The 1997 Ford Ranger represents the final model year of the highly popular third generation of Ford's compact pickup truck. Available in Regular Cab and Extended Cab (SuperCab) body styles, it was known for its utilitarian design and affordability. Key trims included the utilitarian XL, the more equipped XLT, and the sporty Splash. Originally priced from around $11,000 to $20,000, it stood out for its reputation as a rugged, dependable workhorse and an economical daily driver, making it incredibly popular among buyers seeking practicality and value.
The Good
The 1997 Ford Ranger offers straightforward reliability and excellent value, appealing to practical buyers with its low purchase price and simple maintenance. Its decent performance (especially with V6 options) and capable utility for hauling or light off-roading evoke a sense of rugged freedom. While comfort is basic, its classic compact truck design and relative fuel efficiency (particularly the 4-cylinder) make it a beloved, economical choice.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1997 Ford Ranger include susceptibility to rust, particularly on the frame, bed, and rocker panels. The automatic transmissions (4R44E/4R55E) can be prone to failure, and the base 4-cylinder engine may feel underpowered. Interior materials are basic and show age, while the ride quality can be stiff, especially when unladen. Regular maintenance is crucial to mitigate these issues.
1997 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options: The 1997 Ford Ranger offered a versatile lineup of engines to suit different needs. The base engine was a 2.3-liter SOHC inline-4, followed by a 3.0-liter OHV V6, and the most powerful option, a 4.0-liter OHV V6.
- Horsepower:
- 2.3L I4: Approximately 112 horsepower and 135 lb-ft of torque.
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 145 horsepower and 180 lb-ft of torque.
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 160 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque. - Fuel Economy: Fuel economy varied significantly based on engine, transmission, and drivetrain (2WD vs. 4WD).
- 2.3L I4 (2WD manual): Around 20-23 MPG combined.
- 3.0L V6 (2WD automatic): Around 17-20 MPG combined.
- 4.0L V6 (4WD automatic): Around 15-18 MPG combined. - 0-60 Times: Performance was modest, typical for a compact pickup of its era.
- 2.3L I4: Roughly 12-14 seconds.
- 3.0L V6: Roughly 10-12 seconds.
- 4.0L V6: Roughly 9-10 seconds. - Towing Capacity: Towing capacity was a strong suit for its class, varying significantly by configuration.
- Ranges from approximately 2,200 pounds (base 2.3L) to a maximum of about 5,800 pounds (properly equipped 4.0L V6, 2WD, manual transmission). - Trim-Level Features:
- XL: The entry-level "work truck" trim. Included basics like vinyl bench seats, manual windows and door locks, and an AM/FM radio. Air conditioning was often optional.
- XLT: A more comfort-oriented trim. Added cloth seats, carpeting, optional power windows and door locks, an upgraded stereo, chrome exterior accents, and often air conditioning as standard or a popular option.
- Splash: A distinctive, sporty appearance package. Featured body-colored bumpers, special alloy wheels, unique side decals, bucket seats, and was often paired with the V6 engines and extended cab. - Other Key Features/Options: Available in 2WD or 4WD, manual (5-speed) or automatic (4-speed) transmissions, Regular Cab or SuperCab (Extended Cab) configurations. Other options included a sliding rear window, bed liners, cruise control, and larger tire packages.
1997 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1997 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | - |
| Type | Sport Utility Vehicle Cab; Pickup Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | ST. PAUL |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 3406 |
| Engine Size | 4L |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 |
| Transmission | 5-Speed Manual |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1997 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1997 Ford Ranger, while generally robust, does have several frequently reported problems and long-term reliability concerns, many of which are common across the third generation (1993-1997).
One of the most significant and often cited issues is with the automatic transmissions, specifically the 4R44E and 4R55E units. Owners frequently report issues like harsh shifting, slipping gears, delayed engagement, and outright failure, often requiring costly rebuilds or replacements. Proper fluid changes are crucial but don't always prevent these issues.
Rust is another prevalent concern, especially in regions exposed to road salt. Common areas for rust include the frame, bed supports, wheel wells, rocker panels, and cab corners. This can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult.
Regarding engines: the 3.0-liter "Vulcan" V6 is notorious for timing chain cover oil leaks, which can be expensive to fix due to labor involved. It's also known for valve guide wear, which can manifest as excessive oil consumption and blue exhaust smoke. The 2.3-liter I4 is generally reliable but can suffer from head gasket issues and minor oil leaks. The 4.0-liter V6 is often considered the most durable but isn't entirely without fault, with occasional intake manifold gasket leaks or, less commonly in this generation, timing chain guide issues (more common in later SOHC versions).
Other common issues include worn suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and control arm bushings, leading to poor handling or clunking noises. Brake system components, particularly the master cylinder and rear drum brakes, can also require attention over time. Minor electrical gremlins, such as power window motor failures or dashboard light issues, are also reported.
In terms of recalls, the 1997 Ford Ranger was subject to recalls, including those related to the speed control deactivation switch (which could lead to fires) and certain seat belt buckle assemblies. It's always advisable to check the NHTSA database for any specific vehicle identification number (VIN) to confirm applicable recalls and their completion status.
One of the most significant and often cited issues is with the automatic transmissions, specifically the 4R44E and 4R55E units. Owners frequently report issues like harsh shifting, slipping gears, delayed engagement, and outright failure, often requiring costly rebuilds or replacements. Proper fluid changes are crucial but don't always prevent these issues.
Rust is another prevalent concern, especially in regions exposed to road salt. Common areas for rust include the frame, bed supports, wheel wells, rocker panels, and cab corners. This can compromise structural integrity and make repairs difficult.
Regarding engines: the 3.0-liter "Vulcan" V6 is notorious for timing chain cover oil leaks, which can be expensive to fix due to labor involved. It's also known for valve guide wear, which can manifest as excessive oil consumption and blue exhaust smoke. The 2.3-liter I4 is generally reliable but can suffer from head gasket issues and minor oil leaks. The 4.0-liter V6 is often considered the most durable but isn't entirely without fault, with occasional intake manifold gasket leaks or, less commonly in this generation, timing chain guide issues (more common in later SOHC versions).
Other common issues include worn suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and control arm bushings, leading to poor handling or clunking noises. Brake system components, particularly the master cylinder and rear drum brakes, can also require attention over time. Minor electrical gremlins, such as power window motor failures or dashboard light issues, are also reported.
In terms of recalls, the 1997 Ford Ranger was subject to recalls, including those related to the speed control deactivation switch (which could lead to fires) and certain seat belt buckle assemblies. It's always advisable to check the NHTSA database for any specific vehicle identification number (VIN) to confirm applicable recalls and their completion status.
How long will the 1997 Ford Ranger last?
The 1997 Ford Ranger is renowned for its long-term durability, often exceeding 200,000 to 250,000 miles with diligent maintenance. Many owners report their Rangers reaching 300,000 miles or more, underscoring its "tough-as-nails" reputation. These trucks commonly remain in service for well over 20 years, a testament to their simple, robust engineering.
However, weaknesses emerge with age. Rust is a significant long-term concern, compromising structural integrity if left unchecked. Automatic transmissions are often the weakest link, sometimes failing before 150,000 miles. Suspension components, such as ball joints and leaf springs, will require replacement over time. Interior plastics and fabrics also degrade. Consistent fluid changes, rust prevention, and proactive suspension maintenance are key to maximizing its impressive lifespan.
However, weaknesses emerge with age. Rust is a significant long-term concern, compromising structural integrity if left unchecked. Automatic transmissions are often the weakest link, sometimes failing before 150,000 miles. Suspension components, such as ball joints and leaf springs, will require replacement over time. Interior plastics and fabrics also degrade. Consistent fluid changes, rust prevention, and proactive suspension maintenance are key to maximizing its impressive lifespan.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1997 Ford Ranger, being a compact truck from the late 1990s, featured very basic built-in technology, entertainment, and driver-assistance systems compared to modern vehicles. There were no touchscreens, navigation, Bluetooth connectivity, or advanced digital interfaces. The focus was squarely on utility and functionality.
Entertainment: The standard entertainment system consisted of an AM/FM radio, typically with a two-speaker setup. Higher trims or optional packages might have included a cassette player, and a single-disc CD player was a rare, premium option. Sound quality was generally utilitarian, designed for basic listening rather than an immersive experience.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features as we know them today were virtually non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, blind-spot monitoring, or adaptive cruise control. The most advanced "assistance" might have been an optional cruise control system.
Safety Features: Safety features were also fundamental for the era.
Crash-Test Ratings: The 1997 Ford Ranger received crash-test ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). For frontal impact, it generally scored 4 out of 5 stars for the driver and 3 out of 5 stars for the passenger. Side-impact ratings were not typically conducted or published for vehicles of this class and age, as modern side-impact testing standards had not yet been fully implemented. It's important to remember that these ratings reflect standards of the late 1990s and are not comparable to today's stringent safety benchmarks.
Entertainment: The standard entertainment system consisted of an AM/FM radio, typically with a two-speaker setup. Higher trims or optional packages might have included a cassette player, and a single-disc CD player was a rare, premium option. Sound quality was generally utilitarian, designed for basic listening rather than an immersive experience.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features as we know them today were virtually non-existent. There was no traction control, stability control, blind-spot monitoring, or adaptive cruise control. The most advanced "assistance" might have been an optional cruise control system.
Safety Features: Safety features were also fundamental for the era.
- Airbags: Dual front airbags for both the driver and passenger were standard, a significant safety improvement over earlier models.
- Anti-lock Brakes (ABS): ABS was available, often as an option, primarily for the rear wheels on 2WD models, or as 4-wheel ABS on higher trims and 4x4 models.
- Seatbelts: Three-point seatbelts were standard for front occupants, with lap belts for any middle passenger (if applicable).
- Side Impact Protection: The doors incorporated side-impact beams, a common safety feature of the time.
Crash-Test Ratings: The 1997 Ford Ranger received crash-test ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). For frontal impact, it generally scored 4 out of 5 stars for the driver and 3 out of 5 stars for the passenger. Side-impact ratings were not typically conducted or published for vehicles of this class and age, as modern side-impact testing standards had not yet been fully implemented. It's important to remember that these ratings reflect standards of the late 1990s and are not comparable to today's stringent safety benchmarks.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1997 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new in 1997, a base Ford Ranger XL 2WD could start around $11,000, while a well-equipped XLT or a sporty Splash 4x4 could easily exceed $20,000. Over its quarter-century lifespan, these prices have undergone significant depreciation, as expected.
In the current used market, prices for a 1997 Ford Ranger are highly variable, ranging from under $1,000 for a rough, high-mileage example to $6,000 or more for an exceptionally well-maintained, low-mileage 4x4 with a desirable V6 engine. Depreciation has largely bottomed out, meaning their value is now relatively stable, fluctuating based on condition rather than age alone. Factors significantly affecting current resale value include the absence of rust, overall mechanical condition (especially the transmission), engine choice (V6s often command more), 4WD capability, and comprehensive maintenance records. A clean title and operational air conditioning also boost value.
In the current used market, prices for a 1997 Ford Ranger are highly variable, ranging from under $1,000 for a rough, high-mileage example to $6,000 or more for an exceptionally well-maintained, low-mileage 4x4 with a desirable V6 engine. Depreciation has largely bottomed out, meaning their value is now relatively stable, fluctuating based on condition rather than age alone. Factors significantly affecting current resale value include the absence of rust, overall mechanical condition (especially the transmission), engine choice (V6s often command more), 4WD capability, and comprehensive maintenance records. A clean title and operational air conditioning also boost value.
1997 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1997 Ford Ranger is generally an economical vehicle to own in the long term. Insurance costs are typically very low due to its age, lower market value, and lack of expensive features. Fuel economy is reasonable for a truck, especially with the 4-cylinder, though V6s consume more. It uses regular unleaded fuel, which helps keep costs down.
Maintenance and repair costs are also quite affordable. Parts are readily available and inexpensive, and the vehicle's simple mechanical design means many repairs can be done by a skilled DIY enthusiast or at a lower labor rate by independent mechanics. The main variable costs are fuel and potentially a major transmission repair or extensive rust remediation, which can be significant relative to the truck's value.
Maintenance and repair costs are also quite affordable. Parts are readily available and inexpensive, and the vehicle's simple mechanical design means many repairs can be done by a skilled DIY enthusiast or at a lower labor rate by independent mechanics. The main variable costs are fuel and potentially a major transmission repair or extensive rust remediation, which can be significant relative to the truck's value.
1997 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
-
City Mileage
-
Highway Mileage
-
1997 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
1997 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2001-05-22
Recall no.
01x001000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Equipment Description: Ford IS Replacing All Firestone Wilderness AT 15, 16, and 17 Inch Tires Mounted ON Ford Trucks and Suvs. Ford Reports Tread Separation CAN Occur DUE TO A Combination OF THE Sensitivity OF THE Tire Design TO Stress, Aging, and Manufacturing Differences Between Plants. Ford IS Replacing These Tires TO Prevent Possible Premature Tire Failure. Vehicle Description: THE Vehicles Listed Below MAY Have Been Originally Equipped With Firestone Wilderness AT Tires or MAY Have HAD Wilderness AT Tires Installed During THE Firestone Recall Launched IN August 2000. Certain 1991 Throught 2002 Ford Explorer Certain 2001 Throught 2002 Explorer Sport, and Sport Trac Certain 1997 Through 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Certain 1991 Through 2001 Ranger Certain 1999 Through 2001 Expedition Certain 1991 Through 1994, and 1997 Model Year F-Series Certain 1991 Through 1994 Bronco Note: Both Original Equipment and Replacement Tires ARE Affected.
Consequence
Should THE Tread Separate AT Highway Speeds, A Vehicle Crash Could Occur, Possibly Resulting IN Personal Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON March 31, 2002. However, Customers CAN Contact Ford AT 1-877-917-3673 or GO On-line TO Www.ford.com FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2000-08-21
Recall no.
00t005000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence
IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
2009-10-13
Recall no.
09v399000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Ford IS Recalling Model Years 1995-2003 Windstar, 2000-2003 Excursion Diesel, 1993-1997 and 1999-2003 F-250 SD Through F-550 SD Diesel, 1992-2003 E-150 Through E-550, 1995-2002 Explorer, 1997 and 2002 Mercury Mountaineer, 1995-1997 and 2001-2003 Ranger, and 1994 F53 Vehicles Equipped With THE Texas Instruments Speed Control Deactivation Switch (Scds). THE Scds MAY Leak Internally and Then Overheat, Smoke, or Burn.
Consequence
A Vehicle Fire Could Occur With or Without THE Engine Running.
Remedy
Ford Will Notify Owners That Dealers Will Install A Fused Wiring Harness IN Line With THE Scds. ON 1999-2003 Windstar Vehicles With A Leaking Scds, Dealers Will Also Inspect THE ABS Control Module Connector and Repair AS Necessary. Repairs Will BE Completed Free OF Charge. THE Safety Recall Began ON October 27, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Ford AT 1-888-222-2751.
Notes
Ford's Recall Campaign Number IS 09s09.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2008-08-11
Recall no.
08e050000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
K2 Motor IS Recalling 1,921 Aftermarket Headlamps OF Various Models Sold FOR USE ON THE Above Listed Vehicles. These Headlamps ARE Missing THE Amber Side Reflex Reflector Which Fails TO Conform With THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment."
Consequence
Without THE Amber Side Reflex Reflectors, THE Lighting Visibility MAY BE Affected, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
K2 Motor Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund. THE Recall Began ON Decemeber 17, 2008. Owners MAY Contact K2 Motor AT 1-909-839-2992.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Manufactured BY Honda, Ford, or Chrysler Llc. Customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2009-04-07
Recall no.
09e012000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Sabersport IS Recalling 16,270 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Sabersport Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON MAY 11, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Sabersport AT 1-909-598-7589.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Sabersport.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2009-05-11
Recall no.
09e025000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Dope, Inc. IS Recalling 42,540 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dope, Inc. Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON July 28, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Dope, Inc. AT 1-626-272-1798.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Dope, Inc.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen. Owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
1997 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1997 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Sport Utility Vehicle Cab; Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1997 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Sport Utility Vehicle Cab; Pickup Truck?
The 1997 Ford Ranger operated in a competitive compact pickup truck segment, facing off against key rivals such as the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma, Toyota Tacoma, and Nissan Frontier (or the earlier Hardbody pickup), as well as its badge-engineered twin, the Mazda B-Series.
In terms of Performance, the Ranger offered a good range of engine options. Its 4.0L V6 was a strong contender, often delivering more raw power than Toyota's contemporary V6 offerings. The Chevrolet S-10's available 4.3L V6 was also very powerful, sometimes surpassing the Ranger. The 2.3L I4 Ranger was generally competitive with base engines from its rivals.
Features across all these trucks were fairly spartan by modern standards. The Ranger, S-10, and Frontier offered similar levels of basic amenities, with options like air conditioning, power accessories, and upgraded stereos. The Toyota Tacoma often felt a bit more refined in its interior quality and ergonomics, even if not packed with "features".
Reliability is where distinctions became more apparent. The Toyota Tacoma (especially the 2.7L I4 and 3.4L V6) is often considered the gold standard for bulletproof reliability in this segment, known for incredible longevity with minimal fuss. The Ford Ranger is generally very reliable, but its automatic transmissions (4R44E/4R55E) are a known weak point, and rust can be a significant long-term issue. The Chevrolet S-10 was decent but had its own common issues, like intake manifold gaskets and less robust transmissions in some cases. The Nissan Frontier and Hardbody trucks were also known for strong reliability.
Regarding Price, the Ranger and S-10 were typically more affordable both new and on the used market than the Toyota Tacoma. Tacomas from this era have legendary resale value due to their reputation for extreme reliability, often fetching significantly higher prices for comparable condition and mileage.
Alternatives: For buyers prioritizing maximum reliability and willing to pay a premium, a Toyota Tacoma (1995-2004 generation) is almost universally recommended. For a direct competitor offering a similar blend of affordability and utility to the Ranger, the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma is a viable alternative. A Mazda B-Series from the same period is mechanically identical to the Ranger, offering a similar ownership experience, often at a slightly lower price due due to brand perception.
In terms of Performance, the Ranger offered a good range of engine options. Its 4.0L V6 was a strong contender, often delivering more raw power than Toyota's contemporary V6 offerings. The Chevrolet S-10's available 4.3L V6 was also very powerful, sometimes surpassing the Ranger. The 2.3L I4 Ranger was generally competitive with base engines from its rivals.
Features across all these trucks were fairly spartan by modern standards. The Ranger, S-10, and Frontier offered similar levels of basic amenities, with options like air conditioning, power accessories, and upgraded stereos. The Toyota Tacoma often felt a bit more refined in its interior quality and ergonomics, even if not packed with "features".
Reliability is where distinctions became more apparent. The Toyota Tacoma (especially the 2.7L I4 and 3.4L V6) is often considered the gold standard for bulletproof reliability in this segment, known for incredible longevity with minimal fuss. The Ford Ranger is generally very reliable, but its automatic transmissions (4R44E/4R55E) are a known weak point, and rust can be a significant long-term issue. The Chevrolet S-10 was decent but had its own common issues, like intake manifold gaskets and less robust transmissions in some cases. The Nissan Frontier and Hardbody trucks were also known for strong reliability.
Regarding Price, the Ranger and S-10 were typically more affordable both new and on the used market than the Toyota Tacoma. Tacomas from this era have legendary resale value due to their reputation for extreme reliability, often fetching significantly higher prices for comparable condition and mileage.
Alternatives: For buyers prioritizing maximum reliability and willing to pay a premium, a Toyota Tacoma (1995-2004 generation) is almost universally recommended. For a direct competitor offering a similar blend of affordability and utility to the Ranger, the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma is a viable alternative. A Mazda B-Series from the same period is mechanically identical to the Ranger, offering a similar ownership experience, often at a slightly lower price due due to brand perception.
Final Verdict: Is the 1997 Ford Ranger a Good Sport Utility Vehicle Cab; Pickup Truck?
The 1997 Ford Ranger is an ideal vehicle for budget-conscious individuals, first-time truck owners, or anyone needing a reliable, no-frills utility vehicle for light hauling, commuting, or recreational purposes. It particularly appeals to enthusiasts of classic compact trucks and those who appreciate straightforward mechanical simplicity for DIY maintenance.
It is absolutely worth buying as a used vehicle, provided you approach the purchase with caution. Focus on finding an example with minimal rust, a well-maintained engine, and a healthy transmission (especially if automatic). The XLT trim offers a good balance of features and comfort, while the 4.0L V6 provides ample power for most tasks, especially with 4x4. Avoid poorly maintained or heavily rusted units. The Ranger is not for those seeking modern creature comforts, advanced safety features, or refined driving dynamics. However, for sheer value, proven dependability, and practical utility, a good 1997 Ranger remains an excellent, economical choice.
It is absolutely worth buying as a used vehicle, provided you approach the purchase with caution. Focus on finding an example with minimal rust, a well-maintained engine, and a healthy transmission (especially if automatic). The XLT trim offers a good balance of features and comfort, while the 4.0L V6 provides ample power for most tasks, especially with 4x4. Avoid poorly maintained or heavily rusted units. The Ranger is not for those seeking modern creature comforts, advanced safety features, or refined driving dynamics. However, for sheer value, proven dependability, and practical utility, a good 1997 Ranger remains an excellent, economical choice.
Eugene S
Eugene is an automotive enthusiast with over 15 years of experience in the used car market. As a writer at VINCheck.info, he brings deep industry insight and a passion for cars, helping readers make smart, informed decisions. Eugene has written hundreds of used car reviews and is known for breaking down complex automotive topics into clear, actionable advice. Over the years, he has driven and worked on a wide range of vehicles—starting with tuning street cars in his early days and eventually focusing on performance upgrades and reliability improvements. Today, he specializes in evaluating used vehicles through the lens of real-world ownership and enthusiast needs. A longtime fan of Porsche, Eugene especially appreciates vehicles that blend durability with driving enjoyment.