The 1990 Ford Ranger belongs to the second generation of Ford's popular compact pickup truck, produced from 1983 to 1992. Available in various body styles, including Regular Cab and SuperCab, it offered a practical and affordable entry into truck ownership. Key trims included the utilitarian S, the more common Custom, and the well-appointed XLT, with a sporty GT trim also available. New pricing ranged from approximately $8,000 to $14,000. It stood out for its versatility, compact dimensions, and reputation as a reliable, no-nonsense workhorse, appealing to both contractors and everyday drivers.
The Good
The 1990 Ford Ranger offers notable advantages including its impressive value, practical design, and decent fuel efficiency for its era. Its compact size makes it nimble in urban environments, while its robust construction provides dependable performance for light-duty hauling and towing. For emotional buyers, it evokes a sense of rugged nostalgia and simplicity, embodying the classic American pickup. Practically, it's an affordable, easy-to-maintain vehicle, renowned for its workhorse reliability and low ownership costs, making it a smart choice for budget-conscious individuals needing a functional truck.
The Bad
When considering a 1990 Ford Ranger, potential buyers should watch out for pervasive rust issues, especially on the frame, bed, and cab corners. The 2.9-liter V6 engine is notorious for head gasket failures. Automatic transmissions, particularly the A4LD unit, can be problematic. Interior plastics can become brittle and crack with age, and power from the base engines is quite modest. Steering and suspension components are also common wear items.
1990 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1990 Ford Ranger typically offered two primary engine choices. The base engine was a reliable 2.3-liter (140 cu in) OHC inline-four, known for its decent fuel economy and simplicity. For those seeking more power, a 2.9-liter (177 cu in) "Cologne" V6 engine was available, providing a significant boost in performance suitable for heavier loads or more spirited driving. While later second-generation Rangers introduced a 4.0L V6, the 1990 model predominantly featured these two engines.
- Horsepower: The 2.3-liter inline-four engine typically produced around 100-115 horsepower, offering adequate power for daily driving and light hauling. The more potent 2.9-liter V6 engine delivered approximately 140 horsepower, which was considered quite respectable for a compact pickup in its class at the time, enhancing its towing and acceleration capabilities.
- Fuel Economy: Fuel economy varied based on the engine, transmission, and drivetrain (2WD vs. 4WD). The 2.3-liter 2WD models were the most economical, often achieving around 20-25 MPG combined. The 2.9-liter V6 models, especially with 4WD, saw figures drop to roughly 16-20 MPG combined, still competitive for a truck of its era but less efficient than the base engine.
- 0-60 MPH Times: Performance was not a strong suit for these trucks by modern standards. The 2.3-liter engine typically propelled the Ranger from 0 to 60 MPH in approximately 12-14 seconds. The 2.9-liter V6 improved this to a more respectable 10-12 seconds, making it feel more capable in highway merging and overtaking situations, though it was never intended as a performance vehicle.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacity was a key selling point for a compact pickup. Depending on the engine, axle ratio, and transmission, the 1990 Ford Ranger's towing capacity ranged significantly. The 2.3-liter models could typically tow around 2,000 to 2,500 pounds, while the 2.9-liter V6 models, especially with proper options, could handle between 3,000 and 4,000 pounds. This made it suitable for small trailers, boats, or light utility needs.
- Trim-Level Features: The Ranger offered several trim levels, each building on the last:
- S: The base "S" trim was a no-frills work truck, featuring vinyl seats, manual windows, and an AM radio. It was designed for utilitarian purposes and maximum affordability.
- Custom: A step up, the Custom trim added some basic amenities like cloth seats, more interior trim, and often a better radio. It provided a slightly more comfortable and aesthetically pleasing package than the bare-bones S.
- XLT: The XLT was the most luxurious trim, offering more chrome exterior accents, upgraded interior fabrics, full carpeting, and often included options like air conditioning, power windows, power locks, and cruise control, providing a more car-like comfort experience.
- GT: Though less common by 1990, the GT trim was a sport-oriented package available earlier in the generation, featuring unique exterior styling, bucket seats, and sometimes specific suspension tuning, aiming for a sportier appearance rather than significant performance upgrades.
1990 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1990 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab Short Bed 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | TALBOTVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2819 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 63.60 inches |
| Overall Length | 176.50 inches |
| Overall Width | 66.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 107.90 inches |
| Standard Seating | 3 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.0-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $10,120 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1990 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1990 Ford Ranger, while generally lauded for its long-term durability, is not without its common problems and reliability concerns, largely stemming from its age and some specific design elements.
