The 1992 Ford Ranger is a compact pickup truck, part of the third generation (1989-1992) of Rangers. It was available in regular cab and extended cab (SuperCab) configurations. Key trims included the base model, XL, and XLT. New, prices ranged from around $8,000 to $14,000 depending on configuration. Its popularity stemmed from its affordability, reliability, and practicality, making it a popular choice for both personal and commercial use. It stood out as a smaller, more fuel-efficient alternative to full-size trucks.
The Good
The 1992 Ford Ranger offered a blend of practicality and appeal. Its compact size made it easy to maneuver and park. Known for relative reliability, it was affordable to maintain. Fuel efficiency was decent for its class. Its simple, functional design and rugged image appealed to those seeking a dependable workhorse. The Ranger provided a sense of freedom and utility, resonating with both practical and emotional buyers.
The Bad
Common weaknesses of the 1992 Ford Ranger include potential rust issues, especially in areas with road salt. Suspension components and ball joints are prone to wear. The automatic transmission, if equipped, can be problematic. Engine issues, especially with higher mileage, should also be considered. Check for oil leaks and proper maintenance records.
1992 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L Inline-4: This was the base engine, known for its fuel efficiency.
- 3.0L V6: Offered more power and torque, suitable for towing and hauling.
- 4.0L V6: The most powerful option, providing the best performance.
- Horsepower:
- 2.3L I4: Approximately 100 horsepower.
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 145 horsepower.
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 160 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy (Estimated):
- 2.3L I4: 22 mpg city / 27 mpg highway.
- 3.0L V6: 17 mpg city / 22 mpg highway.
- 4.0L V6: 15 mpg city / 20 mpg highway.
- 0-60 Times:
- Varies significantly based on engine and transmission. Expect the 2.3L to be the slowest (12-14 seconds), while the 4.0L could achieve 0-60 in around 9-10 seconds.
- Towing Capacity:
- Ranges from 2,000 to 6,000 lbs depending on engine, configuration, and options (like the tow package). The 4.0L V6 models generally offered the highest towing capacity.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Vinyl seats, basic instrumentation, manual windows and locks, AM radio.
- XL: Cloth seats, upgraded interior trim, sometimes included air conditioning and a better stereo.
- XLT: The top trim, featuring premium cloth seats, carpeting, upgraded sound system, chrome exterior trim, and often included power windows and locks. Some XLT models had optional features like cruise control and alloy wheels.
1992 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1992 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | ATLANTA |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 33001 pounds |
| Overall Height | 68.00 inches |
| Overall Length | 188.50 inches |
| Overall Width | 66.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 113.90 inches |
| Standard Seating | 3 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.3-L L-4 SOHC 8V |
| Engine Size | 2.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $13,556 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1992 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1992 Ford Ranger, like many vehicles of its age, has several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns. Rust is a significant issue, especially in areas where road salt is used. Frame rust can be severe and compromise the vehicle's structural integrity. Suspension components, such as ball joints and tie rod ends, are prone to wear and require periodic replacement. The automatic transmissions (A4LD) used in some models were known for reliability issues, including slipping and failure, especially with high mileage or lack of maintenance. Engine issues, such as oil leaks (valve cover gaskets, rear main seal) and overheating, are also common as the vehicles age.
Recalls for the 1992 Ranger were issued for problems such as faulty speed control cables that could lead to unintended acceleration, and issues with the fuel system that could result in leaks and fire hazards. Checking the NHTSA website for specific recalls affecting a particular VIN is crucial. Long-term reliability concerns revolve around the availability of replacement parts and the overall condition of the vehicle given its age. Proper maintenance, including regular fluid changes and addressing minor issues promptly, is critical to extending the lifespan of a 1992 Ford Ranger.
Recalls for the 1992 Ranger were issued for problems such as faulty speed control cables that could lead to unintended acceleration, and issues with the fuel system that could result in leaks and fire hazards. Checking the NHTSA website for specific recalls affecting a particular VIN is crucial. Long-term reliability concerns revolve around the availability of replacement parts and the overall condition of the vehicle given its age. Proper maintenance, including regular fluid changes and addressing minor issues promptly, is critical to extending the lifespan of a 1992 Ford Ranger.
How long will the 1992 Ford Ranger last?
With diligent maintenance, a 1992 Ford Ranger can easily exceed 200,000 miles. Many owners have reported reaching 250,000 miles or more with proper care. However, neglect can significantly shorten its lifespan. Key factors affecting longevity include regular oil changes, transmission servicing, and addressing rust promptly. Weaknesses over time include worn suspension components, deterioration of rubber parts (hoses, belts), and potential engine issues related to age and wear. Properly maintained, the Ranger is durable. Poorly maintained, expect costly repairs.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1992 Ford Ranger was relatively basic in terms of built-in tech, entertainment, and driver-assistance features, reflecting the technology available at the time. Standard entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio. Higher trims might have included a cassette player. There were no advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) like lane departure warning or automatic emergency braking. Safety features were also limited. Standard features included seatbelts and basic braking systems. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were an optional feature on some models. Power steering was a common, but not universal, feature.
Optional features that enhanced comfort and convenience included air conditioning, power windows and locks, cruise control, and upgraded sound systems. The SuperCab models offered additional interior space. Crash-test ratings for the 1992 Ford Ranger were not comprehensive by today's standards. The IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) did conduct offset crash tests during that era, and the Ranger's performance was considered marginal compared to modern vehicles. NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) also provided ratings, but these should be interpreted cautiously considering the advancements in vehicle safety technology since 1992. Overall, the 1992 Ranger prioritized basic functionality over advanced technology and safety features.
Optional features that enhanced comfort and convenience included air conditioning, power windows and locks, cruise control, and upgraded sound systems. The SuperCab models offered additional interior space. Crash-test ratings for the 1992 Ford Ranger were not comprehensive by today's standards. The IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) did conduct offset crash tests during that era, and the Ranger's performance was considered marginal compared to modern vehicles. NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) also provided ratings, but these should be interpreted cautiously considering the advancements in vehicle safety technology since 1992. Overall, the 1992 Ranger prioritized basic functionality over advanced technology and safety features.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Bright Red
Black
Oxford White
Deep Shadow Blue Metallic
Light Mocha Frost Metallic
Silver Metallic
Cabernet Red Metallic
Interior Colors
Medium Graphite
Opal Grey
1992 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1992 Ford Ranger's prices ranged from approximately $8,000 for a base model to around $14,000 for a fully-equipped XLT SuperCab. Today, used market prices vary significantly based on condition, mileage, and location. Expect to find them anywhere from $1,500 to $6,000 or more for exceptionally well-maintained examples. Depreciation has been substantial, but well-preserved Rangers retain some value due to their simplicity and classic appeal. Factors affecting resale value include rust-free condition, low mileage, documented maintenance, and desirable options like the 4.0L V6 engine and four-wheel drive.
1992 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1992 Ford Ranger is generally economical to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to the vehicle's age and basic design. Fuel economy is decent, especially with the 2.3L engine. Maintenance and repair costs can be reasonable if you're willing to perform some work yourself. Parts are generally affordable and readily available. However, neglecting maintenance can lead to more costly repairs down the line. Rust prevention is key to minimizing long-term expenses. Overall, it's a relatively inexpensive vehicle to keep on the road, provided it's well-maintained.
1992 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
16.30 gallons
City Mileage
18 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
24 miles/gallon
1992 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1992 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1992 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1992 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1992 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1992 Ford Ranger competed with the Chevrolet S-10, GMC Sonoma, Toyota Pickup (Hilux), and Nissan Hardbody. In terms of performance, the Ranger's 4.0L V6 was competitive, offering similar power to the V6 options in the S-10 and Sonoma. The Toyota and Nissan were known for their reliability, often surpassing the Ranger in long-term durability, though their engines might have been less powerful. Features were relatively similar across the class, with basic amenities being standard. Price-wise, the Ranger was generally competitive, offering a good value proposition.
In terms of reliability, the Toyota Pickup (Hilux) is often considered a better alternative, renowned for its longevity and robust construction. The Nissan Hardbody also offered excellent reliability. However, these Japanese trucks might command a higher price on the used market. The Chevrolet S-10 and GMC Sonoma are similar alternatives to the Ranger, offering comparable performance and features at a potentially lower price point, but may also suffer from similar reliability concerns. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual priorities; the Ranger offers a good balance of affordability and capability, but those prioritizing absolute reliability might consider a Toyota or Nissan.
In terms of reliability, the Toyota Pickup (Hilux) is often considered a better alternative, renowned for its longevity and robust construction. The Nissan Hardbody also offered excellent reliability. However, these Japanese trucks might command a higher price on the used market. The Chevrolet S-10 and GMC Sonoma are similar alternatives to the Ranger, offering comparable performance and features at a potentially lower price point, but may also suffer from similar reliability concerns. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual priorities; the Ranger offers a good balance of affordability and capability, but those prioritizing absolute reliability might consider a Toyota or Nissan.
Final Verdict: Is the 1992 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1992 Ford Ranger is ideal for someone seeking an affordable and simple pickup truck for light-duty tasks. It's a good choice for DIY enthusiasts, those needing a basic work truck, or individuals wanting a classic, easy-to-maintain vehicle. Whether it's worth buying depends heavily on the condition. A well-maintained, rust-free example with a 4.0L V6 and 4x4 can be a worthwhile purchase. Avoid trucks with excessive rust or signs of neglect. Given their age, you'll only be buying used. Consider a pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic to assess its overall condition and potential repair needs. If you find a solid example, it can be a reliable and economical vehicle for years to come.
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.