by VIN, Year, Make, Model by License Plate

1991 Ford Ranger Overview, Reviews, Ratings & Specs

Rating: 0.00
Based on 0 Owner Reviews
Jovan | September 27, 2025
The 1991 Ford Ranger represents a pivotal era for compact pickup trucks in North America. Part of the second generation (1989-1992), this robust workhorse featured a classic body-on-frame design, offered as a regular cab or SuperCab with short or long beds. Key trims included the S, XL, XLT, and the more off-road capable STX. Originally priced from roughly $8,000 to $15,000, its popularity stemmed from its reputation for reliability, versatility, and affordability, making it a favorite for both tradesmen and everyday drivers.
The Good

The 1991 Ford Ranger offered impressive practicality and value. Its sturdy design and available 4x4 options appealed to adventure-seekers, while its proven reliability and economical operation satisfied pragmatic buyers. It boasted decent towing capacity for its class, respectable fuel efficiency from its smaller engines, and a no-nonsense, functional design that was easy to maintain.

The Bad

Known weaknesses for the 1991 Ford Ranger include potential rust issues on the frame and body, especially in areas exposed to salt. Owners also report common problems with the automatic transmission, particularly the A4LD, and some electrical gremlins as the truck ages. Power steering leaks and suspension wear are also common.

1991 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview

The 1991 Ford Ranger offered a variety of powertrain and feature options:

  • Engine Options:
    • 2.3L "Lima" I4 (standard)
    • 2.9L "Cologne" V6
    • 4.0L "Cologne" V6 (introduced mid-generation, available for 1991 models)
  • Horsepower:
    • 2.3L I4: Approximately 100-105 hp
    • 2.9L V6: Approximately 140 hp
    • 4.0L V6: Approximately 160 hp
  • Fuel Economy (estimated, varies by transmission/drivetrain):
    • 2.3L I4: Around 19-23 MPG city/highway combined
    • 2.9L V6: Around 17-20 MPG city/highway combined
    • 4.0L V6: Around 15-19 MPG city/highway combined
  • 0-60 Times:
    • Highly dependent on engine/drivetrain, but generally ranged from 10-14 seconds for V6 models and 14-17 seconds for the 4-cylinder. Not a performance truck, but adequate for its time.
  • Towing Capacity:
    • Ranged from approximately 2,000 lbs (2.3L I4) up to 5,800 lbs (4.0L V6, properly equipped), making it a capable light-duty hauler.
  • Trim-Level Features:
    • S: Basic work truck, manual windows, vinyl seats, minimal amenities.
    • XL: Added features like a cloth bench seat, perhaps a radio, and some exterior chrome trim.
    • XLT: The "luxury" trim, offering power windows/locks, air conditioning, upgraded cloth or optional leather-like seating, carpeted floors, improved sound system, and more exterior trim.
    • STX: Sporty, off-road oriented trim with unique decals, bucket seats, alloy wheels, and often the larger V6 engine with 4x4. Included a sport suspension and often a limited-slip differential.
    • Custom/SuperCab: Available extended cab providing extra interior space behind the front seats, often with jump seats for occasional passengers.

1991 Ford Ranger Specifications

Vehicle Information
Year 1991
Make Ford
Model Ranger
Trim -
Style Regular Cab Long Bed 2WD
Type Pickup Truck
Category Small Pickup Truck
Manufacturing Details
Made In United States
Manufacturing City EDISON
Dimensions
Doors 2-Door
Curb Weight 2891 pounds
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating 4080 pounds
Overall Height 63.60 inches
Overall Length 188.50 inches
Overall Width 66.80 inches
Wheelbase Length 113.90 inches
Standard Seating 3
Engine & Performance
Engine 4.0-L V-6 OHV 12V
Engine Size 4L
Engine Cylinders 6
Transmission 5-Speed Manual
Transmission Type Manual
Transmission Speeds 5-Speed
Drivetrain Rear-Wheel Drive
Additional Features
Anti-Brake System 2-Wheel ABS
Steering Type Recirculating
Pricing
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) $10,920
Invoice Price -
Delivery Charges -

Vehicle History Report

Vehicle
Specifications
Ownership
History
All History
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Accident
Check
Theft
Check
Open Lien
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Market Price
Analysis

What Problems Does the 1991 Ford Ranger Have?

The 1991 Ford Ranger, while generally lauded for its durability, has several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns that owners should be aware of. One of the most common issues is rust, particularly on the frame, bed mounts, and wheel wells, especially in regions with harsh winters and road salt. This can compromise structural integrity over time. Another significant concern involves the automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD. These transmissions are known to be prone to failure, often exhibiting issues with delayed shifts, slipping, or complete failure, particularly under heavy loads or neglect of fluid changes. Many owners opt for a manual transmission for greater longevity.