One of the most frequently reported issues is rust. These trucks are highly susceptible to corrosion, particularly on the frame rails, bed floor, wheel wells, cab corners, and rocker panels. Extensive rust can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult or impossible.
Mechanically, the 2.9-liter "Cologne" V6 engine, common in the 1990 model year, is infamous for its propensity for head gasket failures. This is a significant repair that often requires extensive labor. While a properly repaired 2.9L can be reliable afterward, it's a critical pre-purchase inspection point. The 2.3-liter inline-four engine is generally more robust in this regard, though it can suffer from oil leaks.
The automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD unit, is another known weak point. It can be prone to premature wear, delayed shifts, and outright failure, especially if not regularly serviced. Manual transmissions tend to be much more reliable in these Rangers.
Electrical issues are also common due to aging wiring harnesses, grounds, and components. These can manifest as intermittent dashboard lights, faulty gauges, power window/lock failures, or issues with exterior lighting. The instrument cluster itself can have cold solder joint issues.
The cooling system is another area of concern, with radiators, water pumps, and hoses being common failure points due to age. Neglecting these can lead to overheating, exacerbating the head gasket problem on the 2.9L V6.
Finally, steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and leaf spring shackles, are prone to wear and tear over decades of use, requiring periodic replacement to maintain safe handling.
Regarding recalls, specific major recalls for the 1990 model year that would still be relevant today are infrequent, as most would have been addressed decades ago. However, buyers should always check the NHTSA database using the VIN for any outstanding safety recalls, though for vehicles of this age, general wear items and long-term owner-reported issues are more prevalent concerns than active recalls.
One of the most frequently reported issues is rust. These trucks are highly susceptible to corrosion, particularly on the frame rails, bed floor, wheel wells, cab corners, and rocker panels. Extensive rust can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult or impossible.
Mechanically, the 2.9-liter "Cologne" V6 engine, common in the 1990 model year, is infamous for its propensity for head gasket failures. This is a significant repair that often requires extensive labor. While a properly repaired 2.9L can be reliable afterward, it's a critical pre-purchase inspection point. The 2.3-liter inline-four engine is generally more robust in this regard, though it can suffer from oil leaks.
The automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD unit, is another known weak point. It can be prone to premature wear, delayed shifts, and outright failure, especially if not regularly serviced. Manual transmissions tend to be much more reliable in these Rangers.
Electrical issues are also common due to aging wiring harnesses, grounds, and components. These can manifest as intermittent dashboard lights, faulty gauges, power window/lock failures, or issues with exterior lighting. The instrument cluster itself can have cold solder joint issues.
The cooling system is another area of concern, with radiators, water pumps, and hoses being common failure points due to age. Neglecting these can lead to overheating, exacerbating the head gasket problem on the 2.9L V6.
Finally, steering and suspension components, such as ball joints, tie rods, and leaf spring shackles, are prone to wear and tear over decades of use, requiring periodic replacement to maintain safe handling.
Regarding recalls, specific major recalls for the 1990 model year that would still be relevant today are infrequent, as most would have been addressed decades ago. However, buyers should always check the NHTSA database using the VIN for any outstanding safety recalls, though for vehicles of this age, general wear items and long-term owner-reported issues are more prevalent concerns than active recalls.
How long will the 1990 Ford Ranger last?
The 1990 Ford Ranger, with good maintenance habits, can easily achieve 150,000 to 200,000 miles, and many owners report their trucks exceeding 250,000 miles, with some even reaching 300,000 or more. This translates to an average lifespan of 20 to 30+ years of service. Its long-term durability stems from a robust frame and relatively simple mechanicals. The 2.3L engine, in particular, is known for its longevity. However, this impressive durability is heavily contingent on diligent maintenance, especially regular oil changes, cooling system flushes, and attention to rust prevention. Over time, weaknesses like the 2.9L V6 head gaskets, the A4LD automatic transmission, and pervasive body/frame rust become the primary factors limiting the vehicle's lifespan or requiring significant investment to keep it roadworthy. Electrical gremlins also tend to surface with age.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
As a vehicle from the early 1990s, the Ford Ranger was decidedly low-tech by today's standards, reflecting the utilitarian focus of compact pickups of that era.
Built-in Tech: There was virtually no "built-in tech" as we understand it today. Engine management was handled by a basic Electronic Engine Control (EEC-IV) system, which was advanced for its time but offered no user interface beyond dashboard warning lights. There were no digital displays, trip computers, or connectivity options.
Entertainment Features: Entertainment was rudimentary. The base models typically came with an AM/FM radio, sometimes with a mono speaker. Higher trim levels, such as the XLT, could be optioned with a stereo AM/FM radio, a cassette player, and improved speakers. CD players were aftermarket additions and not factory options. There were no auxiliary inputs or advanced sound systems.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were completely absent. There was no anti-lock braking system (ABS) as standard, though it was an optional feature for the rear wheels on some higher trims. Features like traction control, stability control, blind-spot monitoring, or even power steering were not standard across all trims, though power steering was a very common option or standard on V6 models.
Safety Features: Safety features were minimal and basic. The 1990 Ford Ranger predates widespread airbag implementation; therefore, it came with no airbags for either the driver or passenger. Occupant protection relied on three-point seatbelts, particularly in the outboard positions, and a robust ladder frame construction. The body structure provided some inherent crash protection, but it was not designed with crumple zones or advanced impact absorption techniques found in modern vehicles. There were no side-impact beams or advanced head restraints.
Optional Features: Beyond the basic equipment, optional features generally focused on comfort and utility. These included air conditioning, cruise control (mostly on XLT trims), power windows and locks (less common on base models), sliding rear window, chrome appearance packages, alloy wheels, and various bed liners or toolboxes.
Crash-Test Ratings: Modern crash-test ratings (like those from NHTSA or IIHS) are not applicable or available for a vehicle of this age. Testing standards and methodologies have evolved drastically. While the Ranger met the safety regulations of its time, its crash performance would be considered very poor compared to contemporary vehicles, particularly in frontal and side impacts.
Built-in Tech: There was virtually no "built-in tech" as we understand it today. Engine management was handled by a basic Electronic Engine Control (EEC-IV) system, which was advanced for its time but offered no user interface beyond dashboard warning lights. There were no digital displays, trip computers, or connectivity options.
Entertainment Features: Entertainment was rudimentary. The base models typically came with an AM/FM radio, sometimes with a mono speaker. Higher trim levels, such as the XLT, could be optioned with a stereo AM/FM radio, a cassette player, and improved speakers. CD players were aftermarket additions and not factory options. There were no auxiliary inputs or advanced sound systems.
Driver-Assistance Features: Driver-assistance features were completely absent. There was no anti-lock braking system (ABS) as standard, though it was an optional feature for the rear wheels on some higher trims. Features like traction control, stability control, blind-spot monitoring, or even power steering were not standard across all trims, though power steering was a very common option or standard on V6 models.
Safety Features: Safety features were minimal and basic. The 1990 Ford Ranger predates widespread airbag implementation; therefore, it came with no airbags for either the driver or passenger. Occupant protection relied on three-point seatbelts, particularly in the outboard positions, and a robust ladder frame construction. The body structure provided some inherent crash protection, but it was not designed with crumple zones or advanced impact absorption techniques found in modern vehicles. There were no side-impact beams or advanced head restraints.
Optional Features: Beyond the basic equipment, optional features generally focused on comfort and utility. These included air conditioning, cruise control (mostly on XLT trims), power windows and locks (less common on base models), sliding rear window, chrome appearance packages, alloy wheels, and various bed liners or toolboxes.
Crash-Test Ratings: Modern crash-test ratings (like those from NHTSA or IIHS) are not applicable or available for a vehicle of this age. Testing standards and methodologies have evolved drastically. While the Ranger met the safety regulations of its time, its crash performance would be considered very poor compared to contemporary vehicles, particularly in frontal and side impacts.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1990 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new in 1990, the Ford Ranger had a diverse price range. A base Regular Cab 2WD with the 2.3L engine might start around $8,000-$9,000, while a fully optioned SuperCab 4x4 XLT with the V6 could approach $14,000-$16,000. Today, the used market prices are highly variable. A rough, high-mileage example might fetch $1,000-$2,500. Well-maintained, low-mileage, or rust-free examples can command $5,000 to $8,000 or even more from enthusiasts. Initially, these trucks depreciated significantly like most vehicles. However, after two decades, depreciation largely bottoms out, and now values are driven by condition, originality, and demand for classic compact trucks. Factors affecting current resale value include the absence of rust, engine (2.3L preferred for reliability, 2.9L with head gasket history is a red flag), transmission (manual often more desirable), 4x4 capability, and overall cosmetic and mechanical integrity.
1990 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
Long-term ownership of a 1990 Ford Ranger can be quite economical, provided you find a well-maintained example. Insurance costs are generally low due to the vehicle's age and relatively low market value. Fuel efficiency is decent for a truck of its vintage, especially with the 2.3L engine, using regular unleaded. Maintenance is affordable; parts are widely available and inexpensive, and many routine tasks are DIY-friendly. Repair costs can be reasonable for common wear items. However, major issues like a 2.9L head gasket replacement or an A4LD transmission rebuild can be significant expenses. Ultimately, it's an economical vehicle for utilitarian purposes, but be prepared for age-related repairs, as even a "cheap" truck requires consistent attention to prevent minor issues from becoming costly failures.
1990 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
16.30 gallons
City Mileage
21 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
25 miles/gallon
1990 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1990 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Recall date
1998-04-08
Recall no.
98e010000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Equipment Description: Aftermarket Brake Rotors FOR USE ON Certain Ford and Mazda Trucks. Cracked Castings Caused Cracks TO Appear ON THE Outer Diameter OF THE Rotor HAT or Around THE Stud Hole.
Consequence
Loss OF Braking CAN Result.
Remedy
Aimco Will Reimburse Consumers/Installers FOR THE Cost OF Replacement Rotors and Installation. Consumers ARE Requested TO Return TO THE Location Where THE Rotors Were Originally Purchased/Installed FOR Replacement.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin During April 1998.owners WHO DO NOT Receive THE Free Rotors Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Aimco AT 815-759-7935.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Power Train:automatic Transmission
Recall date
1991-11-04
Recall no.
91v189000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
When THE Automatic Transmission Shift Lever IS Placed IN THE Park Position, THE Park Pawl Does NOT Always Abut or Engage THE Park Gear.
Consequence
Driver MAY Believe THE Vehicle IS Safely Engaged IN Parkwhen THE Gear IS NOT Truly Engaged. This CAN Lead TO THE Vehicle Jumping OUT Ofgear Unintentionally, Vehicle Rollaway When Parked ON A Sloped Surface, Andinadvertent Motion When THE Vehicle IS Started. All OF These Conditions Canresult IN A Vehicle Accident.
Remedy
Repair THE Transmission With A NEW Park Pawl.
Notes
System: Transmission.vehicle Description: Pickup Trucks, Vans, and Multi-Purpose Vehicles Equippedwith A4ld Automatic Transmissions.
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1989-12-22
Recall no.
89v234000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Throttle Lever MAY Contact Throttle Body AIR Inlet Tube, With THE Potential FOR Throttle Remaining Open Following Release OF THE Accelerator Pedal From THE Full-Throttle Postion IN Trucks With 4.0 L Engines.
Consequence
Uncontrolled Acceleration Could Create Lack OF Controland Cause AN Accident.
Remedy
Manufacturer Will Replace AIR Inlet Tube With Newly Designed Replacement With AN Increased Throttle Lever-To-Inlet Tube Clearance.
Notes
System: Throttle Linkages and Control.vehicle Category: Light Truck.
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1990-03-01
Recall no.
90v044000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Throttle Lever MAY Contact Throttle Body AIR Inlet Tube, With Potential FOR Throttle Remaining Open Following Release OF THE Accelerator Pedal.
Consequence
Uncontrolled Acceleration Could Create Lack OF Controland Cause AN Accident.
Remedy
Manufacturer Will Replace AIR Inlet Tube With Newly Designed Replacement.
Notes
System: Throttle Linkages and Control.vehicle Description: Light Truck With 4.0 Liter Engine.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1990 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1990 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1990 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1990 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1990 Ford Ranger competed in a fiercely contested compact pickup market, facing off against formidable rivals like the Chevrolet S-10, Nissan Hardbody (D21), Toyota Pickup (Hilux), and the Mazda B-Series (which was essentially a rebadged Ranger).
Performance: In terms of raw performance, the Ranger's 2.9L V6 was competitive with the S-10's V6 options, offering similar horsepower and acceleration. However, both typically lagged behind the more powerful V6 options offered in the Nissan Hardbody and particularly the Toyota Pickup, which often felt more refined and robust. The Ranger's base 2.3L I4 was a good, economical choice, comparable to the base engines in its rivals but not offering much excitement.
Features: Feature-wise, all these trucks were fairly basic, focusing on utility over luxury. The Ranger, S-10, and Hardbody offered similar creature comforts for their higher trims, such as optional air conditioning, power windows, and cassette stereos. No vehicle in this class offered advanced tech or safety features by modern standards. The Ranger held its own in offering a decent array of options for its price point.
Reliability: This is where the Ranger had some distinct pros and cons against its rivals. The 2.3L Ranger was often considered very reliable, comparable to the S-10's Iron Duke. However, the 2.9L V6's predisposition to head gasket failures and the A4LD automatic transmission's reliability issues gave the Ranger a noticeable disadvantage compared to the near-legendary reliability of the Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody, both of which had reputations for being almost bulletproof. The S-10 also had its share of electrical and engine issues, making the Ranger and S-10 relatively even here, but behind the Japanese trucks.
Price: When new, all these compact pickups were competitively priced. In today's used market, the Ranger often falls in a similar price bracket as the S-10 and Mazda B-Series. However, the Toyota Pickup typically commands a premium due to its unmatched reputation for reliability and durability. The Nissan Hardbody also tends to hold its value well.
Recommended Alternatives:
The 1990 Ford Ranger remains a good option for those prioritizing affordability and a classic American truck feel, but buyers should be aware of its specific weak points when comparing to competitors.
Performance: In terms of raw performance, the Ranger's 2.9L V6 was competitive with the S-10's V6 options, offering similar horsepower and acceleration. However, both typically lagged behind the more powerful V6 options offered in the Nissan Hardbody and particularly the Toyota Pickup, which often felt more refined and robust. The Ranger's base 2.3L I4 was a good, economical choice, comparable to the base engines in its rivals but not offering much excitement.
Features: Feature-wise, all these trucks were fairly basic, focusing on utility over luxury. The Ranger, S-10, and Hardbody offered similar creature comforts for their higher trims, such as optional air conditioning, power windows, and cassette stereos. No vehicle in this class offered advanced tech or safety features by modern standards. The Ranger held its own in offering a decent array of options for its price point.
Reliability: This is where the Ranger had some distinct pros and cons against its rivals. The 2.3L Ranger was often considered very reliable, comparable to the S-10's Iron Duke. However, the 2.9L V6's predisposition to head gasket failures and the A4LD automatic transmission's reliability issues gave the Ranger a noticeable disadvantage compared to the near-legendary reliability of the Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody, both of which had reputations for being almost bulletproof. The S-10 also had its share of electrical and engine issues, making the Ranger and S-10 relatively even here, but behind the Japanese trucks.
Price: When new, all these compact pickups were competitively priced. In today's used market, the Ranger often falls in a similar price bracket as the S-10 and Mazda B-Series. However, the Toyota Pickup typically commands a premium due to its unmatched reputation for reliability and durability. The Nissan Hardbody also tends to hold its value well.
Recommended Alternatives:
- Toyota Pickup (Hilux): If ultimate reliability and minimal long-term headaches are the priority, the Toyota Pickup is arguably the best alternative, though it will likely cost more.
- Nissan Hardbody (D21): Another highly reliable and durable option, offering strong engines and robust construction, often at a slightly lower price point than a comparable Toyota.
- Mazda B-Series: As it's essentially a rebadged Ranger, it offers a very similar experience but can sometimes be found for slightly less money due to badge appeal, making it a "similar" alternative.
The 1990 Ford Ranger remains a good option for those prioritizing affordability and a classic American truck feel, but buyers should be aware of its specific weak points when comparing to competitors.
Final Verdict: Is the 1990 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1990 Ford Ranger is an ideal vehicle for budget-conscious individuals, first-time truck owners, or those needing a basic, reliable workhorse for light hauling and occasional utility tasks. It appeals strongly to DIY enthusiasts due to its simple mechanics and readily available, affordable parts.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, but with crucial caveats. It's only available used, so thorough inspection is paramount. Seek out examples with minimal rust, especially on the frame and body panels. A Ranger equipped with the 2.3L inline-four engine and a manual transmission offers the most robust and economical long-term ownership. If considering the 2.9L V6, ensure there's documented proof of a head gasket replacement or factor that into your budget. Avoid automatic transmissions (A4LD) unless well-maintained. This Ranger is perfect as a secondary vehicle, a dedicated shop truck, or a nostalgic weekend cruiser, offering simple, honest utility without modern complexities.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, but with crucial caveats. It's only available used, so thorough inspection is paramount. Seek out examples with minimal rust, especially on the frame and body panels. A Ranger equipped with the 2.3L inline-four engine and a manual transmission offers the most robust and economical long-term ownership. If considering the 2.9L V6, ensure there's documented proof of a head gasket replacement or factor that into your budget. Avoid automatic transmissions (A4LD) unless well-maintained. This Ranger is perfect as a secondary vehicle, a dedicated shop truck, or a nostalgic weekend cruiser, offering simple, honest utility without modern complexities.
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.