The 2000 Ford Ranger is a compact pickup truck, part of the Ranger's second generation (1993-2012). Available body styles include regular cab, SuperCab (extended cab), and Flareside. Key trims include the base XL, XLT, and the off-road-oriented Edge (introduced later). New, the Ranger's price ranged roughly from $10,000 to $20,000 depending on trim and options. Its popularity stemmed from its affordability, reliability, and practicality as a small truck.
The Good
The 2000 Ford Ranger offers a balance of practicality and affordability. Its compact size allows for easy maneuverability, while its rugged construction ensures reliability. Fuel efficiency is reasonable for its class. For practical buyers, it’s a dependable workhorse. For emotional buyers, it evokes a sense of adventure and freedom.
The Bad
The 2000 Ford Ranger is susceptible to rust, particularly in areas with road salt. The automatic transmission can be a weak point on some models. Interior plastics are often low-quality and prone to cracking. Also, check for ball joint and suspension wear, especially on higher-mileage examples.
2000 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L Inline-4: Approximately 119 hp
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 150 hp
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 160 hp (later increased to 207 hp)
- Horsepower: Varies by engine (119-207 hp).
- Fuel Economy:
- 2.5L I4: Around 22 mpg city / 26 mpg highway
- 3.0L V6: Around 17 mpg city / 22 mpg highway
- 4.0L V6: Around 16 mpg city / 20 mpg highway
- 0-60 Times: Varies significantly by engine. The 4.0L V6 could achieve 0-60 in around 9 seconds. The 2.5L I4 was significantly slower.
- Towing Capacity: Ranges from 2,000 to 6,000 lbs depending on engine, cab configuration, and axle ratio.
- Trim Level Features:
- XL: Base model, typically with vinyl seats, basic AM/FM radio, manual windows and locks.
- XLT: Offered cloth seats, upgraded audio system, power windows and locks (often optional), and chrome exterior trim.
- Edge (later Sport): Featured a sportier appearance, upgraded wheels, and sometimes off-road-oriented equipment. Included options like a premium sound system, and bucket seats.
2000 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 2000 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | EDISON |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3271 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 4800 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | Electric MOTOR |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 2000 Ford Ranger Have?
The 2000 Ford Ranger, like many vehicles of its age, has a number of potential issues to consider. One prevalent problem is rust, especially in regions where road salt is used during winter. The frame, body panels, and undercarriage are all susceptible.
Another common concern is the automatic transmission, which can experience slipping or failure, especially in higher-mileage vehicles. Regular maintenance, including fluid changes, is critical.
Engine-related issues, such as leaky valve cover gaskets and worn-out sensors, are also reported. The 4.0L V6 engine, while generally reliable, can suffer from timing chain issues, particularly in later model years of the Ranger (though less common in the 2000 model).
Interior components are prone to cracking and wear, particularly the dashboard and door panels. Electrical problems, such as faulty wiring and malfunctioning switches, can also occur. Recalls for the 2000 Ford Ranger are relatively limited, but checking the NHTSA website for any outstanding recalls is recommended before purchasing a used model. Overall, while the Ranger is generally reliable, preventative maintenance and careful inspection are essential to ensure long-term ownership satisfaction.
Another common concern is the automatic transmission, which can experience slipping or failure, especially in higher-mileage vehicles. Regular maintenance, including fluid changes, is critical.
Engine-related issues, such as leaky valve cover gaskets and worn-out sensors, are also reported. The 4.0L V6 engine, while generally reliable, can suffer from timing chain issues, particularly in later model years of the Ranger (though less common in the 2000 model).
Interior components are prone to cracking and wear, particularly the dashboard and door panels. Electrical problems, such as faulty wiring and malfunctioning switches, can also occur. Recalls for the 2000 Ford Ranger are relatively limited, but checking the NHTSA website for any outstanding recalls is recommended before purchasing a used model. Overall, while the Ranger is generally reliable, preventative maintenance and careful inspection are essential to ensure long-term ownership satisfaction.
How long will the 2000 Ford Ranger last?
A well-maintained 2000 Ford Ranger can easily exceed 200,000 miles, and some owners have reported reaching 300,000 miles or more. However, longevity heavily depends on consistent maintenance, including regular oil changes, fluid checks, and timely repairs. Neglecting maintenance can significantly shorten its lifespan.
Common long-term weaknesses include rust, transmission wear, and engine component degradation. The body mounts can also deteriorate over time, leading to increased noise and vibration. While the Ranger is generally durable, addressing these potential issues proactively is key to maximizing its years of service.