Engine-wise, the 2.3L "Lima" I4 is very robust, but older units can suffer from oil leaks (especially valve cover and front cover gaskets) and occasional head gasket failures. The 2.9L V6 is notorious for cylinder head cracking problems, which can lead to coolant leaks, overheating, and significant engine damage. The 4.0L V6 is generally more reliable but can develop timing chain rattle or oil pan gasket leaks. Electrical issues are also common with age, including failing alternators, starter motors, and wiring harness degradation leading to intermittent accessory operation or dashboard light problems. Power steering pumps and hoses are often sources of leaks, and suspension components like ball joints, tie rods, and leaf springs tend to wear out, especially on 4x4 models used off-road or for heavy hauling. Brake components, especially rear drums, require regular maintenance. There were also recalls for certain model years, though specific to 1991, they often related to seat belt assemblies or minor electrical components. Owners should check the NHTSA database for any applicable recalls by VIN.

How long will the 1991 Ford Ranger last?

The 1991 Ford Ranger, with proper maintenance, is capable of very high mileage. Many owners report these trucks lasting well over 200,000 miles, with numerous examples exceeding 300,000 miles, particularly those equipped with the manual transmission and the 2.3L I4 engine. Years of service can easily extend beyond 20-25 years. However, this longevity hinges on consistent fluid changes, addressing rust promptly, and proactive repairs of common wear items. Over time, weaknesses like the A4LD automatic transmission become more apparent, and rust can severely impact the frame and body if not mitigated. Electrical components and suspension also degrade, requiring attention to maintain reliability and safety.

What Technology & Safety Features are Included?

The 1991 Ford Ranger, as a compact pickup from its era, featured relatively basic built-in technology and entertainment compared to modern vehicles. Standard features were quite spartan, especially on the base "S" trim. The dashboard typically included a speedometer, odometer, fuel gauge, and temperature gauge. Some higher trims or optional packages might have added a tachometer and oil pressure gauge. Entertainment options were limited to AM/FM radio units, with more advanced models offering an AM/FM cassette player. Speaker systems were generally simple, with two or four speakers depending on the trim and cab configuration. There were no integrated touchscreens, navigation systems, or advanced connectivity features like Bluetooth or USB ports; these technologies were decades away.

Driver-assistance features were essentially non-existent by today's standards. The truck relied entirely on the driver's skill and awareness. There were no ABS (anti-lock braking system) as standard on all models, though it might have been an option on some higher trims or later in the generation for the rear wheels. Power steering and power brakes were common options or standard on XLT/STX trims, significantly improving driving ease. Safety features were also fundamental: three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants, but airbags were not yet prevalent. Driver-side airbags became optional later in the 1990s, but were not available on the 1991 model. Side-impact protection was minimal, relying on the structural integrity of the doors and pillars. Crash-test ratings from independent organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS are largely unavailable or not directly comparable for vehicles of this vintage using modern methodologies. However, its body-on-frame construction offered a degree of structural rigidity for its time, though it would perform poorly by contemporary crash safety standards.

What Colors Options are Available?

We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.

1991 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value

When new in 1991, the Ford Ranger had a broad pricing range, typically starting from around $8,000 for a basic 2WD regular cab "S" model and climbing to approximately $15,000 or more for a fully optioned 4WD SuperCab XLT or STX. Like most vehicles, the Ranger depreciated significantly over its first decade. However, due to its enduring popularity and utility, depreciation eventually plateaued. Currently, used market prices for a 1991 Ford Ranger vary wildly based on condition, mileage, engine, transmission, and drivetrain. A well-maintained, lower-mileage example, especially a 4x4 or one with the 4.0L V6, can fetch anywhere from $4,000 to $10,000 or even more from enthusiasts. More common, higher-mileage, or rust-prone examples might be found for $1,500 to $3,500. Factors positively affecting resale value include a rust-free body, a manual transmission, the 4.0L V6, and a 4x4 drivetrain, as well as original documentation and service history.

1991 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership

Long-term ownership of a 1991 Ford Ranger can be quite economical, provided you account for its age. Insurance costs are generally low due to its age and low market value, often qualifying for classic or collector's insurance at reduced rates if applicable. Fuel costs will vary; the 2.3L I4 offers decent economy, while the V6s, especially the 4.0L with 4x4, will be thirstier. Maintenance costs are typically low for routine items as parts are abundant and generally inexpensive. The truck's simple design also makes many repairs accessible for DIY enthusiasts, saving on labor.

However, repair costs can accumulate, especially if addressing major issues like transmission rebuilds (A4LD) or significant rust. Proactive maintenance is key to keeping costs down. Overall, it's an economical vehicle to own if you are prepared for potential age-related repairs and maintenance, as parts are readily available and often affordable. It's more economical than many modern trucks, but deferred maintenance on an old vehicle can quickly make it costly.

1991 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency

Fuel Type Gasoline
Fuel Capacity 16.30 gallons
City Mileage 21 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage 24 miles/gallon

1991 Ford Ranger Safety Rating

NHTSA
Side Driver Rating Not Tested
Frontal Passenger Rating Not Tested
Rollover Rating Not Tested
Side Rear Passenger Rating Not Tested
Frontal Driver Rating Not Tested
IIHS
Moderate Overlap Front Test Results Not Tested

1991 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects

Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date 2001-05-22
Recall no. 01x001000
Source NHTSA
Summary This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Equipment Description: Ford IS Replacing All Firestone Wilderness AT 15, 16, and 17 Inch Tires Mounted ON Ford Trucks and Suvs. Ford Reports Tread Separation CAN Occur DUE TO A Combination OF THE Sensitivity OF THE Tire Design TO Stress, Aging, and Manufacturing Differences Between Plants. Ford IS Replacing These Tires TO Prevent Possible Premature Tire Failure. Vehicle Description: THE Vehicles Listed Below MAY Have Been Originally Equipped With Firestone Wilderness AT Tires or MAY Have HAD Wilderness AT Tires Installed During THE Firestone Recall Launched IN August 2000. Certain 1991 Throught 2002 Ford Explorer Certain 2001 Throught 2002 Explorer Sport, and Sport Trac Certain 1997 Through 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Certain 1991 Through 2001 Ranger Certain 1999 Through 2001 Expedition Certain 1991 Through 1994, and 1997 Model Year F-Series Certain 1991 Through 1994 Bronco Note: Both Original Equipment and Replacement Tires ARE Affected.
Consequence Should THE Tread Separate AT Highway Speeds, A Vehicle Crash Could Occur, Possibly Resulting IN Personal Injury or Death.
Remedy THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON March 31, 2002. However, Customers CAN Contact Ford AT 1-877-917-3673 or GO On-line TO Www.ford.com FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date 2000-08-21
Recall no. 00t005000
Source NHTSA
Summary Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Recall date 1998-04-08
Recall no. 98e010000
Source NHTSA
Summary Equipment Description: Aftermarket Brake Rotors FOR USE ON Certain Ford and Mazda Trucks. Cracked Castings Caused Cracks TO Appear ON THE Outer Diameter OF THE Rotor HAT or Around THE Stud Hole.
Consequence Loss OF Braking CAN Result.
Remedy Aimco Will Reimburse Consumers/Installers FOR THE Cost OF Replacement Rotors and Installation. Consumers ARE Requested TO Return TO THE Location Where THE Rotors Were Originally Purchased/Installed FOR Replacement.
Notes Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin During April 1998.owners WHO DO NOT Receive THE Free Rotors Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Aimco AT 815-759-7935.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist:hydraulic
Recall date 1996-02-05
Recall no. 96v024001
Source NHTSA
Summary THE Studs Which Attach THE Brake Master Cylinder TO THE Power Brake Vacuum Booster Assembly CAN Develop Stress Corrosion Cracking After Being Operated FOR AN Extended Period OF Time IN THE Southern California Location.
Consequence IF A Crack Occurs, IT Could Result IN ONE or Both Studs Fracturing. THE Master Cylinder Could Then Separate From THE Vacuum Booster, When THE Brakes ARE Applied, Preventing THE Service Brakes From Activating Increasing THE Risk OF A Vehicle Accident.
Remedy Dealers Will Replace THE Power Brake Vacuum Booster Assembly.
Notes System: Brakes; Power Assist; Primary; Booster. Vehicle Description: Multi-Purpose Vehicles and Light Duty Trucks Originally Sold or Currently Registered IN THE Southern California Counties OF LOS Angeles, Orange, SAN Bernadino, SAN Diego, Riverside, Ventura, Santa Barbara, SAN Luis Obispo, Imperial, and Kern.note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time, Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Power Train:automatic Transmission
Recall date 1991-11-04
Recall no. 91v189000
Source NHTSA
Summary When THE Automatic Transmission Shift Lever IS Placed IN THE Park Position, THE Park Pawl Does NOT Always Abut or Engage THE Park Gear.
Consequence Driver MAY Believe THE Vehicle IS Safely Engaged IN Parkwhen THE Gear IS NOT Truly Engaged. This CAN Lead TO THE Vehicle Jumping OUT Ofgear Unintentionally, Vehicle Rollaway When Parked ON A Sloped Surface, Andinadvertent Motion When THE Vehicle IS Started. All OF These Conditions Canresult IN A Vehicle Accident.
Remedy Repair THE Transmission With A NEW Park Pawl.
Notes System: Transmission.vehicle Description: Pickup Trucks, Vans, and Multi-Purpose Vehicles Equippedwith A4ld Automatic Transmissions.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date 2006-03-23
Recall no. 06e026000
Source NHTSA
Summary Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.

