The 1989 Ford Ranger is a compact pickup truck that entered its second generation in 1983, with the 1989 model year being part of a significant refresh. It was available in Regular Cab and SuperCab (extended cab) body styles. Key trims included the base, XL, and the sportier XLT. Popularity stemmed from its affordability, manageable size for urban use, and the availability of capable four-wheel-drive options, making it a versatile workhorse and recreational vehicle.
The Good
The 1989 Ranger offered a compelling blend of rugged performance, proven reliability, and economical operation. Its straightforward design appealed to practicality, while its go-anywhere capability and compact size offered freedom for adventure. It was a budget-friendly option that didn't compromise on utility, making it a smart choice for work and play.
The Bad
Potential buyers of a 1989 Ford Ranger should watch out for rust, particularly on the frame, wheel wells, and cab corners. Electrical gremlins, interior wear and tear, and aging suspension components are also common concerns. Engine performance, especially on the smaller displacement options, can feel underpowered by modern standards.
1989 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.3L 4-cylinder
- 2.9L V6
- 3.0L V6 (introduced this year)
- Horsepower:
- 2.3L 4-cylinder: Approximately 100-108 hp
- 2.9L V6: Approximately 140-145 hp
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 140-150 hp
- Fuel Economy: Varies significantly by engine and drivetrain, but generally in the range of 17-24 MPG combined for 2WD models. 4WD models would be slightly lower.
- 0-60 Times: Expect 0-60 mph times to be in the 11-15 second range, depending on engine and configuration.
- Towing Capacity: Towing capacities varied based on configuration, but could range from around 2,000 lbs for lighter duty setups to over 5,000 lbs for properly equipped models with the V6 engines and towing packages.
- Trim-Level Features:
- Base: Basic interior, vinyl flooring, manual windows and locks, steel wheels.
- XL: Improved interior materials, AM/FM radio, optional power steering and brakes, carpeting.
- XLT: Higher-grade interior fabrics, upgraded stereo, chrome exterior accents, optional air conditioning, tilt steering wheel, power windows and locks (often standard on higher XLT trims).
- Options: 4WD, automatic transmission, limited-slip differential, bed liners, running boards, roof racks, upgraded suspension packages.
1989 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1989 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Medium Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | LOUISVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | 3394 pounds |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | - |
| Overall Height | 68.20 inches |
| Overall Length | 193.60 inches |
| Overall Width | 66.80 inches |
| Wheelbase Length | 125.00 inches |
| Standard Seating | 5 |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.3-L L-4 SOHC 8V |
| Engine Size | 2.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | Manual 5-Speed |
| Transmission Type | Manual |
| Transmission Speeds | 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | 2-Wheel ABS |
| Steering Type | Recirculating |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | $14,347 |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1989 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1989 Ford Ranger, while generally considered a reliable truck for its era, does have some common issues owners report. One of the most prevalent concerns is rust. Due to its age, frame rust, particularly around the rear axle and leaf spring mounts, can be a serious structural problem. Body rust is also common on wheel wells, rocker panels, and the cab corners.
Electrical gremlins are another frequently cited issue. This can manifest as intermittent dashboard lights, faulty power windows, or issues with the radio and HVAC controls. The wiring harnesses can degrade over time, leading to these problems.
Regarding engine reliability, the 2.3L four-cylinder engine is known for its durability if maintained, but can suffer from head gasket issues or intake manifold gasket leaks. The V6 engines, particularly the 2.9L, can also experience intake manifold gasket leaks. Some owners have reported issues with the automatic transmission, such as rough shifting or failure to engage gears, especially with higher mileage.
Suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings are also wear items that may need replacement. The clutch on manual transmission models can also be a point of failure.
While specific recalls for the 1989 model year are not as widely documented as later years, it's always advisable to check the NHTSA website for any outstanding safety recalls that may apply. Long-term reliability largely depends on how well the truck has been maintained and protected from the elements. Trucks used in rust-belt regions are far more prone to significant structural degradation. A well-maintained Ranger can still be a dependable vehicle, but thorough inspection is crucial.
Electrical gremlins are another frequently cited issue. This can manifest as intermittent dashboard lights, faulty power windows, or issues with the radio and HVAC controls. The wiring harnesses can degrade over time, leading to these problems.
Regarding engine reliability, the 2.3L four-cylinder engine is known for its durability if maintained, but can suffer from head gasket issues or intake manifold gasket leaks. The V6 engines, particularly the 2.9L, can also experience intake manifold gasket leaks. Some owners have reported issues with the automatic transmission, such as rough shifting or failure to engage gears, especially with higher mileage.
Suspension components like ball joints, tie rod ends, and bushings are also wear items that may need replacement. The clutch on manual transmission models can also be a point of failure.
While specific recalls for the 1989 model year are not as widely documented as later years, it's always advisable to check the NHTSA website for any outstanding safety recalls that may apply. Long-term reliability largely depends on how well the truck has been maintained and protected from the elements. Trucks used in rust-belt regions are far more prone to significant structural degradation. A well-maintained Ranger can still be a dependable vehicle, but thorough inspection is crucial.
How long will the 1989 Ford Ranger last?
Based on owner data and typical maintenance habits, a well-maintained 1989 Ford Ranger can realistically achieve 200,000 to 300,000 miles or more. The 2.3L four-cylinder engine is particularly known for its longevity, often outlasting the rest of the vehicle if regular oil changes and basic maintenance are performed. However, the truck's long-term durability is significantly impacted by its susceptibility to rust. In drier, warmer climates with less exposure to road salt, Rangers tend to hold up much better structurally and can remain on the road for many years. In contrast, vehicles from rust-prone areas may exhibit extensive frame and body degradation that limits their service life, despite the mechanical components still being sound. Regular undercoating and rust prevention treatments are key to maximizing its lifespan.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1989 Ford Ranger, being from an earlier era, is quite basic in terms of technology, driver-assistance, and advanced safety features.
Entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio, with optional upgrades to an AM/FM stereo with cassette player. Higher trim levels might have offered more speakers. There were no CD players or digital displays.
Built-in tech was minimal. Features like power windows and power door locks were optional on lower trims but became more common on the XLT models. Air conditioning was also an optional extra that was highly sought after. Cruise control was available as an option.
Driver-assistance features were essentially non-existent by modern standards. You won't find adaptive cruise control, lane departure warnings, or parking sensors. The focus was on the core functionality of a truck.
Safety features were also rudimentary. Standard safety equipment would typically include seat belts and a collapsible steering column. Antilock Braking System (ABS) was an optional feature for the rear wheels on some models, a significant safety upgrade for its time. Airbags were not standard equipment in 1989 for the Ford Ranger; they became a more common safety feature in later model years.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this vintage are often not directly comparable to modern standards, and specific ratings for the 1989 Ranger might be difficult to find or may not have been conducted by agencies like the IIHS or NHTSA in their current formats. Early tests often focused on frontal impact and did not incorporate side-impact or rollover assessments as comprehensively as today. The truck's body-on-frame construction and relatively simple design meant it offered basic protection, but lacked the advanced crumple zones and safety structures found in contemporary vehicles.
Entertainment typically consisted of an AM/FM radio, with optional upgrades to an AM/FM stereo with cassette player. Higher trim levels might have offered more speakers. There were no CD players or digital displays.
Built-in tech was minimal. Features like power windows and power door locks were optional on lower trims but became more common on the XLT models. Air conditioning was also an optional extra that was highly sought after. Cruise control was available as an option.
Driver-assistance features were essentially non-existent by modern standards. You won't find adaptive cruise control, lane departure warnings, or parking sensors. The focus was on the core functionality of a truck.
Safety features were also rudimentary. Standard safety equipment would typically include seat belts and a collapsible steering column. Antilock Braking System (ABS) was an optional feature for the rear wheels on some models, a significant safety upgrade for its time. Airbags were not standard equipment in 1989 for the Ford Ranger; they became a more common safety feature in later model years.
Crash-test ratings for vehicles of this vintage are often not directly comparable to modern standards, and specific ratings for the 1989 Ranger might be difficult to find or may not have been conducted by agencies like the IIHS or NHTSA in their current formats. Early tests often focused on frontal impact and did not incorporate side-impact or rollover assessments as comprehensively as today. The truck's body-on-frame construction and relatively simple design meant it offered basic protection, but lacked the advanced crumple zones and safety structures found in contemporary vehicles.
What Colors Options are Available?
We’re working on this section!
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
In the meantime, feel free to explore the other sections for more content.
1989 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1989 Ford Ranger had an original MSRP that typically ranged from around $8,000 for a base model to upwards of $15,000 for a well-equipped XLT SuperCab 4x4, depending on options. Today, used 1989 Ford Ranger prices vary dramatically based on condition, mileage, trim level, and location. You might find project trucks for a few hundred dollars, while exceptionally clean, low-mileage examples, especially the more desirable trims like the XLT or those with the V6 engines and 4WD, can fetch anywhere from $3,000 to $8,000 or more. Depreciation has been significant, as expected for a vehicle of this age. Factors affecting resale value include the presence of rust (a major detractor), mechanical condition, originality, and whether it has desirable features like 4WD or a V6 engine. Well-maintained, rust-free examples are becoming increasingly collectible.
1989 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1989 Ford Ranger is generally economical to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and basic nature. Fuel costs depend on the engine; the 4-cylinder is quite efficient, while the V6s consume more. Maintenance and repair costs are usually modest, with many parts being readily available and affordable. Common repairs might involve suspension components, brakes, and exhaust systems. The simplicity of its design means many repairs can be done by DIY enthusiasts. Overall, the 1989 Ranger is considered a cost-effective vehicle to own, provided it has been reasonably maintained and doesn't suffer from severe rust issues, which can dramatically increase repair expenses.
1989 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
17.00 gallons
City Mileage
16 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
19 miles/gallon
1989 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Service Brakes, Air:disc:rotor
Recall date
1998-04-08
Recall no.
98e010000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Equipment Description: Aftermarket Brake Rotors FOR USE ON Certain Ford and Mazda Trucks. Cracked Castings Caused Cracks TO Appear ON THE Outer Diameter OF THE Rotor HAT or Around THE Stud Hole.
Consequence
Loss OF Braking CAN Result.
Remedy
Aimco Will Reimburse Consumers/Installers FOR THE Cost OF Replacement Rotors and Installation. Consumers ARE Requested TO Return TO THE Location Where THE Rotors Were Originally Purchased/Installed FOR Replacement.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin During April 1998.owners WHO DO NOT Receive THE Free Rotors Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Aimco AT 815-759-7935.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Suspension:front:wheel Bearing
Recall date
1989-07-05
Recall no.
89v109000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Front Wheel Bearing Adjusting NUT Retaining Keys MAY BE Missing From Front Axle Assemblies, Allowing THE NUT TO Loosen.
Consequence
This Could Result IN Detachment OF THE Wheel and Hubassembly From THE Axle, Loss OF Vehicle Control, and AN Accident.
Remedy
Install Retaining Keys IN Front Wheel HUB Assemblies Where Missing.
Notes
System:front Wheel Bearing.vehicle Description:4x4 Multipurpose Vehicles Trucks Equipped With Front Axleautomatic Locking Hubs.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1989 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1989 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1989 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1989 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1989 Ford Ranger competed fiercely in the compact pickup truck segment against rivals like the Toyota Pickup (later Tacoma), Nissan Hardbody (later D21), and the Chevrolet S-10/GMC S-15 Sonoma.
In terms of performance, the Ranger's V6 options were competitive, offering decent power for the time, though the base 4-cylinder could feel underpowered compared to some rivals. Toyota and Nissan were often praised for their more refined and robust engine options, especially in their 4-cylinder variants. The S-10 offered a similarly balanced performance profile.
Features were generally on par for the era, with all manufacturers offering similar basic amenities and optional upgrades. The Ranger's SuperCab offered a practical extended cab solution, comparable to competitors. Toyota and Nissan often held a slight edge in perceived interior build quality and comfort.
Reliability is where the Toyota Pickup truly shone, often surpassing the Ranger, S-10, and Nissan in long-term durability and resistance to rust. The Ranger was generally reliable, but rust was a more significant concern than with its Japanese competitors. The S-10 also had its share of electrical and mechanical quirks.
Price was a strong suit for the Ford Ranger; it was often one of the most affordable options in the segment, making it a popular choice for budget-conscious buyers and fleet operators.
Similar or better alternatives to consider from the same era might include:
In terms of performance, the Ranger's V6 options were competitive, offering decent power for the time, though the base 4-cylinder could feel underpowered compared to some rivals. Toyota and Nissan were often praised for their more refined and robust engine options, especially in their 4-cylinder variants. The S-10 offered a similarly balanced performance profile.
Features were generally on par for the era, with all manufacturers offering similar basic amenities and optional upgrades. The Ranger's SuperCab offered a practical extended cab solution, comparable to competitors. Toyota and Nissan often held a slight edge in perceived interior build quality and comfort.
Reliability is where the Toyota Pickup truly shone, often surpassing the Ranger, S-10, and Nissan in long-term durability and resistance to rust. The Ranger was generally reliable, but rust was a more significant concern than with its Japanese competitors. The S-10 also had its share of electrical and mechanical quirks.
Price was a strong suit for the Ford Ranger; it was often one of the most affordable options in the segment, making it a popular choice for budget-conscious buyers and fleet operators.
Similar or better alternatives to consider from the same era might include:
- Toyota Pickup (pre-Tacoma): For superior long-term reliability and off-road prowess.
- Nissan Hardbody: For robust build quality and attractive styling.
- Chevrolet S-10/GMC S-15 Sonoma: For a slightly more modern feel and a wider range of powertrain options in some years.
Final Verdict: Is the 1989 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1989 Ford Ranger is ideal for budget-conscious individuals or small businesses needing a dependable, no-frills compact pickup for light-duty work or basic hauling. It's worth buying if you find a well-maintained, rust-free example, particularly one with the more powerful V6 engine and 4WD if off-road capability is desired. It is certainly not worth buying if significant rust is present, as repairs can be extensive and costly.
When buying used, prioritize mechanical condition and thoroughly inspect for rust, especially on the frame and cab corners. Avoid base models with the 4-cylinder engine if you anticipate needing more power. For its price point, it offers good utility, but its age means potential buyers should be prepared for some level of maintenance and repair. It represents a classic, utilitarian truck that still holds appeal for its simplicity and affordability.
When buying used, prioritize mechanical condition and thoroughly inspect for rust, especially on the frame and cab corners. Avoid base models with the 4-cylinder engine if you anticipate needing more power. For its price point, it offers good utility, but its age means potential buyers should be prepared for some level of maintenance and repair. It represents a classic, utilitarian truck that still holds appeal for its simplicity and affordability.
Drew B
Drew is a seasoned automotive expert and contributor to VinCheck.info. With nearly 15 years of experience as a former Porsche technician, he brings a wealth of hands-on knowledge to his writing. Born in North Carolina, a region renowned for its deep-rooted NASCAR culture, Drew developed a passion for cars early in life, often building and working on vehicles from a young age. At VINCheck, Drew leverages his extensive technical background to provide in-depth analyses of various vehicles. His articles often focus on engine performance, reliability, and maintenance insights, offering readers practical information grounded in real-world experience. Some of his notable contributions include reviews on the Mazda CX-5's longevity and detailed examinations of engine options for models like the 2011 Toyota Camry and Tacoma