The 1994 Ford Ranger is a quintessential example of the compact pickup truck era, belonging to the third generation of the Ranger line (1993-1997). Available in regular cab and SuperCab (extended cab) body styles, it offered a versatile and economical solution for both personal and work use. Key trims included the utilitarian XL, the more equipped XLT, the sporty STX, and the distinct "Splash" model with its unique body-colored bumpers and graphics. Its popularity stemmed from its reputation for rugged simplicity, affordability, and a capable, no-nonsense design, making it a favorite for those seeking a reliable light-duty truck without the bulk of a full-size. Pricing new ranged from approximately $9,000 to $16,000 depending on trim and options.
The Good
The 1994 Ford Ranger offers robust reliability, especially with its simpler powertrains, making it a practical choice for long-term ownership. Its compact design allows for easy maneuverability and parking, while decent fuel efficiency, particularly from the 4-cylinder, appealed to budget-conscious buyers. Emotionally, it provides a sense of classic American truck ruggedness and versatility, capable of handling light hauling and off-road excursions. Excellent parts availability and straightforward maintenance further enhance its value proposition, appealing to those who appreciate a no-frills, dependable workhorse.
The Bad
Known weaknesses for the 1994 Ford Ranger include a propensity for rust on the frame, body panels, and bed, especially in colder climates. The automatic A4LD transmission can be prone to issues, and base engines might feel underpowered. Interior comfort is basic, and modern safety features are limited. Owners should also watch for aging suspension components, power window motor failures, and ignition module problems.
1994 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L "Lima" I4: A venerable 4-cylinder engine, standard on most base models.
- 3.0L "Vulcan" V6: An optional, more powerful V6, offering a good balance of power and economy.
- 4.0L "Cologne" V6: The most powerful engine option, primarily available for 4x4 and higher trim levels.
- Horsepower:
- 2.3L I4: Approximately 98-112 hp
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 145 hp
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 160 hp
- Fuel Economy (EPA estimates, vary by transmission/drivetrain):
- 2.3L I4: Roughly 20-22 MPG city / 26-29 MPG highway
- 3.0L V6: Roughly 16-18 MPG city / 20-23 MPG highway
- 4.0L V6: Roughly 15-17 MPG city / 19-21 MPG highway
- 0-60 MPH Times:
- 2.3L I4: Approximately 10.5-12.0 seconds (can vary significantly based on load and conditions)
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 9.5-10.5 seconds
- 4.0L V6: Approximately 8.5-9.5 seconds
- Towing Capacity (varies by engine, transmission, axle ratio, and configuration):
- Generally ranges from 1,600 lbs (2.3L, 2WD) up to 5,800 lbs (4.0L, 4WD, SuperCab with appropriate gearing).
- Trim-Level Features:
- XL: The base work truck. Featured vinyl seating, manual windows and locks, AM/FM radio, and basic instrumentation. Designed for utility and affordability.
- XLT: The popular mid-range trim. Added cloth upholstery, carpeting, power windows/locks (optional), air conditioning (optional), a cassette player, chrome bumpers, and full instrumentation. Often included creature comforts for daily driving.
- STX: A sportier trim. Often included bucket seats, upgraded audio, unique wheels, and body graphics. It was typically available with the V6 engines.
- Splash: A distinctive, lifestyle-oriented trim. Featured a "flareside" (stepside) bed, body-colored bumpers, mirrors, and grille, unique alloy wheels, and special "Splash" decals. It aimed for a youthful, customized look directly from the factory.
These specifications highlight the Ranger's range from an economical basic work truck to a more capable and stylish compact pickup.
1994 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1994 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | ST. PAUL |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.2-L L-4 |
| Engine Size | 2.2L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1994 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1994 Ford Ranger, while generally reliable, is not without its common pitfalls. One of the most frequently reported problems is rust. The frame, especially around the rear leaf spring hangers and fuel tank mounts, is susceptible to corrosion. Body panels, including the bed, wheel wells, and rocker panels, also commonly show rust, particularly in regions that experience harsh winters and road salt. This is a significant long-term durability concern that can compromise structural integrity if not addressed.
Another notable issue involves the automatic A4LD transmission, particularly on V6 models. These transmissions are known for premature failure, shifting issues, and fluid leaks, often requiring costly rebuilds or replacements. Manual transmissions, in contrast, tend to be more robust.
Ignition system components, specifically the ignition module or coil pack, can fail, leading to misfires, rough idling, or complete no-start conditions.
Power windows and door lock actuators are common points of failure due to aging motors and mechanisms, leading to slow operation or complete stoppage. Air conditioning systems often lose their charge due to old seals and hoses, or experience compressor failures.
The rear leaf springs are known to flatten over time, especially on trucks that have consistently carried heavy loads, impacting ride height and load-carrying capacity.
While major widespread safety recalls specifically for the 1994 model year beyond general Ford campaigns are less common for this specific vehicle, it's always advisable to check a vehicle's VIN for any open recalls through the NHTSA database. Many '90s vehicles, including the Ranger, also have issues with aging vacuum lines and sensors, which can lead to various "check engine" light issues and performance problems. Exhaust systems are also prone to rust and can develop leaks over time. These issues are generally consistent across the third-generation Ranger (1993-1997) model years.
Another notable issue involves the automatic A4LD transmission, particularly on V6 models. These transmissions are known for premature failure, shifting issues, and fluid leaks, often requiring costly rebuilds or replacements. Manual transmissions, in contrast, tend to be more robust.
Ignition system components, specifically the ignition module or coil pack, can fail, leading to misfires, rough idling, or complete no-start conditions.
Power windows and door lock actuators are common points of failure due to aging motors and mechanisms, leading to slow operation or complete stoppage. Air conditioning systems often lose their charge due to old seals and hoses, or experience compressor failures.
The rear leaf springs are known to flatten over time, especially on trucks that have consistently carried heavy loads, impacting ride height and load-carrying capacity.
While major widespread safety recalls specifically for the 1994 model year beyond general Ford campaigns are less common for this specific vehicle, it's always advisable to check a vehicle's VIN for any open recalls through the NHTSA database. Many '90s vehicles, including the Ranger, also have issues with aging vacuum lines and sensors, which can lead to various "check engine" light issues and performance problems. Exhaust systems are also prone to rust and can develop leaks over time. These issues are generally consistent across the third-generation Ranger (1993-1997) model years.
How long will the 1994 Ford Ranger last?
With good maintenance habits, the 1994 Ford Ranger is well-known for its impressive long-term durability and ability to reach high mileage. Many owners report these trucks reliably exceeding 200,000 to 250,000 miles, and even 300,000 miles is not uncommon, especially with the 2.3L 4-cylinder or 4.0L V6 engines paired with manual transmissions. Regular oil changes, timely fluid flushes, and addressing minor issues promptly are crucial for this longevity. Over time, weaknesses such as frame and body rust, particularly in harsh climates, become significant durability concerns. The automatic A4LD transmission can be a weak link, often failing before 150,000 miles if not meticulously maintained. Suspension components, such as shocks and leaf springs, will also wear out, requiring replacement to maintain ride quality and load capacity. Despite these, its simple design and readily available, affordable parts make long-term ownership feasible.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1994 Ford Ranger, being a product of its era, featured very basic built-in tech, entertainment, and safety features compared to modern vehicles. Driver-assistance technologies were virtually non-existent.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
Standard on most models was a simple AM/FM radio. Higher trims like the XLT and STX often included an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player, and sometimes a graphic equalizer. Four-speaker sound systems were common. Beyond the radio, "tech" was limited to essential gauges (speedometer, odometer, fuel, temperature, oil pressure, voltmeter) and basic warning lights. Power windows and door locks were optional features, considered amenities rather than standard tech.
Driver-Assistance Features:
There were no advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) as we know them today. The most sophisticated feature was an optional Rear Anti-lock Brake System (RABS), which prevented the rear wheels from locking up during hard braking. This was a significant safety improvement for trucks of that time, particularly when unladen or towing.
Safety Features:
A major safety enhancement for the 1994 model year was the introduction of a standard driver-side airbag, a significant step forward for compact pickups. This was a new federal mandate that began to be phased in. Passenger-side airbags were not available. Other passive safety features included side-impact door beams to enhance occupant protection in side collisions, three-point seatbelts for front occupants (two-point lap belts for center rear if applicable in SuperCab), and child safety locks on SuperCab models. The truck's robust ladder frame construction also contributed to its crashworthiness.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Specific, comprehensive crash-test ratings comparable to today's NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) or IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) standards are not readily available or were not conducted in the same manner for vehicles of this vintage. While NHTSA would have performed some tests, detailed public reports with star ratings, especially for aspects like small overlap front or side curtain airbags, are not applicable to a 1994 model. The driver-side airbag and side-impact beams were considered leading safety features at the time.
Built-in Tech & Entertainment:
Standard on most models was a simple AM/FM radio. Higher trims like the XLT and STX often included an AM/FM stereo with a cassette player, and sometimes a graphic equalizer. Four-speaker sound systems were common. Beyond the radio, "tech" was limited to essential gauges (speedometer, odometer, fuel, temperature, oil pressure, voltmeter) and basic warning lights. Power windows and door locks were optional features, considered amenities rather than standard tech.
Driver-Assistance Features:
There were no advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) as we know them today. The most sophisticated feature was an optional Rear Anti-lock Brake System (RABS), which prevented the rear wheels from locking up during hard braking. This was a significant safety improvement for trucks of that time, particularly when unladen or towing.
Safety Features:
A major safety enhancement for the 1994 model year was the introduction of a standard driver-side airbag, a significant step forward for compact pickups. This was a new federal mandate that began to be phased in. Passenger-side airbags were not available. Other passive safety features included side-impact door beams to enhance occupant protection in side collisions, three-point seatbelts for front occupants (two-point lap belts for center rear if applicable in SuperCab), and child safety locks on SuperCab models. The truck's robust ladder frame construction also contributed to its crashworthiness.
Crash-Test Ratings:
Specific, comprehensive crash-test ratings comparable to today's NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) or IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) standards are not readily available or were not conducted in the same manner for vehicles of this vintage. While NHTSA would have performed some tests, detailed public reports with star ratings, especially for aspects like small overlap front or side curtain airbags, are not applicable to a 1994 model. The driver-side airbag and side-impact beams were considered leading safety features at the time.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1994 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new in 1994, the Ford Ranger had a broad pricing range. A base XL Regular Cab 2WD model might have started around $9,000-$10,000, while a fully loaded XLT or Splash SuperCab 4x4 could easily exceed $15,000-$17,000. Today, current used market prices vary drastically based on condition, mileage, engine, and location. A rough, high-mileage example might fetch only $1,500-$3,000, whereas a well-maintained, lower-mileage Ranger, especially a desirable XLT or Splash model, could command $5,000-$10,000, or even more for exceptionally preserved specimens.
Depreciation from its original MSRP has largely stabilized over the decades. These trucks have already experienced the vast majority of their depreciation. Factors significantly affecting resale value include the absence of severe rust, a well-documented maintenance history, working four-wheel drive (if equipped), manual transmission preference among enthusiasts, and the overall mechanical and cosmetic condition. Models with the 4.0L V6 or unique "Splash" styling tend to hold value better due to their desirability.
Depreciation from its original MSRP has largely stabilized over the decades. These trucks have already experienced the vast majority of their depreciation. Factors significantly affecting resale value include the absence of severe rust, a well-documented maintenance history, working four-wheel drive (if equipped), manual transmission preference among enthusiasts, and the overall mechanical and cosmetic condition. Models with the 4.0L V6 or unique "Splash" styling tend to hold value better due to their desirability.
1994 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1994 Ford Ranger is generally an economical vehicle to own long-term. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age, lower value, and simple safety features. Fuel costs are moderate; while the 4-cylinder is decent, the V6 engines can be thirstier, but overall, it's better than full-size trucks. Maintenance is relatively inexpensive as parts are abundant, readily available, and often affordable. Its straightforward design makes many repairs DIY-friendly, reducing labor costs. Common repairs include rust mitigation, transmission work (if automatic), and addressing typical wear-and-tear items. While major mechanical failures can be costly, the Ranger's overall simplicity and inexpensive parts make it a budget-friendly choice for those needing basic transportation or a work truck, proving it's quite economical.
1994 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
16.3 gallons
City Mileage
19 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
24 miles/gallon
1994 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1994 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2001-05-22
Recall no.
01x001000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Equipment Description: Ford IS Replacing All Firestone Wilderness AT 15, 16, and 17 Inch Tires Mounted ON Ford Trucks and Suvs. Ford Reports Tread Separation CAN Occur DUE TO A Combination OF THE Sensitivity OF THE Tire Design TO Stress, Aging, and Manufacturing Differences Between Plants. Ford IS Replacing These Tires TO Prevent Possible Premature Tire Failure. Vehicle Description: THE Vehicles Listed Below MAY Have Been Originally Equipped With Firestone Wilderness AT Tires or MAY Have HAD Wilderness AT Tires Installed During THE Firestone Recall Launched IN August 2000. Certain 1991 Throught 2002 Ford Explorer Certain 2001 Throught 2002 Explorer Sport, and Sport Trac Certain 1997 Through 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Certain 1991 Through 2001 Ranger Certain 1999 Through 2001 Expedition Certain 1991 Through 1994, and 1997 Model Year F-Series Certain 1991 Through 1994 Bronco Note: Both Original Equipment and Replacement Tires ARE Affected.
Consequence
Should THE Tread Separate AT Highway Speeds, A Vehicle Crash Could Occur, Possibly Resulting IN Personal Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON March 31, 2002. However, Customers CAN Contact Ford AT 1-877-917-3673 or GO On-line TO Www.ford.com FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2000-08-21
Recall no.
00t005000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence
IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Recall date
1998-04-08
Recall no.
98e010000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Equipment Description: Aftermarket Brake Rotors FOR USE ON Certain Ford and Mazda Trucks. Cracked Castings Caused Cracks TO Appear ON THE Outer Diameter OF THE Rotor HAT or Around THE Stud Hole.
Consequence
Loss OF Braking CAN Result.
Remedy
Aimco Will Reimburse Consumers/Installers FOR THE Cost OF Replacement Rotors and Installation. Consumers ARE Requested TO Return TO THE Location Where THE Rotors Were Originally Purchased/Installed FOR Replacement.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin During April 1998.owners WHO DO NOT Receive THE Free Rotors Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Aimco AT 815-759-7935.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Service Brakes, Hydraulic:power Assist:hydraulic
Recall date
1996-02-05
Recall no.
96v024001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Studs Which Attach THE Brake Master Cylinder TO THE Power Brake Vacuum Booster Assembly CAN Develop Stress Corrosion Cracking After Being Operated FOR AN Extended Period OF Time IN THE Southern California Location.
Consequence
IF A Crack Occurs, IT Could Result IN ONE or Both Studs Fracturing. THE Master Cylinder Could Then Separate From THE Vacuum Booster, When THE Brakes ARE Applied, Preventing THE Service Brakes From Activating Increasing THE Risk OF A Vehicle Accident.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Power Brake Vacuum Booster Assembly.
Notes
System: Brakes; Power Assist; Primary; Booster. Vehicle Description: Multi-Purpose Vehicles and Light Duty Trucks Originally Sold or Currently Registered IN THE Southern California Counties OF LOS Angeles, Orange, SAN Bernadino, SAN Diego, Riverside, Ventura, Santa Barbara, SAN Luis Obispo, Imperial, and Kern.note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time, Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1995-12-05
Recall no.
95v231001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
During Extreme Cold, Northern Climate Winter Conditions, ICE CAN Form IN THE Throttle Body OF THE Engine Causing THE Throttle Plate TO Remain IN THE Highway Cruising Position After THE Accelerator IS Released or THE Speed Control IS Deactivated.
Consequence
THE Vehicle Stopping Distances CAN BE Increased Possibly Resulting IN AN Accident.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE AIR Intake Duct and Valve Assembly With Revised Units.
Notes
System: Fuel; Throttle Linkages and Control.vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks Equipped With A 2.3l Enginebuilt AT THE Edison, Louisville and Twin Cities Assembly Plants and Currently Registered IN THE Following States: Alaska, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan (Upper Peninsula), NEW York, Maine, Vermont and NEW Hampshire.note: Owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Parking Brake:conventional
Recall date
1994-09-07
Recall no.
94v169001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Parking Brake Control Self-Adjust Pawl Does NOT Line UP Properly With THE Self-Adjust Rachet Causing THE Pawl TO Slip Over ONE or More Teeth IN THE Rachet.
Consequence
When THE Above Occurs, IT CAN Result IN Parking Brake System Ineffectiveness. THE Parking Brake Will NOT Hold THE Vehicle, Causing THE Vehicle TO Roll Freely, IF THE Transmission IS NOT Left IN Gear.
Remedy
A Wedge Will BE Installed Which Will Serve TO Lock THE Parking Brake Self-Adjust Mechanism Pawl Into Engagement With THE Rachet. Also, Owners Will BE Advised TO Release and Reapply THE Parking Brake Whenever Tooth Skip Occurs and Will BE Reminded TO Always Turn OFF THE Engine and Leave THE Vehicle IN Gear When THE Vehicle IS Parked.
Notes
System: Emergency Parking Brake; Mechanical.vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks and Multipurpose Vehicles With Manual Transmissions.note: IF Your Vehicle IS Presented TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and THE Remedy IS NOT Provided Free OF Charge Within A Reasonabletime or THE Remedy Does NOT Correct THE Defect, Please Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673. Also, Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
1994-06-13
Recall no.
94v111001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
THE Front Fuel Lines Have A Section OF Flexible Hose That IS Susceptible TO Cracking Which CAN Allow Fuel Leakage.
Consequence
Leaking Fuel CAN Result IN A Fire When Exposed TO A Source OF Ignition.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect And, IF Necessary, Replace THE Front Fuel Line Assembly.
Notes
System: Fuel; Fuel Lines; Hoses; Non-Metallic.vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks Equipped With 3.0 L and 4.0 Lengines.notes: Ford Motor Company IS THE Manufacturer OF Both THE Ford Ranger and THE Mazda B-Series Light Pickup Trucks. Ford Motor Company and Mazda (North America) Will BE Performing THE Corrective Actions FOR Their OWN Trucks.if Your Vehicle IS Presented TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and THE Remedy IS NOT Provided Within A Reasonable Time and Free OF Charge or THE Remedy Does NOT Correct THE Defect or Noncompliance, Please Contact Ford Service Center AT 1-800-392-3673; or Mazda Service Center AT 1-800-222-5500. Also, Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2008-08-11
Recall no.
08e050000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
K2 Motor IS Recalling 1,921 Aftermarket Headlamps OF Various Models Sold FOR USE ON THE Above Listed Vehicles. These Headlamps ARE Missing THE Amber Side Reflex Reflector Which Fails TO Conform With THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment."
Consequence
Without THE Amber Side Reflex Reflectors, THE Lighting Visibility MAY BE Affected, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
K2 Motor Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund. THE Recall Began ON Decemeber 17, 2008. Owners MAY Contact K2 Motor AT 1-909-839-2992.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Manufactured BY Honda, Ford, or Chrysler Llc. Customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2009-04-07
Recall no.
09e012000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Sabersport IS Recalling 16,270 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Sabersport Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON MAY 11, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Sabersport AT 1-909-598-7589.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Sabersport.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2009-05-11
Recall no.
09e025000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Dope, Inc. IS Recalling 42,540 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dope, Inc. Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON July 28, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Dope, Inc. AT 1-626-272-1798.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Dope, Inc.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen. Owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
1994 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1994 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1994 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1994 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1994 Ford Ranger faced stiff competition from other compact pickups of its era, primarily the Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma and the Toyota Pickup (later Tacoma) and Nissan Hardbody (later Frontier).
Performance: The Ranger's engine lineup (2.3L I4, 3.0L V6, 4.0L V6) was competitive. The 4.0L V6 offered strong performance for its class, often outperforming the S-10's 4.3L V6 in some metrics and feeling more robust than Toyota's 3.0L V6. The S-10/Sonoma often had a slight edge in ride comfort, while the Toyota and Nissan were known for their nimble handling. However, none were performance powerhouses, focusing instead on utility.
Features: All rivals offered similar basic features: regular and extended cab options, various bed lengths, and comparable trim levels. The Ranger's "Splash" model stood out with its factory customized look, a unique offering. Interior amenities were largely on par across the board – basic, functional, with optional power accessories, A/C, and cassette players. The 1994 Ranger benefited from a standard driver-side airbag, matching or exceeding rivals in that specific safety aspect for the model year.
Reliability: This is where distinctions emerge. While the Ranger is known for its durability, particularly the 4-cylinder and 4.0L V6 engines with manual transmissions, the automatic A4LD transmission could be a weak point. Toyota Pickups from this era are legendary for their bulletproof reliability, often surpassing the Ranger and S-10 in long-term mechanical dependability, though they were not immune to rust. Nissan Hardbody trucks also enjoyed a strong reputation for durability. The S-10/Sonoma was generally reliable but sometimes faced electrical gremlins or more rapid body rust than the Ranger.
Price: New, their prices were quite comparable. On the used market today, the Ranger often represents excellent value, frequently being more affordable than a comparable Toyota Pickup, which commands a premium due to its legendary reliability. Nissan Hardbodies are also often found at competitive prices. The S-10/Sonoma used prices are generally similar to or slightly less than the Ranger.
Alternatives:
Performance: The Ranger's engine lineup (2.3L I4, 3.0L V6, 4.0L V6) was competitive. The 4.0L V6 offered strong performance for its class, often outperforming the S-10's 4.3L V6 in some metrics and feeling more robust than Toyota's 3.0L V6. The S-10/Sonoma often had a slight edge in ride comfort, while the Toyota and Nissan were known for their nimble handling. However, none were performance powerhouses, focusing instead on utility.
Features: All rivals offered similar basic features: regular and extended cab options, various bed lengths, and comparable trim levels. The Ranger's "Splash" model stood out with its factory customized look, a unique offering. Interior amenities were largely on par across the board – basic, functional, with optional power accessories, A/C, and cassette players. The 1994 Ranger benefited from a standard driver-side airbag, matching or exceeding rivals in that specific safety aspect for the model year.
Reliability: This is where distinctions emerge. While the Ranger is known for its durability, particularly the 4-cylinder and 4.0L V6 engines with manual transmissions, the automatic A4LD transmission could be a weak point. Toyota Pickups from this era are legendary for their bulletproof reliability, often surpassing the Ranger and S-10 in long-term mechanical dependability, though they were not immune to rust. Nissan Hardbody trucks also enjoyed a strong reputation for durability. The S-10/Sonoma was generally reliable but sometimes faced electrical gremlins or more rapid body rust than the Ranger.
Price: New, their prices were quite comparable. On the used market today, the Ranger often represents excellent value, frequently being more affordable than a comparable Toyota Pickup, which commands a premium due to its legendary reliability. Nissan Hardbodies are also often found at competitive prices. The S-10/Sonoma used prices are generally similar to or slightly less than the Ranger.
Alternatives:
- Toyota Pickup (1989-1995): A better alternative if absolute, unyielding reliability is the top priority and you're willing to pay a premium.
- Nissan Hardbody (1986-1997): A similar alternative offering great reliability and value, often overlooked but very capable.
- Chevrolet S-10/GMC Sonoma (1994-2004 generation, the new generation for 1994): A similar alternative, often offering a slightly smoother ride and a more powerful 4.3L V6 option, but potentially with more rust concerns and electrical issues than the Ranger.
Final Verdict: Is the 1994 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1994 Ford Ranger is an ideal vehicle for individuals seeking a no-frills, highly practical, and economical compact pickup. It's perfect for first-time truck owners, DIY enthusiasts, or those who need a light-duty work vehicle for hauling, yard work, or occasional off-road adventures without the bulk and expense of a full-size truck. It's also a great choice for budget-conscious buyers and those who appreciate mechanical simplicity and the ability to perform basic maintenance themselves.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, but with caveats. It is definitively a used vehicle purchase, as it's nearly 30 years old. It's worth buying if you can find a well-maintained example, ideally with minimal rust, a functional 4.0L V6 or 2.3L I4 (depending on power needs), and preferably a manual transmission to avoid potential A4LD automatic issues. Look for XLT or Splash trims if you desire more features or unique styling. Avoid examples with significant frame rust or major transmission problems unless you're prepared for costly repairs. Under these conditions, the 1994 Ford Ranger offers excellent value as a durable, dependable, and affordable companion.
Is it worth buying? Absolutely, but with caveats. It is definitively a used vehicle purchase, as it's nearly 30 years old. It's worth buying if you can find a well-maintained example, ideally with minimal rust, a functional 4.0L V6 or 2.3L I4 (depending on power needs), and preferably a manual transmission to avoid potential A4LD automatic issues. Look for XLT or Splash trims if you desire more features or unique styling. Avoid examples with significant frame rust or major transmission problems unless you're prepared for costly repairs. Under these conditions, the 1994 Ford Ranger offers excellent value as a durable, dependable, and affordable companion.
Cathleen V
Cathleen is an exceptional freelance writer covering hot topics in the automotive world from a gearhead's perspective. Her articles delve into various aspects of automotive technology and history, offering readers detailed insights into engine performance, reliability, and maintenance. Through her engaging and informative writing, Cathleen provides valuable information to automotive enthusiasts and consumers alike, helping them make informed decisions about vehicle maintenance and purchases.