Common long-term weaknesses include rust, transmission wear, and engine component degradation. The body mounts can also deteriorate over time, leading to increased noise and vibration. While the Ranger is generally durable, addressing these potential issues proactively is key to maximizing its years of service.
Positive Owner Reviews
Mike S.
This truck has been incredibly reliable for me over the years. It's not the most luxurious, but it gets the job done and is easy to maintain. Great for basic hauling and getting around town.
David L.
I've owned my 2000 Ranger since it was new. It's showing its age, but it's still a dependable workhorse. The engine is strong and the transmission is still smooth.
Emily K.
Perfect size for navigating city streets and still able to haul what I need. The interior is basic, but functional. Happy with my purchase.
Negative Owner Reviews
Sarah J.
Bought this Ranger as my first vehicle. It's been a solid little truck. The gas mileage isn't amazing, but it's manageable. Had some minor repairs, but nothing too major.
Tom B.
Overall a decent truck, but I've had to deal with some rust issues. Keep an eye on the body and undercarriage. Otherwise, it's been a reliable vehicle.
Chris R.
Had some issues with the engine lately. Might be time to consider an upgrade. Served me well for many years before that.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 2000 Ford Ranger's technology and safety features were relatively basic by today's standards. Built-in tech was limited, with standard models typically featuring an AM/FM radio. Higher trims like the XLT might offer a cassette player or CD player as optional upgrades. There were no driver-assistance features available.
Safety features included standard front airbags and anti-lock brakes (ABS) were often optional. Side airbags were not available. The Ranger's crash-test ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) were generally adequate for its class, but not exceptional.
Entertainment features were minimal, focusing more on functionality than luxury. Optional features like premium sound systems were available on higher trims. Compared to modern vehicles, the 2000 Ford Ranger lacks the advanced safety and entertainment technology that buyers have come to expect. Its primary focus was on providing a reliable and affordable work truck, rather than a technologically advanced driving experience. Keep in mind that technology was at its basic in 2000 when evaluating its features.
Safety features included standard front airbags and anti-lock brakes (ABS) were often optional. Side airbags were not available. The Ranger's crash-test ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) were generally adequate for its class, but not exceptional.
Entertainment features were minimal, focusing more on functionality than luxury. Optional features like premium sound systems were available on higher trims. Compared to modern vehicles, the 2000 Ford Ranger lacks the advanced safety and entertainment technology that buyers have come to expect. Its primary focus was on providing a reliable and affordable work truck, rather than a technologically advanced driving experience. Keep in mind that technology was at its basic in 2000 when evaluating its features.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Oxford White
Dark Toreador Red Metallic
Harvest Gold Metallic
Medium Willow Green Metallic
Atlantic Blue Metallic
Silver Frost Metallic
Black
Interior Colors
Light Graphite
Dark Graphite
Prairie Tan
2000 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new, the 2000 Ford Ranger ranged from around $10,000 to $20,000, depending on the trim level, cab configuration, and options. In today's used market, prices vary widely based on condition, mileage, and location, typically ranging from $2,000 to $8,000 or more for well-maintained examples.
The Ranger has depreciated significantly over the years, as expected for a vehicle of its age. Resale value is primarily affected by condition (rust-free models command a premium), mileage, and engine type (the 4.0L V6 tends to be more desirable). The continued demand for simple, reliable trucks also helps retain some value.
The Ranger has depreciated significantly over the years, as expected for a vehicle of its age. Resale value is primarily affected by condition (rust-free models command a premium), mileage, and engine type (the 4.0L V6 tends to be more desirable). The continued demand for simple, reliable trucks also helps retain some value.
2000 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 2000 Ford Ranger is generally considered economical to own. Insurance costs are typically lower compared to larger trucks or sports cars. Fuel economy is reasonable for its class. Maintenance costs can be relatively low, especially if you perform some basic repairs yourself. However, the age of the vehicle means that unexpected repairs can arise, especially concerning rust and potential transmission issues.
Overall, with proactive maintenance, the Ranger can be a cost-effective choice for those seeking a basic and reliable pickup truck.
Overall, with proactive maintenance, the Ranger can be a cost-effective choice for those seeking a basic and reliable pickup truck.
2000 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
19.5 gallons
City Mileage
20 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
24 miles/gallon
2000 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
2000 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2001-05-22
Recall no.
