Entertainment: The standard entertainment system was a simple AM/FM radio. Upgraded systems, typically found in XLT Lariat models, offered an AM/FM cassette stereo with a few speakers, providing basic audio playback. There were no CD players or digital interfaces.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features, as understood today (e.g., adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring), were non-existent. The truck relied entirely on driver input and awareness.
Safety Features: Safety features were rudimentary compared to modern vehicles. Standard safety equipment included three-point seatbelts for front occupants. Anti-lock Rear Brakes (RABS) became a standard feature on all F-Series light trucks by 1989, providing improved stopping stability under heavy braking. The truck featured a sturdy ladder frame construction and a collapsible steering column designed to absorb impact energy. However, airbags were not available in any configuration for this model year.
Crash-Test Ratings: No formal NHTSA or IIHS crash-test ratings exist for vehicles from this era. Crash testing standards and methodologies were vastly different, and public safety ratings were not a common practice. Buyers relied on the vehicle's inherent structural strength and the basic safety equipment provided.
Built-in Tech: Standard features included an analog gauge cluster displaying speed, fuel level, temperature, oil pressure, and voltage. Optional amenities focused on convenience, such as factory-installed air conditioning, intermittent windshield wipers, and a tilt steering wheel. Higher trims, like the XLT Lariat, could be optioned with power windows and power door locks, a significant luxury at the time. Cruise control was also an available option.
Entertainment: The standard entertainment system was a simple AM/FM radio. Upgraded systems, typically found in XLT Lariat models, offered an AM/FM cassette stereo with a few speakers, providing basic audio playback. There were no CD players or digital interfaces.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features, as understood today (e.g., adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring), were non-existent. The truck relied entirely on driver input and awareness.
Safety Features: Safety features were rudimentary compared to modern vehicles. Standard safety equipment included three-point seatbelts for front occupants. Anti-lock Rear Brakes (RABS) became a standard feature on all F-Series light trucks by 1989, providing improved stopping stability under heavy braking. The truck featured a sturdy ladder frame construction and a collapsible steering column designed to absorb impact energy. However, airbags were not available in any configuration for this model year.
Crash-Test Ratings: No formal NHTSA or IIHS crash-test ratings exist for vehicles from this era. Crash testing standards and methodologies were vastly different, and public safety ratings were not a common practice. Buyers relied on the vehicle's inherent structural strength and the basic safety equipment provided.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty Prices and Market Value
When new in 1989, a Ford F-250 Super Duty ranged from approximately $15,000 for a basic 2WD Custom Regular Cab to over $20,000 for a fully optioned XLT Lariat 4WD SuperCab with the 7.3L diesel.
Today, current used market prices are highly variable. Rough, high-mileage examples can be found for $2,000 - $5,000. Decent, running trucks typically fetch $5,000 - $10,000. Well-preserved, rust-free, low-mileage examples, especially with the 7.3L diesel or 7.5L gas engine, can command $10,000 to $25,000+, with collector-grade trucks sometimes exceeding that.
Depreciation initially followed a steep curve like most vehicles. However, these trucks have long passed their lowest depreciation point. They now experience a slow appreciation due to their classic status and utility. Factors affecting resale value include the critical absence of rust, overall mechanical condition, engine choice (diesel often commands a premium), 4WD capability, trim level, and maintenance history. Originality and period-correctness also add value.
Today, current used market prices are highly variable. Rough, high-mileage examples can be found for $2,000 - $5,000. Decent, running trucks typically fetch $5,000 - $10,000. Well-preserved, rust-free, low-mileage examples, especially with the 7.3L diesel or 7.5L gas engine, can command $10,000 to $25,000+, with collector-grade trucks sometimes exceeding that.
Depreciation initially followed a steep curve like most vehicles. However, these trucks have long passed their lowest depreciation point. They now experience a slow appreciation due to their classic status and utility. Factors affecting resale value include the critical absence of rust, overall mechanical condition, engine choice (diesel often commands a premium), 4WD capability, trim level, and maintenance history. Originality and period-correctness also add value.
1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty presents a mixed bag of costs. Insurance for liability is typically low due to the vehicle's age and value, though comprehensive coverage can be tricky. Fuel costs are high; its V8 gasoline engines and even the diesel are inefficient by modern standards, consuming fuel at a rapid rate. Maintenance is relatively economical if you perform it yourself, as parts are generally affordable and widely available. Professional repairs, particularly for rust or complex electrical issues, can become costly.
Overall, it can be an economical vehicle to own if you're a DIY mechanic and can tolerate high fuel bills. However, if relying on professional shops for all repairs, especially bodywork, it can quickly become a costly endeavor. High fuel consumption is the primary long-term expense.
Overall, it can be an economical vehicle to own if you're a DIY mechanic and can tolerate high fuel bills. However, if relying on professional shops for all repairs, especially bodywork, it can quickly become a costly endeavor. High fuel consumption is the primary long-term expense.
1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty Fuel Efficiency
No records to be displayed
1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty Insurance
Insurance for a 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty Compare to Other Vehicle?
The 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty faced stiff competition from the Chevrolet C/K 2500 (GMT400 generation) and the Dodge Ram D/W 250.
