The 1999 Ford Ranger is part of the third generation (1998-2011) of Ford's enduring compact pickup truck. Available in Regular Cab and SuperCab body styles, with Styleside or Flareside beds, it offered versatility. Key trims included XL, XLT, and Sport. New prices ranged from approximately $11,000 to $20,000. It stood out as a popular, reliable, and affordable workhorse, beloved for its practical size and "get-the-job-done" attitude, making it highly maneuverable and economical.
The Good
The 1999 Ford Ranger offers robust reliability, especially with the 2.5L and 3.0L engines, and good fuel efficiency for a truck. Its compact design ensures easy maneuverability and parking. Practically, it's an excellent value with low ownership costs and strong utility for hauling. Emotionally, it evokes nostalgia and a "no-nonsense" work ethic, appealing to buyers seeking a dependable and unassuming partner for everyday tasks or light adventures.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1999 Ford Ranger include significant rust issues (frame, bed), particularly in salt-belt regions. The 4.0L SOHC V6 engine can suffer from expensive timing chain guide failures. Automatic transmissions (5R55E) may develop shifting problems. Also watch out for worn suspension components, power steering leaks, and head gasket issues on the 3.0L V6.
1999 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L SOHC I4 (117 hp)
- 3.0L OHV V6 "Vulcan" (150 hp)
- 4.0L SOHC V6 (160 hp) - Horsepower:
- 2.5L I4: 117 hp @ 5250 rpm
- 3.0L V6: 150 hp @ 5000 rpm
- 4.0L V6: 160 hp @ 4200 rpm - Fuel Economy (approximate, 2WD):
- 2.5L I4 (Manual/Auto): 20-22 MPG city / 24-26 MPG highway
- 3.0L V6 (Manual/Auto): 15-17 MPG city / 20-22 MPG highway
- 4.0L V6 (Manual/Auto): 15-16 MPG city / 19-20 MPG highway
(4WD models typically slightly lower) - 0-60 MPH Times (approximate):
- 2.5L I4: 10-12 seconds
- 3.0L V6: 9-11 seconds
- 4.0L V6: 8-10 seconds - Towing Capacity (varies by configuration):
- Ranges from approximately 2,000 lbs (2.5L I4) up to 5,800 lbs (4.0L V6, properly equipped with trailer tow package). - Trim-Level Features:
- XL: Basic work truck. Features included manual windows/locks, vinyl bench seats, AM/FM radio, steel wheels. Focused on utility.
- XLT: Added comfort and convenience. Included cloth seats, power windows/locks/mirrors, air conditioning, cruise control, upgraded audio system (often with cassette), chrome bumpers and trim, styled steel or aluminum wheels.
- Sport: Based on XLT, but with cosmetic enhancements like body-colored bumpers, fog lights, unique alloy wheels, and a more aggressive stance. Functionally similar to XLT but with a "sportier" appearance.
- Optional Features (depending on trim/package): CD player, sliding rear window, automatic transmission, various axle ratios, 4x4 drivetrain, off-road packages (e.g., skid plates, larger tires, limited-slip differential).
- Body Styles: Regular Cab (two doors) and SuperCab (extended cab, with jump seats; offered with 2 or 4 doors depending on configuration). Bed options included Styleside (smooth, flared fenders) and Flareside (stepside, separate fenders).
1999 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1999 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | LOUISVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 4540 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | Electric MOTOR |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | 4-Speed Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1999 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1999 Ford Ranger, while generally reliable, is not without its specific long-term problems. The most pervasive issue, especially in regions exposed to road salt, is **severe frame and body rust**. This often affects bed supports, rocker panels, and suspension mounting points, potentially compromising structural integrity and making repairs uneconomical. A pre-purchase inspection should always scrutinize the frame for rot.
Engine-specific concerns are notable. The 3.0L "Vulcan" V6 is generally robust but can suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks and, less commonly for this model year, head gasket failures. More critically, the 4.0L SOHC V6 (introduced in 1997 and prevalent in 1999 models) is known for expensive and catastrophic timing chain guide and tensioner failures. If ignored, this can lead to severe engine damage. Listen for rattling from the engine, especially at startup or low RPMs, which can indicate impending failure. The earlier 4.0L OHV V6 (Cologne) is generally considered more bulletproof, but less common in '99.
Automatic transmissions, particularly the 5R55E, can develop issues like harsh shifting, solenoid problems, or complete failure, typically after 100,000-150,000 miles. Manual transmissions tend to be more durable. Other common long-term concerns include worn **suspension components** (ball joints, control arm bushings), **power steering leaks**, and failing **fuel pumps** or **fuel sending units** leading to inaccurate gauge readings. Electrical gremlins like faulty power window switches and HVAC blend door actuators are also reported. Rear-wheel anti-lock brake (RWABS) sensors, often integrated into the differential, can fail, triggering the ABS warning light.
Regarding **recalls**, while a specific VIN check is always recommended, some Ford vehicles of this era, including certain Rangers, were subject to recalls for the **cruise control deactivation switch** (a fire risk) and potential **airbag inflator issues** (though major Takata recalls primarily affected later models, it's worth verifying). While the Ranger's simplicity generally lends itself to good long-term durability, these specific issues highlight areas requiring careful attention during ownership or inspection.
Engine-specific concerns are notable. The 3.0L "Vulcan" V6 is generally robust but can suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks and, less commonly for this model year, head gasket failures. More critically, the 4.0L SOHC V6 (introduced in 1997 and prevalent in 1999 models) is known for expensive and catastrophic timing chain guide and tensioner failures. If ignored, this can lead to severe engine damage. Listen for rattling from the engine, especially at startup or low RPMs, which can indicate impending failure. The earlier 4.0L OHV V6 (Cologne) is generally considered more bulletproof, but less common in '99.
Automatic transmissions, particularly the 5R55E, can develop issues like harsh shifting, solenoid problems, or complete failure, typically after 100,000-150,000 miles. Manual transmissions tend to be more durable. Other common long-term concerns include worn **suspension components** (ball joints, control arm bushings), **power steering leaks**, and failing **fuel pumps** or **fuel sending units** leading to inaccurate gauge readings. Electrical gremlins like faulty power window switches and HVAC blend door actuators are also reported. Rear-wheel anti-lock brake (RWABS) sensors, often integrated into the differential, can fail, triggering the ABS warning light.
Regarding **recalls**, while a specific VIN check is always recommended, some Ford vehicles of this era, including certain Rangers, were subject to recalls for the **cruise control deactivation switch** (a fire risk) and potential **airbag inflator issues** (though major Takata recalls primarily affected later models, it's worth verifying). While the Ranger's simplicity generally lends itself to good long-term durability, these specific issues highlight areas requiring careful attention during ownership or inspection.
How long will the 1999 Ford Ranger last?
The 1999 Ford Ranger boasts impressive long-term durability, with many owners reporting average lifespans of 200,000 to 250,000 miles, and well-maintained examples frequently exceeding 300,000 miles. It's common to see these trucks still on the road after 20-25+ years of service. Its simple, robust construction is a major factor in its longevity.
However, its long-term weaknesses primarily revolve around **rust**, which can prematurely end a truck's life in corrosive environments, far before mechanical failure. The frame, bed mounts, and rocker panels are particularly susceptible. Mechanically, the 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain issue becomes a critical concern with higher mileage if not previously addressed. Suspension and steering components will naturally wear out over decades of use, requiring periodic replacement of ball joints, tie rods, and bushings. Despite these points, its overall mechanical simplicity makes it a durable and repairable vehicle for the long haul.
However, its long-term weaknesses primarily revolve around **rust**, which can prematurely end a truck's life in corrosive environments, far before mechanical failure. The frame, bed mounts, and rocker panels are particularly susceptible. Mechanically, the 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain issue becomes a critical concern with higher mileage if not previously addressed. Suspension and steering components will naturally wear out over decades of use, requiring periodic replacement of ball joints, tie rods, and bushings. Despite these points, its overall mechanical simplicity makes it a durable and repairable vehicle for the long haul.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1999 Ford Ranger, being a product of the late 1990s, featured what would now be considered very basic built-in technology and entertainment.
For Entertainment, standard offerings included an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player. An optional single-disc CD player was available on higher trims. There were no auxiliary inputs, USB ports, or Bluetooth connectivity, as these technologies were not common in vehicles of this vintage. The instrument cluster provided essential gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were common optional conveniences on XLT and Sport trims, whereas XL models typically featured manual controls.
Driver-Assistance Features, by today's standards, were virtually non-existent. The most "advanced" assistance would encompass power steering and power-assisted brakes. Modern features like traction control, electronic stability control, lane departure warning, or blind-spot monitoring were not available. Cruise control was a desirable optional feature.
In terms of Safety Features, the 1999 Ranger included dual front airbags as standard. The passenger side airbag often had a key-operated deactivation switch, which was particularly useful in regular cab models when transporting children in car seats. It came equipped with front disc brakes and rear drum brakes, with standard rear-wheel anti-lock brakes (RWABS) to prevent skidding during hard braking. Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants, with SuperCab jump seats typically offering lap belts.
Crash-Test Ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 1999 Ford Ranger (Regular Cab) provided the following results:
For Entertainment, standard offerings included an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player. An optional single-disc CD player was available on higher trims. There were no auxiliary inputs, USB ports, or Bluetooth connectivity, as these technologies were not common in vehicles of this vintage. The instrument cluster provided essential gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were common optional conveniences on XLT and Sport trims, whereas XL models typically featured manual controls.
Driver-Assistance Features, by today's standards, were virtually non-existent. The most "advanced" assistance would encompass power steering and power-assisted brakes. Modern features like traction control, electronic stability control, lane departure warning, or blind-spot monitoring were not available. Cruise control was a desirable optional feature.
In terms of Safety Features, the 1999 Ranger included dual front airbags as standard. The passenger side airbag often had a key-operated deactivation switch, which was particularly useful in regular cab models when transporting children in car seats. It came equipped with front disc brakes and rear drum brakes, with standard rear-wheel anti-lock brakes (RWABS) to prevent skidding during hard braking. Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants, with SuperCab jump seats typically offering lap belts.
Crash-Test Ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 1999 Ford Ranger (Regular Cab) provided the following results:
- Frontal Crash Test:
- Driver Side: 3 out of 5 stars
- Passenger Side: 4 out of 5 stars - Side Impact Test (Regular Cab):
- Driver Side: 3 out of 5 stars
- Rear Passenger Side: 3 out of 5 stars
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1999 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new in 1999, the Ford Ranger started around $11,000 for a base XL Regular Cab 2WD with the 2.5L engine. Fully optioned SuperCab XLT 4x4 models with the 4.0L V6 could push prices past $20,000.
In today's used market (2024), prices for a 1999 Ford Ranger vary significantly, ranging from $2,000 for a high-mileage 'beater' with considerable rust, to $8,000-$10,000 or more for exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or specific 4x4 examples. The Ranger has largely reached the bottom of its depreciation curve; its value is now stable and, for well-preserved examples, may even see slight appreciation due to enthusiast demand for classic compact trucks.
Factors affecting resale value include the overall condition (especially rust-free status), maintenance history, mileage, engine type (4.0L V6 4x4 models are often most desirable), and trim level. Rust is the biggest detractor, while documented care significantly boosts value.
In today's used market (2024), prices for a 1999 Ford Ranger vary significantly, ranging from $2,000 for a high-mileage 'beater' with considerable rust, to $8,000-$10,000 or more for exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or specific 4x4 examples. The Ranger has largely reached the bottom of its depreciation curve; its value is now stable and, for well-preserved examples, may even see slight appreciation due to enthusiast demand for classic compact trucks.
Factors affecting resale value include the overall condition (especially rust-free status), maintenance history, mileage, engine type (4.0L V6 4x4 models are often most desirable), and trim level. Rust is the biggest detractor, while documented care significantly boosts value.
1999 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1999 Ford Ranger is an **economical vehicle to own**. Insurance costs are typically very low due to its age and modest value. Fuel economy is decent for a truck; the 2.5L I4 offers the best efficiency, while V6 models are thirstier but still more economical than full-size trucks. Maintenance and repair costs are generally inexpensive; parts are widely available, and its simple design makes it a favorite for DIY mechanics. Common issues are straightforward to address without specialized tools. Long-term ownership is budget-friendly, provided major issues like severe rust or 4.0L SOHC timing chain failures are either absent or have been professionally resolved.
1999 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
19.5 gallons
City Mileage
19 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
24 miles/gallon
1999 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1999 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1999 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1999 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1999 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1999 Ford Ranger competed fiercely with rivals like the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma, Toyota Tacoma, Nissan Frontier, and Dodge Dakota.
In terms of Performance, the Ranger's 4.0L V6 (160 hp) was competitive, though often slightly less powerful than the S-10's 4.3L V6 (180-190 hp) or the Tacoma's 3.4L V6 (190 hp). Its base 2.5L I4 was generally less robust than rivals' base engines. The Dodge Dakota offered a unique advantage with its optional V8, providing superior power and towing, bridging the gap between compact and full-size trucks.
Features across all compact trucks of this era were relatively basic. The Ranger, S-10, and Frontier offered similar levels of creature comforts like optional AC, power accessories, and cruise control. The Tacoma often had a slight edge in interior fit, finish, and ergonomics, but feature lists were comparable.
Reliability is where distinctions emerge. The Toyota Tacoma of this generation is widely considered the gold standard for reliability, known for its robust engines and overall longevity, though it also battled frame rust issues. The **Ford Ranger** is generally reliable, but its 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain issues are a significant long-term concern, as is widespread frame rust. The **Chevy S-10/GMC Sonoma** were decent, but their 4.3L V6s could suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks. The **Nissan Frontier** was robust but less common, and the **Dodge Dakota** often faced more reliability concerns, especially with transmissions and electrical systems.