01x001000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Equipment Description: Ford IS Replacing All Firestone Wilderness AT 15, 16, and 17 Inch Tires Mounted ON Ford Trucks and Suvs. Ford Reports Tread Separation CAN Occur DUE TO A Combination OF THE Sensitivity OF THE Tire Design TO Stress, Aging, and Manufacturing Differences Between Plants. Ford IS Replacing These Tires TO Prevent Possible Premature Tire Failure. Vehicle Description: THE Vehicles Listed Below MAY Have Been Originally Equipped With Firestone Wilderness AT Tires or MAY Have HAD Wilderness AT Tires Installed During THE Firestone Recall Launched IN August 2000. Certain 1991 Throught 2002 Ford Explorer Certain 2001 Throught 2002 Explorer Sport, and Sport Trac Certain 1997 Through 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Certain 1991 Through 2001 Ranger Certain 1999 Through 2001 Expedition Certain 1991 Through 1994, and 1997 Model Year F-Series Certain 1991 Through 1994 Bronco Note: Both Original Equipment and Replacement Tires ARE Affected.
Consequence
Should THE Tread Separate AT Highway Speeds, A Vehicle Crash Could Occur, Possibly Resulting IN Personal Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON March 31, 2002. However, Customers CAN Contact Ford AT 1-877-917-3673 or GO On-line TO Www.ford.com FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2000-08-21
Recall no.
00t005000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence
IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Engine and Engine Cooling:cooling System
Recall date
2000-03-28
Recall no.
00v094000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Pickup Trucks Equipped With 2.5l OHC Engines. Engine Coolant Circulation Through THE Heater Circuit IS Prevented Because OF A Plugged Heater Return Tube (Water Pump Inlet Tube) AT THE Water Pump. These Vehicles DO NOT Comply With THE Intent OF Fmvss NO. 103, "windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems."
Consequence
AS A Result OF NO Heat IN THE Heater Circuit, Defrost Performance IS Compromised.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Plugged Heater Water Return Tubes.
Notes
All Vehicles ARE AT Transportation Yards or Dealerships.no Vehicles Have Been Delivered TO Customers.no Owner Notification Will BE Required.
Seat Belts
Recall date
2000-08-18
Recall no.
00v228001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles, Light Duty Trucks, Sport Utility Vehicles, and Mini Vans Equipped With TRW Seat Belt Buckle Assemblies. THE Buckle Base OF These Seat Belt Assemblies Were NOT Properly Heat Treated and Therefore DO NOT Pass THE Load Bearing Requirement OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 209, "seat Belt Assemblies."
Consequence
IN THE Event OF A Vehicle Crash, THE Occupant MAY NOT BE Properly Restrained.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect THE Date Code ON Certain Seat Belt Buckles OF Your Vehicle and Replace All Seat Belt Buckles That Fall Within THE Suspect Date Code Range. Owner Notification Began October 26, 2000. Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.
Notes
Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-Dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2009-04-07
Recall no.
09e012000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Sabersport IS Recalling 16,270 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Sabersport Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON MAY 11, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Sabersport AT 1-909-598-7589.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Sabersport.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2009-05-11
Recall no.
09e025000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Dope, Inc. IS Recalling 42,540 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dope, Inc. Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON July 28, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Dope, Inc. AT 1-626-272-1798.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Dope, Inc.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen. Owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
2007-08-03
Recall no.
07v336000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Pickup Trucks, Passenger Vehicles, Sport Utility Vehicles, and Motor Homes Chassis, THE Speed Control Deactivation Switch May, Under Certain Conditions, Leak Internally and Then Overheat, Smoke, or Burn.
Consequence
This Could Result IN AN Underhood Fire.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Fused Wiring Harness. Owners OF THE Passenger Cars Included IN This Campaign Will BE Instructed TO Return Their Vehicles TO Their Dealers TO Have THE Speed Control Deactivation Switch Disconnected AS AN Interim Repair. AS Soon AS Repair Parts ARE Available (Expected October 2007), Owners Will BE Instructed TO Return TO THE Dealers FOR Installation OF A Fused Wiring Harness. THE Recall Began ON August 13, 2007, and Mailing Completed BY September 19, 2007. Owners MAY Contact Ford AT 1-888-222-2751.
Notes
Ford Recall NO. 05s28.customers MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;s Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
2000 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
2000 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 2000 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 2000 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 2000 Ford Ranger competed against the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma, Toyota Tacoma, and Nissan Frontier. In terms of performance, the Ranger's 4.0L V6 was competitive but not class-leading. The Tacoma generally offered superior reliability and resale value. The S-10/Sonoma were often priced slightly lower and offered similar features and performance. The Frontier provided a blend of affordability and capability.