In terms of performance for towing and hauling, the Ford F-250 was a strong contender, especially with its 7.5L (460) V8 and the robust 7.3L IDI diesel. The Chevrolet C/K 2500 offered its reliable 7.4L (454) V8, while its 6.2L/6.5L Detroit Diesel options were generally considered less powerful for heavy work compared to Ford's 7.3L IDI. The 1989 Dodge Ram D/W 250, particularly with the newly introduced Cummins 5.9L turbo-diesel, was a game-changer, offering superior torque and longevity for heavy-duty applications, often outclassing its Ford and Chevy diesel rivals in raw capability.
Features across all three were quite similar for the era – basic amenities with higher trims offering power accessories and air conditioning. Ford and Chevrolet generally provided a slightly more refined interior aesthetic and optional comforts on their top trims than Dodge's more utilitarian approach of the time.
Reliability was a strong suit for all three. Ford was known for its durable big-block gas engines and the stout 4.9L I6, alongside the 7.3L IDI diesel. Chevrolet's small and big block gas engines were equally reliable workhorses. The Dodge, while sometimes having lesser build quality in other components, had a legendary reliability factor with its Cummins diesel. All three suffered from common rust issues depending on climate.
Pricing when new was comparable. In the current used market, clean examples of Ford and Chevrolet heavy-duty trucks hold good value. However, Cummins-equipped Dodge Rams from this era often command a significant premium, frequently surpassing comparable Ford or Chevy diesels due to the engine's reputation.
Similar Alternatives: The 1989 Chevrolet K2500/C2500 is a highly recommended and equally capable alternative, offering similar parts availability and a strong enthusiast base. If heavy-duty diesel performance is the absolute priority, a 1989 Dodge Ram D/W250 with the Cummins engine might be a "better" alternative for specific hauling needs, though it might come at a higher price and with potentially lower overall fit-and-finish.
In terms of performance for towing and hauling, the Ford F-250 was a strong contender, especially with its 7.5L (460) V8 and the robust 7.3L IDI diesel. The Chevrolet C/K 2500 offered its reliable 7.4L (454) V8, while its 6.2L/6.5L Detroit Diesel options were generally considered less powerful for heavy work compared to Ford's 7.3L IDI. The 1989 Dodge Ram D/W 250, particularly with the newly introduced Cummins 5.9L turbo-diesel, was a game-changer, offering superior torque and longevity for heavy-duty applications, often outclassing its Ford and Chevy diesel rivals in raw capability.
Features across all three were quite similar for the era – basic amenities with higher trims offering power accessories and air conditioning. Ford and Chevrolet generally provided a slightly more refined interior aesthetic and optional comforts on their top trims than Dodge's more utilitarian approach of the time.
Reliability was a strong suit for all three. Ford was known for its durable big-block gas engines and the stout 4.9L I6, alongside the 7.3L IDI diesel. Chevrolet's small and big block gas engines were equally reliable workhorses. The Dodge, while sometimes having lesser build quality in other components, had a legendary reliability factor with its Cummins diesel. All three suffered from common rust issues depending on climate.
Pricing when new was comparable. In the current used market, clean examples of Ford and Chevrolet heavy-duty trucks hold good value. However, Cummins-equipped Dodge Rams from this era often command a significant premium, frequently surpassing comparable Ford or Chevy diesels due to the engine's reputation.
Similar Alternatives: The 1989 Chevrolet K2500/C2500 is a highly recommended and equally capable alternative, offering similar parts availability and a strong enthusiast base. If heavy-duty diesel performance is the absolute priority, a 1989 Dodge Ram D/W250 with the Cummins engine might be a "better" alternative for specific hauling needs, though it might come at a higher price and with potentially lower overall fit-and-finish.
Final Verdict: Is the 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty a Good Vehicle?
The 1989 Ford F-250 Super Duty is ideal for those seeking a rugged, capable, and mechanically simple work truck without the complexities and costs of modern pickups. It suits DIY enthusiasts, farmers, small business owners, or anyone needing a reliable towing and hauling platform for occasional or regular heavy use.
It is absolutely worth buying, but with specific conditions. As it's exclusively available used, prioritize a rust-free example, particularly in the frame and cab, as body repair can be extensive. Focus on trucks with a well-documented maintenance history. The 7.3L IDI diesel or 7.5L (460) gas V8 are excellent choices for heavy work, while the 4.9L I6 offers exceptional longevity for lighter duties. This truck is not for those prioritizing fuel efficiency, modern amenities, or refined ride quality. It's a testament to old-school durability, best appreciated by those who value its utilitarian charm, robust construction, and straightforward maintenance.
It is absolutely worth buying, but with specific conditions. As it's exclusively available used, prioritize a rust-free example, particularly in the frame and cab, as body repair can be extensive. Focus on trucks with a well-documented maintenance history. The 7.3L IDI diesel or 7.5L (460) gas V8 are excellent choices for heavy work, while the 4.9L I6 offers exceptional longevity for lighter duties. This truck is not for those prioritizing fuel efficiency, modern amenities, or refined ride quality. It's a testament to old-school durability, best appreciated by those who value its utilitarian charm, robust construction, and straightforward maintenance.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma