The Good
The 1990 Ford Ranger offers notable advantages including its impressive value, practical design, and decent fuel efficiency for its era. Its compact size makes it nimble in urban environments, while its robust construction provides dependable performance for light-duty hauling and towing. For emotional buyers, it evokes a sense of rugged nostalgia and simplicity, embodying the classic American pickup. Practically, it's an affordable, easy-to-maintain vehicle, renowned for its workhorse reliability and low ownership costs, making it a smart choice for budget-conscious individuals needing a functional truck.
The Bad
When considering a 1990 Ford Ranger, potential buyers should watch out for pervasive rust issues, especially on the frame, bed, and cab corners. The 2.9-liter V6 engine is notorious for head gasket failures. Automatic transmissions, particularly the A4LD unit, can be problematic. Interior plastics can become brittle and crack with age, and power from the base engines is quite modest. Steering and suspension components are also common wear items.
1990 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1990 Ford Ranger typically offered two primary engine choices. The base engine was a reliable 2.3-liter (140 cu in) OHC inline-four, known for its decent fuel economy and simplicity. For those seeking more power, a 2.9-liter (177 cu in) "Cologne" V6 engine was available, providing a significant boost in performance suitable for heavier loads or more spirited driving. While later second-generation Rangers introduced a 4.0L V6, the 1990 model predominantly featured these two engines.
- Horsepower: The 2.3-liter inline-four engine typically produced around 100-115 horsepower, offering adequate power for daily driving and light hauling. The more potent 2.9-liter V6 engine delivered approximately 140 horsepower, which was considered quite respectable for a compact pickup in its class at the time, enhancing its towing and acceleration capabilities.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy varied based on the engine, transmission, and drivetrain (2WD vs. 4WD). The 2.3-liter 2WD models were the most economical, often achieving around 20-25 MPG combined. The 2.9-liter V6 models, especially with 4WD, saw figures drop to roughly 16-20 MPG combined, still competitive for a truck of its era but less efficient than the base engine.
- 0-60 MPH Times: Performance was not a strong suit for these trucks by modern standards. The 2.3-liter engine typically propelled the Ranger from 0 to 60 MPH in approximately 12-14 seconds. The 2.9-liter V6 improved this to a more respectable 10-12 seconds, making it feel more capable in highway merging and overtaking situations, though it was never intended as a performance vehicle.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity was a key selling point for a compact pickup. Depending on the engine, axle ratio, and transmission, the 1990 Ford Ranger's towing capacity ranged significantly. The 2.3-liter models could typically tow around 2,000 to 2,500 pounds, while the 2.9-liter V6 models, especially with proper options, could handle between 3,000 and 4,000 pounds. This made it suitable for small trailers, boats, or light utility needs.
- Trim-Level Features: The Ranger offered several trim levels, each building on the last:
- S: The base "S" trim was a no-frills work truck, featuring vinyl seats, manual windows, and an AM radio. It was designed for utilitarian purposes and maximum affordability.
- Custom: A step up, the Custom trim added some basic amenities like cloth seats, more interior trim, and often a better radio. It provided a slightly more comfortable and aesthetically pleasing package than the bare-bones S.
- XLT: The XLT was the most luxurious trim, offering more chrome exterior accents, upgraded interior fabrics, full carpeting, and often included options like air conditioning, power windows, power locks, and cruise control, providing a more car-like comfort experience.
- GT: Though less common by 1990, the GT trim was a sport-oriented package available earlier in the generation, featuring unique exterior styling, bucket seats, and sometimes specific suspension tuning, aiming for a sportier appearance rather than significant performance upgrades.
1990 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1990 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab Short Bed 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | TALBOTVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2819 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 63.60 inches |
| Overall Length | 176.50 inches |
| Overall Width | 66.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 107.90 inches |
| Standard Seating | 3 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.0-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $10,120 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1990 Ford Ranger Have?
One of the most frequently reported issues is rust. These trucks are highly susceptible to corrosion, particularly on the frame rails, bed floor, wheel wells, cab corners, and rocker panels. Extensive rust can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult or impossible.
Mechanically, the 2.9-liter "Cologne" V6 engine, common in the 1990 model year, is infamous for its propensity for head gasket failures. This is a significant repair that often requires extensive labor. While a properly repaired 2.9L can be reliable afterward, it's a critical pre-purchase inspection point. The 2.3-liter inline-four engine is generally more robust in this regard, though it can suffer from oil leaks.
The automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD unit, is another known weak point. It can be prone to premature wear, delayed shifts, and outright failure, especially if not regularly serviced. Manual transmissions tend to be much more reliable in these Rangers.
Electrical issues are also common due to aging wiring harnesses, grounds, and components. These can manifest as intermittent dashboard lights, faulty gauges, power window/lock failures, or issues with exterior lighting. The instrument cluster itself can have cold solder joint issues.
The cooling system is another area of concern, with radiators, water pumps, and hoses being common failure points due to age. Neglecting these can lead to overheating, exacerbating the head gasket problem on the 2.9L V6.
Finally, steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and leaf spring shackles, are prone to wear and tear over decades of use, requiring periodic replacement to maintain safe handling.
Regarding recalls, specific major recalls for the 1990 model year that would still be relevant today are infrequent, as most would have been addressed decades ago. However, buyers should always check the NHTSA database using the VIN for any outstanding safety recalls, though for vehicles of this age, general wear items and long-term owner-reported issues are more prevalent concerns than active recalls.
How long will the 1990 Ford Ranger last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
Built-in Tech: There was virtually no "built-in tech" as we understand it today. Engine management was handled by a basic Electronic Engine Control (EEC-IV) system, which was advanced for its time but offered no user interface beyond dashboard warning lights. There were no digital displays, trip computers, or connectivity options.
Entertainment Features: Entertainment was rudimentary. The base models typically came with an AM/FM radio, sometimes with a mono speaker. Higher trim levels, such as the XLT, could be optioned with a stereo AM/FM radio, a cassette player, and improved speakers. CD players were aftermarket additions and not factory options. There were no auxiliary inputs or advanced sound systems.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were completely absent. There was no anti-lock braking system (ABS) as standard, though it was an optional feature for the rear wheels on some higher trims. Features like traction control, stability control, blind-spot monitoring, or even power steering were not standard across all trims, though power steering was a very common option or standard on V6 models.
Safety Features: Safety features were minimal and basic. The 1990 Ford Ranger predates widespread airbag implementation; therefore, it came with no airbags for either the driver or passenger. Occupant protection relied on three-point seatbelts, particularly in the outboard positions, and a robust ladder frame construction. The body structure provided some inherent crash protection, but it was not designed with crumple zones or advanced impact absorption techniques found in modern vehicles. There were no side-impact beams or advanced head restraints.
Optional Features: Beyond the basic equipment, optional features generally focused on comfort and utility. These included air conditioning, cruise control (mostly on XLT trims), power windows and locks (less common on base models), sliding rear window, chrome appearance packages, alloy wheels, and various bed liners or toolboxes.
Crash-Test Ratings: Modern crash-test ratings (like those from NHTSA or IIHS) are not applicable or available for a vehicle of this age. Testing standards and methodologies have evolved drastically. While the Ranger met the safety regulations of its time, its crash performance would be considered very poor compared to contemporary vehicles, particularly in frontal and side impacts.
What Colors Options are Available?
1990 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
1990 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
1990 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
1990 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1990 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Power Train:automatic Transmission
Vehicle Speed Control
Vehicle Speed Control
Exterior Lighting
1990 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
1990 Ford Ranger Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1990 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
Performance: In terms of raw performance, the Ranger's 2.9L V6 was competitive with the S-10's V6 options, offering similar horsepower and acceleration. However, both typically lagged behind the more powerful V6 options offered in the Nissan Hardbody and particularly the Toyota Pickup, which often felt more refined and robust. The Ranger's base 2.3L I4 was a good, economical choice, comparable to the base engines in its rivals but not offering much excitement.
Features: Feature-wise, all these trucks were fairly basic, focusing on utility over luxury. The Ranger, S-10, and Hardbody offered similar creature comforts for their higher trims, such as optional air conditioning, power windows, and cassette stereos. No vehicle in this class offered advanced tech or safety features by modern standards. The Ranger held its own in offering a decent array of options for its price point.
Reliability: This is where the Ranger had some distinct pros and cons against its rivals. The 2.3L Ranger was often considered very reliable, comparable to the S-10's Iron Duke. However, the 2.9L V6's predisposition to head gasket failures and the A4LD automatic transmission's reliability issues gave the Ranger a noticeable disadvantage compared to the near-legendary reliability of the Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody, both of which had reputations for being almost bulletproof. The S-10 also had its share of electrical and engine issues, making the Ranger and S-10 relatively even here, but behind the Japanese trucks.
Price: When new, all these compact pickups were competitively priced. In today's used market, the Ranger often falls in a similar price bracket as the S-10 and Mazda B-Series. However, the Toyota Pickup typically commands a premium due to its unmatched reputation for reliability and durability. The Nissan Hardbody also tends to hold its value well.
Recommended Alternatives:
- Toyota Pickup (Hilux): If ultimate reliability and minimal long-term headaches are the priority, the Toyota Pickup is arguably the best alternative, though it will likely cost more.
- Nissan Hardbody (D21): Another highly reliable and durable option, offering strong engines and robust construction, often at a slightly lower price point than a comparable Toyota.
- Mazda B-Series: As it's essentially a rebadged Ranger, it offers a very similar experience but can sometimes be found for slightly less money due to badge appeal, making it a "similar" alternative.
The 1990 Ford Ranger remains a good option for those prioritizing affordability and a classic American truck feel, but buyers should be aware of its specific weak points when comparing to competitors.
Final Verdict: Is the 1990 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, but with crucial caveats. It's only available used, so thorough inspection is paramount. Seek out examples with minimal rust, especially on the frame and body panels. A Ranger equipped with the 2.3L inline-four engine and a manual transmission offers the most robust and economical long-term ownership. If considering the 2.9L V6, ensure there's documented proof of a head gasket replacement or factor that into your budget. Avoid automatic transmissions (A4LD) unless well-maintained. This Ranger is perfect as a secondary vehicle, a dedicated shop truck, or a nostalgic weekend cruiser, offering simple, honest utility without modern complexities.