Regarding Price, when new, all were similarly positioned. In the current used market, the **Toyota Tacoma** commands a significant premium due to its reputation, often costing 20-50% more than a comparable Ranger or S-10. The **Ford Ranger** and **Chevy S-10** typically offer excellent value in a similar price bracket. The **Nissan Frontier** might be slightly cheaper, and the **Dodge Dakota** often the most affordable used option due to its higher running costs and varied reliability.
Alternatives:
- Better Alternative (if budget allows and top-tier reliability is paramount): A **Toyota Tacoma** from the same era, but be prepared for higher purchase prices and diligent frame rust inspection.
- Similar Alternatives (for value-focused buyers): Another well-maintained **Ford Ranger** (especially with the 2.5L I4 or 3.0L V6) or a **Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma**, both offering comparable utility and affordability. For more power, a V8 **Dodge Dakota** is an option, accepting potential reliability tradeoffs.
In terms of Performance, the Ranger's 4.0L V6 (160 hp) was competitive, though often slightly less powerful than the S-10's 4.3L V6 (180-190 hp) or the Tacoma's 3.4L V6 (190 hp). Its base 2.5L I4 was generally less robust than rivals' base engines. The Dodge Dakota offered a unique advantage with its optional V8, providing superior power and towing, bridging the gap between compact and full-size trucks.
Features across all compact trucks of this era were relatively basic. The Ranger, S-10, and Frontier offered similar levels of creature comforts like optional AC, power accessories, and cruise control. The Tacoma often had a slight edge in interior fit, finish, and ergonomics, but feature lists were comparable.
Reliability is where distinctions emerge. The Toyota Tacoma of this generation is widely considered the gold standard for reliability, known for its robust engines and overall longevity, though it also battled frame rust issues. The **Ford Ranger** is generally reliable, but its 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain issues are a significant long-term concern, as is widespread frame rust. The **Chevy S-10/GMC Sonoma** were decent, but their 4.3L V6s could suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks. The **Nissan Frontier** was robust but less common, and the **Dodge Dakota** often faced more reliability concerns, especially with transmissions and electrical systems.
Regarding Price, when new, all were similarly positioned. In the current used market, the **Toyota Tacoma** commands a significant premium due to its reputation, often costing 20-50% more than a comparable Ranger or S-10. The **Ford Ranger** and **Chevy S-10** typically offer excellent value in a similar price bracket. The **Nissan Frontier** might be slightly cheaper, and the **Dodge Dakota** often the most affordable used option due to its higher running costs and varied reliability.
Alternatives:
- Better Alternative (if budget allows and top-tier reliability is paramount): A **Toyota Tacoma** from the same era, but be prepared for higher purchase prices and diligent frame rust inspection.
- Similar Alternatives (for value-focused buyers): Another well-maintained **Ford Ranger** (especially with the 2.5L I4 or 3.0L V6) or a **Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma**, both offering comparable utility and affordability. For more power, a V8 **Dodge Dakota** is an option, accepting potential reliability tradeoffs.
Final Verdict: Is the 1999 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1999 Ford Ranger is an excellent choice for individuals or small businesses needing a compact, practical, and economical pickup. It's ideal for first-time truck owners, DIY enthusiasts, students, or anyone seeking light hauling and towing capabilities without the expense and bulk of a full-size truck. Its simple mechanics make it appealing for those who prefer DIY maintenance or budget-friendly repairs.
Yes, it is absolutely worth buying as a **used vehicle**. Its robust build (despite specific weaknesses) and low ownership costs make it a fantastic value.
Conditions for buying: A crucial pre-purchase inspection is paramount, focusing intensely on frame rust and the condition of the 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain (if equipped). Prioritize examples with documented maintenance. The 2.5L I4 and 3.0L V6 engines generally offer fewer long-term headaches than the 4.0L SOHC. XLT and Sport trims provide more comfort. If you find a rust-free, well-maintained Ranger, it can be a highly durable and functional vehicle for many years to come, offering exceptional utility for its price.
Yes, it is absolutely worth buying as a **used vehicle**. Its robust build (despite specific weaknesses) and low ownership costs make it a fantastic value.
Conditions for buying: A crucial pre-purchase inspection is paramount, focusing intensely on frame rust and the condition of the 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain (if equipped). Prioritize examples with documented maintenance. The 2.5L I4 and 3.0L V6 engines generally offer fewer long-term headaches than the 4.0L SOHC. XLT and Sport trims provide more comfort. If you find a rust-free, well-maintained Ranger, it can be a highly durable and functional vehicle for many years to come, offering exceptional utility for its price.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma