The 1993 Ford Ranger represents the third generation of Ford's highly popular compact pickup truck, known for its rugged durability and versatility. Introduced for the 1993 model year and running through 1997, it featured a refreshed body style available in Regular Cab and SuperCab configurations, with short or long beds. Key trims included XL, XLT, STX, and the distinctive "Splash" model. New prices ranged roughly from $9,000 to $18,000. Its popularity stemmed from its reputation as an affordable, reliable, and maneuverable workhorse, appealing to a wide range of buyers.
The Good
The 1993 Ford Ranger boasts exceptional value and impressive reliability, especially with proper maintenance. Practical buyers appreciate its robust design, decent fuel efficiency for a truck, and compact size ideal for city driving or light hauling. Emotionally, its classic, no-nonsense aesthetic, and "go-anywhere" attitude (especially 4x4 models) evoke a sense of freedom and adventure.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1993 Ford Ranger include susceptibility to rust on the frame and body, particularly in salt-belt regions. Automatic transmissions (A4LD) can be prone to failure at higher mileages. Older engines, while durable, might feel underpowered by modern standards, and interior comfort is basic. Electrical gremlins can also arise with age.
1993 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L "Lima" SOHC I4 (standard)
- 3.0L "Vulcan" OHV V6 (optional)
- 4.0L "Cologne" OHV V6 (optional, often with 4x4 or higher trims)
- Horsepower (approximate):
- 2.3L I4: 100-112 hp
- 3.0L V6: 140 hp
- 4.0L V6: 160 hp
- Fuel Economy (approximate MPG, varies by drivetrain/transmission):
- 2.3L I4: 20-24 MPG (city/highway combined)
- 3.0L V6: 17-21 MPG
- 4.0L V6: 15-19 MPG
- 0-60 MPH Times (approximate, varies significantly by engine/drivetrain):
- 2.3L I4: 12-14 seconds
- 3.0L V6: 10-12 seconds
- 4.0L V6: 8-10 seconds
- Towing Capacity (if applicable):
- Ranges from approximately 1,200 lbs (base I4) up to 5,000 lbs (4.0L V6 with proper equipment)
- Trim-Level Features:
- XL: Base work truck with vinyl seating, manual windows and locks, AM/FM radio, basic instrumentation.
- XLT: Added comfort features like cloth upholstery, optional power windows/locks, air conditioning, chrome exterior accents, styled steel or alloy wheels, upgraded interior trim.
- STX: Sport-oriented trim with bucket seats, unique wheels, body graphics, and typically included many XLT options as standard.
- Splash: A distinctive styling package featuring a flareside (stepside) bed, unique body-color bumpers and grille, bold graphics, special alloy wheels, and often included sport bucket seats.
1993 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1993 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Heavy Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | Canada |
| Manufacturing City | WIXOM |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 33001 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | M11 |
| Engine Size | 8.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | Manual 5-Speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1993 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1993 Ford Ranger, while generally lauded for its long-term durability, does have several frequently reported problems and reliability concerns. Foremost among these is rust, which can severely affect the frame, bed supports, wheel arches, cab corners, and rocker panels, especially in regions exposed to road salt. This is a primary killer of these vehicles.
Another significant concern is the automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD 4-speed unit. These transmissions are known to be problematic, often developing rough shifting, solenoid issues, or outright failure around 100,000-150,000 miles. Manual transmissions are generally much more robust and preferred by enthusiasts for reliability.
Cooling system issues are also common, including radiator leaks, water pump failures, and deteriorating hoses due to age. Suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and control arm bushings will inevitably wear out, leading to loose steering or clunking noises. Leaf springs can also sag over time.
Electrical problems, though usually minor, can include faulty dashboard lights, power window motors, or issues with the fuel gauge sender. Fuel pump failures, often located in the fuel tank, are also a known issue at higher mileages.
Engine-specific concerns include oil leaks (valve cover, timing cover) on the 2.3L I4, intake manifold gasket leaks on the 3.0L V6, and potential timing chain guide wear on neglected 4.0L V6s. However, these engines are generally very durable when maintained.
Regarding recalls for the 1993 model year, specific instances included a recall for an accessory power distribution junction box that could cause an electrical short, posing a fire risk. There were also minor recalls related to seat belt assemblies. While not as widely publicized as later cruise control switch recalls, it's always advisable to check a specific vehicle's VIN for any outstanding recalls.
Another significant concern is the automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD 4-speed unit. These transmissions are known to be problematic, often developing rough shifting, solenoid issues, or outright failure around 100,000-150,000 miles. Manual transmissions are generally much more robust and preferred by enthusiasts for reliability.
Cooling system issues are also common, including radiator leaks, water pump failures, and deteriorating hoses due to age. Suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and control arm bushings will inevitably wear out, leading to loose steering or clunking noises. Leaf springs can also sag over time.
Electrical problems, though usually minor, can include faulty dashboard lights, power window motors, or issues with the fuel gauge sender. Fuel pump failures, often located in the fuel tank, are also a known issue at higher mileages.
Engine-specific concerns include oil leaks (valve cover, timing cover) on the 2.3L I4, intake manifold gasket leaks on the 3.0L V6, and potential timing chain guide wear on neglected 4.0L V6s. However, these engines are generally very durable when maintained.
Regarding recalls for the 1993 model year, specific instances included a recall for an accessory power distribution junction box that could cause an electrical short, posing a fire risk. There were also minor recalls related to seat belt assemblies. While not as widely publicized as later cruise control switch recalls, it's always advisable to check a specific vehicle's VIN for any outstanding recalls.
How long will the 1993 Ford Ranger last?
Many 1993 Ford Rangers, particularly those with the 2.3L I4 or 3.0L V6 engines and manual transmissions, can easily achieve 200,000 to 250,000 miles with consistent maintenance. Well-cared-for examples are known to exceed 300,000 miles, demonstrating remarkable long-term durability thanks to their simple, robust design. Their sturdy frames contribute to their longevity, provided they are kept free from severe rust.
However, key weaknesses that emerge over time include significant rust accumulation on the chassis and body panels, which can compromise structural integrity. The automatic transmissions are a notable weak point, often requiring rebuilding or replacement. Suspension components and electrical systems also become more prone to wear and failure with age and high mileage, becoming common maintenance items for vehicles approaching three decades of service.
However, key weaknesses that emerge over time include significant rust accumulation on the chassis and body panels, which can compromise structural integrity. The automatic transmissions are a notable weak point, often requiring rebuilding or replacement. Suspension components and electrical systems also become more prone to wear and failure with age and high mileage, becoming common maintenance items for vehicles approaching three decades of service.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1993 Ford Ranger, being a vehicle from the early 1990s, offers a minimalist approach to built-in technology and entertainment compared to modern trucks. Standard features included analog gauges for speed, fuel, temperature, and oil pressure. Basic AM/FM radio was standard, with an optional cassette player. CD changers were rare and mostly aftermarket additions. Air conditioning, power windows, power locks, and cruise control were available as optional creature comforts.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, lane-keeping assist, or advanced parking sensors. Rear anti-lock brakes (RABS) were standard, offering improved braking performance for the rear wheels, but full 4-wheel ABS was an optional extra, typically found on higher trims or models equipped with the 4.0L V6 engine.
In terms of safety, a significant advancement for the 1993 model year Ranger was the introduction of a driver-side airbag as standard equipment, a crucial safety upgrade for its time. A passenger-side airbag was not available. Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants. The vehicle relied on its robust ladder frame construction and steel body panels for occupant protection. Given its age, advanced crumple zones and side-impact protection were not as sophisticated as in contemporary vehicles.
Crash-test ratings from NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for vehicles of this vintage are less comprehensive and use different standards than today's. While specific detailed ratings for the 1993 Ranger are difficult to directly compare, vehicles from this era typically received modest frontal impact ratings (often 3-4 stars, if rated) and lacked side-impact or rollover evaluations by modern methodologies. It's important to understand that its safety performance, while acceptable for its time, would be significantly inferior to any modern vehicle due to the absence of multiple airbags, advanced structural designs, and electronic safety aids.
Driver-assistance features were virtually non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, lane-keeping assist, or advanced parking sensors. Rear anti-lock brakes (RABS) were standard, offering improved braking performance for the rear wheels, but full 4-wheel ABS was an optional extra, typically found on higher trims or models equipped with the 4.0L V6 engine.
In terms of safety, a significant advancement for the 1993 model year Ranger was the introduction of a driver-side airbag as standard equipment, a crucial safety upgrade for its time. A passenger-side airbag was not available. Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants. The vehicle relied on its robust ladder frame construction and steel body panels for occupant protection. Given its age, advanced crumple zones and side-impact protection were not as sophisticated as in contemporary vehicles.
Crash-test ratings from NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) for vehicles of this vintage are less comprehensive and use different standards than today's. While specific detailed ratings for the 1993 Ranger are difficult to directly compare, vehicles from this era typically received modest frontal impact ratings (often 3-4 stars, if rated) and lacked side-impact or rollover evaluations by modern methodologies. It's important to understand that its safety performance, while acceptable for its time, would be significantly inferior to any modern vehicle due to the absence of multiple airbags, advanced structural designs, and electronic safety aids.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1993 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new in 1993, the Ford Ranger had a broad pricing spectrum. A base Regular Cab 2WD model started around $8,900 - $10,500, while a well-equipped XLT SuperCab 4x4 could reach $15,000 - $18,000, depending on options.
Today, current used market prices vary wildly based on condition. A running but rough example might fetch $1,500 - $4,000. Good condition, rust-free Rangers typically range from $4,000 - $8,000. Exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or rare "Splash" models can command $8,000 to $15,000 or more, especially among collectors.
The Ranger experienced significant depreciation during its first 15-20 years. However, its value has largely stabilized, and clean examples are now experiencing slight appreciation due to nostalgia and the dwindling supply of compact trucks. Factors affecting resale value are primarily rust absence (a rust-free frame and body are paramount), maintenance history, mileage, and desirable configurations like 4x4, SuperCab, or the sporty "Splash" trim. Manual transmissions and the 4.0L V6 can also enhance value.
Today, current used market prices vary wildly based on condition. A running but rough example might fetch $1,500 - $4,000. Good condition, rust-free Rangers typically range from $4,000 - $8,000. Exceptionally clean, low-mileage, or rare "Splash" models can command $8,000 to $15,000 or more, especially among collectors.
The Ranger experienced significant depreciation during its first 15-20 years. However, its value has largely stabilized, and clean examples are now experiencing slight appreciation due to nostalgia and the dwindling supply of compact trucks. Factors affecting resale value are primarily rust absence (a rust-free frame and body are paramount), maintenance history, mileage, and desirable configurations like 4x4, SuperCab, or the sporty "Splash" trim. Manual transmissions and the 4.0L V6 can also enhance value.
1993 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1993 Ford Ranger is generally an economical vehicle to own long-term, especially for budget-conscious individuals. Insurance costs are typically very low due to its age and modest value. Fuel economy is reasonable for a truck, particularly with the 2.3L I4 engine, and it runs on regular unleaded gasoline. Maintenance and repair costs are often minimal because parts are abundant and inexpensive, both OEM and aftermarket. Many common repairs are also straightforward for DIY enthusiasts.
However, major repairs like an automatic transmission rebuild or extensive rust remediation can become costly if professional help is required. If a Ranger is well-maintained and free from major underlying issues like significant rust, it offers very low ownership costs, making it an excellent choice for a utilitarian daily driver or light work truck.
However, major repairs like an automatic transmission rebuild or extensive rust remediation can become costly if professional help is required. If a Ranger is well-maintained and free from major underlying issues like significant rust, it offers very low ownership costs, making it an excellent choice for a utilitarian daily driver or light work truck.
1993 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1993 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
1993 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2001-05-22
Recall no.
01x001000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Equipment Description: Ford IS Replacing All Firestone Wilderness AT 15, 16, and 17 Inch Tires Mounted ON Ford Trucks and Suvs. Ford Reports Tread Separation CAN Occur DUE TO A Combination OF THE Sensitivity OF THE Tire Design TO Stress, Aging, and Manufacturing Differences Between Plants. Ford IS Replacing These Tires TO Prevent Possible Premature Tire Failure. Vehicle Description: THE Vehicles Listed Below MAY Have Been Originally Equipped With Firestone Wilderness AT Tires or MAY Have HAD Wilderness AT Tires Installed During THE Firestone Recall Launched IN August 2000. Certain 1991 Throught 2002 Ford Explorer Certain 2001 Throught 2002 Explorer Sport, and Sport Trac Certain 1997 Through 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Certain 1991 Through 2001 Ranger Certain 1999 Through 2001 Expedition Certain 1991 Through 1994, and 1997 Model Year F-Series Certain 1991 Through 1994 Bronco Note: Both Original Equipment and Replacement Tires ARE Affected.
Consequence
Should THE Tread Separate AT Highway Speeds, A Vehicle Crash Could Occur, Possibly Resulting IN Personal Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON March 31, 2002. However, Customers CAN Contact Ford AT 1-877-917-3673 or GO On-line TO Www.ford.com FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2000-08-21
Recall no.
00t005000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence
IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Recall date
1998-04-08
Recall no.
98e010000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Equipment Description: Aftermarket Brake Rotors FOR USE ON Certain Ford and Mazda Trucks. Cracked Castings Caused Cracks TO Appear ON THE Outer Diameter OF THE Rotor HAT or Around THE Stud Hole.
Consequence
Loss OF Braking CAN Result.
Remedy
Aimco Will Reimburse Consumers/Installers FOR THE Cost OF Replacement Rotors and Installation. Consumers ARE Requested TO Return TO THE Location Where THE Rotors Were Originally Purchased/Installed FOR Replacement.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin During April 1998.owners WHO DO NOT Receive THE Free Rotors Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Aimco AT 815-759-7935.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist:hydraulic
Recall date
1996-02-05
Recall no.
96v024001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Studs Which Attach THE Brake Master Cylinder TO THE Power Brake Vacuum Booster Assembly CAN Develop Stress Corrosion Cracking After Being Operated FOR AN Extended Period OF Time IN THE Southern California Location.
Consequence
IF A Crack Occurs, IT Could Result IN ONE or Both Studs Fracturing. THE Master Cylinder Could Then Separate From THE Vacuum Booster, When THE Brakes ARE Applied, Preventing THE Service Brakes From Activating Increasing THE Risk OF A Vehicle Accident.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Power Brake Vacuum Booster Assembly.
Notes
System: Brakes; Power Assist; Primary; Booster. Vehicle Description: Multi-Purpose Vehicles and Light Duty Trucks Originally Sold or Currently Registered IN THE Southern California Counties OF LOS Angeles, Orange, SAN Bernadino, SAN Diego, Riverside, Ventura, Santa Barbara, SAN Luis Obispo, Imperial, and Kern.note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time, Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1995-12-05
Recall no.
95v231001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
During Extreme Cold, Northern Climate Winter Conditions, ICE CAN Form IN THE Throttle Body OF THE Engine Causing THE Throttle Plate TO Remain IN THE Highway Cruising Position After THE Accelerator IS Released or THE Speed Control IS Deactivated.
Consequence
THE Vehicle Stopping Distances CAN BE Increased Possibly Resulting IN AN Accident.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE AIR Intake Duct and Valve Assembly With Revised Units.
Notes
System: Fuel; Throttle Linkages and Control.vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks Equipped With A 2.3l Enginebuilt AT THE Edison, Louisville and Twin Cities Assembly Plants and Currently Registered IN THE Following States: Alaska, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan (Upper Peninsula), NEW York, Maine, Vermont and NEW Hampshire.note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Parking Brake:conventional
Recall date
1994-09-07
Recall no.
94v169001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Parking Brake Control Self-Adjust Pawl Does NOT Line UP Properly With THE Self-Adjust Rachet Causing THE Pawl TO Slip Over ONE or More Teeth IN THE Rachet.
Consequence
When THE Above Occurs, IT CAN Result IN Parking Brake System Ineffectiveness. THE Parking Brake Will NOT Hold THE Vehicle, Causing THE Vehicle TO Roll Freely, IF THE Transmission IS NOT Left IN Gear.
Remedy
A Wedge Will BE Installed Which Will Serve TO Lock THE Parking Brake Self-Adjust Mechanism Pawl Into Engagement With THE Rachet. Also, Owners Will BE Advised TO Release and Reapply THE Parking Brake Whenever Tooth Skip Occurs and Will BE Reminded TO Always Turn OFF THE Engine and Leave THE Vehicle IN Gear When THE Vehicle IS Parked.
Notes
System: Emergency Parking Brake; Mechanical.vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks and Multipurpose Vehicles With Manual Transmissions.note: IF Your Vehicle IS Presented TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and THE Remedy IS NOT Provided Free OF Charge Within A Reasonabletime or THE Remedy Does NOT Correct THE Defect, Please Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also, Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2008-08-11
Recall no.
08e050000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
K2 Motor IS Recalling 1,921 Aftermarket Headlamps OF Various Models Sold FOR USE ON THE Above Listed Vehicles. These Headlamps ARE Missing THE Amber Side Reflex Reflector Which Fails TO Conform With THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment."
Consequence
Without THE Amber Side Reflex Reflectors, THE Lighting Visibility MAY BE Affected, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
K2 Motor Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund. THE Recall Began ON Decemeber 17, 2008. Owners MAY Contact K2 Motor AT 1-909-839-2992.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Manufactured BY Honda, Ford, or Chrysler Llc. Customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2009-04-07
Recall no.
09e012000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Sabersport IS Recalling 16,270 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Sabersport Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON MAY 11, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Sabersport AT 1-909-598-7589.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Sabersport.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2009-05-11
Recall no.
09e025000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Dope, Inc. IS Recalling 42,540 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dope, Inc. Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON July 28, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Dope, Inc. AT 1-626-272-1798.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Dope, Inc.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen. Owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
1993 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1993 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1993 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1993 Ford Ranger competed directly with strong rivals in the compact pickup segment, primarily the Chevrolet S-10 (and its GMC Sonoma twin), Toyota Pickup (pre-Tacoma), and Nissan Hardbody (D21).
In terms of performance, the Ranger's optional 4.0L V6 offered competitive power for its class, often feeling more muscular than the base engines of its rivals. However, the 2.3L I4 and 3.0L V6 were often less powerful than optional V6s found in the S-10 (especially the refreshed 1994+ 4.3L Vortec) or Toyota's V6, though these Ranger engines excelled in durability. Handling was typical for a compact truck, utilitarian rather than sporty.
Features were quite similar across the board for this era of compact trucks, with all offering basic amenities like optional air conditioning, power windows/locks, and various cab/bed configurations. The Ranger did distinguish itself by making a driver-side airbag standard in 1993, a notable safety advantage over some competitors. The "Splash" trim also offered unique factory styling.
Reliability is where distinctions truly emerge. The Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody are often considered the gold standard for bulletproof drivetrain reliability and overall longevity, frequently outlasting other components. The Ranger is also highly reliable, particularly with manual transmissions and the I4 or 3.0L V6. However, its automatic transmissions (A4LD) and susceptibility to rust are often cited as weak points, potentially making it less "bulletproof" than its Japanese counterparts. The S-10 offered decent reliability but sometimes suffered from more electrical gremlins or less durable interior plastics.
Regarding price, the Ranger, due to its massive production numbers, often represents the most affordable entry point into the compact truck market, both new and used. Toyota Pickups often command a significant premium on the used market due to their legendary reliability and robust off-road reputation, while Nissan Hardbodies sit somewhere in the middle. The S-10 is often priced similarly to the Ranger, or slightly higher for its more powerful V6 options.
Recommended alternatives that are similar or potentially "better" depending on priorities include:
In terms of performance, the Ranger's optional 4.0L V6 offered competitive power for its class, often feeling more muscular than the base engines of its rivals. However, the 2.3L I4 and 3.0L V6 were often less powerful than optional V6s found in the S-10 (especially the refreshed 1994+ 4.3L Vortec) or Toyota's V6, though these Ranger engines excelled in durability. Handling was typical for a compact truck, utilitarian rather than sporty.
Features were quite similar across the board for this era of compact trucks, with all offering basic amenities like optional air conditioning, power windows/locks, and various cab/bed configurations. The Ranger did distinguish itself by making a driver-side airbag standard in 1993, a notable safety advantage over some competitors. The "Splash" trim also offered unique factory styling.
Reliability is where distinctions truly emerge. The Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody are often considered the gold standard for bulletproof drivetrain reliability and overall longevity, frequently outlasting other components. The Ranger is also highly reliable, particularly with manual transmissions and the I4 or 3.0L V6. However, its automatic transmissions (A4LD) and susceptibility to rust are often cited as weak points, potentially making it less "bulletproof" than its Japanese counterparts. The S-10 offered decent reliability but sometimes suffered from more electrical gremlins or less durable interior plastics.
Regarding price, the Ranger, due to its massive production numbers, often represents the most affordable entry point into the compact truck market, both new and used. Toyota Pickups often command a significant premium on the used market due to their legendary reliability and robust off-road reputation, while Nissan Hardbodies sit somewhere in the middle. The S-10 is often priced similarly to the Ranger, or slightly higher for its more powerful V6 options.
Recommended alternatives that are similar or potentially "better" depending on priorities include:
- Toyota Pickup (1989-1995): For unmatched reliability, off-road prowess, and a strong enthusiast following, if budget allows for the higher price tag.
- Nissan Hardbody (D21, 1986-1997): A strong contender for reliability and robustness, often overlooked, offering similar utility to the Ranger.
- Chevrolet S-10 / GMC Sonoma (1994+): If more powerful V6 engines (4.3L Vortec) and a slightly larger feel are desired, though overall reliability can be a bit more variable than the Japanese rivals.
Final Verdict: Is the 1993 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1993 Ford Ranger is an excellent choice for individuals seeking a straightforward, utilitarian, and highly affordable compact pickup truck. It's ideal for first-time truck owners, those needing a reliable vehicle for light hauling, DIY projects, or simply commuting. Its compact size makes it manageable in urban environments, while 4x4 models offer decent off-road capability. It appeals to those who prioritize practicality, low ownership costs, and a classic truck aesthetic over modern features or luxurious comfort.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, under the right conditions. Since it's an older vehicle, you'll be buying it used. Critical conditions for purchase include finding a model with minimal to no frame rust, as this is its biggest long-term Achilles' heel. A well-documented maintenance history is a significant plus. Opting for a manual transmission can enhance long-term reliability by avoiding potential automatic transmission issues. The 2.3L I4 is superb for economy and durability, while the 4.0L V6 provides ample power. It's not for those expecting contemporary safety tech, infotainment, or quiet, refined rides, but for a simple, honest workhorse, the 1993 Ranger remains a solid, budget-friendly option.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, under the right conditions. Since it's an older vehicle, you'll be buying it used. Critical conditions for purchase include finding a model with minimal to no frame rust, as this is its biggest long-term Achilles' heel. A well-documented maintenance history is a significant plus. Opting for a manual transmission can enhance long-term reliability by avoiding potential automatic transmission issues. The 2.3L I4 is superb for economy and durability, while the 4.0L V6 provides ample power. It's not for those expecting contemporary safety tech, infotainment, or quiet, refined rides, but for a simple, honest workhorse, the 1993 Ranger remains a solid, budget-friendly option.
Simon A
Simon is a contributor to VinCheck, where he provides articles and reviews on various automotive topics. His work focuses on delivering accurate and up-to-date information about used cars, helping readers make informed decisions.