The Good
The 1991 Ford Ranger offered impressive practicality and value. Its sturdy design and available 4x4 options appealed to adventure-seekers, while its proven reliability and economical operation satisfied pragmatic buyers. It boasted decent towing capacity for its class, respectable fuel efficiency from its smaller engines, and a no-nonsense, functional design that was easy to maintain.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1991 Ford Ranger include potential rust issues on the frame and body, especially in areas exposed to salt. Owners also report common problems with the automatic transmission, particularly the A4LD, and some electrical gremlins as the truck ages. Power steering leaks and suspension wear are also common.
1991 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
The 1991 Ford Ranger offered a variety of powertrain and feature options:
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L "Lima" I4 (standard)
- 2.9L "Cologne" V6
- 4.0L "Cologne" V6 (introduced mid-generation, available for 1991 models)
- Horsepower:
- 2.3L I4: Approximately 100-105 hp
- 2.9L V6: Approximately 140 hp
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 160 hp
- Fuel Economy (estimated, varies by transmission/drivetrain):
- 2.3L I4: Around 19-23 MPG city/highway combined
- 2.9L V6: Around 17-20 MPG city/highway combined
- 4.0L V6: Around 15-19 MPG city/highway combined
- 0-60 Times:
- Highly dependent on engine/drivetrain, but generally ranged from 10-14 seconds for V6 models and 14-17 seconds for the 4-cylinder. Not a performance truck, but adequate for its time.
- Towing Capacity:
- Ranged from approximately 2,000 lbs (2.3L I4) up to 5,800 lbs (4.0L V6, properly equipped), making it a capable light-duty hauler.
- Trim-Level Features:
- S: Basic work truck, manual windows, vinyl seats, minimal amenities.
- XL: Added features like a cloth bench seat, perhaps a radio, and some exterior chrome trim.
- XLT: The "luxury" trim, offering power windows/locks, air conditioning, upgraded cloth or optional leather-like seating, carpeted floors, improved sound system, and more exterior trim.
- STX: Sporty, off-road oriented trim with unique decals, bucket seats, alloy wheels, and often the larger V6 engine with 4x4. Included a sport suspension and often a limited-slip differential.
- Custom/SuperCab: Available extended cab providing extra interior space behind the front seats, often with jump seats for occasional passengers.
1991 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1991 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab Long Bed 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | EDISON |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 2891 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 4080 pounds |
| Overall Height | 63.60 inches |
| Overall Length | 188.50 inches |
| Overall Width | 66.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 113.90 inches |
| Standard Seating | 3 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 4.0-L V-6 OHV 12V |
| Engine Size | 4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $10,920 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Specifications
History
Events
History Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
Listings
Recalls
Check
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1991 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1991 Ford Ranger, while generally lauded for its durability, has several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns that owners should be aware of. One of the most common issues is rust, particularly on the frame, bed mounts, and wheel wells, especially in regions with harsh winters and road salt. This can compromise structural integrity over time. Another significant concern involves the automatic transmission, specifically the A4LD. These transmissions are known to be prone to failure, often exhibiting issues with delayed shifts, slipping, or complete failure, particularly under heavy loads or neglect of fluid changes. Many owners opt for a manual transmission for greater longevity.
Engine-wise, the 2.3L "Lima" I4 is very robust, but older units can suffer from oil leaks (especially valve cover and front cover gaskets) and occasional head gasket failures. The 2.9L V6 is notorious for cylinder head cracking problems, which can lead to coolant leaks, overheating, and significant engine damage. The 4.0L V6 is generally more reliable but can develop timing chain rattle or oil pan gasket leaks. Electrical issues are also common with age, including failing alternators, starter motors, and wiring harness degradation leading to intermittent accessory operation or dashboard light problems. Power steering pumps and hoses are often sources of leaks, and suspension components like ball joints, tie rods, and leaf springs tend to wear out, especially on 4x4 models used off-road or for heavy hauling. Brake components, especially rear drums, require regular maintenance. There were also recalls for certain model years, though specific to 1991, they often related to seat belt assemblies or minor electrical components. Owners should check the NHTSA database for any applicable recalls by VIN.
How long will the 1991 Ford Ranger last?
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1991 Ford Ranger, as a compact pickup from its era, featured relatively basic built-in technology and entertainment compared to modern vehicles. Standard features were quite spartan, especially on the base "S" trim. The dashboard typically included a speedometer, odometer, fuel gauge, and temperature gauge. Some higher trims or optional packages might have added a tachometer and oil pressure gauge. Entertainment options were limited to AM/FM radio units, with more advanced models offering an AM/FM cassette player. Speaker systems were generally simple, with two or four speakers depending on the trim and cab configuration. There were no integrated touchscreens, navigation systems, or advanced connectivity features like Bluetooth or USB ports; these technologies were decades away.
Driver-assistance features were essentially non-existent by today's standards. The truck relied entirely on the driver's skill and awareness. There were no ABS (anti-lock braking system) as standard on all models, though it might have been an option on some higher trims or later in the generation for the rear wheels. Power steering and power brakes were common options or standard on XLT/STX trims, significantly improving driving ease. Safety features were also fundamental: three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants, but airbags were not yet prevalent. Driver-side airbags became optional later in the 1990s, but were not available on the 1991 model. Side-impact protection was minimal, relying on the structural integrity of the doors and pillars. Crash-test ratings from independent organizations like the NHTSA or IIHS are largely unavailable or not directly comparable for vehicles of this vintage using modern methodologies. However, its body-on-frame construction offered a degree of structural rigidity for its time, though it would perform poorly by contemporary crash safety standards.
What Colors Options are Available?
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1991 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new in 1991, the Ford Ranger had a broad pricing range, typically starting from around $8,000 for a basic 2WD regular cab "S" model and climbing to approximately $15,000 or more for a fully optioned 4WD SuperCab XLT or STX. Like most vehicles, the Ranger depreciated significantly over its first decade. However, due to its enduring popularity and utility, depreciation eventually plateaued. Currently, used market prices for a 1991 Ford Ranger vary wildly based on condition, mileage, engine, transmission, and drivetrain. A well-maintained, lower-mileage example, especially a 4x4 or one with the 4.0L V6, can fetch anywhere from $4,000 to $10,000 or even more from enthusiasts. More common, higher-mileage, or rust-prone examples might be found for $1,500 to $3,500. Factors positively affecting resale value include a rust-free body, a manual transmission, the 4.0L V6, and a 4x4 drivetrain, as well as original documentation and service history.
1991 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
Long-term ownership of a 1991 Ford Ranger can be quite economical, provided you account for its age. Insurance costs are generally low due to its age and low market value, often qualifying for classic or collector's insurance at reduced rates if applicable. Fuel costs will vary; the 2.3L I4 offers decent economy, while the V6s, especially the 4.0L with 4x4, will be thirstier. Maintenance costs are typically low for routine items as parts are abundant and generally inexpensive. The truck's simple design also makes many repairs accessible for DIY enthusiasts, saving on labor.
However, repair costs can accumulate, especially if addressing major issues like transmission rebuilds (A4LD) or significant rust. Proactive maintenance is key to keeping costs down. Overall, it's an economical vehicle to own if you are prepared for potential age-related repairs and maintenance, as parts are readily available and often affordable. It's more economical than many modern trucks, but deferred maintenance on an old vehicle can quickly make it costly.
1991 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
1991 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1991 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Tires:tread/Belt
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist:hydraulic
Power Train:automatic Transmission
Exterior Lighting
1991 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Powertrain
Rust
1991 Ford Ranger Insurance
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1991 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1991 Ford Ranger competed fiercely in the compact pickup segment against several strong rivals. Its primary competitors included the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma, Toyota Pickup (which became the Tacoma in later generations), Nissan Hardbody (D21), and the Mazda B-Series (which was essentially a rebadged Ranger). Each offered a unique blend of attributes.
Performance: The Ranger's available 4.0L V6 engine (160 hp) put it on par or slightly ahead of its domestic rival, the S-10's larger V6 options (e.g., 4.3L V6, which came later and had higher output). The Toyota Pickup and Nissan Hardbody typically offered durable but less powerful 4-cylinder and smaller V6 options, often prioritizing reliability over raw power. The Ranger generally offered a good balance of power for its size.
Features: All these trucks were relatively spartan by today's standards. The Ranger, S-10, Toyota, and Nissan all offered similar trim levels ranging from basic work trucks to more appointed XLT/DLX/LE variants with optional power accessories, air conditioning, and upgraded interiors. No single vehicle significantly outclassed the others in terms of "tech" or luxury features for the era.
Reliability: This is where the competition often became clear. The Toyota Pickup, with its legendary 22R-E 4-cylinder engine, often had the edge in terms of outright long-term mechanical reliability, particularly in the powertrain, though rust was still a concern. The Nissan Hardbody also earned a strong reputation for durability. The Ranger was generally reliable, especially the 2.3L I4, but the 2.9L V6's head issues and the A4LD automatic transmission were known weak points that could affect its overall reliability score compared to the Japanese rivals. The S-10 was comparable to the Ranger in terms of mechanical reliability and common issues.
Price: All these compact pickups were designed to be affordable. New prices were competitive across the board. In the current used market, while Rangers are popular, well-preserved Toyota Pickups often command a premium due to their bulletproof reputation. The S-10 and Nissan Hardbody usually fall into a similar price bracket as the Ranger, depending on condition.
Alternatives:
- Better Alternative (Reliability): Toyota Pickup (especially with the 22R-E engine) for superior long-term mechanical dependability.
- Similar Alternative (Domestic): Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma for similar capabilities, parts availability, and ownership experience.
- Similar Alternative (Import): Nissan Hardbody for robust construction and good reliability.
Final Verdict: Is the 1991 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.