The 1986 Ford Ranger, part of the first generation introduced in 1983, solidified its place as a compact and capable pickup truck. Available in regular and extended cab body styles, it offered a range of trims like the base XL, the sportier XLS, and the rugged STX. New pricing in 1986 typically ranged from around $7,000 to $13,000, depending on configuration. Its popularity stemmed from its affordability, manageable size, and dependable workhorse reputation, making it a practical choice for daily use and light-duty hauling.
The Good
The 1986 Ford Ranger offers robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, appealing to practical buyers. Its straightforward design and nimble handling evoke a sense of dependable simplicity, while its affordable price and excellent value proposition resonate with those seeking a no-nonsense, capable truck.
The Bad
Potential buyers should watch out for rust, particularly in the wheel wells, rocker panels, and frame. Electrical gremlins, especially with older wiring harnesses, can be an issue. Interior wear and tear, along with aging suspension components, are also common concerns to inspect.
1986 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1986 Ford Ranger offered a selection of gasoline engines. The base engine was typically a 2.0-liter inline-four. Optional engines included a larger 2.9-liter V6. Diesel options were also available in some configurations, though less common.
- Horsepower: Horsepower varied significantly by engine. The 2.0-liter inline-four generally produced around 80-85 horsepower. The 2.9-liter V6 offered more grunt, with figures in the range of 110-115 horsepower. Diesel engines had lower horsepower but higher torque.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy was a strong suit for the Ranger, especially with the four-cylinder engines. Depending on the engine, transmission, and drivetrain (2WD or 4WD), owners could expect to see figures in the range of 18-25 MPG combined.
- 0-60 Times: 0-60 mph times were not a primary focus for the Ranger and would vary widely. With the smaller engines, acceleration was modest, often taking 12-15 seconds or more. The V6 offered slightly quicker acceleration.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity for the 1986 Ranger was respectable for its class, typically ranging from around 1,000 lbs to over 4,000 lbs when properly equipped with the correct towing packages and engine. This made it suitable for small trailers or recreational equipment.
- Trim-Level Features:
- XL: The base trim, offering essential features like vinyl seats, manual windows and locks, and a basic AM/FM radio.
- XLS: This trim often added more creature comforts such as upgraded interior trim, a better stereo system, and sometimes exterior styling enhancements.
- STX: Positioned as a sportier option, the STX often featured unique badging, sportier seat upholstery, alloy wheels, and sometimes performance-oriented suspension tuning or appearance packages.
- Optional Features: Common optional features across trims included air conditioning, power steering, power brakes, cruise control, intermittent wipers, and various bed liners and cargo management accessories. Four-wheel drive was also a significant option for many models.
1986 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1986 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | 2-Door Regular Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | ST. PAUL |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.9-L V-6 |
| Engine Size | 2.9L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1986 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1986 Ford Ranger, like many vehicles of its era, is susceptible to certain common issues that owners should be aware of. One of the most prevalent concerns is **rust**. This can manifest in various areas, including the rocker panels, wheel wells, cab corners, and undercarriage, particularly in regions with harsh winters or high humidity. Significant rust can compromise structural integrity and lead to costly repairs.
Another area to watch for is the **electrical system**. Over time, wiring harnesses can degrade, leading to intermittent electrical problems, such as malfunctioning lights, wipers, or gauges. Faulty sensors, particularly for the engine management system, can also cause drivability issues.
The **cooling system** is another potential weak point. Radiators can develop leaks, and water pumps may fail, leading to overheating if not addressed promptly. Heater cores can also leak, causing interior moisture issues and a loss of heating function.
Regarding engine reliability, while generally robust, the **carburetor** on older models can require periodic adjustments and maintenance to ensure optimal performance and fuel efficiency. The **clutch** on manual transmission models can also wear out over time, especially with heavy use.
In terms of recalls, specific recalls for the 1986 model year would need to be researched through official NHTSA databases, as they can vary. However, general concerns for trucks of this age might include issues related to braking systems or fuel system components.
Long-term reliability is often dependent on the level of maintenance performed. A well-maintained 1986 Ranger can still be a dependable vehicle, but a neglected one is more likely to exhibit a cascade of problems. The simplicity of its design is a double-edged sword; it makes repairs more accessible but also means that wear and tear on individual components are inevitable over decades.
Another area to watch for is the **electrical system**. Over time, wiring harnesses can degrade, leading to intermittent electrical problems, such as malfunctioning lights, wipers, or gauges. Faulty sensors, particularly for the engine management system, can also cause drivability issues.
The **cooling system** is another potential weak point. Radiators can develop leaks, and water pumps may fail, leading to overheating if not addressed promptly. Heater cores can also leak, causing interior moisture issues and a loss of heating function.
Regarding engine reliability, while generally robust, the **carburetor** on older models can require periodic adjustments and maintenance to ensure optimal performance and fuel efficiency. The **clutch** on manual transmission models can also wear out over time, especially with heavy use.
In terms of recalls, specific recalls for the 1986 model year would need to be researched through official NHTSA databases, as they can vary. However, general concerns for trucks of this age might include issues related to braking systems or fuel system components.
Long-term reliability is often dependent on the level of maintenance performed. A well-maintained 1986 Ranger can still be a dependable vehicle, but a neglected one is more likely to exhibit a cascade of problems. The simplicity of its design is a double-edged sword; it makes repairs more accessible but also means that wear and tear on individual components are inevitable over decades.
How long will the 1986 Ford Ranger last?
Based on owner data and maintenance habits, a well-maintained 1986 Ford Ranger can realistically achieve **200,000 to 300,000 miles**, or even more. These trucks are known for their inherent durability, especially the chassis and drivetrain components when properly cared for. Regular oil changes, timely fluid flushes, and addressing minor issues before they escalate are crucial. However, long-term weaknesses typically revolve around susceptibility to rust, which can severely limit its lifespan in corrosive environments. Electrical components and wear items like suspension bushings and exhaust systems will eventually require replacement. Despite these potential issues, the Ranger's simple mechanical design contributes to its longevity, making it a durable choice for those willing to invest in upkeep.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1986 Ford Ranger was a product of its time, and as such, its technology, entertainment, and safety features were relatively basic compared to modern vehicles.
Technology and Entertainment:
The standard entertainment system typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. Optional upgrades often included an AM/FM stereo with cassette player, offering a significant advancement for audio enthusiasts of the era. Features like a tachometer were often part of optional gauge packages, particularly on sportier trims. Power windows and power door locks were rare options and usually found on higher trim levels or as part of specific option packages.
Driver-Assistance Features:
Driver-assistance technologies as we know them today were virtually non-existent in the 1986 Ford Ranger. There were no advanced cruise control systems, lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring, or automatic emergency braking. The focus was on the fundamental operation of the vehicle. Power steering was a common option that greatly aided maneuverability, especially at lower speeds.
Safety Features:
Safety features were also quite rudimentary. Standard safety equipment generally included seat belts (lap belts in the front, with shoulder belts becoming more common). Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was not widely available or standard on the Ranger in 1986; it was a cutting-edge feature for luxury vehicles at the time. Airbags were not present. The truck's construction offered a degree of passive safety through its metal frame and body panels, but the lack of modern safety restraints and active safety systems means occupants would be more vulnerable in a collision compared to contemporary vehicles.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for vehicles from the mid-1980s are often scarce or may not have been conducted using the same rigorous methodologies as today. Given the safety standards of the era, it's unlikely the 1986 Ranger would perform well by today's stringent safety benchmarks.
Technology and Entertainment:
The standard entertainment system typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. Optional upgrades often included an AM/FM stereo with cassette player, offering a significant advancement for audio enthusiasts of the era. Features like a tachometer were often part of optional gauge packages, particularly on sportier trims. Power windows and power door locks were rare options and usually found on higher trim levels or as part of specific option packages.
Driver-Assistance Features:
Driver-assistance technologies as we know them today were virtually non-existent in the 1986 Ford Ranger. There were no advanced cruise control systems, lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring, or automatic emergency braking. The focus was on the fundamental operation of the vehicle. Power steering was a common option that greatly aided maneuverability, especially at lower speeds.
Safety Features:
Safety features were also quite rudimentary. Standard safety equipment generally included seat belts (lap belts in the front, with shoulder belts becoming more common). Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was not widely available or standard on the Ranger in 1986; it was a cutting-edge feature for luxury vehicles at the time. Airbags were not present. The truck's construction offered a degree of passive safety through its metal frame and body panels, but the lack of modern safety restraints and active safety systems means occupants would be more vulnerable in a collision compared to contemporary vehicles.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Official crash-test ratings from organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS for vehicles from the mid-1980s are often scarce or may not have been conducted using the same rigorous methodologies as today. Given the safety standards of the era, it's unlikely the 1986 Ranger would perform well by today's stringent safety benchmarks.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1986 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
In 1986, the Ford Ranger had a starting MSRP typically ranging from around $7,000 for a base model to over $13,000 for a more optioned-out variant. As a compact pickup from the mid-80s, the Ranger experienced significant depreciation in its early years. However, due to its enduring popularity and reputation for durability, its depreciation curve flattened considerably over time, especially for well-maintained examples.
Current used market prices for a 1986 Ford Ranger can vary wildly, from as little as $1,000-$3,000 for projects or high-mileage vehicles needing work, to $5,000-$10,000 or even more for pristine, low-mileage, and highly optioned models (like STX trims with desirable engines). Factors affecting resale value include the condition of the body (rust is a major detractor), mechanical soundness, original mileage, drivetrain configuration (4WD often commands a premium), and the presence of original documentation or desirable factory options.
Current used market prices for a 1986 Ford Ranger can vary wildly, from as little as $1,000-$3,000 for projects or high-mileage vehicles needing work, to $5,000-$10,000 or even more for pristine, low-mileage, and highly optioned models (like STX trims with desirable engines). Factors affecting resale value include the condition of the body (rust is a major detractor), mechanical soundness, original mileage, drivetrain configuration (4WD often commands a premium), and the presence of original documentation or desirable factory options.
1986 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1986 Ford Ranger is generally considered an economical vehicle to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and basic safety features. Fuel costs are reasonable, especially with the four-cylinder engines, offering good MPG for its class. Maintenance costs are moderate; while routine servicing like oil changes and tire rotations are inexpensive, parts for older vehicles can sometimes be harder to find or more costly, especially for specific body panels or rare options. Repairs are generally straightforward due to its simple mechanical design, making DIY fixes feasible for many owners. Overall, the Ranger is economical to own, provided you are prepared for the possibility of age-related repairs and diligent rust prevention.
1986 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1986 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Recall date
1998-04-08
Recall no.
98e010000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Equipment Description: Aftermarket Brake Rotors FOR USE ON Certain Ford and Mazda Trucks. Cracked Castings Caused Cracks TO Appear ON THE Outer Diameter OF THE Rotor HAT or Around THE Stud Hole.
Consequence
Loss OF Braking CAN Result.
Remedy
Aimco Will Reimburse Consumers/Installers FOR THE Cost OF Replacement Rotors and Installation. Consumers ARE Requested TO Return TO THE Location Where THE Rotors Were Originally Purchased/Installed FOR Replacement.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin During April 1998.owners WHO DO NOT Receive THE Free Rotors Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Aimco AT 815-759-7935.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Seats
Recall date
1988-09-02
Recall no.
88v145000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Wiring FOR THE Power Lumbar Seat System WAS Routed Directly Beneath THE Seat Cushion Springs and MAY BE Abraded BY THE Springs.
Consequence
This Could Result IN A Short Circuit Which MAY Createsufficient Heat TO Start A Fire IN THE Seat Cushion PAD And/Or Trim Cover.
Remedy
Install A Fuse Within THE Power Lumbar Electrical Circuit.
Notes
System: Wiring FOR Power Lumbar Seats.vehicle Description: Multipurpose Vehicles and Trucks Equipped With Power Lumbarseat Adjusters IN THE Front Seats.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
1987-09-04
Recall no.
87v139000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Spring Lock Fuel Line Coupling MAY NOT BE Properly Engaged.
Consequence
Coupling Could Disengage DUE TO Fuel Pressure,vibration, and Engine Movements; This Would Cause Loss OF Fuel Which, Inpresence OF AN Ignition Source, Creates A Fire Risk.
Remedy
Install Retainer Clips Over THE Couplings TO Prevent Coupling Separation and Fuel Leakage.
Notes
System: Fuel Line Couplingvehicle Description: Passenger Cars and Light Trucks Equipped With Fuelinjection.
Electrical System:wiring:front Underhood
Recall date
1985-09-24
Recall no.
85v116000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Electronic Engine Control Wiring Harness Insulation MAY BE Damaged DUE TO Copper Spikes Produced During THE Welding OF ITS Wires. This Creates A Potential FOR A Short Circuit Between THE Wires Which Energize THE Fuel Pump, Causing Some Fuel Injectors TO Open, Discharging Fuel Into THE Engine. Consequence OF Defect: Fuel Discharged Into THE Engine Would Eventually Leak Through THE Exhaust System TO THE Ground. This Could Result IN A Fire IF A Source OF Ignition IS Present.
Consequence
Remedy
Repair Wiring Harness, Check Engine and Catalyst FOR Damage.
Notes
Vehicle Description: Light Trucks Equipped With 2.9 Liter Engine. System: Electronic Engine Control Wiring Harness.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
1985-10-18
Recall no.
85v130000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Nylon Fuel Lines ON THE Fuel Return Side OF THE Fuel Pressure Regulator Assembly MAY Crack. Consequence OF Defect: Fuel Line Could Leak And, IF AN Ignition Source IS Present, Create THE Potential FOR A Fire.
Consequence
Remedy
Replace Nylon Fuel Hoses With Rubber Hoses.
Notes
System: Fuel Lines.vehicle Description: Light Trucks With 2.9 Liter V-6 Engines.
1986 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1986 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1986 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1986 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1986 Ford Ranger competed in a crowded compact pickup truck market against formidable rivals such as the Chevrolet S-10/GMC S-15, Nissan Hardbody (D21), Toyota Pickup (pre-Tacoma), and Mazda B-Series.
Performance: The Ranger offered a range of engines, from economical four-cylinders to more potent V6s. In terms of outright acceleration, it was generally competitive with the S-10 and B-Series, but the Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody often felt a bit more peppy and refined. The Ranger's handling was utilitarian, focused on capability rather than sportiness.
Features: Features were basic across the board for this era. The Ranger offered standard amenities and optional upgrades similar to its contemporaries. While the S-10 and Ranger might have had slightly more comfort-oriented options available, the Japanese trucks, particularly the Toyota and Nissan, were sometimes praised for their slightly more modern interior designs and better build quality in certain aspects.
Reliability: The 1986 Ranger was generally considered reliable, but it faced strong competition. The Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody built legendary reputations for bulletproof reliability, often outlasting their domestic counterparts in terms of long-term mechanical endurance. The S-10 was also a strong contender, though some years had more reported issues than the Japanese trucks. Rust was a more significant concern for the Ranger and S-10 compared to the galvanizing used in later Japanese pickups.
Price: The Ranger, along with the S-10, typically offered very competitive pricing, often undercutting their Japanese rivals when new. This affordability was a major selling point.
Alternatives:
* Toyota Pickup (pre-Tacoma): If absolute long-term reliability and legendary durability are the top priorities, the 1986 Toyota Pickup is an excellent alternative. They are known to run for hundreds of thousands of miles with proper care.
* Nissan Hardbody (D21): Similar to the Toyota, the Hardbody offers strong reliability and a robust build. They often have a slightly more aggressive styling.
* Chevrolet S-10/GMC S-15: A very similar domestic alternative offering comparable utility and available options. Prices might be slightly lower on the used market for equivalent condition.
The 1986 Ford Ranger remains a solid choice for its value and practicality, but for the ultimate in longevity and robust engineering, the Japanese competitors often hold an edge.
Performance: The Ranger offered a range of engines, from economical four-cylinders to more potent V6s. In terms of outright acceleration, it was generally competitive with the S-10 and B-Series, but the Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody often felt a bit more peppy and refined. The Ranger's handling was utilitarian, focused on capability rather than sportiness.
Features: Features were basic across the board for this era. The Ranger offered standard amenities and optional upgrades similar to its contemporaries. While the S-10 and Ranger might have had slightly more comfort-oriented options available, the Japanese trucks, particularly the Toyota and Nissan, were sometimes praised for their slightly more modern interior designs and better build quality in certain aspects.
Reliability: The 1986 Ranger was generally considered reliable, but it faced strong competition. The Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody built legendary reputations for bulletproof reliability, often outlasting their domestic counterparts in terms of long-term mechanical endurance. The S-10 was also a strong contender, though some years had more reported issues than the Japanese trucks. Rust was a more significant concern for the Ranger and S-10 compared to the galvanizing used in later Japanese pickups.
Price: The Ranger, along with the S-10, typically offered very competitive pricing, often undercutting their Japanese rivals when new. This affordability was a major selling point.
Alternatives:
* Toyota Pickup (pre-Tacoma): If absolute long-term reliability and legendary durability are the top priorities, the 1986 Toyota Pickup is an excellent alternative. They are known to run for hundreds of thousands of miles with proper care.
* Nissan Hardbody (D21): Similar to the Toyota, the Hardbody offers strong reliability and a robust build. They often have a slightly more aggressive styling.
* Chevrolet S-10/GMC S-15: A very similar domestic alternative offering comparable utility and available options. Prices might be slightly lower on the used market for equivalent condition.
The 1986 Ford Ranger remains a solid choice for its value and practicality, but for the ultimate in longevity and robust engineering, the Japanese competitors often hold an edge.
Final Verdict: Is the 1986 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1986 Ford Ranger is an ideal vehicle for budget-conscious buyers seeking a practical, no-frills compact pickup for light-duty tasks, daily commuting, or as a reliable workhorse. It's particularly well-suited for individuals who appreciate straightforward mechanical simplicity and are willing to perform basic maintenance.
Whether it's worth buying depends heavily on condition. A well-maintained, rust-free example with the desirable V6 engine and 4WD can be a fantastic value. However, one with significant rust or mechanical issues might become a money pit. It is almost exclusively a used purchase, as new ones are obviously unavailable.
For those looking for maximum dependability and longevity, exploring a clean Toyota Pickup or Nissan Hardbody from the same era might be a slightly safer bet in terms of outright mechanical endurance. However, the Ranger offers comparable utility and often at a more accessible price point, making it a worthy consideration for those who prioritize value and capability.
Whether it's worth buying depends heavily on condition. A well-maintained, rust-free example with the desirable V6 engine and 4WD can be a fantastic value. However, one with significant rust or mechanical issues might become a money pit. It is almost exclusively a used purchase, as new ones are obviously unavailable.
For those looking for maximum dependability and longevity, exploring a clean Toyota Pickup or Nissan Hardbody from the same era might be a slightly safer bet in terms of outright mechanical endurance. However, the Ranger offers comparable utility and often at a more accessible price point, making it a worthy consideration for those who prioritize value and capability.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.