1991 Ford Ranger Warranty

Basic
Original warranty 0 months / No data
Estimated remaining Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty 0 months / No data
Estimated remaining Expired
Rust
Original warranty 0 months / No data
Estimated remaining Expired

1991 Ford Ranger Insurance

Insurance for a 1991 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.

How Does the 1991 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?

The 1991 Ford Ranger competed fiercely in the compact pickup segment against several strong rivals. Its primary competitors included the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma, Toyota Pickup (which became the Tacoma in later generations), Nissan Hardbody (D21), and the Mazda B-Series (which was essentially a rebadged Ranger). Each offered a unique blend of attributes.

Performance: The Ranger's available 4.0L V6 engine (160 hp) put it on par or slightly ahead of its domestic rival, the S-10's larger V6 options (e.g., 4.3L V6, which came later and had higher output). The Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody typically offered durable but less powerful 4-cylinder and smaller V6 options, often prioritizing reliability over raw power. The Ranger generally offered a good balance of power for its size.

Features: All these trucks were relatively spartan by today's standards. The Ranger, S-10, Toyota, and Nissan all offered similar trim levels ranging from basic work trucks to more appointed XLT/DLX/LE variants with optional power accessories, air conditioning, and upgraded interiors. No single vehicle significantly outclassed the others in terms of "tech" or luxury features for the era.

Reliability: This is where the competition often became clear. The Toyota Pickup, with its legendary 22R-E 4-cylinder engine, often had the edge in terms of outright long-term mechanical reliability, particularly in the powertrain, though rust was still a concern. The Nissan Hardbody also earned a strong reputation for durability. The Ranger was generally reliable, especially the 2.3L I4, but the 2.9L V6's head issues and the A4LD automatic transmission were known weak points that could affect its overall reliability score compared to the Japanese rivals. The S-10 was comparable to the Ranger in terms of mechanical reliability and common issues.

Price: All these compact pickups were designed to be affordable. New prices were competitive across the board. In the current used market, while Rangers are popular, well-preserved Toyota Pickups often command a premium due to their bulletproof reputation. The S-10 and Nissan Hardbody usually fall into a similar price bracket as the Ranger, depending on condition.

Alternatives:

  • Better Alternative (Reliability): Toyota Pickup (especially with the 22R-E engine) for superior long-term mechanical dependability.
  • Similar Alternative (Domestic): Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma for similar capabilities, parts availability, and ownership experience.
  • Similar Alternative (Import): Nissan Hardbody for robust construction and good reliability.

Final Verdict: Is the 1991 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?

The 1991 Ford Ranger is an ideal vehicle for individuals seeking an affordable, no-frills, and highly practical compact pickup truck. It's perfect for a first-time truck owner, someone needing a capable light-duty hauler for home projects, or a robust work vehicle for a small business. Its compact size makes it maneuverable in urban environments, while optional 4x4 offers genuine off-road capability. It is definitely worth buying for those who appreciate mechanical simplicity and are willing to perform routine maintenance or minor repairs. Opt for models with the 2.3L I4 or 4.0L V6 (if available) coupled with a manual transmission for the best long-term reliability. Crucially, scrutinize potential purchases for rust, especially on the frame, and verify the condition of the automatic transmission if present. A well-maintained 1991 Ranger offers tremendous value, low ownership costs for basic operation, and a timeless utility that many modern trucks lack. Avoid neglected examples unless you're prepared for significant restoration work.

1991 Ford Ranger Owner Reviews

0.00
Consumer Rating, Based on 0 Consumer Reviews
Overall rating
Cancel
Thank You for Your Review!

We truly appreciate the time and effort you took to share your experience with us.

Uh oh!

Something went wrong, please try again later.

Author Image
Jovan

Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.