The Ranger's features were basic compared to some rivals, particularly the Tacoma, which had a reputation for offering more options. Reliability-wise, the Ranger was generally good, but not as bulletproof as the Tacoma. For buyers prioritizing reliability and resale value, the Toyota Tacoma might be a better choice, albeit often at a higher price. If budget is a major concern, the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma offer a similar experience at a potentially lower cost. However, the Ranger strikes a good balance between affordability, capability, and reasonable reliability making it a solid choice in the compact truck segment.
The Ranger's features were basic compared to some rivals, particularly the Tacoma, which had a reputation for offering more options. Reliability-wise, the Ranger was generally good, but not as bulletproof as the Tacoma. For buyers prioritizing reliability and resale value, the Toyota Tacoma might be a better choice, albeit often at a higher price. If budget is a major concern, the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma offer a similar experience at a potentially lower cost. However, the Ranger strikes a good balance between affordability, capability, and reasonable reliability making it a solid choice in the compact truck segment.
Ranks #126 Truck
| 1 | 2023 Toyota Tundra | (5.0★) |
| 2 | 2022 Honda Ridgeline | (5.0★) |
| 3 | 2023 Ford E-Transit Chassis | (0.0★) |
| 4 | 2020 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Cab Chassis | (0.0★) |
| 5 | 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD | (0.0★) |
| 6 | 2023 Hyundai Santa Cruz | (5.0★) |
| 7 | 2023 Nissan Frontier | (5.0★) |
| 8 | 2024 GMC Sierra 2500HD | (0.0★) |
| 9 | 2023 Ram 4500 | (0.0★) |
| 10 | 2022 Jeep Gladiator | (5.0★) |
| 11 | 2012 Suzuki Equator | (0.0★) |
| 12 | 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | (5.0★) |
| 126 | 2000 Ford Ranger | (4.0★) |
Final Verdict: Is the 2000 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 2000 Ford Ranger is ideal for individuals seeking an affordable, compact pickup truck for light-duty tasks. It's well-suited for those who need a reliable work truck or a simple vehicle for occasional hauling and DIY projects. Whether it's worth buying depends on the condition and price. A well-maintained, rust-free example is a better investment than a cheaper, neglected one.
Focus on the 4.0L V6 for better performance, and be prepared to address potential maintenance issues related to its age. Buying used is the only option, and a thorough inspection is crucial before making a purchase. If reliability is paramount and budget allows, the Toyota Tacoma might be a better long-term choice.
Focus on the 4.0L V6 for better performance, and be prepared to address potential maintenance issues related to its age. Buying used is the only option, and a thorough inspection is crucial before making a purchase. If reliability is paramount and budget allows, the Toyota Tacoma might be a better long-term choice.
Mike S. on March 18, 2025
Reliable Little TruckThis truck has been incredibly reliable for me over the years. It's not the most luxurious, but it gets the job done and is easy to maintain. Great for basic hauling and getting around town.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Sarah J. on March 18, 2025
Good Starter TruckBought this Ranger as my first vehicle. It's been a solid little truck. The gas mileage isn't amazing, but it's manageable. Had some minor repairs, but nothing too major.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
David L. on March 18, 2025
Still Kicking After All These YearsI've owned my 2000 Ranger since it was new. It's showing its age, but it's still a dependable workhorse. The engine is strong and the transmission is still smooth.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Emily K. on March 18, 2025
Compact and CapablePerfect size for navigating city streets and still able to haul what I need. The interior is basic, but functional. Happy with my purchase.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Tom B. on March 18, 2025
Rust is a ConcernOverall a decent truck, but I've had to deal with some rust issues. Keep an eye on the body and undercarriage. Otherwise, it's been a reliable vehicle.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Jessica P. on March 18, 2025
Simple and DependableNot fancy, but it's a truck that gets the job done. Easy to park, easy to drive. Good for light hauling and everyday errands.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Chris R. on March 18, 2025
Engine TroubleHad some issues with the engine lately. Might be time to consider an upgrade. Served me well for many years before that.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Ashley M. on March 18, 2025
Great Value for the PriceBought it used and it's been a fantastic value. It's not perfect, but it's a reliable and affordable truck.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Kevin W. on March 18, 2025
Small, but MightySurprisingly capable little truck. I've used it for hauling firewood and small construction projects. No complaints.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Brittany H. on March 18, 2025
Needs Some TLCIt's an older truck, so it needs some work. If you're willing to put in the effort, it can be a good little vehicle. Consider having a mechanic inspect it before purchasing.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.