The 1999 Ford Ranger is part of the third generation (1998-2011) of Ford's enduring compact pickup truck. Available in Regular Cab and SuperCab body styles, with Styleside or Flareside beds, it offered versatility. Key trims included XL, XLT, and Sport. New prices ranged from approximately $11,000 to $20,000. It stood out as a popular, reliable, and affordable workhorse, beloved for its practical size and "get-the-job-done" attitude, making it highly maneuverable and economical.
The Good
The 1999 Ford Ranger offers robust reliability, especially with the 2.5L and 3.0L engines, and good fuel efficiency for a truck. Its compact design ensures easy maneuverability and parking. Practically, it's an excellent value with low ownership costs and strong utility for hauling. Emotionally, it evokes nostalgia and a "no-nonsense" work ethic, appealing to buyers seeking a dependable and unassuming partner for everyday tasks or light adventures.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1999 Ford Ranger include significant rust issues (frame, bed), particularly in salt-belt regions. The 4.0L SOHC V6 engine can suffer from expensive timing chain guide failures. Automatic transmissions (5R55E) may develop shifting problems. Also watch out for worn suspension components, power steering leaks, and head gasket issues on the 3.0L V6.
1999 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L SOHC I4 (117 hp)
- 3.0L OHV V6 "Vulcan" (150 hp)
- 4.0L SOHC V6 (160 hp) - Horsepower:
- 2.5L I4: 117 hp @ 5250 rpm
- 3.0L V6: 150 hp @ 5000 rpm
- 4.0L V6: 160 hp @ 4200 rpm - Fuel Economy (approximate, 2WD):
- 2.5L I4 (Manual/Auto): 20-22 MPG city / 24-26 MPG highway
- 3.0L V6 (Manual/Auto): 15-17 MPG city / 20-22 MPG highway
- 4.0L V6 (Manual/Auto): 15-16 MPG city / 19-20 MPG highway
(4WD models typically slightly lower) - 0-60 MPH Times (approximate):
- 2.5L I4: 10-12 seconds
- 3.0L V6: 9-11 seconds
- 4.0L V6: 8-10 seconds - Towing Capacity (varies by configuration):
- Ranges from approximately 2,000 lbs (2.5L I4) up to 5,800 lbs (4.0L V6, properly equipped with trailer tow package). - Trim-Level Features:
- XL: Basic work truck. Features included manual windows/locks, vinyl bench seats, AM/FM radio, steel wheels. Focused on utility.
- XLT: Added comfort and convenience. Included cloth seats, power windows/locks/mirrors, air conditioning, cruise control, upgraded audio system (often with cassette), chrome bumpers and trim, styled steel or aluminum wheels.
- Sport: Based on XLT, but with cosmetic enhancements like body-colored bumpers, fog lights, unique alloy wheels, and a more aggressive stance. Functionally similar to XLT but with a "sportier" appearance.
- Optional Features (depending on trim/package): CD player, sliding rear window, automatic transmission, various axle ratios, 4x4 drivetrain, off-road packages (e.g., skid plates, larger tires, limited-slip differential).
- Body Styles: Regular Cab (two doors) and SuperCab (extended cab, with jump seats; offered with 2 or 4 doors depending on configuration). Bed options included Styleside (smooth, flared fenders) and Flareside (stepside, separate fenders).
1999 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1999 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | LOUISVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 4540 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | Electric MOTOR |
| Engine Size | 2.5L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1999 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1999 Ford Ranger, while generally reliable, is not without its specific long-term problems. The most pervasive issue, especially in regions exposed to road salt, is **severe frame and body rust**. This often affects bed supports, rocker panels, and suspension mounting points, potentially compromising structural integrity and making repairs uneconomical. A pre-purchase inspection should always scrutinize the frame for rot.
Engine-specific concerns are notable. The 3.0L "Vulcan" V6 is generally robust but can suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks and, less commonly for this model year, head gasket failures. More critically, the 4.0L SOHC V6 (introduced in 1997 and prevalent in 1999 models) is known for expensive and catastrophic timing chain guide and tensioner failures. If ignored, this can lead to severe engine damage. Listen for rattling from the engine, especially at startup or low RPMs, which can indicate impending failure. The earlier 4.0L OHV V6 (Cologne) is generally considered more bulletproof, but less common in '99.
Automatic transmissions, particularly the 5R55E, can develop issues like harsh shifting, solenoid problems, or complete failure, typically after 100,000-150,000 miles. Manual transmissions tend to be more durable. Other common long-term concerns include worn **suspension components** (ball joints, control arm bushings), **power steering leaks**, and failing **fuel pumps** or **fuel sending units** leading to inaccurate gauge readings. Electrical gremlins like faulty power window switches and HVAC blend door actuators are also reported. Rear-wheel anti-lock brake (RWABS) sensors, often integrated into the differential, can fail, triggering the ABS warning light.
Regarding **recalls**, while a specific VIN check is always recommended, some Ford vehicles of this era, including certain Rangers, were subject to recalls for the **cruise control deactivation switch** (a fire risk) and potential **airbag inflator issues** (though major Takata recalls primarily affected later models, it's worth verifying). While the Ranger's simplicity generally lends itself to good long-term durability, these specific issues highlight areas requiring careful attention during ownership or inspection.
Engine-specific concerns are notable. The 3.0L "Vulcan" V6 is generally robust but can suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks and, less commonly for this model year, head gasket failures. More critically, the 4.0L SOHC V6 (introduced in 1997 and prevalent in 1999 models) is known for expensive and catastrophic timing chain guide and tensioner failures. If ignored, this can lead to severe engine damage. Listen for rattling from the engine, especially at startup or low RPMs, which can indicate impending failure. The earlier 4.0L OHV V6 (Cologne) is generally considered more bulletproof, but less common in '99.
Automatic transmissions, particularly the 5R55E, can develop issues like harsh shifting, solenoid problems, or complete failure, typically after 100,000-150,000 miles. Manual transmissions tend to be more durable. Other common long-term concerns include worn **suspension components** (ball joints, control arm bushings), **power steering leaks**, and failing **fuel pumps** or **fuel sending units** leading to inaccurate gauge readings. Electrical gremlins like faulty power window switches and HVAC blend door actuators are also reported. Rear-wheel anti-lock brake (RWABS) sensors, often integrated into the differential, can fail, triggering the ABS warning light.
Regarding **recalls**, while a specific VIN check is always recommended, some Ford vehicles of this era, including certain Rangers, were subject to recalls for the **cruise control deactivation switch** (a fire risk) and potential **airbag inflator issues** (though major Takata recalls primarily affected later models, it's worth verifying). While the Ranger's simplicity generally lends itself to good long-term durability, these specific issues highlight areas requiring careful attention during ownership or inspection.
How long will the 1999 Ford Ranger last?
The 1999 Ford Ranger boasts impressive long-term durability, with many owners reporting average lifespans of 200,000 to 250,000 miles, and well-maintained examples frequently exceeding 300,000 miles. It's common to see these trucks still on the road after 20-25+ years of service. Its simple, robust construction is a major factor in its longevity.
However, its long-term weaknesses primarily revolve around **rust**, which can prematurely end a truck's life in corrosive environments, far before mechanical failure. The frame, bed mounts, and rocker panels are particularly susceptible. Mechanically, the 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain issue becomes a critical concern with higher mileage if not previously addressed. Suspension and steering components will naturally wear out over decades of use, requiring periodic replacement of ball joints, tie rods, and bushings. Despite these points, its overall mechanical simplicity makes it a durable and repairable vehicle for the long haul.
However, its long-term weaknesses primarily revolve around **rust**, which can prematurely end a truck's life in corrosive environments, far before mechanical failure. The frame, bed mounts, and rocker panels are particularly susceptible. Mechanically, the 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain issue becomes a critical concern with higher mileage if not previously addressed. Suspension and steering components will naturally wear out over decades of use, requiring periodic replacement of ball joints, tie rods, and bushings. Despite these points, its overall mechanical simplicity makes it a durable and repairable vehicle for the long haul.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1999 Ford Ranger, being a product of the late 1990s, featured what would now be considered very basic built-in technology and entertainment.
For Entertainment, standard offerings included an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player. An optional single-disc CD player was available on higher trims. There were no auxiliary inputs, USB ports, or Bluetooth connectivity, as these technologies were not common in vehicles of this vintage. The instrument cluster provided essential gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were common optional conveniences on XLT and Sport trims, whereas XL models typically featured manual controls.
Driver-Assistance Features, by today's standards, were virtually non-existent. The most "advanced" assistance would encompass power steering and power-assisted brakes. Modern features like traction control, electronic stability control, lane departure warning, or blind-spot monitoring were not available. Cruise control was a desirable optional feature.
In terms of Safety Features, the 1999 Ranger included dual front airbags as standard. The passenger side airbag often had a key-operated deactivation switch, which was particularly useful in regular cab models when transporting children in car seats. It came equipped with front disc brakes and rear drum brakes, with standard rear-wheel anti-lock brakes (RWABS) to prevent skidding during hard braking. Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants, with SuperCab jump seats typically offering lap belts.
Crash-Test Ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 1999 Ford Ranger (Regular Cab) provided the following results:
For Entertainment, standard offerings included an AM/FM radio, often with a cassette player. An optional single-disc CD player was available on higher trims. There were no auxiliary inputs, USB ports, or Bluetooth connectivity, as these technologies were not common in vehicles of this vintage. The instrument cluster provided essential gauges for speed, RPM, fuel level, and engine temperature. Power windows, power door locks, and power mirrors were common optional conveniences on XLT and Sport trims, whereas XL models typically featured manual controls.
Driver-Assistance Features, by today's standards, were virtually non-existent. The most "advanced" assistance would encompass power steering and power-assisted brakes. Modern features like traction control, electronic stability control, lane departure warning, or blind-spot monitoring were not available. Cruise control was a desirable optional feature.
In terms of Safety Features, the 1999 Ranger included dual front airbags as standard. The passenger side airbag often had a key-operated deactivation switch, which was particularly useful in regular cab models when transporting children in car seats. It came equipped with front disc brakes and rear drum brakes, with standard rear-wheel anti-lock brakes (RWABS) to prevent skidding during hard braking. Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants, with SuperCab jump seats typically offering lap belts.
Crash-Test Ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the 1999 Ford Ranger (Regular Cab) provided the following results:
- Frontal Crash Test:
- Driver Side: 3 out of 5 stars
- Passenger Side: 4 out of 5 stars - Side Impact Test (Regular Cab):
- Driver Side: 3 out of 5 stars
- Rear Passenger Side: 3 out of 5 stars
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1999 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new in 1999, the Ford Ranger started around $11,000 for a base XL Regular Cab 2WD with the 2.5L engine. Fully optioned SuperCab XLT 4x4 models with the 4.0L V6 could push prices past $20,000.
In today's used market (2024), prices for a 1999 Ford Ranger vary significantly, ranging from $2,000 for a high-mileage 'beater' with considerable rust, to $8,000-$10,000 or more for exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or specific 4x4 examples. The Ranger has largely reached the bottom of its depreciation curve; its value is now stable and, for well-preserved examples, may even see slight appreciation due to enthusiast demand for classic compact trucks.
Factors affecting resale value include the overall condition (especially rust-free status), maintenance history, mileage, engine type (4.0L V6 4x4 models are often most desirable), and trim level. Rust is the biggest detractor, while documented care significantly boosts value.
In today's used market (2024), prices for a 1999 Ford Ranger vary significantly, ranging from $2,000 for a high-mileage 'beater' with considerable rust, to $8,000-$10,000 or more for exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or specific 4x4 examples. The Ranger has largely reached the bottom of its depreciation curve; its value is now stable and, for well-preserved examples, may even see slight appreciation due to enthusiast demand for classic compact trucks.
Factors affecting resale value include the overall condition (especially rust-free status), maintenance history, mileage, engine type (4.0L V6 4x4 models are often most desirable), and trim level. Rust is the biggest detractor, while documented care significantly boosts value.
1999 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1999 Ford Ranger is an **economical vehicle to own**. Insurance costs are typically very low due to its age and modest value. Fuel economy is decent for a truck; the 2.5L I4 offers the best efficiency, while V6 models are thirstier but still more economical than full-size trucks. Maintenance and repair costs are generally inexpensive; parts are widely available, and its simple design makes it a favorite for DIY mechanics. Common issues are straightforward to address without specialized tools. Long-term ownership is budget-friendly, provided major issues like severe rust or 4.0L SOHC timing chain failures are either absent or have been professionally resolved.
1999 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
19.5 gallons
City Mileage
19 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
24 miles/gallon
1999 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1999 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2001-05-22
Recall no.
01x001000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Equipment Description: Ford IS Replacing All Firestone Wilderness AT 15, 16, and 17 Inch Tires Mounted ON Ford Trucks and Suvs. Ford Reports Tread Separation CAN Occur DUE TO A Combination OF THE Sensitivity OF THE Tire Design TO Stress, Aging, and Manufacturing Differences Between Plants. Ford IS Replacing These Tires TO Prevent Possible Premature Tire Failure. Vehicle Description: THE Vehicles Listed Below MAY Have Been Originally Equipped With Firestone Wilderness AT Tires or MAY Have HAD Wilderness AT Tires Installed During THE Firestone Recall Launched IN August 2000. Certain 1991 Throught 2002 Ford Explorer Certain 2001 Throught 2002 Explorer Sport, and Sport Trac Certain 1997 Through 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Certain 1991 Through 2001 Ranger Certain 1999 Through 2001 Expedition Certain 1991 Through 1994, and 1997 Model Year F-Series Certain 1991 Through 1994 Bronco Note: Both Original Equipment and Replacement Tires ARE Affected.
Consequence
Should THE Tread Separate AT Highway Speeds, A Vehicle Crash Could Occur, Possibly Resulting IN Personal Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON March 31, 2002. However, Customers CAN Contact Ford AT 1-877-917-3673 or GO On-line TO Www.ford.com FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2000-08-21
Recall no.
00t005000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence
IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Power Train:automatic Transmission
Recall date
1999-07-28
Recall no.
99v204000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Electric Vehicles. THE Transaxle MAY Have Been Manufactured With THE Park Detent Spring Misaligned. IF THE Spring IS Misaligned, THE Park Mechanism MAY NOT Engage When THE Shift Lever IS Placed IN THE Park Position.
Consequence
IF THE Park Mechanism Does NOT Engage and THE Vehicle Operator HAS NOT Applied THE Parking Brake, THE Vehicle Could Roll Free AS IF IN Neutral.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect THE Transaxle and ANY With Misaligned Park Detent Springs Will BE Replaced.
Notes
Owner Notification Began July 28, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1999-03-30
Recall no.
99v062001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Certain 1997-1999 RHD Explorer Equipped With 4.0l Ohv/Sohc Engines and Cruise Control Built From MAY 29, 1996 Through March 4, 1999; 1998-1999 Explorer/Mountaineers Equipped With 4.0l Ohv/sohc or 5.0l Engines or 1998-1999 Rangers Equipped With 2.5l, 3.0l Ffv/efi or 4.0l Engines and Cruise Control Built From January 5, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; 1998-1999 Mustangs Equipped With 3.8l, 4.6l 2-valve or 4-valve Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; 1999 F250/f350/f450/f550 (Over 8,500 Lbs.) Trucks Equipped With 5.4l or 6.8l Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; and 1999 F-53 Stripped Chassis Equipped With 5.4l or 6.8l Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999. A Cruise Control Cable CAN Interfere With THE Speed Control Servo Pulley and NOT Allow THE Throttle TO Return TO Idle When Disengaging THE Cruise Control.
Consequence
IF THE Cruise Control IS Used and This Condition IS Present, A Stuck Throttle Could Result, Which Could Potentially Result IN A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Cruise Control Cables. AT THE Present Time, THE Replacement Cables ARE NOT Available. Customers ARE Being Advised NOT TO USE THE Cruise Control System Until A Replacement CAN BE Made.
Notes
A Pre-Release Warning Letter That Identified AN Interim FIX Until THE Parts FOR THE Permanent FIX Became Available WAS Mailed TO Owners Beginning March 27, 1999.a Second Owner Notification, Identifying THE Permanent FIX WAS Mailed TO Owners Beginning MAY 24, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline:fuel Injection System
Recall date
1998-09-01
Recall no.
98v201000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks With 3.0l Engine. AN 'o'-Ring Seal IN THE Fuel Injection Pulse Damper TO Fuel Rail Joint Could BE Damaged Allowing Fuel Leakage.
Consequence
IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire CAN Result From Fuel Leakage.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Pulse Damper.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin September 21, 1998.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-06-13
Recall no.
06e056000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Aftermarket Fuel Filters Sold Under THE Purolator Brand Name, P/N F65277, Shipped From January 16 Through June 2, 2006, FOR USE ON THE Above Listed Passenger Vehicles. DUE TO Incorrect Design, THE Quick Connectors MAY NOT Fully Seat With THE Tube Interface, Even Though THE Person Making THE Connection MAY Believe That THE Quick Connector IS Fully Attached.
Consequence
Failure OF This Connection Could Lead TO Fuel Spillage And, IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
UFI Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON August 4, 2006. Owners MAY Contact UFI Filters USA AT 800-230-5876.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO UFI Filters USA (Purolator) Aftermarket Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2009-04-07
Recall no.
09e012000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Sabersport IS Recalling 16,270 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Sabersport Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON MAY 11, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Sabersport AT 1-909-598-7589.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Sabersport.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2009-05-11
Recall no.
09e025000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Dope, Inc. IS Recalling 42,540 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dope, Inc. Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON July 28, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Dope, Inc. AT 1-626-272-1798.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Dope, Inc.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen. Owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
2007-08-03
Recall no.
07v336000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Pickup Trucks, Passenger Vehicles, Sport Utility Vehicles, and Motor Homes Chassis, THE Speed Control Deactivation Switch May, Under Certain Conditions, Leak Internally and Then Overheat, Smoke, or Burn.
Consequence
This Could Result IN AN Underhood Fire.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Fused Wiring Harness. Owners OF THE Passenger Cars Included IN This Campaign Will BE Instructed TO Return Their Vehicles TO Their Dealers TO Have THE Speed Control Deactivation Switch Disconnected AS AN Interim Repair. AS Soon AS Repair Parts ARE Available (Expected October 2007), Owners Will BE Instructed TO Return TO THE Dealers FOR Installation OF A Fused Wiring Harness. THE Recall Began ON August 13, 2007, and Mailing Completed BY September 19, 2007. Owners MAY Contact Ford AT 1-888-222-2751.
Notes
Ford Recall NO. 05s28.customers MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;s Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1999 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1999 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1999 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1999 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1999 Ford Ranger competed fiercely with rivals like the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma, Toyota Tacoma, Nissan Frontier, and Dodge Dakota.
In terms of Performance, the Ranger's 4.0L V6 (160 hp) was competitive, though often slightly less powerful than the S-10's 4.3L V6 (180-190 hp) or the Tacoma's 3.4L V6 (190 hp). Its base 2.5L I4 was generally less robust than rivals' base engines. The Dodge Dakota offered a unique advantage with its optional V8, providing superior power and towing, bridging the gap between compact and full-size trucks.
Features across all compact trucks of this era were relatively basic. The Ranger, S-10, and Frontier offered similar levels of creature comforts like optional AC, power accessories, and cruise control. The Tacoma often had a slight edge in interior fit, finish, and ergonomics, but feature lists were comparable.
Reliability is where distinctions emerge. The Toyota Tacoma of this generation is widely considered the gold standard for reliability, known for its robust engines and overall longevity, though it also battled frame rust issues. The **Ford Ranger** is generally reliable, but its 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain issues are a significant long-term concern, as is widespread frame rust. The **Chevy S-10/GMC Sonoma** were decent, but their 4.3L V6s could suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks. The **Nissan Frontier** was robust but less common, and the **Dodge Dakota** often faced more reliability concerns, especially with transmissions and electrical systems.
Regarding Price, when new, all were similarly positioned. In the current used market, the **Toyota Tacoma** commands a significant premium due to its reputation, often costing 20-50% more than a comparable Ranger or S-10. The **Ford Ranger** and **Chevy S-10** typically offer excellent value in a similar price bracket. The **Nissan Frontier** might be slightly cheaper, and the **Dodge Dakota** often the most affordable used option due to its higher running costs and varied reliability.
Alternatives:
- Better Alternative (if budget allows and top-tier reliability is paramount): A **Toyota Tacoma** from the same era, but be prepared for higher purchase prices and diligent frame rust inspection.
- Similar Alternatives (for value-focused buyers): Another well-maintained **Ford Ranger** (especially with the 2.5L I4 or 3.0L V6) or a **Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma**, both offering comparable utility and affordability. For more power, a V8 **Dodge Dakota** is an option, accepting potential reliability tradeoffs.
In terms of Performance, the Ranger's 4.0L V6 (160 hp) was competitive, though often slightly less powerful than the S-10's 4.3L V6 (180-190 hp) or the Tacoma's 3.4L V6 (190 hp). Its base 2.5L I4 was generally less robust than rivals' base engines. The Dodge Dakota offered a unique advantage with its optional V8, providing superior power and towing, bridging the gap between compact and full-size trucks.
Features across all compact trucks of this era were relatively basic. The Ranger, S-10, and Frontier offered similar levels of creature comforts like optional AC, power accessories, and cruise control. The Tacoma often had a slight edge in interior fit, finish, and ergonomics, but feature lists were comparable.
Reliability is where distinctions emerge. The Toyota Tacoma of this generation is widely considered the gold standard for reliability, known for its robust engines and overall longevity, though it also battled frame rust issues. The **Ford Ranger** is generally reliable, but its 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain issues are a significant long-term concern, as is widespread frame rust. The **Chevy S-10/GMC Sonoma** were decent, but their 4.3L V6s could suffer from intake manifold gasket leaks. The **Nissan Frontier** was robust but less common, and the **Dodge Dakota** often faced more reliability concerns, especially with transmissions and electrical systems.
Regarding Price, when new, all were similarly positioned. In the current used market, the **Toyota Tacoma** commands a significant premium due to its reputation, often costing 20-50% more than a comparable Ranger or S-10. The **Ford Ranger** and **Chevy S-10** typically offer excellent value in a similar price bracket. The **Nissan Frontier** might be slightly cheaper, and the **Dodge Dakota** often the most affordable used option due to its higher running costs and varied reliability.
Alternatives:
- Better Alternative (if budget allows and top-tier reliability is paramount): A **Toyota Tacoma** from the same era, but be prepared for higher purchase prices and diligent frame rust inspection.
- Similar Alternatives (for value-focused buyers): Another well-maintained **Ford Ranger** (especially with the 2.5L I4 or 3.0L V6) or a **Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma**, both offering comparable utility and affordability. For more power, a V8 **Dodge Dakota** is an option, accepting potential reliability tradeoffs.
Final Verdict: Is the 1999 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1999 Ford Ranger is an excellent choice for individuals or small businesses needing a compact, practical, and economical pickup. It's ideal for first-time truck owners, DIY enthusiasts, students, or anyone seeking light hauling and towing capabilities without the expense and bulk of a full-size truck. Its simple mechanics make it appealing for those who prefer DIY maintenance or budget-friendly repairs.
Yes, it is absolutely worth buying as a **used vehicle**. Its robust build (despite specific weaknesses) and low ownership costs make it a fantastic value.
Conditions for buying: A crucial pre-purchase inspection is paramount, focusing intensely on frame rust and the condition of the 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain (if equipped). Prioritize examples with documented maintenance. The 2.5L I4 and 3.0L V6 engines generally offer fewer long-term headaches than the 4.0L SOHC. XLT and Sport trims provide more comfort. If you find a rust-free, well-maintained Ranger, it can be a highly durable and functional vehicle for many years to come, offering exceptional utility for its price.
Yes, it is absolutely worth buying as a **used vehicle**. Its robust build (despite specific weaknesses) and low ownership costs make it a fantastic value.
Conditions for buying: A crucial pre-purchase inspection is paramount, focusing intensely on frame rust and the condition of the 4.0L SOHC V6's timing chain (if equipped). Prioritize examples with documented maintenance. The 2.5L I4 and 3.0L V6 engines generally offer fewer long-term headaches than the 4.0L SOHC. XLT and Sport trims provide more comfort. If you find a rust-free, well-maintained Ranger, it can be a highly durable and functional vehicle for many years to come, offering exceptional utility for its price.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma