The 1993 Ford Ranger represents the third generation of Ford's highly popular compact pickup truck, known for its rugged durability and versatility. Introduced for the 1993 model year and running through 1997, it featured a refreshed body style available in Regular Cab and SuperCab configurations, with short or long beds. Key trims included XL, XLT, STX, and the distinctive "Splash" model. New prices ranged roughly from $9,000 to $18,000. Its popularity stemmed from its reputation as an affordable, reliable, and maneuverable workhorse, appealing to a wide range of buyers.
The Good
The 1993 Ford Ranger boasts exceptional value and impressive reliability, especially with proper maintenance. Practical buyers appreciate its robust design, decent fuel efficiency for a truck, and compact size ideal for city driving or light hauling. Emotionally, its classic, no-nonsense aesthetic, and "go-anywhere" attitude (especially 4x4 models) evoke a sense of freedom and adventure.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1993 Ford Ranger include susceptibility to rust on the frame and body, particularly in salt-belt regions. Automatic transmissions (A4LD) can be prone to failure at higher mileages. Older engines, while durable, might feel underpowered by modern standards, and interior comfort is basic. Electrical gremlins can also arise with age.
1993 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L "Lima" SOHC I4 (standard)
- 3.0L "Vulcan" OHV V6 (optional)
- 4.0L "Cologne" OHV V6 (optional, often with 4x4 or higher trims)
- Horsepower (approximate):
- 2.3L I4: 100-112 hp
- 3.0L V6: 140 hp
- 4.0L V6: 160 hp
- Fuel Economy (approximate MPG, varies by drivetrain/transmission):
- 2.3L I4: 20-24 MPG (city/highway combined)
- 3.0L V6: 17-21 MPG
- 4.0L V6: 15-19 MPG
- 0-60 MPH Times (approximate, varies significantly by engine/drivetrain):
- 2.3L I4: 12-14 seconds
- 3.0L V6: 10-12 seconds
- 4.0L V6: 8-10 seconds
- Towing Capacity (if applicable):
- Ranges from approximately 1,200 lbs (base I4) up to 5,000 lbs (4.0L V6 with proper equipment)
- Trim-Level Features:
- XL: Base work truck with vinyl seating, manual windows and locks, AM/FM radio, basic instrumentation.
- XLT: Added comfort features like cloth upholstery, optional power windows/locks, air conditioning, chrome exterior accents, styled steel or alloy wheels, upgraded interior trim.
- STX: Sport-oriented trim with bucket seats, unique wheels, body graphics, and typically included many XLT options as standard.
- Splash: A distinctive styling package featuring a flareside (stepside) bed, unique body-color bumpers and grille, bold graphics, special alloy wheels, and often included sport bucket seats.
1993 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1993 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Heavy Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Canada |
| Manufacturing City | WIXOM |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 33001 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | M11 |
| Engine Size | 8.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | - |
| Transmission Type | - |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1993 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1993 Ford Ranger, while generally lauded for its long-term durability, does have several frequently reported problems and reliability concerns. Foremost among these is rust, which can severely affect the frame, bed supports, wheel arches, cab corners, and rocker panels, especially in regions exposed to road salt. This is a primary killer of these vehicles.
Another significant concern is the automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD 4-speed unit. These transmissions are known to be problematic, often developing rough shifting, solenoid issues, or outright failure around 100,000-150,000 miles. Manual transmissions are generally much more robust and preferred by enthusiasts for reliability.
Cooling system issues are also common, including radiator leaks, water pump failures, and deteriorating hoses due to age. Suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and control arm bushings will inevitably wear out, leading to loose steering or clunking noises. Leaf springs can also sag over time.
Electrical problems, though usually minor, can include faulty dashboard lights, power window motors, or issues with the fuel gauge sender. Fuel pump failures, often located in the fuel tank, are also a known issue at higher mileages.
Engine-specific concerns include oil leaks (valve cover, timing cover) on the 2.3L I4, intake manifold gasket leaks on the 3.0L V6, and potential timing chain guide wear on neglected 4.0L V6s. However, these engines are generally very durable when maintained.
Regarding recalls for the 1993 model year, specific instances included a recall for an accessory power distribution junction box that could cause an electrical short, posing a fire risk. There were also minor recalls related to seat belt assemblies. While not as widely publicized as later cruise control switch recalls, it's always advisable to check a specific vehicle's VIN for any outstanding recalls.
Another significant concern is the automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD 4-speed unit. These transmissions are known to be problematic, often developing rough shifting, solenoid issues, or outright failure around 100,000-150,000 miles. Manual transmissions are generally much more robust and preferred by enthusiasts for reliability.
Cooling system issues are also common, including radiator leaks, water pump failures, and deteriorating hoses due to age. Suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and control arm bushings will inevitably wear out, leading to loose steering or clunking noises. Leaf springs can also sag over time.
Electrical problems, though usually minor, can include faulty dashboard lights, power window motors, or issues with the fuel gauge sender. Fuel pump failures, often located in the fuel tank, are also a known issue at higher mileages.
Engine-specific concerns include oil leaks (valve cover, timing cover) on the 2.3L I4, intake manifold gasket leaks on the 3.0L V6, and potential timing chain guide wear on neglected 4.0L V6s. However, these engines are generally very durable when maintained.
Regarding recalls for the 1993 model year, specific instances included a recall for an accessory power distribution junction box that could cause an electrical short, posing a fire risk. There were also minor recalls related to seat belt assemblies. While not as widely publicized as later cruise control switch recalls, it's always advisable to check a specific vehicle's VIN for any outstanding recalls.
How long will the 1993 Ford Ranger last?
Many 1993 Ford Rangers, particularly those with the 2.3L I4 or 3.0L V6 engines and manual transmissions, can easily achieve 200,000 to 250,000 miles with consistent maintenance. Well-cared-for examples are known to exceed 300,000 miles, demonstrating remarkable long-term durability thanks to their simple, robust design. Their sturdy frames contribute to their longevity, provided they are kept free from severe rust.
However, key weaknesses that emerge over time include significant rust accumulation on the chassis and body panels, which can compromise structural integrity. The automatic transmissions are a notable weak point, often requiring rebuilding or replacement. Suspension components and electrical systems also become more prone to wear and failure with age and high mileage, becoming common maintenance items for vehicles approaching three decades of service.
However, key weaknesses that emerge over time include significant rust accumulation on the chassis and body panels, which can compromise structural integrity. The automatic transmissions are a notable weak point, often requiring rebuilding or replacement. Suspension components and electrical systems also become more prone to wear and failure with age and high mileage, becoming common maintenance items for vehicles approaching three decades of service.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1993 Ford Ranger, being a vehicle from the early 1990s, offers a minimalist approach to built-in technology and entertainment compared to modern trucks. Standard features included analog gauges for speed, fuel, temperature, and oil pressure. Basic AM/FM radio was standard, with an optional cassette player. CD changers were rare and mostly aftermarket additions. Air conditioning, power windows, power locks, and cruise control were available as optional creature comforts.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, lane-keeping assist, or advanced parking sensors. Rear anti-lock brakes (RABS) were standard, offering improved braking performance for the rear wheels, but full 4-wheel ABS was an optional extra, typically found on higher trims or models equipped with the 4.0L V6 engine.
In terms of safety, a significant advancement for the 1993 model year Ranger was the introduction of a driver-side airbag as standard equipment, a crucial safety upgrade for its time. A passenger-side airbag was not available. Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants. The vehicle relied on its robust ladder frame construction and steel body panels for occupant protection. Given its age, advanced crumple zones and side-impact protection were not as sophisticated as in contemporary vehicles.
Crash-test ratings from NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for vehicles of this vintage are less comprehensive and use different standards than today's. While specific detailed ratings for the 1993 Ranger are difficult to directly compare, vehicles from this era typically received modest frontal impact ratings (often 3-4 stars, if rated) and lacked side-impact or rollover evaluations by modern methodologies. It's important to understand that its safety performance, while acceptable for its time, would be significantly inferior to any modern vehicle due to the absence of multiple airbags, advanced structural designs, and electronic safety aids.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, lane-keeping assist, or advanced parking sensors. Rear anti-lock brakes (RABS) were standard, offering improved braking performance for the rear wheels, but full 4-wheel ABS was an optional extra, typically found on higher trims or models equipped with the 4.0L V6 engine.
In terms of safety, a significant advancement for the 1993 model year Ranger was the introduction of a driver-side airbag as standard equipment, a crucial safety upgrade for its time. A passenger-side airbag was not available. Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants. The vehicle relied on its robust ladder frame construction and steel body panels for occupant protection. Given its age, advanced crumple zones and side-impact protection were not as sophisticated as in contemporary vehicles.
Crash-test ratings from NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for vehicles of this vintage are less comprehensive and use different standards than today's. While specific detailed ratings for the 1993 Ranger are difficult to directly compare, vehicles from this era typically received modest frontal impact ratings (often 3-4 stars, if rated) and lacked side-impact or rollover evaluations by modern methodologies. It's important to understand that its safety performance, while acceptable for its time, would be significantly inferior to any modern vehicle due to the absence of multiple airbags, advanced structural designs, and electronic safety aids.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1993 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new in 1993, the Ford Ranger had a broad pricing spectrum. A base Regular Cab 2WD model started around $8,900 - $10,500, while a well-equipped XLT SuperCab 4x4 could reach $15,000 - $18,000, depending on options.
Today, current used market prices vary wildly based on condition. A running but rough example might fetch $1,500 - $4,000. Good condition, rust-free Rangers typically range from $4,000 - $8,000. Exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or rare "Splash" models can command $8,000 to $15,000 or more, especially among collectors.
The Ranger experienced significant depreciation during its first 15-20 years. However, its value has largely stabilized, and clean examples are now experiencing slight appreciation due to nostalgia and the dwindling supply of compact trucks. Factors affecting resale value are primarily rust absence (a rust-free frame and body are paramount), maintenance history, mileage, and desirable configurations like 4x4, SuperCab, or the sporty "Splash" trim. Manual transmissions and the 4.0L V6 can also enhance value.
Today, current used market prices vary wildly based on condition. A running but rough example might fetch $1,500 - $4,000. Good condition, rust-free Rangers typically range from $4,000 - $8,000. Exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or rare "Splash" models can command $8,000 to $15,000 or more, especially among collectors.
The Ranger experienced significant depreciation during its first 15-20 years. However, its value has largely stabilized, and clean examples are now experiencing slight appreciation due to nostalgia and the dwindling supply of compact trucks. Factors affecting resale value are primarily rust absence (a rust-free frame and body are paramount), maintenance history, mileage, and desirable configurations like 4x4, SuperCab, or the sporty "Splash" trim. Manual transmissions and the 4.0L V6 can also enhance value.
1993 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1993 Ford Ranger is generally an economical vehicle to own long-term, especially for budget-conscious individuals. Insurance costs are typically very low due to its age and modest value. Fuel economy is reasonable for a truck, particularly with the 2.3L I4 engine, and it runs on regular unleaded gasoline. Maintenance and repair costs are often minimal because parts are abundant and inexpensive, both OEM and aftermarket. Many common repairs are also straightforward for DIY enthusiasts.
However, major repairs like an automatic transmission rebuild or extensive rust remediation can become costly if professional help is required. If a Ranger is well-maintained and free from major underlying issues like significant rust, it offers very low ownership costs, making it an excellent choice for a utilitarian daily driver or light work truck.
However, major repairs like an automatic transmission rebuild or extensive rust remediation can become costly if professional help is required. If a Ranger is well-maintained and free from major underlying issues like significant rust, it offers very low ownership costs, making it an excellent choice for a utilitarian daily driver or light work truck.
1993 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1993 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
1993 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1993 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1993 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1993 Ford Ranger competed directly with strong rivals in the compact pickup segment, primarily the Chevrolet S-10 (and its GMC Sonoma twin), Toyota Pickup (pre-Tacoma), and Nissan Hardbody (D21).
In terms of performance, the Ranger's optional 4.0L V6 offered competitive power for its class, often feeling more muscular than the base engines of its rivals. However, the 2.3L I4 and 3.0L V6 were often less powerful than optional V6s found in the S-10 (especially the refreshed 1994+ 4.3L Vortec) or Toyota's V6, though these Ranger engines excelled in durability. Handling was typical for a compact truck, utilitarian rather than sporty.
Features were quite similar across the board for this era of compact trucks, with all offering basic amenities like optional air conditioning, power windows/locks, and various cab/bed configurations. The Ranger did distinguish itself by making a driver-side airbag standard in 1993, a notable safety advantage over some competitors. The "Splash" trim also offered unique factory styling.
Reliability is where distinctions truly emerge. The Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody are often considered the gold standard for bulletproof drivetrain reliability and overall longevity, frequently outlasting other components. The Ranger is also highly reliable, particularly with manual transmissions and the I4 or 3.0L V6. However, its automatic transmissions (A4LD) and susceptibility to rust are often cited as weak points, potentially making it less "bulletproof" than its Japanese counterparts. The S-10 offered decent reliability but sometimes suffered from more electrical gremlins or less durable interior plastics.
Regarding price, the Ranger, due to its massive production numbers, often represents the most affordable entry point into the compact truck market, both new and used. Toyota Pickups often command a significant premium on the used market due to their legendary reliability and robust off-road reputation, while Nissan Hardbodies sit somewhere in the middle. The S-10 is often priced similarly to the Ranger, or slightly higher for its more powerful V6 options.
Recommended alternatives that are similar or potentially "better" depending on priorities include:
In terms of performance, the Ranger's optional 4.0L V6 offered competitive power for its class, often feeling more muscular than the base engines of its rivals. However, the 2.3L I4 and 3.0L V6 were often less powerful than optional V6s found in the S-10 (especially the refreshed 1994+ 4.3L Vortec) or Toyota's V6, though these Ranger engines excelled in durability. Handling was typical for a compact truck, utilitarian rather than sporty.
Features were quite similar across the board for this era of compact trucks, with all offering basic amenities like optional air conditioning, power windows/locks, and various cab/bed configurations. The Ranger did distinguish itself by making a driver-side airbag standard in 1993, a notable safety advantage over some competitors. The "Splash" trim also offered unique factory styling.
Reliability is where distinctions truly emerge. The Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody are often considered the gold standard for bulletproof drivetrain reliability and overall longevity, frequently outlasting other components. The Ranger is also highly reliable, particularly with manual transmissions and the I4 or 3.0L V6. However, its automatic transmissions (A4LD) and susceptibility to rust are often cited as weak points, potentially making it less "bulletproof" than its Japanese counterparts. The S-10 offered decent reliability but sometimes suffered from more electrical gremlins or less durable interior plastics.
Regarding price, the Ranger, due to its massive production numbers, often represents the most affordable entry point into the compact truck market, both new and used. Toyota Pickups often command a significant premium on the used market due to their legendary reliability and robust off-road reputation, while Nissan Hardbodies sit somewhere in the middle. The S-10 is often priced similarly to the Ranger, or slightly higher for its more powerful V6 options.
Recommended alternatives that are similar or potentially "better" depending on priorities include:
- Toyota Pickup (1989-1995): For unmatched reliability, off-road prowess, and a strong enthusiast following, if budget allows for the higher price tag.
- Nissan Hardbody (D21, 1986-1997): A strong contender for reliability and robustness, often overlooked, offering similar utility to the Ranger.
- Chevrolet S-10 / GMC Sonoma (1994+): If more powerful V6 engines (4.3L Vortec) and a slightly larger feel are desired, though overall reliability can be a bit more variable than the Japanese rivals.
Final Verdict: Is the 1993 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1993 Ford Ranger is an excellent choice for individuals seeking a straightforward, utilitarian, and highly affordable compact pickup truck. It's ideal for first-time truck owners, those needing a reliable vehicle for light hauling, DIY projects, or simply commuting. Its compact size makes it manageable in urban environments, while 4x4 models offer decent off-road capability. It appeals to those who prioritize practicality, low ownership costs, and a classic truck aesthetic over modern features or luxurious comfort.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, under the right conditions. Since it's an older vehicle, you'll be buying it used. Critical conditions for purchase include finding a model with minimal to no frame rust, as this is its biggest long-term Achilles' heel. A well-documented maintenance history is a significant plus. Opting for a manual transmission can enhance long-term reliability by avoiding potential automatic transmission issues. The 2.3L I4 is superb for economy and durability, while the 4.0L V6 provides ample power. It's not for those expecting contemporary safety tech, infotainment, or quiet, refined rides, but for a simple, honest workhorse, the 1993 Ranger remains a solid, budget-friendly option.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, under the right conditions. Since it's an older vehicle, you'll be buying it used. Critical conditions for purchase include finding a model with minimal to no frame rust, as this is its biggest long-term Achilles' heel. A well-documented maintenance history is a significant plus. Opting for a manual transmission can enhance long-term reliability by avoiding potential automatic transmission issues. The 2.3L I4 is superb for economy and durability, while the 4.0L V6 provides ample power. It's not for those expecting contemporary safety tech, infotainment, or quiet, refined rides, but for a simple, honest workhorse, the 1993 Ranger remains a solid, budget-friendly option.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.