
The Good
The 1992 Ford Ranger offered a blend of practicality and appeal. Its compact size made it easy to maneuver and park. Known for relative reliability, it was affordable to maintain. Fuel efficiency was decent for its class. Its simple, functional design and rugged image appealed to those seeking a dependable workhorse. The Ranger provided a sense of freedom and utility, resonating with both practical and emotional buyers.
The Bad
Common weaknesses of the 1992 Ford Ranger include potential rust issues, especially in areas with road salt. Suspension components and ball joints are prone to wear. The automatic transmission, if equipped, can be problematic. Engine issues, especially with higher mileage, should also be considered. Check for oil leaks and proper maintenance records.
1992 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L Inline-4: This was the base engine, known for its fuel efficiency.
- 3.0L V6: Offered more power and torque, suitable for towing and hauling.
- 4.0L V6: The most powerful option, providing the best performance.
- Horsepower:
- 2.3L I4: Approximately 100 horsepower.
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 145 horsepower.
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 160 horsepower.
- Fuel Economy (Estimated):
- 2.3L I4: 22 mpg city / 27 mpg highway.
- 3.0L V6: 17 mpg city / 22 mpg highway.
- 4.0L V6: 15 mpg city / 20 mpg highway.
- 0-60 Times:
- Varies significantly based on engine and transmission. Expect the 2.3L to be the slowest (12-14 seconds), while the 4.0L could achieve 0-60 in around 9-10 seconds.
- Towing Capacity:
- Ranges from 2,000 to 6,000 lbs depending on engine, configuration, and options (like the tow package). The 4.0L V6 models generally offered the highest towing capacity.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Vinyl seats, basic instrumentation, manual windows and locks, AM radio.
- XL: Cloth seats, upgraded interior trim, sometimes included air conditioning and a better stereo.
- XLT: The top trim, featuring premium cloth seats, carpeting, upgraded sound system, chrome exterior trim, and often included power windows and locks. Some XLT models had optional features like cruise control and alloy wheels.
1992 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
Year | 1992 |
Make | Ford |
Model | Ranger |
Trim | - |
Style | Regular Cab 2WD |
Type | Pickup Truck |
Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
Made In | United States |
Manufacturing City | ST. PAUL |
Dimensions
Doors | 2-Door |
Curb Weight | - |
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 33001 pounds |
Overall Height | 68.00 inches |
Overall Length | 188.50 inches |
Overall Width | 66.80 inches |
Wheelbase Length | 113.90 inches |
Standard Seating | 3 |
Engine & Performance
Engine | 2.3-L L-4 SOHC 8V |
Engine Size | 2.3L |
Engine Cylinders | 4 |
Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
Transmission Type | Manual |
Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $13,556 |
Invoice Price | - |
Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1992 Ford Ranger Have?
Recalls for the 1992 Ranger were issued for problems such as faulty speed control cables that could lead to unintended acceleration, and issues with the fuel system that could result in leaks and fire hazards. Checking the NHTSA website for specific recalls affecting a particular VIN is crucial. Long-term reliability concerns revolve around the availability of replacement parts and the overall condition of the vehicle given its age. Proper maintenance, including regular fluid changes and addressing minor issues promptly, is critical to extending the lifespan of a 1992 Ford Ranger.
How long will the 1992 Ford Ranger last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Optional features that enhanced comfort and convenience included air conditioning, power windows and locks, cruise control, and upgraded sound systems. The SuperCab models offered additional interior space. Crash-test ratings for the 1992 Ford Ranger were not comprehensive by today's standards. The IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) did conduct offset crash tests during that era, and the Ranger's performance was considered marginal compared to modern vehicles. NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) also provided ratings, but these should be interpreted cautiously considering the advancements in vehicle safety technology since 1992. Overall, the 1992 Ranger prioritized basic functionality over advanced technology and safety features.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Interior Colors
1992 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
1992 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
1992 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
1992 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1992 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Tires:tread/Belt
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist:hydraulic
Structure:body:door
Exterior Lighting
1992 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
1992 Ford Ranger Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1992 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
In terms of reliability, the Toyota Pickup (Hilux) is often considered a better alternative, renowned for its longevity and robust construction. The Nissan Hardbody also offered excellent reliability. However, these Japanese trucks might command a higher price on the used market. The Chevrolet S-10 and GMC Sonoma are similar alternatives to the Ranger, offering comparable performance and features at a potentially lower price point, but may also suffer from similar reliability concerns. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual priorities; the Ranger offers a good balance of affordability and capability, but those prioritizing absolute reliability might consider a Toyota or Nissan.