The 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty is part of the seventh generation of the iconic Ford F-Series trucks, produced from 1980 to 1986. As a heavy-duty model, it was built for demanding work. Available in various cab configurations (regular cab, SuperCab) and bed lengths, it was a workhorse. Key trims included the base, XLT, and XLT Lariat. Its popularity stemmed from its robust construction, powerful engine options, and legendary Ford toughness, making it a favorite for farmers, contractors, and those needing serious hauling and towing capability.
The Good
The 1983 F-250 Super Duty excels in raw performance and unwavering reliability, appealing to practical needs. Its commanding road presence and durable design evoke a sense of dependable strength for emotional connection. This truck offers exceptional value as a workhorse.
The Bad
When considering a 1983 F-250 Super Duty, watch out for rust, particularly in common areas like wheel wells, cab corners, and frame rails. Older electrical components can be finicky, and aging cooling systems may require attention. Engine wear and transmission issues are also possibilities.
1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty offered a selection of potent engines designed for work and power.
- 4.2L (255 ci) V8: A less common but available option for some configurations.
- Horsepower: Approximately 120-130 hp
- Torque: Around 190-200 lb-ft
- 5.0L (302 ci) V8: A popular choice providing a good balance of power and everyday drivability.
- Horsepower: Approximately 135-150 hp
- Torque: Around 230-250 lb-ft
- 5.8L (351 ci) V8: A more powerful option for those needing extra grunt.
- Horsepower: Approximately 160-185 hp
- Torque: Around 270-300 lb-ft
- 6.9L (420 ci) IDI V8 Diesel: The powerhouse option, known for its immense torque and durability.
- Horsepower: Approximately 170 hp
- Torque: Around 315 lb-ft
- 4.2L (255 ci) V8: A less common but available option for some configurations.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for these trucks was not a primary focus and varied significantly based on engine choice, transmission, and driving conditions. Expect figures generally in the range of 10-15 MPG combined for gasoline V8s, and potentially slightly better for the diesel depending on load.
- Gasoline V8s: ~10-14 MPG City / ~12-17 MPG Highway
- 6.9L Diesel: ~13-17 MPG Combined
- 0-60 Times: Official 0-60 mph times were not widely published for these heavy-duty trucks, as acceleration was not a primary design consideration. However, expect leisurely acceleration, likely in the 12-18 second range depending on engine and configuration.
- Approximate 0-60 mph: 12-18 seconds
- Towing Capacity: The F-250 Super Duty was built for towing. Towing capacity varied greatly with axle ratios, drivetrain (2WD/4WD), and specific factory options, but typically ranged from 7,000 lbs to well over 10,000 lbs for properly equipped models.
- Towing Capacity: 7,000 lbs - 12,500+ lbs (properly equipped)
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Provided essential functionality. Often included vinyl bench seats, basic gauges, and minimal trim.
- XLT: Offered a step up in comfort and appearance. Could include more comfortable seating, upgraded interior trim, and some convenience features like intermittent wipers.
- XLT Lariat: The top-tier trim, providing the most features and comfort. Typically included nicer upholstery (e.g., cloth inserts), more extensive interior and exterior brightwork, power steering, power brakes, and often air conditioning as an option.
1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty Specifications
No records to be displayed
Vehicle History Report
What Problems Does the 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty Have?
The 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty, while generally a robust truck, does have some common issues that owners and potential buyers should be aware of. One of the most pervasive problems is rust. Due to its age, significant corrosion can be found on the frame rails, especially around the rear axle and cab mounts. Wheel wells, rocker panels, and cab corners are also highly susceptible. Addressing rust early is crucial for structural integrity and long-term viability.
Another area of concern for these older trucks is the cooling system. Over time, radiators can corrode, hoses can crack and leak, and water pumps can fail. Overheating can lead to more serious engine damage, so regular inspection and maintenance of the cooling system are vital. The aging electrical systems can also be temperamental. Headlight switches, turn signal switches, and various relays can fail, leading to intermittent or complete loss of function. Wiring harnesses can degrade, causing shorts or corrosion at connectors.
For the gasoline engines, particularly the V8s, valve stem seals can wear out, leading to increased oil consumption and blue smoke on startup or deceleration. The carburetors, while generally reliable, can require tuning and rebuilding over time.
The 6.9L IDI diesel engine is renowned for its durability, but it's not immune to issues. Glow plug systems can become a point of failure, making cold starts difficult. Injectors can also require servicing. Fuel injection pumps, while robust, can eventually wear.
While specific major recalls for widespread catastrophic failures in the 1983 model year are not prominently documented, like any vehicle of this age, it's essential to check for any outstanding manufacturer service bulletins or recall campaigns that might have been issued retrospectively for common wear items or safety concerns. Overall long-term reliability is highly dependent on how the truck was maintained and used. Trucks that were regularly serviced, had rust addressed promptly, and weren't subjected to extreme abuse tend to be the most reliable. Conversely, neglected trucks can present a multitude of problems.
Another area of concern for these older trucks is the cooling system. Over time, radiators can corrode, hoses can crack and leak, and water pumps can fail. Overheating can lead to more serious engine damage, so regular inspection and maintenance of the cooling system are vital. The aging electrical systems can also be temperamental. Headlight switches, turn signal switches, and various relays can fail, leading to intermittent or complete loss of function. Wiring harnesses can degrade, causing shorts or corrosion at connectors.
For the gasoline engines, particularly the V8s, valve stem seals can wear out, leading to increased oil consumption and blue smoke on startup or deceleration. The carburetors, while generally reliable, can require tuning and rebuilding over time.
The 6.9L IDI diesel engine is renowned for its durability, but it's not immune to issues. Glow plug systems can become a point of failure, making cold starts difficult. Injectors can also require servicing. Fuel injection pumps, while robust, can eventually wear.
While specific major recalls for widespread catastrophic failures in the 1983 model year are not prominently documented, like any vehicle of this age, it's essential to check for any outstanding manufacturer service bulletins or recall campaigns that might have been issued retrospectively for common wear items or safety concerns. Overall long-term reliability is highly dependent on how the truck was maintained and used. Trucks that were regularly serviced, had rust addressed promptly, and weren't subjected to extreme abuse tend to be the most reliable. Conversely, neglected trucks can present a multitude of problems.
How long will the 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty last?
The 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty is a testament to long-term durability. With diligent maintenance, these trucks can easily surpass 200,000 miles and many have achieved well over 300,000 miles. The robust construction, particularly the frame and powertrain (especially the diesel engine), contributes to this longevity. However, the primary limiting factor over time is usually rust. Frame and body integrity can be compromised, making repairs extensive and costly. Regular fluid changes, attention to the cooling system, and timely rust prevention treatments are critical. While engines and transmissions can last for hundreds of thousands of miles, wear on other components like suspension, brakes, and interior parts is expected over several decades of service.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty represents a simpler era of automotive technology, with a focus on utility rather than advanced electronic features. Built-in tech was minimal by today's standards. Entertainment primarily consisted of an AM/FM radio, with an optional cassette player or even a CB radio for some users. Analog gauges provided essential information: speedometer, odometer, fuel level, engine temperature, oil pressure, and battery voltage. No digital displays or complex infotainment systems were present.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Power steering and power brakes were common options that significantly aided the driving experience and reduced driver fatigue. Cruise control was also an available option on higher trims, adding convenience for highway driving. Mirrors were manually adjusted.
Safety features were basic. The primary safety structure was the heavily built Ford body and frame, designed to absorb impacts. Seat belts were standard, typically a three-point lap and shoulder belt for the driver and passenger. Some models may have offered limited slip differentials as an option for improved traction. Airbags were not available in this model year. There were no electronic stability control or anti-lock braking systems.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this era are not directly comparable to modern standards and were often less stringent. Ford trucks of this generation were known for their sturdy construction, but without modern safety crumple zones and restraint systems, the impact on occupants in a severe collision would be considerably different than in contemporary vehicles. The emphasis was on a robust, durable vehicle rather than sophisticated passive or active safety systems.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Power steering and power brakes were common options that significantly aided the driving experience and reduced driver fatigue. Cruise control was also an available option on higher trims, adding convenience for highway driving. Mirrors were manually adjusted.
Safety features were basic. The primary safety structure was the heavily built Ford body and frame, designed to absorb impacts. Seat belts were standard, typically a three-point lap and shoulder belt for the driver and passenger. Some models may have offered limited slip differentials as an option for improved traction. Airbags were not available in this model year. There were no electronic stability control or anti-lock braking systems.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this era are not directly comparable to modern standards and were often less stringent. Ford trucks of this generation were known for their sturdy construction, but without modern safety crumple zones and restraint systems, the impact on occupants in a severe collision would be considerably different than in contemporary vehicles. The emphasis was on a robust, durable vehicle rather than sophisticated passive or active safety systems.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty Prices and Market Value
When new in 1983, the Ford F-250 Super Duty had a starting MSRP that typically ranged from approximately $10,000 to $15,000, depending on cab configuration, engine choice, and trim level. Options could significantly increase the final price. Due to their age, these trucks have long since passed their steepest depreciation curves. Current used market prices for a 1983 F-250 Super Duty vary dramatically. A project truck needing significant work might be found for $2,000-$5,000. Well-maintained examples, especially those with desirable engines like the 6.9L diesel or in good condition with low mileage, can fetch anywhere from $8,000 to $20,000 or more, particularly for rare configurations or pristine restorations. Factors affecting resale value include rust-free condition, original mileage, engine type (diesel usually commands a premium), trim level, overall condition, and documentation of maintenance.
1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty can range from economical to moderately costly, depending heavily on its condition and your usage. Insurance is generally affordable for older trucks, especially if not used as a daily driver. Fuel costs, particularly with the V8 gasoline engines, can be significant given their lower MPG. Maintenance is straightforward for those with mechanical aptitude, but parts availability for some specific items can be a challenge. Repair costs can escalate quickly if significant rust repair or major drivetrain work is needed. Long-term, these trucks are built to last, but expect ongoing costs for upkeep and potential repairs related to age. They are not typically considered economical daily drivers due to fuel consumption and potential maintenance needs.
1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty Fuel Efficiency
No records to be displayed
1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty Insurance
Insurance for a 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty Compare to Other Vehicle?
In the heavy-duty pickup truck segment of 1983, the Ford F-250 Super Duty faced stiff competition primarily from the Chevrolet C20/K20 Silverado and the Dodge Ram W250. In terms of raw performance, the F-250, especially with its larger V8s or the 6.9L diesel, offered competitive torque and towing capabilities, often rivaling or exceeding its contemporaries, particularly the diesel offering superior pulling power and longevity. Chevrolet's offerings often provided a slightly more refined ride and a wider range of engine options, though their diesel engines of the era were less powerful than Ford's 6.9L.
When it comes to features, the F-250 Super Duty, especially in XLT Lariat trim, was comparable to the Silverado, offering decent interior amenities for the time, though neither truck was a technological marvel. Both prioritized utility over luxury. Dodge's Ram trucks were generally seen as more basic in terms of interior appointments and available features during this period.
Reliability is where the F-250 Super Duty, particularly the diesel variants, truly shone. Ford's reputation for building tough, long-lasting trucks was well-earned. While all trucks of this age are susceptible to rust and aging components, the F-250's core mechanicals were often seen as exceptionally robust. Chevrolet's offerings were also generally reliable, but the Ford 6.9L diesel often had a longer service life than its GM counterparts of the same era.
Price-wise, these trucks were in a similar ballpark when new, with heavy-duty models commanding higher prices. Used market values now reflect their condition and desirability, with well-preserved or restored F-250 diesels often holding their value exceptionally well, sometimes surpassing comparable Chevys or Dodges.
Alternatives:
When it comes to features, the F-250 Super Duty, especially in XLT Lariat trim, was comparable to the Silverado, offering decent interior amenities for the time, though neither truck was a technological marvel. Both prioritized utility over luxury. Dodge's Ram trucks were generally seen as more basic in terms of interior appointments and available features during this period.
Reliability is where the F-250 Super Duty, particularly the diesel variants, truly shone. Ford's reputation for building tough, long-lasting trucks was well-earned. While all trucks of this age are susceptible to rust and aging components, the F-250's core mechanicals were often seen as exceptionally robust. Chevrolet's offerings were also generally reliable, but the Ford 6.9L diesel often had a longer service life than its GM counterparts of the same era.
Price-wise, these trucks were in a similar ballpark when new, with heavy-duty models commanding higher prices. Used market values now reflect their condition and desirability, with well-preserved or restored F-250 diesels often holding their value exceptionally well, sometimes surpassing comparable Chevys or Dodges.
Alternatives:
- Chevrolet C20/K20 Silverado: A strong contender, often offering a smoother ride and more V8 options. Reliability is good, but its diesel was less potent than the Ford's 6.9L.
- Dodge Ram W250: A rugged truck, though often considered more utilitarian and less refined than the Ford or Chevy in terms of features and interior comfort during this generation.
- For a more modern experience with similar capability: Consider later model Ford F-250s (late 90s onwards), Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD, or Ram 2500. These will offer significantly improved safety, technology, and fuel efficiency, but at a higher purchase price.
Final Verdict: Is the 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty a Good Vehicle?
The 1983 Ford F-250 Super Duty is ideal for individuals or businesses requiring a no-nonsense, heavy-duty workhorse for towing, hauling, or demanding off-road use. It's best suited for enthusiasts who appreciate vintage trucks and are willing to undertake regular maintenance and address age-related issues. Buying one is often worth it if you find a well-maintained, rust-free example, especially with the 6.9L diesel engine, which offers exceptional longevity and towing grunt. It is definitely a used vehicle purchase, as it hasn't been sold new for decades. Specific trims like the XLT Lariat offer more creature comforts, but the core value lies in the truck's fundamental robustness. It's a solid buy for those prioritizing capability and durability over modern amenities and fuel efficiency.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma