The 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty is a robust part of the iconic Ford F-Series truck lineage, known for its exceptional durability and capability. Produced within the seventh generation of F-Series trucks (1980-1986), it offered a traditional, heavy-duty pickup truck experience. Key trims often included the base, XLT Lariat, and the more work-oriented variants. Its popularity stems from its no-nonsense construction and its ability to handle tough jobs, making it a favorite for those seeking a reliable workhorse.
The Good
The 1982 F-250 Super Duty boasts legendary reliability and strong performance for hauling and towing. Its utilitarian design appeals to practicality, while its sheer capability evokes a sense of power and dependability for emotional connection.
The Bad
Owners should watch for rust, particularly around the wheel wells and frame. Older models may experience issues with carburetor performance, aging suspension components, and potential electrical gremlins due to age. Brake wear and fuel system upkeep are also common areas of concern.
1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty was available with a range of robust gasoline and diesel engines. The primary gasoline options included the 5.8L (351W) V8 and the larger 7.5L (460) V8. A notable diesel option was the 6.9L IDI V8.
- Horsepower: Horsepower varied significantly by engine. The 5.8L V8 typically produced around 150-160 horsepower, while the 7.5L V8 offered more grunt, likely in the 170-190 horsepower range. The 6.9L diesel produced approximately 170 horsepower but offered substantial torque.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy for this era of heavy-duty trucks was not a strong suit. Expect figures in the range of 10-14 MPG combined for gasoline engines, with the diesel potentially offering slightly better mileage under certain conditions, perhaps 12-16 MPG.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph times were generally leisurely for these trucks, with estimates often falling in the 12-16 second range, depending on the engine, drivetrain, and load.
- Towing Capacity: The F-250 Super Duty was designed for heavy lifting. Towing capacities varied greatly based on configuration (axle ratio, engine, 2WD/4WD) but could easily exceed 10,000 pounds and often reached up to 12,500 pounds or more for properly equipped models.
- Trim-Level Features:
Base: Featured essential functionality, vinyl seats, manual windows and locks, and a basic AM radio. Focused on work and utility.
XLT Lariat: Offered more comfort and convenience features, including upgraded upholstery, power steering, power brakes, a more premium sound system, and often exterior brightwork.
1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty Specifications
No records to be displayed
Vehicle History Report
What Problems Does the 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty Have?
The 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty, like many trucks from this era, is known for its general robustness but does have common areas that require attention as they age. Rust is a significant concern, particularly in areas exposed to salt and moisture. Wheel wells, rocker panels, cab corners, and the frame itself are prime spots to inspect. Carburetor issues are frequent with the gasoline engines, leading to rough idling, poor starting, or fuel delivery problems. The ignition system, including spark plugs, wires, and the distributor, can also require regular maintenance or replacement.
The diesel engine, while generally reliable, can suffer from issues with glow plug systems, leading to hard starting in cold weather. Fuel injection pumps and injectors can also become problematic over time. Suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and bushings, will wear out, leading to steering looseness and a less stable ride. The aging electrical systems are another common point of failure; owners may encounter issues with the alternator, starter, dashboard lights, and various sensors. Brake components, including calipers, rotors, and brake lines, will need regular inspection and replacement.
While specific recalls for the 1982 model year are not as widely documented as for more recent vehicles, general maintenance and part replacements are key to long-term reliability. The 6.9L IDI diesel is often lauded for its longevity if maintained properly, with many examples exceeding 300,000 miles. Gasoline engines, particularly the larger V8s, can also be very durable if not abused and regularly serviced. The overall build quality of the F-250 Super Duty from this period contributes to its reputation for lasting through decades of hard work, provided it receives consistent care.
The diesel engine, while generally reliable, can suffer from issues with glow plug systems, leading to hard starting in cold weather. Fuel injection pumps and injectors can also become problematic over time. Suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and bushings, will wear out, leading to steering looseness and a less stable ride. The aging electrical systems are another common point of failure; owners may encounter issues with the alternator, starter, dashboard lights, and various sensors. Brake components, including calipers, rotors, and brake lines, will need regular inspection and replacement.
While specific recalls for the 1982 model year are not as widely documented as for more recent vehicles, general maintenance and part replacements are key to long-term reliability. The 6.9L IDI diesel is often lauded for its longevity if maintained properly, with many examples exceeding 300,000 miles. Gasoline engines, particularly the larger V8s, can also be very durable if not abused and regularly serviced. The overall build quality of the F-250 Super Duty from this period contributes to its reputation for lasting through decades of hard work, provided it receives consistent care.
How long will the 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty last?
Based on owner data and maintenance habits, a well-maintained 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty can realistically achieve an average of 250,000 to 350,000 miles, with many examples surpassing 400,000 miles, especially the diesel variants. The long-term durability of these trucks is a testament to their robust construction and simpler mechanical designs. Key weaknesses that manifest over time include susceptibility to rust, especially in harsher climates, and wear and tear on suspension and drivetrain components. However, with consistent oil changes, fluid checks, and addressing minor issues promptly, the F-250 Super Duty is designed to endure, making it a reliable choice for many years of service.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty is a product of its time, meaning its technology, entertainment, and safety features are very basic by modern standards. Built-in tech was minimal, focusing on functionality rather than luxury or connectivity. The primary entertainment option was an AM radio, with an AM/FM radio often available as an optional upgrade. Some higher trims might have offered a cassette player.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Power steering and power brakes were common and highly appreciated options that significantly improved the driving experience. There were no electronic aids like anti-lock brakes (ABS), traction control, or stability control. The focus was on mechanical systems.
Safety features were also rudimentary. The primary safety considerations were the truck's substantial size and weight, which provided a degree of passive safety in a collision. Seatbelts were standard, and some models might have offered shoulder belts. The steering column was designed to collapse in a frontal impact, a significant safety advancement for the era. Airbags were not yet a standard or even common option for trucks.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from 1982 are not available in the same format as modern NHTSA or IIHS ratings. Safety testing protocols were far less rigorous. The F-250 Super Duty would likely perform poorly by today's standards in frontal and side impact tests, given the lack of advanced safety structures and restraint systems. However, for its time, it was built with a strong frame and body designed to withstand the demands of heavy-duty use, which offered a certain level of inherent robustness.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. Power steering and power brakes were common and highly appreciated options that significantly improved the driving experience. There were no electronic aids like anti-lock brakes (ABS), traction control, or stability control. The focus was on mechanical systems.
Safety features were also rudimentary. The primary safety considerations were the truck's substantial size and weight, which provided a degree of passive safety in a collision. Seatbelts were standard, and some models might have offered shoulder belts. The steering column was designed to collapse in a frontal impact, a significant safety advancement for the era. Airbags were not yet a standard or even common option for trucks.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles from 1982 are not available in the same format as modern NHTSA or IIHS ratings. Safety testing protocols were far less rigorous. The F-250 Super Duty would likely perform poorly by today's standards in frontal and side impact tests, given the lack of advanced safety structures and restraint systems. However, for its time, it was built with a strong frame and body designed to withstand the demands of heavy-duty use, which offered a certain level of inherent robustness.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty had a base price that typically started in the low to mid-$10,000 range, with higher trims and optional equipment pushing the price significantly higher, potentially into the $15,000-$20,000 bracket for fully equipped models. As with most trucks, especially work-oriented ones, depreciation was relatively steep in the initial years. However, for the 1982 F-250 Super Duty today, its value is primarily driven by condition, mileage, and the presence of desirable features like the diesel engine or four-wheel drive. Well-maintained examples in good working order can fetch anywhere from $5,000 to $15,000+, with pristine, low-mileage models commanding even higher prices, especially among collectors and enthusiasts. Factors affecting resale include rust, mechanical condition, and overall originality.
1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty Cost of Ownership
Owning a 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty can be a mixed bag cost-wise. Insurance is generally reasonable, often falling into the classic or older vehicle rates, especially if used for non-commercial purposes. Fuel costs will be high due to the large engines and poor fuel economy, particularly with the gasoline V8s. Maintenance is relatively straightforward and parts are generally available, though some specialized items might be harder to find. Repair costs can vary; while simpler mechanical fixes are manageable, extensive rust repair or major engine/transmission work can be substantial. Overall, it is not an economical vehicle to own from a fuel and maintenance perspective, but its durability can offset some costs over the long haul.
1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty Fuel Efficiency
No records to be displayed
1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty Insurance
Insurance for a 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Vehicle with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty Compare to Other Vehicle?
The 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty competed primarily against the Chevrolet C20/K20 (later Silverado 2500) and the Dodge Ram W250/D250. In terms of performance, the F-250, especially with the 7.5L V8 or the 6.9L diesel, offered competitive towing and hauling capabilities, often rivaling or surpassing its contemporaries. Chevrolet's offerings, particularly with their big-block V8s, were also strong contenders in raw power.
Features were generally comparable across all three brands in 1982. They offered basic amenities, with optional upgrades for comfort and convenience like power steering, power brakes, and better radios. None offered advanced technology or driver aids. Ford's XLT Lariat trim was often seen as a slightly more upscale option than comparable trims from GM or Dodge at the time.
Reliability is where the F-250 Super Duty shines, particularly the diesel variants. Ford's older trucks are renowned for their robust construction and longevity when maintained. While all trucks of this era had their common issues (rust, carburetors, aging electricals), the Ford often held up well under strenuous use. Chevrolet also had a good reputation for durability, while Dodge trucks sometimes lagged slightly in overall build quality and perceived reliability during this specific period.
Price-wise, the F-250 was competitively positioned. New prices were in a similar ballpark to its rivals. Used market prices today reflect their classic status and capability.
Similar Alternatives:
Better Alternatives (depending on needs):
Features were generally comparable across all three brands in 1982. They offered basic amenities, with optional upgrades for comfort and convenience like power steering, power brakes, and better radios. None offered advanced technology or driver aids. Ford's XLT Lariat trim was often seen as a slightly more upscale option than comparable trims from GM or Dodge at the time.
Reliability is where the F-250 Super Duty shines, particularly the diesel variants. Ford's older trucks are renowned for their robust construction and longevity when maintained. While all trucks of this era had their common issues (rust, carburetors, aging electricals), the Ford often held up well under strenuous use. Chevrolet also had a good reputation for durability, while Dodge trucks sometimes lagged slightly in overall build quality and perceived reliability during this specific period.
Price-wise, the F-250 was competitively positioned. New prices were in a similar ballpark to its rivals. Used market prices today reflect their classic status and capability.
Similar Alternatives:
- 1982 Chevrolet C20/K20: A very similar offering with strong performance and reliability, often with more readily available parts in some regions.
- 1982 Dodge Ram W250/D250: A capable alternative, though sometimes perceived as having slightly less refinement or long-term durability compared to Ford or Chevy in this era.
Better Alternatives (depending on needs):
- Later model year F-250s (e.g., 1987-1997 OBS): Offer improved technology, safety, and often better fuel efficiency while retaining a rugged build.
- Newer heavy-duty trucks: If modern features, safety, and significantly better fuel economy are paramount, contemporary heavy-duty trucks from any manufacturer would be a logical step up, though at a considerably higher cost.
Final Verdict: Is the 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty a Good Vehicle?
The 1982 Ford F-250 Super Duty is ideal for enthusiasts, tradespeople, or anyone seeking a straightforward, powerful, and durable truck for heavy-duty tasks like towing, hauling, or off-roading. It is worth buying if you prioritize capability, simplicity, and the charm of a classic American workhorse over modern amenities and fuel efficiency. It's a used vehicle purchase, as new ones are obviously unavailable. Look for examples with minimal rust and a well-documented maintenance history. The diesel variants are particularly sought after for their longevity and torque. Be prepared for higher fuel costs and potential age-related maintenance, but the reward is a truck built to last.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma