The 1998 Ford Ranger is a compact pickup truck, part of the second generation (1993-2012). Offered in regular and SuperCab body styles, popular trims included the XL, XLT, and Splash. New, it ranged from roughly $10,000 to $18,000. Its appeal stems from its affordability, compact size making it easy to maneuver, and rugged dependability, making it a favorite for light-duty tasks and first-time truck buyers.
The Good
The 1998 Ford Ranger offers a blend of practicality and appeal. Its simple design provides reliable performance and decent fuel efficiency. The compact size is easy to maneuver. Emotionally, it's a dependable, no-frills truck; practically, it's an affordable and capable workhorse for light-duty tasks and weekend projects.
The Bad
Known weaknesses of the 1998 Ford Ranger include potential rust issues, particularly in areas with road salt. The automatic transmission, especially in higher mileage vehicles, can be prone to issues. Also, check for worn suspension components and potential leaks in the engine or transmission.
1998 Ford Ranger: Quick Overview
- Engine Options:
- 2.5L Inline-4: Produces around 119 horsepower.
- 3.0L V6: Offers approximately 145 horsepower.
- 4.0L V6: Delivers about 160 horsepower.
- Horsepower:
- Ranges from 119 hp (2.5L) to 160 hp (4.0L).
- Fuel Economy:
- 2.5L I4: Around 20 mpg city / 25 mpg highway.
- 3.0L V6: Approximately 17 mpg city / 22 mpg highway.
- 4.0L V6: Roughly 15 mpg city / 20 mpg highway.
- 0–60 Times:
- Vary depending on engine and transmission, but generally range from 9 to 12 seconds.
- Towing Capacity:
- Ranging from 2,000 to 6,000 pounds, depending on engine and configuration. The 4.0L V6 equipped models generally offer the highest towing capability.
- Trim-Level Features:
- XL: Base model with basic features, including vinyl seating, AM/FM radio, and manual windows and locks.
- XLT: Adds features like cloth seating, air conditioning, upgraded audio system, and power windows/locks.
- Splash: Sportier trim with unique styling elements like flared fenders and a lowered suspension.
- Standard Features (generally):
- Manual transmission (automatic optional).
- Rear-wheel drive (4x4 optional).
- Bench seating.
- Optional Features (depending on trim and packages):
- Air conditioning.
- Power windows and locks.
- Upgraded audio system (CD player).
- Cruise control.
- 4x4.
- Sliding rear window.
1998 Ford Ranger Specifications
Vehicle Information
| Year | 1998 |
| Make | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Trim | - |
| Style | Regular Cab 2WD |
| Type | Pickup Truck |
| Category | Small Pickup Truck |
Manufacturing Details
| Made In | United States |
| Manufacturing City | LOUISVILLE |
Dimensions
| Doors | 2-Door |
| Curb Weight | - |
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 4560 pounds |
| Overall Height | - |
| Overall Length | - |
| Overall Width | - |
| Wheelbase Length | - |
| Standard Seating | - |
Engine & Performance
| Engine | 2.3-L L-4 SOHC 8V |
| Engine Size | 2.3L |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Transmission Speeds | - |
| Drivetrain | Rear-Wheel Drive |
Additional Features
| Anti-Brake System | - |
| Steering Type | - |
Pricing
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) | - |
| Invoice Price | - |
| Delivery Charges | - |
Vehicle History Report
Vehicle
Specifications
Specifications
Ownership
History
History
All History
Events
Events
NMVTIS Title
History Check
History Check
Salvage/Rebuilt
Check
Check
Accident
Check
Check
Theft
Check
Check
Open Lien
Check
Check
Past Sale
Listings
Listings
Safety
Recalls
Recalls
Odometer
Check
Check
Market Price
Analysis
Analysis
What Problems Does the 1998 Ford Ranger Have?
The 1998 Ford Ranger, like many vehicles of its age, has some frequently reported problems. Rust is a significant concern, especially in regions where road salt is used. This can affect the frame, body panels, and undercarriage.
Automatic transmissions are also known to develop issues, especially with high mileage, including slipping or failure to shift properly. Regular maintenance, including fluid changes, can help mitigate this, but it's a common point of failure.
Engine-related issues, such as leaks (oil, coolant) and sensor failures (e.g., oxygen sensors), are also reported. The 4.0L V6 engine, while powerful, can be prone to head gasket failures if not properly maintained.
Suspension components, such as ball joints and tie rod ends, can wear out over time and require replacement. Additionally, electrical issues, like faulty wiring or malfunctioning switches, are sometimes reported.
While specific recalls for the 1998 model year can be found on the NHTSA website, common issues across this generation of Rangers involved airbag systems and fuel system components. Checking the VIN against recall databases is always recommended before purchasing a used vehicle. Long-term reliability hinges on consistent maintenance and addressing issues promptly to prevent further damage.
Automatic transmissions are also known to develop issues, especially with high mileage, including slipping or failure to shift properly. Regular maintenance, including fluid changes, can help mitigate this, but it's a common point of failure.
Engine-related issues, such as leaks (oil, coolant) and sensor failures (e.g., oxygen sensors), are also reported. The 4.0L V6 engine, while powerful, can be prone to head gasket failures if not properly maintained.
Suspension components, such as ball joints and tie rod ends, can wear out over time and require replacement. Additionally, electrical issues, like faulty wiring or malfunctioning switches, are sometimes reported.
While specific recalls for the 1998 model year can be found on the NHTSA website, common issues across this generation of Rangers involved airbag systems and fuel system components. Checking the VIN against recall databases is always recommended before purchasing a used vehicle. Long-term reliability hinges on consistent maintenance and addressing issues promptly to prevent further damage.
How long will the 1998 Ford Ranger last?
With proper maintenance, a 1998 Ford Ranger can easily exceed 200,000 miles or 20+ years of service. Many owners report reaching 250,000+ miles with original engines and transmissions. However, longevity depends heavily on maintenance habits. Regular oil changes, timely repairs, and addressing rust are crucial. Weaknesses include rust-prone areas, potential automatic transmission issues at higher mileage, and general wear and tear of components like suspension and brakes over time. Consistent upkeep significantly impacts its durability.
Positive Owner Reviews
John S.
This truck has been incredibly reliable for me over the years. It's not fancy, but it gets the job done. Gas mileage isn't great, and it's definitely showing its age with some rust and wear, but I can't complain for what I paid for it.
Sarah M.
I bought this as my first truck. It's easy to drive, park, and maintain. It's perfect for running errands and light hauling. The interior is pretty basic, but it's comfortable enough. I would recommend it for anyone needing a small, dependable truck.
David L.
I use this truck for work every day. It's tough and durable. It's not the most comfortable on long drives, but it can handle anything I throw at it. Simple to repair as well, which is a huge plus.
Negative Owner Reviews
Emily R.
I was surprised by the gas mileage on this truck. It's not amazing, but it's better than I expected for a vehicle of this age. It's a good little truck for getting around town.
Robert K.
I have been having some trouble with the engine lately. It sputters sometimes, and I'm not sure what's causing it. Otherwise, it's a decent truck, but the engine problems are concerning.
Brian J.
The seats are not the most comfortable, especially on longer trips. The ride can be a little bumpy. But it's a tough truck that I can rely on.
What Technology & Safety Features are Included?
The 1998 Ford Ranger was relatively basic in terms of built-in tech and features, reflecting the technology available at the time.
Entertainment: Standard models typically came with an AM/FM radio. Higher trims like the XLT could include a cassette player, and potentially a CD player as an optional feature.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features were extremely limited. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available as an option on some trims, but that was the extent of it.
Safety Features: Standard safety features included dual front airbags. Side airbags and electronic stability control were not available.
Optional Features: Other optional features may have included cruise control, power windows, power locks, and air conditioning.
Crash-Test Ratings: NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) crash test ratings for the 1998 Ford Ranger vary. Single cab models received mixed ratings. Driver-side ratings were typically better than passenger-side ratings. These ratings should be considered in the context of the safety standards of the late 1990s, which were less stringent than modern standards. Always consult the NHTSA website for specific crash test results.
Entertainment: Standard models typically came with an AM/FM radio. Higher trims like the XLT could include a cassette player, and potentially a CD player as an optional feature.
Driver-Assistance: Driver-assistance features were extremely limited. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were available as an option on some trims, but that was the extent of it.
Safety Features: Standard safety features included dual front airbags. Side airbags and electronic stability control were not available.
Optional Features: Other optional features may have included cruise control, power windows, power locks, and air conditioning.
Crash-Test Ratings: NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) crash test ratings for the 1998 Ford Ranger vary. Single cab models received mixed ratings. Driver-side ratings were typically better than passenger-side ratings. These ratings should be considered in the context of the safety standards of the late 1990s, which were less stringent than modern standards. Always consult the NHTSA website for specific crash test results.
What Colors Options are Available?
Exterior Colors
Black
Bright Red
Dark Toreador Red Metallic
Deep Forest Green Metallic
Oxford White
Pacific Green Metallic
Silver Frost Metallic
Royal Blue Metallic
Interior Colors
Light Saddle
Medium Graphite
1998 Ford Ranger Prices and Market Value
When new, the 1998 Ford Ranger ranged from approximately $10,000 to $18,000, depending on the trim and options. Currently, used market prices typically range from $2,000 to $7,000, contingent on condition, mileage, and location. Depreciation has been significant, as expected for a vehicle of this age. Resale value is most affected by condition (rust-free examples command a premium), mileage, engine type (4.0L V6 models are more desirable), and whether it's a 4x4. Well-maintained examples with lower mileage hold their value better.
1998 Ford Ranger Cost of Ownership
The 1998 Ford Ranger is generally economical to own. Insurance costs are typically low due to its age and value. Fuel economy is decent for its class. Maintenance is relatively affordable, with readily available and inexpensive parts. However, potential repairs, especially concerning the transmission or rust, can increase long-term costs. Overall, it's an affordable vehicle to own, but budgeting for potential repairs is essential to keep costs down.
1998 Ford Ranger Fuel Efficiency
Fuel Type
Gasoline
Fuel Capacity
21 gallons
City Mileage
20 miles/gallon
Highway Mileage
23 miles/gallon
1998 Ford Ranger Safety Rating
NHTSA
IIHS
1998 Ford Ranger Recalls & Defects
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2001-05-22
Recall no.
01x001000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
This IS NOT A Safety Recall IN Accordance With THE Safety Act. However, IT IS Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign BY THE Agency. Equipment Description: Ford IS Replacing All Firestone Wilderness AT 15, 16, and 17 Inch Tires Mounted ON Ford Trucks and Suvs. Ford Reports Tread Separation CAN Occur DUE TO A Combination OF THE Sensitivity OF THE Tire Design TO Stress, Aging, and Manufacturing Differences Between Plants. Ford IS Replacing These Tires TO Prevent Possible Premature Tire Failure. Vehicle Description: THE Vehicles Listed Below MAY Have Been Originally Equipped With Firestone Wilderness AT Tires or MAY Have HAD Wilderness AT Tires Installed During THE Firestone Recall Launched IN August 2000. Certain 1991 Throught 2002 Ford Explorer Certain 2001 Throught 2002 Explorer Sport, and Sport Trac Certain 1997 Through 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Certain 1991 Through 2001 Ranger Certain 1999 Through 2001 Expedition Certain 1991 Through 1994, and 1997 Model Year F-Series Certain 1991 Through 1994 Bronco Note: Both Original Equipment and Replacement Tires ARE Affected.
Consequence
Should THE Tread Separate AT Highway Speeds, A Vehicle Crash Could Occur, Possibly Resulting IN Personal Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON March 31, 2002. However, Customers CAN Contact Ford AT 1-877-917-3673 or GO On-line TO Www.ford.com FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Tires:tread/Belt
Recall date
2000-08-21
Recall no.
00t005000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness AT, Size P235/75r15, Produced AT THE Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant and All Firestone Radial ATX and Radial ATX II Tires, Size P235/75r15. Operation OF These Tires AT Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, and IN HOT Weather, CAN Contribute TO Separation OF THE Tire Tread.
Consequence
IF THE Tread Separates From THE Tire, THE Driver CAN Lose Control OF THE Vehicle, Possibly Resulting IN A Crash Causing Injury or Death.
Remedy
THE Replacement/Reimbursement Program FOR This Campaign Expired ON August 29, 2001. However, Customers Should Contact Firestone Customer Service AT 1-800-465-1904 FOR Possible Assistance.
Notes
Power Train:automatic Transmission
Recall date
1999-07-28
Recall no.
99v204000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Electric Vehicles. THE Transaxle MAY Have Been Manufactured With THE Park Detent Spring Misaligned. IF THE Spring IS Misaligned, THE Park Mechanism MAY NOT Engage When THE Shift Lever IS Placed IN THE Park Position.
Consequence
IF THE Park Mechanism Does NOT Engage and THE Vehicle Operator HAS NOT Applied THE Parking Brake, THE Vehicle Could Roll Free AS IF IN Neutral.
Remedy
Dealers Will Inspect THE Transaxle and ANY With Misaligned Park Detent Springs Will BE Replaced.
Notes
Owner Notification Began July 28, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
1999-03-30
Recall no.
99v062001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Certain 1997-1999 RHD Explorer Equipped With 4.0l Ohv/Sohc Engines and Cruise Control Built From MAY 29, 1996 Through March 4, 1999; 1998-1999 Explorer/Mountaineers Equipped With 4.0l Ohv/sohc or 5.0l Engines or 1998-1999 Rangers Equipped With 2.5l, 3.0l Ffv/efi or 4.0l Engines and Cruise Control Built From January 5, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; 1998-1999 Mustangs Equipped With 3.8l, 4.6l 2-valve or 4-valve Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; 1999 F250/f350/f450/f550 (Over 8,500 Lbs.) Trucks Equipped With 5.4l or 6.8l Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999; and 1999 F-53 Stripped Chassis Equipped With 5.4l or 6.8l Engines and Cruise Control Built From March 2, 1998 Through March 4, 1999. A Cruise Control Cable CAN Interfere With THE Speed Control Servo Pulley and NOT Allow THE Throttle TO Return TO Idle When Disengaging THE Cruise Control.
Consequence
IF THE Cruise Control IS Used and This Condition IS Present, A Stuck Throttle Could Result, Which Could Potentially Result IN A Crash.
Remedy
Dealers Will Replace THE Cruise Control Cables. AT THE Present Time, THE Replacement Cables ARE NOT Available. Customers ARE Being Advised NOT TO USE THE Cruise Control System Until A Replacement CAN BE Made.
Notes
A Pre-Release Warning Letter That Identified AN Interim FIX Until THE Parts FOR THE Permanent FIX Became Available WAS Mailed TO Owners Beginning March 27, 1999.a Second Owner Notification, Identifying THE Permanent FIX WAS Mailed TO Owners Beginning MAY 24, 1999.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Equipment:other:labels
Recall date
1998-02-02
Recall no.
98v021000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Light Duty Four-Wheel Drive Pickup Trucks Equipped With Off-Road Option. THE Tire and RIM Identification Information IS Incorrect ON These Vehicles. This Does NOT Comply With THE Requirements OF Fmvss NO. 120, "tire Selection and Rims FOR Motor Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars."
Consequence
THE 16" Tires Could NOT BE Inflated ON THE Specified 15x7.0j Rim.
Remedy
Owners Will BE Sent A Safety Certificaiton Label Partial Overlay Which Will Contain THE Correct RIM Size, and Instructions FOR Affixing This Label TO THE Vehicle. IF AN Owner SO Desires, Their Ford Dealer CAN Install THE Label FOR Them.
Notes
Owner Notification Began July 6, 1998. Owners WHO DO NOT Receive THE Correct Label Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-888-dash-2-dot (1-888-327-4236).
Fuel System, Gasoline:delivery:hoses, Lines/Piping, and Fittings
Recall date
1997-10-28
Recall no.
97v186001
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Vehicle Description: Light Duty Pickup Trucks Equipped With 4.0l Engines. THE Flexible Section OF THE Chassis Mounted Fuel Line That Connects TO THE Engine WAS Routed TOO Close TO THE Exhaust Manifold. THE Line Could Contact THE Manifold.
Consequence
This Could Potentially Result IN Damage TO THE Fuel Line, or IN Some Cases, Cause A Fuel Leak. Fuel Leakage IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source Could Result IN A Fire.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install AN Additional Clip TO Hold THE Fuel Line IN THE Intended Design Position.
Notes
Owner Notification IS Expected TO Begin December 1, 1997.owners WHO Take Their Vehicles TO AN Authorized Dealer ON AN Agreed Upon Service Date and DO NOT Receive THE Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford AT 1-800-392-3673.also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline AT 1-800-424-9393.
Fuel System, Gasoline
Recall date
2006-06-13
Recall no.
06e056000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Aftermarket Fuel Filters Sold Under THE Purolator Brand Name, P/N F65277, Shipped From January 16 Through June 2, 2006, FOR USE ON THE Above Listed Passenger Vehicles. DUE TO Incorrect Design, THE Quick Connectors MAY NOT Fully Seat With THE Tube Interface, Even Though THE Person Making THE Connection MAY Believe That THE Quick Connector IS Fully Attached.
Consequence
Failure OF This Connection Could Lead TO Fuel Spillage And, IN THE Presence OF AN Ignition Source, A Fire Could Occur.
Remedy
UFI Will Notify Owners and Replace THE Filters Free OF Charge. THE Recall Began ON August 4, 2006. Owners MAY Contact UFI Filters USA AT 800-230-5876.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO UFI Filters USA (Purolator) Aftermarket Fuel Filters and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2006-03-23
Recall no.
06e026000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, and Headlights Sold AS Replacement Lamps FOR USE ON Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That ARE NOT Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail TO Conform TO Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Consequence
Without THE Amber Reflectors, THE Vehicle Will BE Poorly Illuminated, Possibly Resulting IN A Vehicle Crash Without Warning.
Remedy
Pro-A Motors Will Notify Owners and Offer TO Repurchase THE Lamps. THE Recall Began ON April 3, 2006. Owners MAY Contact Pro-A Motors AT 323-838-2988.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Pro-A Motors Aftermarket Lamps and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON THE Listed Passenger Vehicles.for More Information ON THE Lamp Model Numbers, Click ON Document Search and View Document Titled "lamp Model Numbers."customers MAY Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty: 1-800-424-9153); or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
Exterior Lighting
Recall date
2009-04-07
Recall no.
09e012000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Sabersport IS Recalling 16,270 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Sabersport Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON MAY 11, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Sabersport AT 1-909-598-7589.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Sabersport.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen.owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Exterior Lighting:headlights
Recall date
2009-05-11
Recall no.
09e025000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
Dope, Inc. IS Recalling 42,540 Combination Corner and Bumper Lamp Assemblies OF Various Part Numbers Sold FOR USE AS Aftermarket Equipment FOR Various Passenger Vehicles. These Headlamps Fail TO Conform TO THE Requirements OF Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 108, "lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment." These Lamps DO NOT Contain THE Required Amber Side Reflectors.
Consequence
Decreased Lighting Visibility MAY Result IN A Vehicle Crash.
Remedy
Dope, Inc. Will Notify Owners and Offer A Full Refund FOR THE Noncompliant Combination Lamps. THE Safety Recall Began ON July 28, 2009. Owners MAY Contact Dope, Inc. AT 1-626-272-1798.
Notes
This Recall Only Pertains TO Aftermarket Replacement Equipment and HAS NO Relation TO ANY Original Equipment Installed ON Vehicles Produced BY THE Vehicle Manufacturer.in Order TO Determine IF Your Aftermarket Lamp Assembly IS Affected BY This Noncompliance, Please Review THE List OF Model Numbers Provided TO US BY Dope, Inc.the List CAN BE Found Under "document Search" Located AT THE Bottom OF Your Screen. Owners MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO <A Href=http://Www.safercar.gov>http://www.safercar.gov</a> .
Vehicle Speed Control
Recall date
2007-08-03
Recall no.
07v336000
Source
NHTSA
Summary
ON Certain Pickup Trucks, Passenger Vehicles, Sport Utility Vehicles, and Motor Homes Chassis, THE Speed Control Deactivation Switch May, Under Certain Conditions, Leak Internally and Then Overheat, Smoke, or Burn.
Consequence
This Could Result IN AN Underhood Fire.
Remedy
Dealers Will Install A Fused Wiring Harness. Owners OF THE Passenger Cars Included IN This Campaign Will BE Instructed TO Return Their Vehicles TO Their Dealers TO Have THE Speed Control Deactivation Switch Disconnected AS AN Interim Repair. AS Soon AS Repair Parts ARE Available (Expected October 2007), Owners Will BE Instructed TO Return TO THE Dealers FOR Installation OF A Fused Wiring Harness. THE Recall Began ON August 13, 2007, and Mailing Completed BY September 19, 2007. Owners MAY Contact Ford AT 1-888-222-2751.
Notes
Ford Recall NO. 05s28.customers MAY Also Contact THE National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;s Vehicle Safety Hotline AT 1-888-327-4236 (Tty 1-800-424-9153), or GO TO Http://Www.safercar.gov.
1998 Ford Ranger Warranty
Basic
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Powertrain
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
Rust
Original warranty
0 months / No data
Estimated remaining
Expired
1998 Ford Ranger Insurance
Insurance for a 1998 Ford Ranger is moderately priced, reflecting its status as a Pickup Truck with strong safety ratings and
reasonable repair costs.
reasonable repair costs.
How Does the 1998 Ford Ranger Compare to Other Pickup Truck?
The 1998 Ford Ranger competed with the Chevrolet S-10, Toyota Tacoma, and Nissan Frontier.
Performance: The Ranger's engine options were comparable, though the Tacoma often had a slight edge in overall refinement and available power.
Features: In terms of features, the Ranger was generally on par with its competitors. However, the Tacoma was known for having slightly better build quality and more available options, even in the late 90s.
Reliability: The Ranger is generally considered reliable, but the Toyota Tacoma often outperformed it in long-term reliability surveys. The S-10 had a reputation for being less reliable than both the Ranger and the Tacoma.
Price: The Ranger was often priced competitively, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
Alternatives: If reliability is a top priority, the Toyota Tacoma is a better alternative, despite potentially being slightly more expensive. The Nissan Frontier offers a similar blend of features and reliability to the Ranger. The Chevrolet S-10 is a similar alternative but consider its reliability concerns. The Ranger is a solid choice for a budget-friendly compact truck but consider the Tacoma for enhanced reliability.
Performance: The Ranger's engine options were comparable, though the Tacoma often had a slight edge in overall refinement and available power.
Features: In terms of features, the Ranger was generally on par with its competitors. However, the Tacoma was known for having slightly better build quality and more available options, even in the late 90s.
Reliability: The Ranger is generally considered reliable, but the Toyota Tacoma often outperformed it in long-term reliability surveys. The S-10 had a reputation for being less reliable than both the Ranger and the Tacoma.
Price: The Ranger was often priced competitively, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
Alternatives: If reliability is a top priority, the Toyota Tacoma is a better alternative, despite potentially being slightly more expensive. The Nissan Frontier offers a similar blend of features and reliability to the Ranger. The Chevrolet S-10 is a similar alternative but consider its reliability concerns. The Ranger is a solid choice for a budget-friendly compact truck but consider the Tacoma for enhanced reliability.
Ranks #129 Truck
| 1 | 2023 Toyota Tundra | (5.0★) |
| 2 | 2022 Honda Ridgeline | (5.0★) |
| 3 | 2023 Ford E-Transit Chassis | (0.0★) |
| 4 | 2020 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Cab Chassis | (0.0★) |
| 5 | 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD | (0.0★) |
| 6 | 2023 Hyundai Santa Cruz | (5.0★) |
| 7 | 2023 Nissan Frontier | (5.0★) |
| 8 | 2024 GMC Sierra 2500HD | (0.0★) |
| 9 | 2023 Ram 4500 | (0.0★) |
| 10 | 2022 Jeep Gladiator | (5.0★) |
| 11 | 2012 Suzuki Equator | (0.0★) |
| 12 | 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | (5.0★) |
| 129 | 1998 Ford Ranger | (4.0★) |
Final Verdict: Is the 1998 Ford Ranger a Good Pickup Truck?
The 1998 Ford Ranger is ideal for budget-conscious buyers needing a small, capable pickup for light-duty tasks. It's worth buying used if you find a well-maintained, rust-free example. Opt for the 4.0L V6 if you need more power or towing capacity. Avoid models with significant rust or transmission issues. A mechanically sound Ranger is a practical and affordable choice, especially for first-time truck buyers or those needing a secondary vehicle for errands and projects. Pre-purchase inspection by a mechanic is crucial.
John S. on March 18, 2025
Reliable but Showing Its AgeThis truck has been incredibly reliable for me over the years. It's not fancy, but it gets the job done. Gas mileage isn't great, and it's definitely showing its age with some rust and wear, but I can't complain for what I paid for it.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Sarah M. on March 18, 2025
Great First Truck!I bought this as my first truck. It's easy to drive, park, and maintain. It's perfect for running errands and light hauling. The interior is pretty basic, but it's comfortable enough. I would recommend it for anyone needing a small, dependable truck.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
David L. on March 18, 2025
WorkhorseI use this truck for work every day. It's tough and durable. It's not the most comfortable on long drives, but it can handle anything I throw at it. Simple to repair as well, which is a huge plus.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Emily R. on March 18, 2025
Decent Gas Mileage for a TruckI was surprised by the gas mileage on this truck. It's not amazing, but it's better than I expected for a vehicle of this age. It's a good little truck for getting around town.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Michael B. on March 18, 2025
Good Value for the PriceYou can't beat the value of these older Rangers. They're affordable, reliable, and easy to find parts for. It's not perfect, but it's a solid truck for the money.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Jessica P. on March 18, 2025
Compact and Easy to ManeuverI love how compact this truck is. It's easy to park and maneuver in tight spaces. Perfect for city driving. The ride is a little rough, but that's to be expected for a truck of this age.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Robert K. on March 18, 2025
Engine IssuesI have been having some trouble with the engine lately. It sputters sometimes, and I'm not sure what's causing it. Otherwise, it's a decent truck, but the engine problems are concerning.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Ashley T. on March 18, 2025
Simple and FunctionalThis truck is very simple, no frills, just functional. If you need a reliable work vehicle, this is a good choice. Don't expect luxury or advanced features.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Brian J. on March 18, 2025
Not the Most ComfortableThe seats are not the most comfortable, especially on longer trips. The ride can be a little bumpy. But it's a tough truck that I can rely on.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Kevin W. on March 18, 2025
Great for HaulingI use it for hauling equipment for my business. It's been very reliable, and I appreciate its towing capacity for such a compact truck.
Was this review helpful?
0
0
Jovan
Jovan specializes in interpreting vehicle records and making sense of VIN data. With over 10 years of experience in the automotive data industry, his work ensures that every report is clear, accurate, and useful for car buyers.